SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

We use SentinelOne Singularity Complete to detect and respond to "unknown unknowns," which are threats that haven't been previously identified. Our process involves monitoring for any unusual activity or deviations from typical program behavior. This includes analyzing parent and child processes to ensure they're loading correctly and not communicating with unauthorized external servers for remote execution.

For example, I encountered a phishing email that triggered an investigation. Fortunately, Singularity Complete offers an event log feature that allows me to analyze the incident. The tool's built-in Advanced Detection Analytics functionality helped me identify the downloaded file, and its access time, and track its interactions with applications, including attempted installations. Furthermore, Singularity Complete boasts a rollback capability, enabling me to revert to a safe state before the malicious activity occurred. I've utilized this feature successfully for several clients.

In addition to Singularity Complete's event log and rollback functions, it excels in antivirus detection. It effectively identified even sophisticated threats like the MimiKatz attack, which attempts to escalate user privileges in Linux and Windows systems. The tool's signature-based detection proved valuable in this instance.

Automating threat resolution has significantly improved our security operations. On average, I scan around forty million files, and the detection rate has been quite good.

The integration capabilities significantly enhance my existing security environment. It is a night and day difference compared to CylanceOPTICS by BlackBerry, which I used previously. While CylanceOPTICS was good, it relied on an algorithmic approach that flagged millions of potential threats, resulting in some false positives that needed manual analysis and training. SentinelOne, on the other hand, leverages eleven different engines simultaneously, including AI, machine learning, heuristics, and dynamic and static scans. This comprehensive approach offers robust protection, and if something falls through the cracks, it can consult a cloud database for the latest threat intelligence. Beyond its detection capabilities, SentinelOne offers exceptional visibility and control. I can easily investigate events at any time, like tracking who accessed Yahoo Finance within my organization across specific timeframes. The global tenancy feature empowers me to apply scans and threat signatures across different segments or even my entire network, ensuring consistent protection. The more I explore SentinelOne's features, the more impressed I am. It's incredibly powerful and versatile, offering a level of security and control that far surpasses my previous solution.

The interface is user-friendly, but there's a learning curve due to its extensive capabilities. Navigating for someone unfamiliar with threat hunting can be challenging as they may need to explore every option. However, some features have tooltips explaining their function when hovered over.

Accessing the knowledge base often requires a partnership with the company. While I lack this access, my distributor provided the comprehensive admin guide.

Ranger is an excellent feature for threat scanning. While alternative pen testing tools like Digital Defense exist, Ranger offers a unique advantage. It utilizes SentinelOne agents as probes within the network, allowing scans for irregular connections and identifying devices without the agent. This provides a comprehensive view of potential vulnerabilities. Imagine we decide to deny access to certain devices. In that case, every agent with those policies implemented, throughout our network, would individually isolate their traffic. This isolation prevents communication with the rogue devices. Consequently, even if one of those devices harbors a threat, it's unable to move laterally within the network. All other devices, recognizing it as unauthorized, will refuse to communicate with it.

Ranger requires no additional agents, hardware, or network modifications. It's essentially a built-in feature of the existing agent. Therefore, if we have the module, we already possess the capability. Activation can be done remotely through the cloud. So, when we decide to upgrade to Singularity Complete, they'll offer us the option of adding Ranger Plus. If we agree, a small additional fee, typically around a few dollars, will be applied per client. While it might seem a bit pricey, considering the value it provides, I believe it's worth the investment. It translates to roughly five dollars per client. For instance, with 50 machines, the monthly cost would be $250. In my experience, it hasn't significantly increased my expenses. There might be a slight increase, but I haven't noticed any substantial impact.

SentinelOne Ranger effectively prevents vulnerable devices from being compromised by isolating their network traffic. This feature is just one of many within the SentinelOne platform, which includes a built-in router and firewall integrated directly into the agent. This integration allows for seamless compatibility with Windows firewalls and offers granular control over network traffic. For example, Ranger enables modification of the firewall's IP stack, granting the ability to isolate specific traffic based on defined rules. This can be particularly useful for segregating vulnerable devices and preventing their communication. While not recommended for general use, advanced users can leverage SentinelOne's Singularly Complete feature on, for example, a VMware server to further isolate vulnerable devices. By running the client software on a separate network from the server, administrators can block unauthorized traffic based on Ranger's or the agent's identification. This effectively isolates the vulnerable device, even if it's compromised since it lacks any incoming network traffic. The server acts as a default gateway, filtering and controlling all incoming traffic.

Singularity Complete can help reduce alerts when a threat is identified and a solution is implemented. However, if a threat is known but no solution is available, using Singularity Complete might increase alerts. This is because suppressing alerts for a known threat without addressing it can create a false sense of security. While Singularity Complete allows manual blacklisting of threats, it cannot import large lists of threats from spreadsheets in one go, a feature available in CylanceOPTICS. This can be time-consuming for dealing with many threats. Overall, Singularity Complete has improved in its alert management, but it remains average compared to competitors. While detection is excellent, the alerting system still requires some refinement.

As a threat detector, I perform threat analysis to quickly identify threats. This has significantly reduced the time I spend on analysis, allowing Singularity Complete to free up about 30 percent of my time for other tasks.

Singularity Complete has achieved a 15 percent reduction in our mean time to detection. This efficiency gain is powered by eleven different detection engines running concurrently, ensuring comprehensive identification of potential threats.

Singularity Complete can reduce our mean time to respond by providing a clear path to the root cause of an attack. However, it doesn't always do this, and sometimes further investigation is necessary. Nevertheless, the tool significantly speeds up the process of identifying the root cause. For example, imagine the timeline indicates a suspicious file was executed. We can use Singularity Complete to find out when it last ran in our environment, even if it wasn't detected on the same day. If the threat appeared recently but the file ran a month ago, it suggests a potential Trojan was planted. This prompts further investigation into how the file arrived on the system. It could have been introduced through a USB drive, email attachment, copied file, or existing on a network share. While Singularity Complete won't explicitly state the location like "Share five," it will provide a hash that can often lead us to the network path.

Singularity Complete helps manage costs by eliminating the need for additional products with overlapping functionality. This saves us thousands of dollars per month on full scans, as our existing agent already possesses that capability. By deploying it across all organizational agents and enabling Ranger, we can conduct daily scans that provide comprehensive insights into our network activity.

