Jamf Connect Reviews

We use the solution for Azure authentication. 

The tool supports different types of authentication. It also integrates seamlessly if you are using other Jamf products. 

We have faced issues with the product's configuration. If we use the tool with other business manager solutions, then there is the issue of naming conventions. The tool needs to be careful with newer updates so that it doesn't break any of the existing configurations. 

I have been using the product for two years. 

I would rate the product's stability a nine out of ten.

I would rate the product's scalability a nine out of ten. 

We contacted the tool's support regarding an issue with configuration and they were not able to trace the exact problem. 

The product's setup requires a lot of team coordination if your organization is big. We need to create applications in Azure AD and grant permissions so that the authentication process works seamlessly. The product's setup is straightforward and fast and depends on the documentation. The solution's deployment took around 10-15 days to complete. 

We pay 2 dollars per device monthly. For the plus version, you have to pay 4 dollars per month. I think the product will give discounts based on the number of users and devices. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

We use Jamf Connect to provide Azure connectivity with MacOS devices. Azure Active Directory policy changes on Azure are reflected on the MacOS devices and user accounts. About 1,000 users at my organization use Jamf Conect to log in. Around 5 percent cannot use the solution because it's unavailable on their device.

The most valuable feature is ease of access. It's convenient to do things like resetting passwords. Previously, users were bound to their domain. We had to bind the user to the domain and log them in through the AD. Now, using Jamf Connect, we don't face any of these challenges. Resetting passwords is hassle-free so we can regularly rotate passwords according to best practices. 

We've had some issues when users restart their devices because the device asks for credentials afterward. Jamf Connect asks for a username, password, and MFA. 

I have worked with three all three Jamf products for the past year: Jamf Pro, Jamf Connect, and Jam Protect.

I rate Jamf Connect eight out of 10 for stability.

I rate Jamf Connect eight out of 10 for scalability.

I rate Jamf support nine out of 10. 

Positive

Deploying Jamf Connect isn't complex. 

I rate Jamf Connect eight out of 10. I like it better than any other MDM I've used for Apple devices. 

We use the solution for user account authentication and deployment purposes.

The solution provides our customers with a seamless experience logging in with their existing credentials.

The solution's most valuable features are integration with an active directory and ease of deployment.

The solution's UI could be more user-friendly for the setup process.

We have been using the solution for a year.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten.

The solution's initial setup process is straightforward.

The solution's price is reasonable.

I advise others to use the solution for its support features. I rate it a ten out of ten.

We required a solution during the pandemic to sync user local passwords with IDP passwords.  

The solution needs to improve its licensing. Instead of having separate licensing files for Jamf Pro and Jamf Connect compared to other MDMs. 

I have been working with the product for three years. 

I would rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten. 

I would rate the product's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has around 2000 users for the product. 

You can accomplish setup if you follow the tool's documentation. However, you will need to have three to four configuration profiles. 

I would rate the product a seven out of ten. 

It's connection with Azure is the most valuable. It is easy to deploy and connect. 

The configuration could be faster. 

I have been using Jamf Connect for two years. 

It is stable solution. 

We shifted because of the availability of the solution. Also for its easy deployment. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

The pricing is good. 

It is a scalable solution. Not many users are using the solution.