SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

It's our main EDR solution on campus for our university. It's the main solution that we deployed to our host throughout the university.

I wasn't here for the initial implementation, however, it was to replace a previous product that we had, so we wanted to move to something cleaner, easier to use, and an overall better product.

Its basic use, which is just an EDR solution for actively hunting and killing threats, is good. It does what we had intended it to do, and that's what it does a great job of.

The main feature, its EDR capabilities, is the most valuable. It is great for security monitoring and blocking when needed. It offers good basic operations of an antivirus solution.

Singularity's ability to ingest and correlate across security solutions is good. It does not ingest as much as it gives out. Right now, for us, there is not any ingesting happening for it right now. We don't have that set up.

The interoperability with other solutions or other third-party applications has been pretty solid. It's pretty standalone by itself. We're exporting a little bit of data from it, however, and we haven't had any issues.

Our mean time to detect is good. I wouldn't have the numbers on that, however, it's relatively quick. From some of the stuff that we've done investigations on, it's within the minute. It responds when it sees something within minutes and runs through its normal process of blocking and then alerting us about whatever was done.

The response comes to us. That's a human response. It's just the detection and alerting system, and then the response falls on us, and that varies depending on workload.

The quality is obviously great. They are mature. They change, they adapt as any security tool would in response to the threats in the threat landscape.

Off the top of my head, I can't think of much that’s wrong with the product. It's a pretty solid tool from top to bottom. I've had some issues with the specific agents, however, we are moving off of that particular OS that we were having issues with. Other than that, it's been a pretty solid tool.

We had a problem on the Singularity side. So for that particular issue, I’m not sure why it didn’t work with the OS, a Windows Server. It was an issue with some of the clients connecting to the console. We’ve been working with them and haven't been able to find out a single cause of failure.

I've been using the solution for a year and a half. 

We haven't had any issues. There is nothing that's noticeable and it's never offline for long periods of time. 

It's pretty scalable. There are a few operating systems that we've had issues with. Other than that, everything else has been pretty scalable.

Technical support is super. They are very helpful and relatively quick to respond. Sometimes they take a little bit to respond, however, it's not super long. 

The company also has good online knowledge and it's pretty helpful. Usually, we'll access the database knowledge first and then go to support. 

Positive

We used CrowdStrike previously.

I was not involved in the initial setup. 

I'm not hands-on. I'm more on the management side. Basically, we make sure that they connect, and I'll handle the management once everything's set up. I'm handling monitoring. Deployment is handled by another team. We have maybe ten team members who manage deployments. 

The maintenance is minimal. It's pretty self-sufficient. We just do normal reviews. 

From my point of view, the deployment is straightforward. 

We use internal teams to handle deployment. 

I'm not sure of the pricing. That's above me. I'm a technical person. It's not my arena.

They also have this feature called Ranger. That one we don't have implemented. That's an extra fee, so we don't have it.

Overall, I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. It's been a pretty solid tool. 

I would probably recommend it over some of the other ones that I've seen only based on the ease of use. It does what it's supposed to do. It's been relatively fast and is also pretty complete from what we've seen. The product is not very difficult to learn.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Complete for the EDR piece, and we have it installed everywhere.

Singularity Complete works well with other SentinelOne solutions. We must make sure to whitelist the right binary with other tools, and that is all.

The ability to ingest and correlate data across our security operations is good. We can send all of the events to our SIEM system, or we can use Singularity Complete's built-in SIEM functionality. I believe the retention period is 14 days by default, but we purchased the additional package that allows us to store data for longer.

Ranger is a great tool that lets us see what's on our network which is extremely important. It pings other devices on the network and tells us what kind of devices they are. We're big fans of Ranger!

Ranger does not require any new agents, hardware, or network changes. It automatically starts mapping out the network, which is great for us.

Ranger helps prevent vulnerable devices from becoming compromised by alerting us to their presence. This allows us to proactively install SentinelOne on these devices, which is a very helpful tool.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has helped improve our organization by preventing hacks and providing us with visibility into our devices through the Deep Visibility plugin that we have enabled.

It has reduced the number of alerts we receive by 80 percent. We spent the first six months tuning the workflow of different admins and users, and after that, we only received alerts that required action.