Singularity Complete has helped reduce our organizational risk. However, it's important to remember that no system is foolproof. While I haven't experienced a security breach since installing it, I deliberately expose some machines to potential threats to test and observe new attack techniques. To strengthen our security posture, I've implemented additional measures. Some machines have less aggressive scan and detection settings to simulate vulnerabilities and observe attacker behavior. Additionally, our network is layered, with weaker points that serve as honeypots, while critical systems are protected by stricter security protocols. Beyond Singularity Complete, we utilize Palo Alto Networks and FortiGate firewalls for further protection. Ultimately, the decision to invest in additional scanning capabilities depends on the cost and our overall security strategy.

The most valuable feature is the ability to drill down into individual sequences of processes. This allows for building a highly detailed timeline of events, which is incredibly helpful. Additionally, the quality of the intelligence provided is excellent, making it difficult to choose between the two. The solution effectively reveals the attacker's tactics, including the mechanism or injection method used, how they exploit vulnerabilities and their use of decoys or misdirection tactics like dequay attacks. They may target one area initially, then shift focus to another, potentially planting seeds for future attacks. Overall, the timeline, intelligence, and overall capabilities of SentinelOne Singularity Complete are highly impressive.

Everything operates in real-time, allowing us to conduct in-depth analysis to uncover previously unknown threats. This capability stems from the use of dynamic libraries, which enable flexible code execution. The key concept here is the ability to pivot within an application. We can dissect and analyze this pivoting behavior, which is a rare feature among software solutions. Additionally, the system allows us to create our custom signatures. By identifying a threat and performing a global search, we can locate other instances of the same threat across our network and establish correlation points. Subsequently, we can create a signature based on a unique identifier (story ID) and integrate it into the initial login scan. This enables us to proactively detect and respond to any attacks that utilize that specific signature, making it a powerful tool for threat prevention.

The uninstallation process for the SentinelOne agent could be improved. While it is currently possible to uninstall through the console, it can be more complex if registry modifications are required. Streamlining this process, especially for users with console access, would be a valuable improvement.

I encountered issues running Singularity Complete alongside other machine-learning tools. The program uses hooks, which we configure through a whitelist to specify allowed functionalities for each app. However, I've observed compatibility problems with certain applications. This seems to stem from my limited access to information from those companies, hindering the creation of effective hooks.

For example, an external scanner's EXE file might not provide hooks for features like memory protection or script locking, potentially conflicting with SentinelOne's capabilities. In my experience, Singularity Complete doesn't always play well with others. While it coexists with Kaspersky's detection without issue, enterprise AI solutions employing algorithmic scans or pre/post-execution analysis can pose problems. We might need to modify the whitelist due to unavailable information about the application's memory range. Sharing this information could create vulnerabilities, so companies understandably keep it confidential. While I believe CylanceOPTICS could likely work with Singularity Complete, I haven't achieved it because I prioritize optimal protection. Disabling all CylanceOPTICS features and putting it in uninstall mode allows it to function but without intervention. In such cases, CylanceOPTICS detects threats first, possibly due to its higher application number in Windows. Similar behavior has been observed with other products.

Deep Instinct is another excellent detection software I use for remote devices. Expanding Singularity Complete's coverage to include IoT devices, Linux, servers, Docker, and mobile platforms (currently limited to Deep Instinct on my devices) would be highly beneficial. While Deep Instinct allows uploading and installation via email code, Singularity Complete currently lacks this functionality.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for over five years.

I've only had one interaction with their tech support, but it was excellent. In situations where we're struggling with an investigation, I believe they have a guardian contract that could allow them to analyze our findings. Alternatively, if we're having difficulty detecting something, they can guide us through the process. However, my access to their tech department was limited to a single instance when I needed it. The impressive part is that they were willing to help me even though I was from a partner company. Such helpfulness is rare in many organizations, which often require expensive fees before offering similar assistance.

Previously, we used CylanceOPTICS by BlackBerry but transitioned to SentinelOne Singularity Complete due to its enhanced user-friendliness. The latter platform boasts comprehensive investigation capabilities, allowing us to delve deeper into the specifics of security incidents. We can examine parent-child relationships, delve into registry entries, and analyze memory ranges with ease. The feature set is truly extensive.

While CylanceOPTICS offered some of these functionalities, it could not identify pivoting areas within an attack. If I needed to investigate the pivot itself, CylanceOPTICS wouldn't suffice. SentinelOne proves invaluable in such situations. By examining registry entries or monitoring running processes, it helps us pinpoint the root cause, be it a Run DLL or a Windows EXE file disguised as innocuous activity. While CylanceOPTICS might catch the attack, it wouldn't reveal the underlying malicious intent. SentinelOne grants us this crucial level of insight, empowering us to respond effectively.

I rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete a nine out of ten. While the product itself is impressive, the price point is on the higher side. The only drawback is the limited support access. If they offered more affordable support options or provided unrestricted access to their knowledge base, I would easily give it a ten. Unfortunately, they haven't implemented this yet, as it would unlock more resources and expertise for users. Ultimately, it is what it is, but hopefully, they'll consider these improvements in the future. 

In my environment, I support a law firm and a music company while pursuing my research. Additionally, I use Intel hardware for testing purposes. My security strategy prioritizes avoiding complete system reimaging whenever possible. While I have encountered compatibility issues with specific SentinelOne versions and certain software, these were primarily during testing when I intentionally introduced malicious files. In general, the software has proven effective in preventing and mitigating threats.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has been excellent in its ability to be innovative.

While SentinelOne Singularity Complete is well-established software, the developers continuously strive to improve it. After all, no software ever truly reaches complete maturity. To remain effective, we must constantly adapt, improve, and refine ourselves in response to evolving threats and technologies.

I'd love to partner with SentinelOne right now, but as a small business, cost is a major concern. That's why I'm working with a distributor. They purchase larger license blocks, like five thousand or ten thousand, and because I was one of their early customers, they granted me access. While I have a partnership with them, it's not a formal one. To my knowledge, they require organizations to have at least one hundred or two hundred seats to be considered for a true partnership. I'm unsure if a program exists for smaller businesses, but based on what I've seen, access to their knowledge base, support team, etc., seems to be restricted to contracts with a minimum seat capacity of one hundred or two hundred.

It is our primary software platform for endpoint detection and response and vulnerabilities.

