SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

I use the solution for EDR. We're in the process of deploying so log collection will be a use case later on.

We are certain it will improve our organization later on because today our cloud has limited AD and zero EDR. SentinelOne is replacing our current legacy and we're also getting the EDR functionality. 

The tool's most valuable feature is EDR. 

I have been using the product for two months. 

I rate Singularity Cloud Workload Security's stability a four out of ten. 

I rate the solution's scalability a four out of five. 

We chose Singularity Cloud Workload Security because our team wanted a cloud-native solution instead of a legacy. 

The tool's deployment is not complex. Our team got complex information, which made it complex. 

SentinelOne's team helped us with the deployment. We had an awesome experience working with them. There were some miscommunications also. 

The product is reasonably priced. 

I rate Singularity Cloud Workload Security an eight out of ten. 

I use SentinelOne for security.

We function as an internal red team and do numerous tests of attack simulations. SentinelOne has helped us to improve our security by fine-tuning our current use cases and creating new ones. 

SentinelOne's best features are test automation, playbooks, incident response, use-case improvement, and compliance with MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

SentinelOne's performance and the accuracy of its incident filtering could be improved.

I've been using SentinelOne for five years.

SentinelOne is stable.

SentinelOne is scalable.

The initial setup was straightforward because we created an implementation plan and did some diagnostics before starting.

We used a third-party team. 

SentinelOne's pricing could be lower.

I would give SentinelOne a rating of eight out of ten.

We are a system integrator. We provide this solution to the end-users.

Most of the features are valuable. As a system integrator, agent deployment is valuable. It also fits the requirements of most of the clients.

They can improve the administrative interface. They can make it more user-friendly.

Its price can be lower.

I have been using this solution for three years.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

Its setup is of medium complexity. It is not complex, and it is also not straightforward.

Its price can be lower because I'm seeing competition from another vendor who beats it on commercials.

I would advise others to go for it. It is a good product, and it fits the requirements of most of the clients. It is very flexible.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.