It has helped free up our staff to work on other projects and tasks. They now only receive actionable alerts, without any false positives, which saves them a few hours per week.

Singularity Complete has reduced our MTTD by 40 percent.

Singularity Complete has helped reduce our MTTR. We are alerted right away and we can access the dashboard and respond from there quickly.

I like the centralized management with the web dashboard. It allows me to quickly view incidents and see what's happening in a well-organized way. I can also easily query different points.

SentinelOne should include Ranger Pro out of the box with Singularity Complete.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for one and a half years.

We have run SentinelOne Singularity Complete on many different machines without any stability issues.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable.

We've had nothing but fantastic things to say about the support. Our technical account manager is great, and the support staff has been very helpful. We've also been onboarded with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, and everyone from the account manager all the way down to the support engineer has been excellent.

Positive

We replaced Symantec Endpoint Security Complete with SentinelOne Singularity Complete to improve our security posture because Symantec was outdated.

The initial setup was straightforward and required six people for deployment, which took a few weeks to complete. Some teams took a little longer to figure out their deployment, but we deployed the whole system enterprise-wide within a month or two.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete nine out of ten.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is a mature solution.

We have deployed SentinelOne Singularity Complete across multiple locations, departments, and operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and Mac. We have around one thousand endpoints.

The only maintenance required is the package updates that are released to keep the solution up to date. The cloud version is automatically updated by SentinelOne support, which manages it. The agents themselves must be updated manually which I do by clicking on them.

I recommend completing a POC to ensure SentinelOne Singularity Complete is a good fit before moving forward.

We need to provide a form of antivirus for our cybersecurity insurance. The new term now is EDR or endpoint detection response. I tested out several vendors including CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, and Cisco. SentinelOne definitely stood out. My use case is pretty for much protecting all of my end-user devices and all of my servers on-premise and in our virtual environment.

We were trying to solve for visibility and license management. We used to use other products, and licensing became an issue. We would have issues where clients would not really be connected all the time. They would just randomly lose connection. And that was with McAfee. 

ESET was another one that we used in the past, and we just kept running the issues with the physical server. So having a cloud-managed EDR solution, the agent-based, cloud-managed solution, has worked very well for a few years now at multiple companies. It's the first thing I bought when I came to my new company.

I really like Ranger. I like the deep dive of Ranger in an incident section. Diving into each incident and being able to see complete visibility of when the action was taken against something that it deemed a threat is valuable. Using those incidents in Ranger is definitely up there on my list of favorite features. I have multiple locations all across the globe. Being able to separate my devices, per location, is super helpful.

It's good at ingesting data and correlating. It has zero issues with ingesting data with the agents installed. I've had no issues with that. Being able to go through and create exclusions for specific types of data, like SQL has been really tough in our environment. Being able to just go through and customize those exclusions and working with the support team is great. We also have Vigilance, which is another SOC that they offer. That's a fantastic service.

Everywhere I have an agent, it sees everything, and it does so when I deep dive into a threat or a proposed threat. It does pick out host names, and IP addresses, and it just gives you a really clear picture where you can read it.

I like that Ranger requires no new agents or hardware. Anytime you can keep it lightweight enough. If you add a function and you only pay for your yearly fee for an extra function without making changes in your environment, that's huge. 

I love the reporting. The reporting definitely helps me see the entire network and find what open ports are out there. I can work with my network team to get those things closed, which is fantastic. I like the ease of looking at the graphs and the reports.

The solution has helped reduce our alerts. Instead of waiting on a monthly basis and then executing a plan, I'm able to keep up with it all throughout and day to day. That granular control has left me very impressed.

It gives me peace of mind. My staff isn't really using it. I know I have 24/7 eyes on it. 

It has helped me reduce my mean time to detect. I would be lost without the tool. It definitely helps me figure things out really quickly. I can figure out the whole story very quickly. 

It helps with my mean time to respond. It definitely helps with that. I get an alert in my email immediately, which lets me just know that something happened to my environment. That's something that I previously did not have in my old tool set.

I do want to see Vigilance reach out with that Identity. I don't have Identity, however, it's a very good tool. There is another tool that I use called Purple Knight that does very similar things. I'd like to see adding Vigilance to the visibility of Identity. 