Our overall fleet posture and our security have increased a lot. It is much easier to get the agents out onto machines no matter what their operating system is, and it gives equitable reports back no matter what our platform is.

So far, it is one of the most interoperable applications and platforms that I have seen. There is the ease of bringing things in with the marketplace and the willingness of the company itself to work with you to help you address anything that they do not currently have.

Singularity Complete has helped free up our staff for other projects and tasks. Being new in the department for a year and a half, I am not the one to say how much time it has saved, but it has made my life easier by several hours a week. It gives me a straight line and a story for what I am looking for, so I can quickly identify whether something is to be expected and just a false positive or if it is actually a problem. Usually, when it is a problem, SentinelOne would have already mitigated it.

Singularity Complete has absolutely helped reduce alerts. It has drastically reduced alerts across the board. There is a 40% to 60% reduction. This reduction is because it is tunable. It is very tunable, and you can tweak it to meet your needs where you are not just stuck with what a manufacturer or a software developer said in terms of the alerting that you are going to get.

Singularity Complete has definitely helped reduce our organizational risk. Our risk score has gone down by 15% to 20%. We have better coverage and better insight into what is being covered.

Singularity Complete has probably saved us costs. I do not have enough insight into those budget numbers, but they keep adding things to it, so my guess is that it has saved us costs.

SentinelOne is one of our most important partners. The help that we get from their engineers, success team, and support really and truly has been unparalleled.

I am going to be a little biased because I am a Mac guy. I have been a Mac guy for twenty years, and the feature parity and the capabilities of a Macintosh agent are unparalleled in the industry. It is the first anti-malware and antivirus that does not make you feel that you bought the wrong processor. It is really good and lightweight. 

It seems like they are doing a lot with their automatic updates. They can maybe slow down the actual release cycle to make it easier to deploy the most recent and then do it using the live update. They can continue to work on that because trying to get agent changes through change management platforms and get approvals and testing can be quite difficult.

I have been using Singularity Complete for three years.

I am blown away by their support. Every time I reach out to my customer service manager, they are returning questions after hours. You do not see that from a lot of companies. I would rate their support a 10 out of 10.

Positive

We were not officially using a similar solution. We had other products that we were using, but we did not have a full solution like SentinelOne. We were using multiple things. One of them was McAfee. We switched because they got bought by Trellix, and nobody knew what was going to happen with them. That was our most recent one and what I am most experienced with.

I was involved in its initial deployment. I packaged the Jamf mobile device management installation package for our Macs. As far as security products go, it was the easiest one. The instructions were great. They were aligned with the vendor, which is something not common. Usually, it is like, "Here is what you have to do with your vendor." SentinelOne took that extra step, and it deployed right out of the box.

We have on-premises, public cloud, and private cloud deployment. Our cloud provider is primarily AWS, but we also have a little bit with Google and Mandiant, so we have a hybrid cloud. We are in the middle of a migration. The cloud is fairly new for us, and securing it has been a priority.

We have our deployment segregated on endpoint types, but our entire organization has it.

We did it directly on our own. We rolled it out very quickly. We had been dealing with McAfee before it, so this was like a breath of fresh air.

We had two or three people working on it, so it went out very smoothly.

I believe we have seen an ROI. If nothing else, the investment that they are making, as analysts, engineers, and architects, we feel that we can get more done in SentinelOne and have a better stance overall for our organization. 

They evaluated a lot, but that was before I was in the department, so I do not know exactly which ones they did.

I would advise listening to your sales engineers and letting them give you ideas because SentinelOne can do things that you have no idea about.

For next-generation platforms, it is at the top of what is a small stack right now, and that puts them ahead of a lot of other people.

I would rate it a 10 out of 10. It has been fantastic for us.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Complete as an endpoint detection and response solution to detect advanced threats in memory and protect our environment from ransomware attacks.

We are ingesting data from Singularity Complete into our team. The integration between Singularity Complete and Splunk works well, pushing all alerts from Singularity Complete to our soft tool. We have also looked at other SentinelOne products, but we only use a few of them.

We use Ranger to detect rogue sensors by scanning networks for endpoints that do not have SentinelOne installed. We do not use Ranger Pro.

Ranger is used to identify endpoints that do not have SentinelOne installed, ensuring 100 percent coverage. However, we also use a network access control tool to verify that endpoints have the necessary security telemetry and toolsets installed. The NAC tool can either orchestrate the installation of missing components, quarantine endpoints or simply notify us that components are missing.

The biggest benefit for us, other than mitigating the risks, is that Singularity Complete has raised the bar for red teaming, compared to the previous tool we were using. Some of the agent coverage in the previous toolset was becoming a limitation, but Singularity Complete gives us better coverage and visibility, both for red teaming and in general.

Over time, Singularity Complete has helped to reduce alerts. At the beginning of the implementation, we had to spend some time training the system, accepting events, and so on. However, over time, the number of alerts has been reduced.

Singularity Complete has helped our MTTD by providing broader visibility into our environment.

We collect a lot of telemetry from Singularity Complete. We then use this telemetry to search for malicious processes, which we would not have been able to see before. In other words, in addition to the standard setup that we expect, we are extracting additional telemetry from Singularity Complet to identify malicious processes and other types of threats running on endpoints.

Singularity Complete can be improved by allowing for better nesting of policies. Currently, when we create a policy and want to apply two different policies to an endpoint, we cannot do so. Instead, we must create two separate policies and place the endpoint in each policy, even if the only difference between the policies is slight. This makes the policy nesting process cumbersome and inefficient. Therefore, allowing for nested policies would be a valuable improvement to Singularity Complete.

The Endpoint Health telemetry could be improved. This is likely true of all tools, but I think it would be particularly useful for us to be able to see the sensor when it is running on an endpoint and starts to consume more memory, or if there is a memory leak. This would allow us to collect better telemetry on this topic.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for one and a half years.

Singularity Complete is stable, but there are occasional instances where the sensor monitors a specific process that starts to malfunction, which is naturally possible. In these cases, we need to investigate and add an exception to prevent the sensor from monitoring the process so heavily, if it is a valid process so that it can return to normal operation. Therefore, there is a significant amount of tuning required. If the tuning is correct, Singularity Complete operates quite well and is certainly stable.

Singularity Complete is scalable. We have 2,500 endpoints. I know other organizations that have over 70,000 endpoints.

