TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs webMethods.io comparison

TIBCO and IBM are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. TIBCO is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. TIBCO holds a 3.9% mindshare in E, compared to IBM’s 10.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of TIBCO users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Read 12 TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus reviews

818 Views
555 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

2,134 Views
1,518 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and webMethods.io are competitors in the enterprise integration field. TIBCO holds an advantage in pricing and support, while webMethods.io excels in robust functionality.

Features: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus offers strong integration capabilities, powerful error handling, and stability. webMethods.io provides advanced cloud integration, scalability, and extensive feature sets for sophisticated integration needs.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO could enhance its scalability options, user interface design, and overall performance optimization. webMethods.io may need to refine its cost structure, reduce complexity for new users, and improve native support for non-standard integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO is recognized for its flexible deployment model along with robust customer support for a smooth implementation. Conversely, webMethods.io, with its cloud-native platform, enables quicker deployments and an intuitive user experience, appealing to businesses focusing on speed.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is praised for competitive pricing and a beneficial ROI, making it suitable for budget-conscious enterprises. In contrast, webMethods.io requires a higher initial investment but justifies this cost with strong ROI owing to its expansive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), API Management (10th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is 3.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 10.7%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

Mustofa Yonus

Cheif Specialist- Licensing Systems at Roads & Transport Authority

A robust product that needs to improve the functionality it offers related to API lifecycle management

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a six to seven out of ten. My company consists of around 7000 employees, and we use the solution as an integrated service in around 300 to 400 systems, both internally and externally, making it a huge number. Our company uses the solution every minute and every second, and we can't function without it.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance. This is why, for most customers who have to deal with big files, I suggest that they use a product other than ActiveTransfer. I would like to note that this problem mainly concerns large files that undergo extra operations, such assigning, unassigning, or file translation. When these operations take place on large files, ActiveTransfer will use up a lot of resources. Within the product itself, I also believe that there is room for improvement in terms of optimization when it comes to general performance. I suspect that the issues underlying poor optimization are because it is all developed in Java. That is, all the objects and functions that are used need to be better organized, especially when it comes to big files but also overall. webMethods ActiveTransfer was born as an ESB to handle messages, and these messages were typically very short, i.e. small in size. A message is data that you have to send to an application, where it must be received in real-time and possibly processed or acknowledged elsewhere in the system as well. So, because it was initially designed for small messages, it struggles with performance when presented with very large files. All this to say, I suggest that they have an engineer reevaluate the architecture of the product in order to consider cases where large files are sent, and not only small ones. As for new features, compared to other products in the market, I think Software AG should be more up to date when it comes to extra protocol support, especially those protocols that other solutions have included in their products by default. Whenever we need to add an unsupported protocol, we have to go through the effort of custom development in order to work with it. Also, all the banks are obligated to migrate to the new standards, and big companies are all handling translations and operating their libraries with the new protocol formats. But webMethods ActiveTransfer doesn't seem to be keeping up with this evolution. Thus, they should aim to be more compliant in future, along the lines of their competitors such as IBM and Primeur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product’s most valuable feature is stability."

"The most valuable feature is that it is a service-oriented architecture, SOA-based."

"The most attractive and beneficial feature is the ease of development."

"The stability of this solution is excellent."

"The technology is really easy to learn."

"TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use."

"It's very stable and reliable."

"The solution is very stable."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus pros

"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."

"It is good for communicating between the systems and for publishing and subscribing. We can easily retrieve data. It is good in terms of troubleshooting and other things."

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."

"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."

"EDI is robust and integration with SAP is good."

"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."

"What I like the most about the solution is that it comes with ready-made tools like handling security tokens and OAuth."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The stability of their latest version is not on par with their classic version 5.X."

"Our version does not have cloud capabilities."

"If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs."

"Issues with the support, the fees, and the termination of the professional services are reasons we are looking for other solutions."

"In the configuration, where we need to customize, it takes more time that we expect it to, ideally."

"We'd like to see improvements in product support."

"The intermediate version that we are using has stability issues. These stability issues should be resolved, but it seems like TIBCO is not focusing on resolving these issues. The resolution timelines are quite high even for high-priority incidents. Its price should be lower. Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"The solution is very expensive when you use multiple components, it would b better if this could be reduced."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus cons

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."

"It is an expensive solution and not very suitable for smaller businesses."

"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."

"The solution should include REST API calls."

"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us."

"A while ago, they were hacked, and it took them a very long time to open their website again in order to download any service packs or any features. I don't know what they could do differently. I know that they were vulnerable, and there was some downtime, but because they were down, we were unable to download any potential service packs."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The biggest issue disadvantage of TIBCO is that it is expensive."

"When it comes to cost, TIBCO is much more competitive than a product like Pega."

"Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"The licensing cost is a challenge for quite a few customers."

"Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive."

"The price is on the higher side. For the same price, if I go to the previous version, I would have got a lot more capacity with similar kinds of features."

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"There are no hidden costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for webMethods. For corporate organizations, it's a very cheap or fairly priced product, but for growing or small businesses, it's quite expensive. These businesses would probably need to consider an enterprise services bus at some point. Thus, from a pricing point, it closes out non-cooperate businesses."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."

"Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors. The...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 56% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 24% of the time

Mule ESB vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 21% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

March 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

March 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a lightweight enterprise service bus that helps organizations bridge the mediation gap in their SOA infrastructure. It reduces complexity and increases flexibility and reuse by replacing hard-coded service dependencies with configuration, and can be used to onboard services from a third-party environment or a TIBCO-based infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus provides service mediation capabilities to the TIBCO ActiveMatrix SOA platform. Service mediation allows you to adapt to changing requirements for developing mediation flows.

TIBCO

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Colonial Life, CTBC Bank, New World Mobility, QUALCOMM, Swisscom Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Tata Teleservices, Telecom Italia

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io

March 2025

Free Report: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.