One thing I don't like is the exportable report. They're not as useful as I'd hoped they would be. I always feel like I have to finagle them a little bit before I can present them to the executive board. The reporting needs to be beefed up a bit more. Everything feels a little lacking. They're trying to keep it simple, yet it is a little oversimplified. 

I really wish it could be an app on my phone. If I could open up an app on my phone and get all the alerts or look at my environment and see the health real quick, that would be ideal. It doesn't have to be a full feature.

I'd like the ability to have text alerts, for example, if something gets quarantined. 

The website, if you are trying to figure out what all the products are, it's kind of busy. I don't know what all the products are. The marketing is a little tough to follow. 

I've been using the solution for three years.

I haven't experienced any stability issues. 

The solution is extremely scalable. It's super easy to push out to thousands of clients if you really need to. I haven't had any issues. It scales very well.

Usually, technical support is very good. They are very knowledgeable. It's usually 24 hours for a response. I've had a couple of phone conversations with them. Right now, we're going basically through email. They give me a ton of information. They're open to working with my third-party MSP. Right now, the MSP brought up a concern about a very specific function that needs a little bit more tending to in the exclusion arena. 

Positive

We had Defender at this company before.

I was involved in the initial setup.

The deployment is very straightforward. It's super easy to just download your agent, and you get your site token, you install, and you push it out. We use the PDQ at my last company. Here, we use SCCM. We push it out with the MSI, with the site token pre-installed. I see it on my dashboard. It's easy.

My last deployment was handled by myself.

The solution does not require any maintenance anymore. It used to be kind of a headache to go through and have to update the agent. And just to remember to do it. Now I get the email. It tells me there's a new agent out there. I go read up on what the changes are, which is great. Then I go in there and set up the auto-install on the agents, and it just hits them on the schedule. You only have to really pay attention to it once in a blue moon when a new agent is installed or there's a general release.

I installed the solution myself.

I can pay, for my environment, between $30,000 and $40,000 a year, and that's a pretty good deal.

I'm a customer and end-user.

I haven't really done any third-party tools. I've looked into their Identity tool which is one of the newer offerings that they have. It's a very nice offering. It is rather expensive. That said, it is very nice to be able to see Active Directory all in one pane of glass. Honestly, the hardest thing about my job as a security professional is having all these different tools so the more I can see everything in one area, the better it is.

The quality and maturity are important. The company is relatively new in the space, however, they are pretty mature in the market and pretty well-respected. 

SentinelOne is a great strategic partner. I can't see myself doing security without them at this point. They are one of the backbones of my security platform. They were the first pieces even before I bought Cisco Duo or Meraki. 

I'm excited to see where this will be in the next ten years. I can just see this platform just going crazy. I would love to see maybe a little bit more focus. We have to deal with a lot of sensitive equipment that run specific jobs and I love how SentinelOne, and specifically Ranger, is very passive in its ability. It complements our OT. I would love to see some way of getting away from the super expensive platforms of Tenable and bringing in some of these functions that Tenable offers from a scanning platform fully into SentinelOne in the future.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

This is a best-in-breed solution. If you're looking at anything in comparison, do your due diligence, do proof of concept between whatever companies you're looking into. However, SentinelOne is the best-in-breed.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is an endpoint protection solution that my company deployed on all workstations and servers to protect against ransomware, malware, and other types of infection.

What I like best about SentinelOne Singularity Complete is its web-based admin interface, which allows me to go into the platform, look at the entire organization, particularly all of the sentinels or endpoints, and manage everything from there. For example, if someone is infected, I can manage the whole operation and process from the admin panel.

I also find SentinelOne Singularity Complete beneficial in its interoperability with other SentinelOne solutions and third-party applications. This helps the solution stand out.

The ability of SentinelOne Singularity Complete to ingest and correlate across security solutions is also a great feature.

The solution has not reduced any of the alerts for my company, but I'm happy to see when the alerts come through on the platform. As for the mean time to detect, SentinelOne Singularity Complete helped reduce it by ninety percent.

I noticed the mean time to respond has been reasonably quicker after using SentinelOne Singularity Complete, plus the organizational risk has been reduced.