We have technical support that we can access, but I think it could be stronger. Currently, we deal with some local support, but their knowledge is limited. I would like to establish a closer relationship with SentinelOne International support, especially for the upgrade we are planning next year. I was in Tel Aviv in June and July and visited the SentinelOne offices to speak to them about this.

Neutral

Our previous solution, Cybereason was not very good at detecting things happening in memory, so we were looking to replace it with SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, or Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The replacement had to be able to see things happening in memory and deal with ransomware attacks. SentinelOne Singularity Complete was able to meet our requirements.

The initial deployment was slightly more complex than our previous tool because we needed to understand and implement the exceptions. These exceptions included both standard exceptions and our own custom exceptions related to how applications behave. However, the complexity is justified by the better coverage and protection that the new tool provides.

Three people from our company were involved in the deployment, which took about six months. This included removing the previous solution and replacing it with Singularity Complete.

The cost of Singularity Complete is similar to our previous solution but it comes with additional options such as Kubernetes integration. We make sure to benchmark the prices against other EDR solutions before renewal to ensure we are not overpaying.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete eight out of ten.

We started looking at the reception technology, but it was too much for us and required too many permissions. As a result, we did not proceed with it.

Ranger provides network and asset visibility, but we use other telemetry to build a data lake, which we then use to give us more holistic visibility.

Singularity Complete is definitely innovative. It offers better coverage of endpoints and sensors than our previous solution, as well as better coverage from red teams and other threats. It also provides us with much better telemetry from endpoints than our previous solution. This includes features that our previous EDR tool promised but did not deliver.

SentinelOne is a fairly mature product. I think we first looked at it about six or seven years ago when it first came out. It has definitely matured a lot since then. When we first saw SentinelOne, it had a lot of problems with automatically killing things without alerting us. However, we have definitely seen improvements in the solution from a product perspective. Additionally, there are now more modules and integrations available. We have looked at the reception part of it, as well as quite a few other pieces, including Rogue Sensor Pro. We have looked at a lot of little bits, so it has quite broad coverage in terms of what it actually will cover.

We have deployed Singularity Complete across the company and all lines of business, including our branches in South Africa and other parts of Africa. This includes approximately two and a half thousand endpoints.

Four people are managing Singularity Complete. Every six months we have to update the sensors. 

We have definitely told others about and shown them Singularity Complete, and we have told them that we are happy with it. When implementing Singularity Complete, we need to know what our expectations are and, obviously, test the solution thoroughly to prevent any negative outcomes.

I review the data logs from each SentinelOne agent using Skylight to develop queries. We have been using Star Alerts to create custom alerts based on those rules. We also partner with their Vigilance team for 24/7 monitoring.

We implemented SentinelOne Singularity Complete to gain widespread visibility into global markets and to facilitate easy agent deployment for EDR and XDR solutions.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete's interoperability with other SentinelOne and third-party applications is excellent. We recently used a proof of value to integrate some of our other email products, such as Proofpoint, with SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The ease of use has been amazing. Singularity Complete has been a great data ingestion platform, and we have already gained a wealth of data that we never had access to before.

Singularity Complete's ability to ingest and correlate data across our security solutions has been effective. We can see a significant number of events from our DNS logs, firewall logs, and email tenancy. Overall, it has performed very well thus far.

We ended up getting rid of QRadar and relied heavily on Singularity Complete. Singularity Complete allowed us to deploy the SentinelOne agent on a significant number of domain controllers and collect much more information than we could with QRadar alone. We needed to purchase additional licenses to quantify the data more effectively. However, Singularity Complete provided the same if not even more enrichment because it allowed us to see a lot of things about the transitioning of IP ranges, the ingressing of traffic from different IP ranges if they are open to the internet, and who is contacting those ranges via different endpoints. Overall, Singularity Complete has provided a significant improvement in data ingestion over our previous solution of QRadar.

Overall, we have seen a quicker response time with Singularity Complete. We are able to drill down into events in a much more granular way. This allows us to respond better, correlate the information that Singularity has gathered, and come up with a definitive answer to certain questions. Because of Singularity's enrichment of the data that we currently have, we are able to answer these questions more accurately, carefully, and with more specific timestamps. Since we have some of these deployed globally, it is very important for us to get the centralized time zones correct so that we know exactly when an event occurred.

Singularity Complete has helped us reduce the number of false positives. It provides us with a wealth of data enrichment, which allows us to distinguish between normal and abnormal events in our environment. This is important because we have billions of events happening every ten minutes across our many deployed endpoints. In the past, we would waste analyst time investigating alerts that turned out to be false positives. However, with Singularity Complete, we can now quickly identify which alerts are most likely to be legitimate and prioritize those for investigation. For example, if Singularity Complete tells us that a particular event has been seen a thousand times on one endpoint but only twenty times on another endpoint, we know that the twenty occurrences on the second endpoint are more likely to be abnormal and worth investigating.

Singularity Complete has helped free up our staff's time for other projects. With all the data enrichment that Singularity Complete has provided us, we are no longer chasing false positives. We are able to set our custom Star rules so that we receive the alerts that are most relevant to our organization, rather than broad alerts that may or may not be relevant. This allows us to focus our attention on what matters most and to investigate more accurate alerts. As a result, we are able to dedicate time to other projects. Before Singularity Complete, our analysts spend two to four weeks. With Singularity Complete in place, we've seen a reduction of two to three weeks, depending on the vendor. On average, analysts now spend three to ten days analyzing logs.

Singularity Complete substantially reduced our MTTD.

Our MTTR has been substantially reduced by Singularity Complete. We are now able to respond within the hour of receiving the alert.

Singularity Complete has helped our organization save costs by eliminating the need to replace equipment infested with malware. We can now detect, remediate, and roll back malware attacks as needed, thanks to the visibility that Singularity Complete provides. We can drill down into actual alerts, not just false positives, and eradicate any malware that may be infecting our systems.

Singularity Complete has reduced our organizational risk by providing us with much broader visibility into various endpoints deployed globally. This allows us to see what is normal in our environment, rather than reacting to what may not be normal.

The most valuable aspects of SentinelOne Singularity Complete are the ease of deployment with the Sentinel Agent and the enhanced visibility with Skylight, which provides correlation of logs and all endpoint data in a centralized location.