In terms of quality and maturity, SentinelOne Singularity Complete has been around for a while and is a trusted solution. I have a colleague who works for another organization that was hit with ransomware, and the consulting company working with his team recommended SentinelOne Singularity Complete as one of the changes to implement immediately so from that standpoint, I truly enjoyed hearing that knowing that my company is also a SentinelOne Singularity Complete customer.

As a strategic security partner, I found the solution great, primarily because all of its features work well.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete takes up a lot of memory in Google Chrome, which sometimes causes it to lag, so this is an area for improvement. The solution could be improved by increasing its efficiency within the web browser.

Another area for improvement in SentinelOne Singularity Complete is technical support, particularly the response time when dealing with non-critical issues.

We've been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for over two years now.

I didn't experience crashing and downtime from SentinelOne Singularity Complete, so I find it stable.

For my company's use, SentinelOne Singularity Complete is great and has no issues scalability-wise.

The technical support provided for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is a seven out of ten because the team takes longer to deal with non-critical support issues. Response time could be faster.

Neutral

My company was looking for a solution encompassing a wide range of protection, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete matched what the company was looking for. The company used another product, particularly Webroot, and then moved to this solution.

Moving to SentinelOne Singularity Complete was my company's decision as it had more features, was more advanced and was more suitable for an enterprise application. Hence, the solution was ultimately a better fit when compared to Webroot.

I was involved in the initial deployment of SentinelOne Singularity Complete, which was very straightforward.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete was implemented in-house. I did it all by myself.

Anytime my company doesn't get infected with ransomware, there's ROI from SentinelOne Singularity Complete, as being infected with ransomware is pretty costly.

I find the licensing cost for SentinelOne Singularity Complete fair.

I've never used the Ranger functionality of SentinelOne Singularity Complete.

In my company, SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a hybrid deployment.

From a maintenance perspective, I have to ensure the solution is working and looks good, but I only have to go in and check occasionally. In SentinelOne Singularity Complete, the upgrade is automated.

My rating for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is nine out of ten.

I'd tell others looking into SentinelOne Singularity Complete that it provides complete protection and has yet to fail my company, so it's a solution that I recommend. I'd tell others to go with SentinelOne Singularity Complete.

My company is a SentinelOne customer.

We use the tool for malware protection and the XDR portion to track intrusions and possible exploitations.

I find the product very easy to maintain and troubleshoot. Their engineers are very helpful if you need additional assistance. It's one of the best products I've used. It's easy to use from my standpoint, both for troubleshooting and with the support we get from their team if necessary.

I find its interoperability with other solutions very good. When there are issues, because everything eventually has issues, the team is very good about running logs and finding out what portion is having issues. We can either exclude a portion of it or make it work. They find a solution.

We haven't had any issues with how we ingest or correlate data across security solutions. We use APIs and things like that to ingest data. For us, we haven't had any issues with the tools we use, but I can't speak for other organizations.

We now have threat hunting, visibility, and malware protection in one console. There are other portions we don't leverage because we choose to keep them separate, like our firewall, but we could if we wanted to.

The solution has helped us reduce false positives. We still get alerts, but I think they're more dynamic now. We have fewer issues with systems. It doesn't take as many resources, so we don't have outages caused by hijacking resources. We've probably reduced our issues with that by 90 percent from the previous program we were using.

The tool has helped free up our team's time. Especially when it comes to upgrades, I went from taking several months with the previous software to getting it done in a week or two for 15,000 to 17,000 assets. It's freed up months.

While I don't track mean time to detect specifically, I know it's very quick because of the way it detects intrusions. It's anomaly-based, not signature-based. It will flag something, review it, determine whether it's a false positive or actually malicious, and then quarantine it. It's pretty instantaneous. We've averted several ransomware attempts before they could infect anything.

Our mean time to respond has decreased significantly. The response is much quicker now, especially since very little gets reverted to us for handling. The Vigilance AI portion usually takes care of most of it, determining the severity of something and whether it needs human attention.

It has helped us save costs, particularly regarding fewer infections throughout the network. While I don't have exact numbers, we've had a reduction in costs associated with reimaging machines due to malware.

It would be nice to be able to adjust the canned reports manually and choose the specific data we want to report on instead of being limited to their pre-set reports.

I have been using the product for three years. 

In terms of stability, we have no downtime from SentinelOne Singularity Complete. We may have some complications with interoperability when we deploy something new that didn't get tested, but that's usually not SentinelOne's fault. It's usually because a third party changed something that had already been whitelisted.

We haven't had any issues with scalability. It scales very well from small to large. We're at 16,000 endpoints, and it's very easy to deploy and manage.

I've contacted technical support myself. Their response time depends on the severity with which you submit the case. For low priority, it takes about a day or two. For high priority, it's within an hour or two, according to their SLA. They're very prompt.

Positive

We switched from Symantec to SentinelOne Singularity Complete mainly because of cost and technology changes. Symantec wasn't changing quickly enough as technology moved toward the cloud, and things were going faster. Broadcom was still using heavy, clunky on-premises agents that used a lot of resources. SentinelOne Singularity Complete was new, next-gen, smoother, and quicker with less downtime. They manage their end in the cloud, so we don't have to maintain our console.

We saw the benefits immediately after deployment. The deployment was seamless, easy to learn, and easy to use—very intuitive. The initial deployment was pretty seamless and easy. It took us about six months to fully deploy, but that was because we did it in segments. We're a global organization with many different entities, so we had to do it segmented. It probably would have taken us a quarter if we had just set it out all at once.

The only maintenance we require is keeping our agents up to date. We do this manually because we go through a change approval process to ensure we don't introduce anything that will harm the system. We then test and deploy.

We used SentinelOne's guidance, but we did the deployment ourselves in-house.

My impression of SentinelOne Singularity Complete as a strategic security partner is that it's state-of-the-art, easy, and uncomplicated. As an engineer, I find the product easy to deploy, maintain, and efficiently. I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. 

I advise new users to read the manual before they start using it. Understand all the different modules to utilize them as intended and get the best out of them. Also, use their support if you have questions before you deploy. Get a game plan and follow their recommendations.

Our primary use cases involve Endpoint Detection and Response and Extended Detection and Response.

My positive experience with SentinelOne lies in its comprehensive version, allowing for rollback and replay of events, which is especially useful for EDR. The strength of behavior-based solutions like SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, CyberArk, and others lies in their ability to reveal the consequences of opening a file. Witnessing the impact of a virus gaining control over a computer or understanding the ramifications of opening a file adds a layer of insight.

It stands out for its seamless interoperability with other SentinelOne products and tools, facilitated by REST interfaces. This integration is particularly potent when connecting SentinelOne as an endpoint solution to firewalls like Fortinet, allowing the firewall to receive insights from SentinelOne clients. In today's landscape, where file transfers often occur through encrypted channels, traditional firewalls face challenges in inspecting these streams effectively. SentinelOne's endpoint security addresses this by analyzing downloaded files in their decrypted form, providing a crucial layer of protection. The bidirectional information flow between the firewall and endpoint security, enabled by SentinelOne's REST API, empowers proactive threat prevention and detection, contributing to a robust cybersecurity posture.

Utilizing SentinelOne has significantly reduced the number of alerts for us. We might have experienced more false positives and missed potential attacks without it. Its alert system is efficient, with a low rate of false positives compared to other solutions I've heard about. Managing alerts is straightforward, and the platform allows for creating white lists to handle false positives, such as those related to old printer drivers. The administration is user-friendly, offering features like multi-factor authentication for secure connections to the console and automatic updates within the SentinelOne interface.

It has proven to be a time-saver for our staff, significantly reducing the likelihood of falling victim to various cyber threats. By addressing the spectrum of attacks, from initial malware infiltration to potential worst-case scenarios like Active Directory compromise, SentinelOne has played a pivotal role. It effectively diminishes the probability of becoming a target for attacks that exploit stolen passwords, infiltrate the company's IT infrastructure, and escalate privileges, ultimately leading to severe consequences such as a randomized Active Directory.

The platform is user-friendly, easy to administer, and aligns well with GDPR requirements, which is crucial for us. What makes SentinelOne stand out is its speed and efficiency, consuming minimal computing resources. It operates by checking data only when it's accessed, synchronizing with the process that opens the data which is well-designed and effective.