The ingestion and correlation of data would be improved by integrating with email security solutions such as Proofpoint or our email security solution. We do not yet have a marketplace integration, so we had to build it from scratch. As a result, it has been somewhat difficult for this particular use case, but the data is available and we are able to correlate it with users, not necessarily with endpoints, but we are making progress.

We often experience interruptions to our investigations in SentinelOne Singularity Complete. It would be helpful if we could resume our search query from where we left off, even if we lose internet connectivity or the platform is caching results. This would reduce our MTTR by eliminating the need to wait for the platform to load results again. We expect some load times due to the amount of data in our environment, but the current load times are too long and sometimes produce no results. We would like to see the overall response time of the platform improved.

One area for improvement would be per-user dashboarding. This may be a permissions issue, but we currently only have organization-wide dashboards. I think per-user dashboards would be beneficial because they would allow users to focus on their specific investigations. For example, when a user opens Singularity Complete, they can see a dashboard that is tailored to their current investigation.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for three years.

I would rate the stability of SentinelOne Singularity Complete as a seven out of ten. We have sometimes encountered problems where queries do not load or take an abnormally long time to load, especially when we are narrowing down the search range to a fourteen-day period, which is standard for us. We have also seen queries that run for twenty minutes or so and then log us out. Additionally, the time narrowing feature, or at least the custom time slots, where we can specify a date, such as September 18, may not work depending on how we write the query. We have had to get used to the custom syntax for the time stamps. Finally, we have sometimes seen data that does not update as often as it should.

We have not experienced any problems with scalability. We are able to onboard new machines, and within a day or two, we see more data populate for those machines. So far, scaling has been very helpful for us. This is one of the reasons why we wanted to onboard with Singularity Complete, to get that visibility and to get it right away.

Most of the technical support team members I have spoken to at the level two and level three levels of support have been very helpful and willing to share resources and documents from the help portal and knowledge base articles.

Positive

We previously used IBM Security QRadar but it did not provide the level of data ingestion we required so we switched to SentinelOne Singularity Complete.

We have seen a return on investment from SentinelOne Singularity Complete, based on our reduced time to detect and respond to threats, as well as the overall risk reduction to the organization.

Our organization is very satisfied with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, especially compared to other options available. It is very affordable and easy to license, and it allows us to onboard new analysts quickly, with a turnaround time of one day at most.

We evaluated CrowdStrike, but the way their deployment platform worked would not work for our organization.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete eight out of ten.

We just started using Ranger this week. So far, we've done small test use cases to see what our endpoints can communicate with. Ranger has identified a significant number of machines, including printers, other endpoints, and personal machines, which gives us a better understanding of our network security.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has come a long way. I believe it used to be called Power Query or even Data Set at one time. We're currently using the Skylight portion of Singularity Complete, which is a newer addition. Compared to where it was, Singularity Complete is now leaps and bounds ahead. It's the product we use when we need a lot of raw data and the ability to customize what we're looking for in our environment. The wealth of information that we get from every endpoint with the Singularity Complete agent installed allows us to create a large number of custom rules and alerts. This saves us a lot of time, especially for our analysts, who no longer have to respond to as many false positive alerts. 

We have a maintenance process in place for our custom rules and alerting. We have a dedicated team of members who are responsible for maintaining these aspects, but overall, we have not encountered any major issues that have impacted our team. A lot of this maintenance does occur outside of office hours.

With SentinelOne Singularity Complete, experiment and use it to its fullest potential, even if a mistake is made. It is a robust platform, so causing any serious damage is unlikely. Some specific features to play around with include custom roles, alerting, fields, power queries, search queries, data retention, and customized displays for the analysts. Tailoring the platform to specific needs will help get the most out of it. Singularity Complete collects a lot of data, so make sure to parse and categorize it in the most efficient way for the organization.

We have deployed SentinelOne Singularity on each end-user machine, as well as on the majority of our servers, utilizing it as an antivirus solution. Additionally, we employ SentinelOne Vigilance for our Security Operations Center. Moreover, we extensively utilize this solution across all our machines for tasks such as inventory control, asset tracking, and software monitoring. Furthermore, we have incorporated Ranger AD to enhance security within our active directory setup.

We use Ranger and Ranger AD. We incorporate the data from our SentinelOne Singularity into our SIEM. Moreover, in terms of Ranger, they are both accessible through the same console. When I click, the information is readily available. It's quite straightforward. Furthermore, concerning the transmission of logs to our SIEM, I don't believe we've ever encountered any problems with the initial setup or ongoing functionality.

Ranger offers visibility into our network and assets, which is quite significant. While other tools are available, having this functionality integrated is advantageous since we have it incorporated into a couple of our tools. This covers everything from our switches onward; although there are different options available, Ranger stands out because we are already using Singularity for other purposes. Hence, having it included is beneficial. While it may not be a decisive feature, it's something we always keep enabled.

It is important that Ranger does not necessitate new agents, hardware, or network changes. The fact that it's present, and functions seamlessly, alleviates any need for concern on my part. Furthermore, it effectively identifies new elements.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has helped improve our response time. In areas where we don't have twenty-four-seven support, VigilanceOne will take over. We use VigilanceOne through SentinelOne, and it ensures constant monitoring. This makes me feel more at ease, knowing that there's continuous surveillance. With the addition of Ranger, Ranger AD, and VigilanceOne, I believe we have gained better insight into our entire network. This combination offers us an added layer of comfort.

It has helped reduce our MTTD and MTTR.

It has helped reduce our risk overall.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is exceptionally proficient at alerting and identifying any anomalies or unusual behaviors on the machines. While we do encounter false positives, it has successfully detected several instances of malicious activities on the machines. Having the capability to gain insights across our network, observe all our machines, and have a centralized view of what's protected and where things are is incredibly advantageous.

The process of uninstalling and reinstalling older agent updates needs improvement. I am aware that the newer versions of SentinelOne that they have been working on are more effective. One of our major frustrations arises when we attempt to remove SentinelOne Singularity Complete from a machine and it only partially uninstalls.

The initial tier of support, when we call or engage with them in conversation, assigns a representative to assist us. However, we have occasionally encountered difficulties with the initial person, either due to their lack of knowledge or failure to follow through. In such cases, we have had to seek assistance from others or navigate through basic support on our own. Despite this, it appears that everything is progressing in the right direction. This is why we chose to renew our contract with them and even expand our range of products with their company.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for three years.

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.

I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

My feelings are moderate towards the technical support.

Neutral

We had Sophos Intercept X Advanced Cloud Security initially. We had acquired all these tools through a different program. Despite having these tools, a virus managed to get through and bypass all our defenses. This is why we opted for SentinelOne Singularity Complete – we wanted to test the effectiveness of the AI-based approach compared to the traditional signature-based method.

The initial setup was quite straightforward. During the initial phases of deployment, we had a couple of helpful individuals assisting us with the solution deployment, which resulted in a relatively smooth process.

The deployment was carried out by two administrators collaborating with one or two individuals from SentinelOne. Subsequently, we needed to initiate the installation and verify the installs. Consequently, I assembled a team of technicians for this task as well. To be specific, there were around two administrators and possibly four to six technicians dedicated to checking and ensuring the proper functionality of the setup. This was necessary due to the replacement of the old solution across twelve hundred machines within a limited timeframe.

The implementation was completed in-house.

I believe that the current pricing and licensing structure is fair. While it may not be a budget-friendly solution, I think it's reasonable considering what we are receiving.

We evaluated other solutions through online research, but we were recommended SentinelOne Singularity Complete by a company with which we were collaborating. Since the solution performed effectively during our cleanup process, we decided to continue using it.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete a nine out of ten.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has matured over the last two years and is a more complete product.

Moderate maintenance is required to keep up with the end users.

I do consider SentinelOne a partner. I do believe that their program is developing, but I wouldn't use them for all purposes everywhere. This is due to my mindset. Nonetheless, I do perceive that SentinelOne is increasingly becoming more of a partner.

We use it for endpoint security for all of the systems in our environment. We have servers and workstations. We have macOS and Linux operating systems, and we are using it as an EDR/endpoint protection platform.

There is a lot of improvement from a security maturity perspective. Even though we have a very reputable and well-known SIEM, one of our go-to applications in our environment is SentinelOne. On a daily basis, almost all my staff or my analysts use it and operate it every day. It gives us a lot of information and a lot of data about what is going on. In addition to the detections, we are able to use and leverage Binary Vault. We could also use Remote Script Orchestration, which is an add-on that we could add to the platform. It allows us other functionalities that we would not normally have with another product in the same category. It allows us to run scripts on endpoints remotely out of the SentinelOne administrative GUI, which we use for all kinds of purposes. It has improved our abilities significantly in what we can do.

We have visibility into all our systems. We have visibility into malware or any suspicious activities that are occurring. We have the ability to quarantine systems based on the risks. If there is something going on, we have the ability to do that. We can also run remote scripts on systems, and we can control certain types of devices such as USB access. We have the ability to control what people can do with USBs. That is another functionality we use.

Most traditional antivirus platforms are very basic in terms of how you add exclusions. Usually, you completely exclude an application from detection. They do not provide you with various modes or various levels of visibility into an application. SentinelOne provides different levels of visibility, so you can have a level that has some visibility and does not completely make the application invisible to SentinelOne. It is the first platform that I have ever worked on with such capability. Instead of just a binary exclusion on or exclusion off, they provide different interoperability modes. There are five interoperability modes. Some are performance-focused, and some are visibility-focused. They allow you to select the mode that will give you the best balance of visibility and performance depending on the application. It is very handy. Most endpoint security platforms, antivirus, and EDRs are binary. You apply the exclusion and have zero visibility into what that particular application is doing in your environment. With SentinelOne, you can implicitly trust, or you have the ability to say that you trust it, but you want to have an eye on it if anything ever happens. For example, your third-party software is compromised, as happened with SolarWinds, and it starts doing funny things in your environment. That is what the interoperability exclusions give you with SentinelOne. This is an excellent feature.

In terms of its ability to ingest and correlate across our security solutions, they have recently added the Singularity marketplace in XDR. Not all of them but most of them are included in the license. We do leverage it. It gives us additional context. For example, we were able to add the VirusTotal API, which adds the context of what VirusTotal has in terms of information on a particular detection or binary that is detected in SentinelOne. They are starting to build those APIs out. We are able to add more context from other third-party applications. It is excellent. It is at no cost to us. We are using quite a few of them already for other platforms that are built out of the box. We are starting to leverage any out-of-the-box APIs for the platforms that we have.

It has helped us with a little bit of consolidation. We were able to consolidate the device control. We were using another platform for that. We had another completely separate vendor for USB control, and now, we have decided to not renew that license and move all the controls through SentinelOne.

It has not helped reduce alerts. The point is not to reduce alerts. It is to increase alerts. The point of Singularity is to reduce incidents, and, we for sure, have achieved that. The point of the Singularity platform is to block things that we do not want to occur in our environment or at least have visibility to them so that we can take action. If we were to strip it out completely, the organization would be in a much worse place.

It has helped free up our staff for other projects and tasks because the incident response has diminished. I do not have my analysts responding to threats. I have them just validating when something is detected to ensure that we are okay. For sure, it has freed them up. There are about 25% of time savings.

It has reduced our mean time to respond (MTTR). Without it, we would not have very much visibility into detections. It has improved our mean time to detect by 80% to 90%. If we did not have Singularity Complete, we would have very little visibility on the endpoints at least, and that is where most of our threats are occurring.

We have a service from SentinelOne called Vigilance. This service has reduced our mean time to react or respond. This 24/7 service has improved our mean time to respond significantly because it is the SentinelOne analysts who are responding. It has improved our mean time to respond by 80% because they are performing the analysis. They are the experts, and they are looking at the detection in our console. We do not have to go out and try to perform that same level of understanding of what we have just seen. Their experts take a look at that. Instead of spending hours and hours trying to figure out what we are seeing, it is literally down to just minutes by the Vigilance team. It is a separate license that we have incorporated with our Singularity license. It is a part of their MDR solution. It is a service they offer.

It has overall reduced our organizational risk.

The EDR functionality of the platform is what we use the most. That was the primary reason why we got SentinelOne. That is what we use the most in terms of functionality.

The ease of use can be better in Deep Visibility. It is not always the easiest. If I have not been in there in the Deep Visibility module for a long time, I do not always find it that easy to use. I tend to go and have to consult the help quite often if I have not been in there a long time. I am not a primary user of the application, so I do not always find it second nature to go in there and gather information. It could be a little easier. 

We have been using this solution for four years.