I don't actively use SentinelOne's Ranger functionality because we haven't implemented it university-wide. While we've employed it in specific cases, my experience with it is limited. However, it provides valuable insights into past events, allowing you to trace the history of a virus download or malware activity. For instance, you might discover that a virus was downloaded two weeks ago using the Safari web browser, saved to the computer, and later opened with Excel, triggering certain actions before SentinelOne intervened. The ability to roll back such ransom actions is a valuable capability provided by SentinelOne.

It primarily operates on local machines, monitoring processes, and not always providing detailed insights, relying on external information to determine the nature of a file. This limitation becomes apparent in more complex scenarios, such as analyzing or assessing the content of files at the byte level, especially in cases involving files like Excel, where there may be some difficulty in discerning potential issues. They should consider incorporating a cloud-based service where users can upload suspicious links, documents like Excel sheets, or ambiguous files to observe their behavior in a sandbox environment. Currently, with SentinelOne, the process involves setting up a separate network and machine for this purpose, requiring users to upload the file and monitor its behavior on the dedicated machine. Offering a free and accessible service like this would be a noteworthy enhancement to their product, providing users with a convenient and efficient way to analyze potentially harmful content.

I have been working with it for four years.

I would rate its stability capabilities ten out of ten.

I would rate its scalability abilities nine out of ten.

I am highly satisfied with their technical support; it is truly excellent. I would rate it ten out of ten.

Positive

Comparatively, SentinelOne has certain drawbacks, particularly when measured against CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike offers a free sandbox at hybrid-analysis.com, allowing the examination of links and downloaded files on a virtual machine. This proves especially valuable in assessing potential phishing emails. Uploading the file or link to hybrid-analysis.com provides a detailed analysis, complete with screenshots of what transpires on the virtual machine. This includes actions like the opening of links, prompting CEO impersonation attempts, and other background information. While SentinelOne may lack these specific features, its advantage lies in being an all-encompassing solution, whereas CrowdStrike functions primarily as a managed service, which may not align with specific preferences.

The initial setup was straightforward.

The deployment of Singularity Complete involved some consultation, as we collaborated with a partner who facilitated the onboarding process with SentinelOne. While the partner occasionally provides support, larger issues are infrequent, and overall, the deployment has been relatively smooth. We have implemented it across various locations. There is some maintenance involved in managing Singularity Complete.

It's challenging to quantify precisely, but the implementation of Singularity Complete has significantly reduced organizational risks. Currently, we employ it on critical systems, constituting approximately fifty percent of our infrastructure.

Creating separate groups for various types of computers, like Windows servers and clients, enables efficient management and customization of security configurations tailored to specific needs. Overall, I would rate it ten out of ten.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Complete to protect all of our servers and cloud workloads, whether they are on-premises or hosted in the cloud.

We were transitioning from our legacy antivirus protection system, which required a lot of overhead to maintain, ensure they were up to date, and verify their performance. It also tended to hurt system performance. We therefore sought to move to a modern EDR solution that did not rely on that type of outdated technology. We migrated to SentinelOne, which gave us better protection without the adverse consequences of legacy AV products.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is deployed on workstations, data centers, servers in the public cloud, and all of our mobile devices, which are very numerous.

The integration between SentinelOne and IBM QRadar, our security operation center SIEM, is important and works extremely well. It means that if there are any alerts on the SentinelOne platform, they will be sent to QRadar, where a stack analyst will review them. This allows us to start working on incidents quickly, without having to have people continuously monitoring the SentinelOne console. Another benefit of the integration is that it makes it easy to deploy new or upgraded versions of the SentinelOne software to all of our endpoints and servers. We simply notify the data center run by the customer success team, and they take care of the deployment. This eliminates the need for IT overhead to keep everything up to date, which is important from a governance perspective.

The integration with other SentinelOne products and third-party tools is very good.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete's ability to ingest and correlate data from our other security solutions is good. If we look at a diagram of our security operation systems, we can see that the SIEM is at the center of everything. All other products, such as SentinelOne, Chain, patch management, and abnormal security for email, feed into the SIEM, which is where the stack measures everything. Therefore, SentinelOne does not integrate with other solutions directly, but rather through the SIEM.