Its stability is next to nothing. It probably has an uptime of 99.99%. The only issue you would have is that the agent sometimes becomes unresponsive or corrupt, but there is not a single application in the world where you do not have some level of corruption or issues that may arise. If anything, it is much better than the others that we have.

It is very scalable. We have doubled the number of licenses or agents we have had in the last three years, and we have not had any issues.

They are excellent when it comes to interoperability and exclusions. For example, you may have somebody in your environment complaining about slowness, or you may have several situations where end-users may report that a certain application has been slow on their computer. SentinelOne gives you the ability to remotely pull the logs off a computer and send the logs to tech support for them to perform an analysis. They can perform their analysis from the logs and come back to you and say, "From what we are seeing, it looks like you have an application running application ABC that seems to require an exclusion. We recommend this interoperability type." All you have to do is say, "Oh, perfect. Thank you very much for that information. Add the exclusion." They have done all the analysis for you. You check back with your end-user to see if that has rectified the situation. In almost every circumstance that we have run into, it got rectified. I have never seen that type of analysis performed by an EDR or endpoint protection provider before. It is the first time I have seen that. This aspect of their support is excellent. However, some of the other things are not always detailed enough in terms of what we should be doing. They can be a bit vague, and if it does not help the situation, they may have to raise the issue to a different tier. So, they can be a little vague about exactly what you should do, but at least they set you on the right path. Overall, I would rate them an eight out of ten.

Positive

It was a product by Carbon Black called Carbon Black Response and Carbon Black Defense. We switched because Carbon Black was purchased by VMware at the time, and their customer service was diminishing substantially. Some of the older products that we still had by Carbon Black were not being supported as well as they were previously. Their technology roadmap was not fantastic. We started looking at other products. We found CrowdStrike and SentinelOne to be more up-to-date and more modern EDR solutions. We saw a noticeable improvement in terms of technology and detection. At the time, SentinelOne was priding itself on the level of number of detections it could detect. A lot of that came into the reviews of the product at the time and the type of tests that it was undergoing and its performance in those tests. That was a primary reason for deciding to go with SentinelOne and going away from Carbon Black. Pricing was another excellent aspect of the platform.

They host the platform in the cloud. It is a SaaS application for us.

Its deployment was extremely straightforward. All you have to do is deploy their agents on your computers. The agent checks in with your cloud console, and you start retrieving information immediately. Carbon Black Defense has that capability as well, but we went with SentinelOne because it did have that cloud capability. When COVID hit, and everybody left the office to go home to work, it was seamless for us. We have full visibility into every single system and asset in the organization whether they are on-premises or off-premises. They could be traveling. They could be anywhere in the world. As long as they have Internet connectivity, we have full visibility into their computers.

In terms of maintenance, the only maintenance that is required is to maintain the health of the agents. Sometimes the agents can become corrupt or stop functioning, so you have to ensure that you are checking for assets in which you run into those situations. The other thing would be the agent versions. You have to maintain agent versions as new versions of the agents come out. You can either automate it so that your agents get updated automatically on whatever schedule that you want, or you can do it manually. You can also do it through some other software deployment platform. That is the only thing you have to do maintenance on. The backend is all maintained by SentinelOne. All the updates to the console environment are taken care of by SentinelOne. Because it is a SaaS application, the only thing that the customer is responsible for is the agent deployment and upgrades.

We worked directly with the SentinelOne team. From our side, there were two of us. From their side, there was probably just one engineer.

It has helped our organization save costs. In terms of metrics, I can only go by what other competitors were charging at the time, and we got it at a significantly better price than what some of the other competitors were charging.

The ROI is not just from the platform itself. It is also from the Vigilance service perspective that has freed up my guys to do many other things. It saves my analysts at least two to three hours per day in man-hours, so there is a huge return on investment there. For the price that the service costs, it is extremely good value.

Their pricing was extremely competitive. That is why we stayed with them so long. We are renewing at the end of next month. We have already put in the approval. It is all set to go. We are renewing for another year or so year over year. It has been a very effective product, and it has been priced very competitively.

To someone who is researching Singularity Complete, I would say that it is excellent in terms of quality and maturity.

I would advise performing an extensive proof of concept. If you have the ability to use a security tool validation platform to test out multiple platforms before choosing one, that would be a good idea. You should also understand various modules that are add-ons to the platform. It is extremely important.

I have used the Ranger functionality, and I am very familiar with it. It provides network and asset visibility. You can configure the agent to scan the subnet that it sits on and look for other assets that are missing the SentinelOne agent. You can create a policy saying that if a device sits on a specific subnet and has, for example, more than five systems, try to interrogate those systems to see if they are the systems that may be eligible for the SentinelOne agent but are missing one. We did not renew the license for that specific functionality of SentinelOne about a year ago. We decided to go with another vendor to give us that type of visibility.

Overall, I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete a nine out of ten.

The whole purpose of having the product is to have endpoint security and visibility with those endpoints as well. After an evaluation period, we determined the product would be a fit for our organization.

The security and visibility we have on all endpoints helped our organization immensely.

There's not one particular item that stands out the most besides the availability of the product itself. We're a small organization. Having the visibility and the protection that it provides helped out greatly. Plus, it fits with our requirements.

The product does not have to go across a lot of different solutions. We don't have a cloud or anything like that where we have to push it in terms of visibility. The deployment is fairly simple. In the end, the overall visibility of it is very simple and the usability has been very simple for us as well.

So far, it helped to reduce our alerts. Based on the application that we would utilize prior to this product, the alert reduction is similar. It is not 100% the same, just similar. They gave us some visibility into what was going on, which provided a 30%, if not more, alert reduction.

It helped free up staff time. Using this solution, we don't have to keep our eyes on it 100% of the time.

It reduced our mean time to detect and respond. 

The product helped reduce organizational risk.

The overall product quality is good. I'd give it three and a half stars out of five. It checked all of our boxes. It met the requirements of the security we needed.

If for some reason, we were breached, it gave us the comfort of knowing that we could either automatically set the product to fix the issue or at least record it and let our team go in and resolve the issue. However, it also has the data to hunt the threat if need be. It's given us so much more than we would have expected from a product. Their dashboard is great. We log in and we get everything we need to know right out of the box on our dashboard. If we have anything that's infected it will tell us all of that information in real time. In our environment, it works without giving us any issues or slowing down our productivity in the process. The agent that runs on the system is not heavy. It's easily portable.