In the three years since we began using SentinelOne Singularity Complete, we have not had a major security incident. We have observed malware entering browsers through websites, but SentinelOne has always dealt with it effectively. Therefore, we see the benefits of the platform in the absence of any significant events. As long as SentinelOne Singularity Complete continues to operate quietly, we are happy with its performance.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete alerts when it should, and those alerts are sent to the SIEM. I don't approach EDR or SentinelOne from the perspective of wanting to reduce alerts, because I want those alerts. I rely on peripheral systems like SentinelOne to always tell the SIEM anything it needs to know. So, I'm not approaching this from an alert minimization perspective. Instead, I approach it from this perspective: If we have a high, medium, or low alert, it's up to us to decide how we're feeding our highest rate and mediums, but we don't need to feed in the lowest alerts because we don't see the benefit of that. It's up to us to make that judgment. And obviously, our high and medium alerts will be smaller, and our lows will be higher. It's up to the customer to decide how much they want to send over to the team.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has helped free up our staff time around one day per week.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete helps reduce our MTTD.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has reduced our MTTR by 25 percent. It is a more reliable product, so we receive alerts and respond to them more quickly than we did with the previous product.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has reduced our organizational risks by five percent.

The most valuable aspect of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is the protection it provides. We get endpoint protection without the IT team workloads and the negative impact on end-user rotation servers. This is because of the way SentinelOne has implemented the technology.

One of my criticisms of SentinelOne is the Ranger functionality. If Ranger were part of the core product, we would be able to identify endpoints or servers that need to be protected with our licenses. However, to get Ranger, we need to buy more licenses, which doubles our costs. I would like to have Ranger, but I challenge the way that SentinelOne licenses it. I believe that Ranger should be a core part of the product. If we run Ranger today and find that 100 devices on our network are not protected by SentinelOne, we would then need to add on those 100 licenses to cover them.

The licensing model is too complex, whether we agree with all parts of it or not. Everything is now offered as a service, so the console and the licensing model can be improved to make things easier, especially when updating new versions of the software.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for three years. 

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is stable.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is highly scalable.

We are happy with SentinelOne's technical support.

Neutral

We previously used a legacy solution. The migration over to SentinelOne Singularity Complete was relatively trouble-free.

Once all testing was complete, the deployment was straightforward. Eight part-time employees completed the deployment in three months.

The only return on investment we can point to with any EDR is that we have not been attacked.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is reasonably priced. Compared to other products I've used in the past, such as CrowdStrike, it is significantly less expensive. I can easily find evidence of this price difference, so I believe that SentinelOne is a fairly priced product.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete eight out of ten.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is a mature solution of the highest quality.

We have deployed SentinelOne Singularity Complete worldwide in airlines from Australia, throughout Europe, and across Africa in a complex environment.

We have 4,500 endpoints and around ten active users.

The maintenance level for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is relatively low.

SentinelOne is good as a security partner. They do exactly what we expect of them and it protects us.

I would always conduct a proof of concept for these types of products, as each environment is different. Even though SentinelOne Singularity Complete works well, a POC should always be done.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Complete as an endpoint protection solution. It is our primary endpoint protection solution for our workstations and servers for protection from any kind of threats that may appear on those systems.

We have some localized virtual machines that it is running on. We do not have any cloud workloads.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is pretty good in terms of being able to fine-tune the alerting that you get. It is better than other solutions that are super noisy to the point that it is difficult to drill down. If you get an alert of something that is actionable, it is better than getting one alert and then getting five others right behind it. This solution is pretty good at not being noisy.

Luckily, I do not spend a ton of time with SentinelOne Singularity Complete unless there is an alert or a potential breach, but that just does not happen very often. Email security is the front door of protection, and that takes the brunt of any kind of security concerns. Luckily, most things are not hitting our network right now.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is pretty good at picking up things that are not necessarily malicious and alerting me that somebody or something is using something that needs attention. That happens instantaneously. It is pretty quick.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is as fast as we can ask. I can see the alert and get on it. It does not take very long, so I am not sure how we can improve more when it comes to our time to respond. We are a small enterprise. It does not take us too long to respond to things.