Initially, when we first deployed the solution, it caused some third-party connectivity issues. It would see it as an application that was not secure. However, we were able to put in a white listing, to help us operate well. We had to do that with around five applications that we ran. Once we applied those fixes, we haven't had any issues since.

I'd like them to make it easier to log in. 

I've been using the solution for 4 years. 

I have not experienced any downtime with it. It has not crashed. 

It won't run on our accounting server, and we're not sure why the agent caused the conflict with this particular server. Beyond that, it's fine.

****Update: This has been resolved since this review

We deployed the solution to about 200 endpoints. 

We've only contacted technical support for the licensing portion of the process. They were very helpful and very straightforward. Everything was right on the money. Once we made the call over the ticket, we were contacted and it was resolved while we were on the phone.

Positive

We used Fortinet as well. We've used a few products and this solution does everything we've asked it to do. It was a good replacement for the free Fortinet solution and it protects against things Fortinet does not. 

In the past, for some reason, we found that somehow or another, the agent was disabled, and we have not determined as to why that is just yet. 

I was involved in the solution's initial deployment.

The deployment was fairly easy. We had a product that allowed us to push the agents out there. It was time-consuming based on the fact that we didn't have full automation. The only other drawback was when it was going through and doing some form of machine learning, it would block certain applications that we had to whitelist with the system in order to get it to work. However, we deployed it in less than thirty days, and it's been running everything well since then.

Our team, comprised of four people, handled the implementation. 

There isn't really any maintenance needed. All the agents update well. It is fairly automated.

The initial onboarding was done with SentinelOne. After that, we took it from there.

The pricing is good. It's a big factor for us. Their pricing comes in much less than Fortinet or CrowdStrike.

We looked at similar products, such as CrowdStrike and other versions of Fortinet.

I'd rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I'd advise new users to do a proof of concept. That way, you get some time with the system before you deploy it into the environment, and you can iron out issues. If you have 1,000 endpoints and only 1% of the issues that we ran into, it would still be significant, and you'd want to deal with them head-on to make the full deployment easier. 

We utilize SentinelOne Singularity Complete to manage the endpoints, including workstations on both Windows and Mac platforms. This enables us to detect any anomalous behavior and threats on these workstations. Essentially, it empowers us to safeguard our enterprise, effectively replacing our conventional antivirus solution.

We aimed to bolster our security and achieve more comprehensive coverage, which is why we adopted SentinelOne Singularity Complete.

Singularity Complete's interoperability with third-party tools is good. The integration with the Singularity AI-SIEM platform enables us to collect logs from various other platforms and consolidate them into a single console. This greatly facilitates swift issue diagnosis and identification, making it an advantageous perspective.

We have recently begun using the ingestion and correlation functionalities of Singularity Complete. Currently, we are in the process of integrating it with our existing networking equipment, namely Palo Alto and Fortinet. Our objective is to ingest specific data from these sources and derive meaningful insights from the collected information. The integration processes are quite straightforward and user-friendly. It seems that any challenges we are facing might be attributed to configuration issues on our side, which we need to improve upon.

Singularity Complete has assisted us in consolidating our security solutions. With Singularity Complete, we now have a centralized platform for monitoring alarms. We are gradually phasing out the other solutions we had in place.

It has enabled us to gain more confidence and autonomy. The solution is comprehensive as it effectively manages both workstations and threats. Consequently, it significantly reduces the burden of dealing with operational issues and reacting to problems. This approach eliminates the need for excessive proactivity, as we trust the platform to handle these tasks on our behalf. Thus, we no longer need to spend time searching for threats, as the platform efficiently performs this task for us.

It helped reduce false positives. We fine-tuned the solution by creating some exclusions that have reduced the number of alerts.

Singularity Complete has freed up two to three hours per week of our staff's time to work on other projects and tasks.

Singularity Complete has reduced our MTTD by around five hours and has reduced our MTTR by around three hours on average.

It has indirectly helped save costs because we spend less time having to deal with configuration and proactively configuring alarms and alerts.

Singularity Complete has reduced our organizational risk by around 40 percent.

It is now a toss up between the AI-SIEM platform and the the rollback feature. There were instances when some workstations detected infections, and having the rollback feature proved to be incredibly valuable.

Native integration with the mobile console is an area that can be improved.

I'd like to see more operations with the XDR platform.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for one year.

I would rate the stability of Singularity Complete a ten out of ten.

I would rate the scalability of Singularity Complete a nine out of ten.

The technical support is of high quality, strong, and responsive.

Positive

We previously used ESET but we were often missing threats and not finding out until after the fact.

The initial setup is straightforward. We collected several samples for each department, and subsequently, we distributed them to ensure their functionality among the users in different departments. After conducting the necessary tests, we proceeded to implement the final version.

Two individuals were engaged in the deployment: a Cyber Hunter and an administrator.

The implementation was completed in-house.

We have observed a return on investment through the time saved managing our workstations and addressing threats. This has provided us with additional time to dedicate to operational projects.

The pricing was very similar in terms of its competitors, but I believe SentinelOne's capability and willingness to attract new business allowed us to save some extra money. I think the pricing aligns well with the market. They encountered competition, so their pricing was slightly more adaptable. That's where we gained an advantage from it.

We evaluated CrowdStrike and Microsoft Defender. We didn't find microsoft Defender to be a strong enough technology. CrowdStrike was more expensive, while SentinelOne offered a combination of good technology and affordability.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete ten out of ten.

SentinelOne is ahead of the curve. They are certainly leading the way. When we consider the kinds of integrations being developed and the AI integrated into the platform, it's evident that they are the latest entrants to the market. This current position enables them to be more innovative in their approach.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is extremely mature at this level.

We have 50 end users based out of multiple locations. A lot of our users work from home. Singularity Complete is deployed on laptops, workstations, and our servers.

The maintenance is minimal and is overseen by one person.

We're very satisfied with SentinelOne as a strategic partner. They've given us what we need, and we see a long-term future relationship with them.

Planning the rollout is crucial because we need to effectively manage the changes with the users. Therefore, meticulous planning of the rollout, organized by department, ensures a seamless transition and allows us to anticipate any potential issues. Adopting a staggered approach, rolling it out per department, is likely the most effective strategy for deploying Singularity Complete.