Being able to keep track of the endpoints and the data that is available from the endpoints is valuable. We can see the patch levels, whether Windows endpoints are active or inactive, and who is the last user that was logged on. We get a lot of granular information that is valuable even when we are not talking from a security standpoint.

The agent update is not the most intuitive process, but I understand why they do it. We have a pretty vertical 64-bit environment for Windows. That is pretty much all we have, but we get alerts for things like the new Linux endpoint or things that do not apply to us. That is probably the only thing that I do not like. There may be some way to turn that off so that I do not get endpoint update alerts from platforms that are not applicable to our system, enterprise, or network.

We have had it for a couple of years now.

I have not had any issues related to downtime, uptime, or responsiveness of their infrastructure. I have not seen any reports where something was not working the way it was supposed to.

They would far outpace the scale of what we would be looking at.

I contacted their technical support at the very beginning when I was rolling things out, but it was not a major issue. It was just about me getting up to speed with how they do things. I do not have a negative impression of how that interaction went.

SentinelOne is a good partner. I had a few other technical support questions, and they answered them pretty quickly. They were pretty minor things, and they were always pretty quick to respond. 

Positive

We were using another solution previously. It was long ago. We were using Berkeley, which was bought by Alert Logic. The Berkeley product was pretty good, but when they were bought by Alert Logic, I did not like the way they did things. It was complicated. It was not intuitive. Their sales program was a little shady. We got locked into a contract that was not intentional. It was not a great experience. They have a product that is not a direct competitor to SentinelOne. We tried it, and it was super noisy for alerts. If I tried to clear all the alerts in the system, I would not have time for anything else. We were not necessarily looking for it, but because of the platform that we were on, we tried the other offerings that were included in the platform, and it just was not a good fit.

SentinelOne is a much more robust platform than Berkeley or Alert Logic in terms of endpoint protection. In terms of the ability to be innovative, SentinelOne provides tools. If we had stronger security requirements, they have other tools that we could utilize, such as Ranger. 

The portal is cloud-based, but the agents are on-prem.

I was involved in its deployment. I am a one-man IT shop. It was pretty straightforward. You get the agent that you want to install, and there is a code that you put in that locks it to your portal. It installs pretty easily.

It requires very little maintenance. Occasionally, I check to make sure that the agent version is pushed out because that is not automatic. I get to choose when the agent gets pushed out. If there is an update, I update them when I want to.

We did not need any help at all. It was just me. 

We do not put a price on security, but we have to choose between different products that are on the market. We are constantly evaluating other products every year. Endpoint protection is not something with which there is a huge opportunity cost by moving from one vendor to the next. Our security stack is not so integrated with SentinelOne. If, for some reason, they were not the best option, we could move to another option fairly easily. The fact that we are sticking with SentinelOne is a testament that it is not broken. It is still working for us. It gives us good peace of mind about the product line, where it is going, and the protection that it provides.

It is very competitive with other solutions that are on the market. At least the last time we renewed, it was very competitive.

I try to stay abreast of different platforms. I reached out to SentinelOne, and they put me in touch with a reseller, so I went out and found it. 

The biggest thing was how well SentinelOne ranked versus the other platforms. There was also a cost-benefit of a solution like SentinelOne. We thought it would be effective for endpoint protection.

It certainly was a cost-effective solution as compared to some of the other endpoint protection solutions that were available at the time. I would not have gone with SentinelOne if it was not a good value.

It is a very robust platform. It is a great candidate to serve small business environments. They do not target small businesses. They do not market it to small business environments with 50 users or less, but being a little more technically-minded, I wanted something that was enterprise-ready. Even though our environment is small, it was a good fit for us.

It did not require a lot of in-place support from the integrator or the reseller, but they did provide a large amount of presale decision-making help in terms of what I was getting into and what they could provide. That was very helpful. Talking to an integrator or a reseller so that you can put a person to the discussion is helpful.

In terms of integrations, we have looked into some of the integrations, such as with Mimecast. We have had some interest in that, but we have not utilized any of those third-party integrations. We also looked at the possibility of using some things with log management and being able to have a single source of how protected we are across the enterprise, but we have not yet pulled the trigger on anything like that.

Overall, I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete a nine out of ten.