Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Andrey Naumov - PeerSpot reviewer
System Administrator at Craft Group
Real User
Made it possible to deploy a new infrastructure in the shortest amount of time and at a low cost without purchasing expensive hardware storage
Pros and Cons
  • "It has a nice, simple control panel. You can clearly see the state and health of storage along with the synchronization."
  • "This solution made it possible to deploy a new infrastructure in the shortest amount of time, at a low cost without purchasing expensive hardware storage, and use unused servers."
  • "In the next release, they could make some graphs of the real-time loading, speed of storage, and interfaces. Of course, these can be viewed in other places. But, in the event of a malfunction or troubleshooting, this would be convenient."

What is our primary use case?

We needed to deploy the new infrastructure in our new data center as soon as possible. As a reliable, fault-tolerant storage, we chose StarWind solution. I took two old Supermicro servers and installed them in RAID controllers and SSD drives, then installed Windows Server 2012 R2 with the Hyper-V role. Then, I made StarWind the two-node iSCSI target. The servers were connected to the VMware cluster via the iSCSI 10 GbE interfaces. The storage showed very good speed results with SQL databases, file servers, and MS Exchange, which completely satisfied us.

How has it helped my organization?

This solution made it possible to deploy a new infrastructure in the shortest amount of time, at a low cost without purchasing expensive hardware storage, and use unused servers. As a result, we got a reliable fault-tolerant storage with good performance and placed virtual machines that are important for business on it. This solution has been working for several months without a single failure. 

What is most valuable?

It has a nice, simple control panel. You can clearly see the state and health of storage along with the synchronization. 

StarWind installs on the Windows Server host where I can monitor RAID using various software already installed in my organization. 

  • Easy to install and configure.  
  • A lot of documentation, video instructions, and excellent technical support. 
  • The ability to install on almost any type of equipment, including legacy. 
  • Fast delivery compared to hardware storage facilities, which have a delivery time of four to six weeks.

What needs improvement?

I would like to see all the network adapters in the console with their assigned roles as sync, Heartbeat, and iSCSI, then their link speeds and real-time loading.

In the next release, they could make some graphs of the real-time loading, speed of storage, and interfaces. Of course, these can be viewed in other places. But, in the event of a malfunction or troubleshooting, this would be convenient.

Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
September 2025
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
869,883 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

Three months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

For three months, there has not been a single failure. Testing was performed and restarting one server did not affect the performance of the storage and important virtual machines.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I didn't have that task.

How are customer service and support?

They are very friendly and have quick support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No, I haven't used such solutions before.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

I installed everything myself. Later, the technical support connected with me and to the servers to inspect the installation.

What was our ROI?

This is the best priced solution for an SMB.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This is a very good solution for small businesses.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also considered the option of VMware vSAN, but it is very expensive.

What other advice do I have?

Everything works. I am completely satisfied with the reliability and speed.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1296921 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a pharma/biotech company
Real User
Cost-effective, easy to implement, and the technical support is good
Pros and Cons
  • "It has given the company an almost zero possibility of downtime."
  • "New versions of this solution should be tested more thoroughly before the release as we had a few problems with one version due to a bug."

What is our primary use case?

We have a fault-tolerant infrastructure, consisting of two storage nodes hosting the VM's storage and two Hyper-V nodes.

How has it helped my organization?

It has given the company an almost zero possibility of downtime.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are:

  1. Easy implementation
  2. Great Support
  3. It doesn’t break the bank

What needs improvement?

New versions of this solution should be tested more thoroughly before the release, as we had a few problems with one version due to a bug.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for four years.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
September 2025
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
869,883 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Head of Software Development Department at Everest
Real User
Top 20
Reliable, cost-effective, and offers high performance replication for redundancy in clusters
Pros and Cons
  • "StarWind vSAN is a great solution to create a redundant two-node-only Hyper-V cluster, both for domain or workgroup scenarios."
  • "Being able to run StarWind vSAN on top of any free UNIX operating system to build a resilient iSCSI/FTP/SMB storage system would be useful."

What is our primary use case?

Our company, an IT integrator in Ukraine, conducted a pilot deployment of five two-node Hyper-V failover clusters with CSV build with VSAN for Microsoft Hyper-V. Each cluster consisted of only two hardware nodes with redundant 10Gb/s direct DAC links (no switch) and 1Gb/s uplinks. After four months of testing, we have no doubt in using this exact solution in our customer’s production environment.

We are going to deploy three similar installations this year. Also, we are planning to test the new VSAN for VMware vSphere.

How has it helped my organization?

Being able to create reliable virtual environments with less hardware and no need to pay for expensive enterprise or datacenter grade software. This expends our portfolio with a solution for those customers with low budgets and a lack of highly qualified administrators.  

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are:

  • Clear licensing model;
  • Rich PowerShell integration for scripting and testing;
  • No need for RAID controller-level mirroring and BBU. Thus we significantly increase effective storage space and speed;
  • Great synchronous replication speed in addition to RAM volume cache;
  • Reliable failover solution with MPIO which requires just two servers running Windows Server 2019, Standard edition.

What needs improvement?

If we could get more within its price, it would be useful to:

  • Be able to collect operational logs with external dedicated syslog or SNMP servers;
  • Be able to encrypt separate LUNs/iSCSI targets with a key stored on external KMS/KMIP servers;
  • Being able to run StarWind vSAN on top of any free UNIX operating system to build a resilient iSCSI/FTP/SMB storage system would be useful.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for four months.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, we had to use Storage Spaces Direct or VMware vSAN for similar projects. Those two are worth mentioning, but they are more expensive and have a larger administrative footprint.  

How was the initial setup?

Fast and simple installation using GUI with all required manuals, video guides, and a great support team explaining every step of a process. There is no need for highly qualified professionals.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost, including OPEX, is lower compared to other solutions.

What other advice do I have?

StarWind vSAN is a great solution to create a redundant two-node-only Hyper-V cluster, both for domain or workgroup scenarios.

You should be totally sure to avoid "split brain" in a two-node clustering with a redundant heartbeat, but without any external witness/arbitrator it is not against the solution`s concept.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1253883 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Network Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Easy to set up and use fault-tolerant volumes that give us peace of mind
Pros and Cons
  • "We have experienced multiple hardware failures at one site and the fault-tolerant volume worked exactly as expected with zero downtime."
  • "If there was one feature I would like to see it would be a built-in subsystem for managing UPS backups shutdown procedures providing a way to initiate VM shutdown on all host servers, shut down the host servers, then put the fault-tolerant mirroring in standby, and finally shut down the StarWind SANs."

What is our primary use case?

We have set up a dual StarWind SAN with a fault-tolerant volume for our critical virtual servers in addition to some non-fault-tolerant volumes for less critical virtual servers in both our corporate HQ and one of our large divisions. The corporate site is using Hyper-V and the other division using VMware ESX. Between the two sites we have 15+ physical servers with over 150 VMs running.

Our corporate site uses Dell servers w/SAS drives for the two StarWind nodes and the division site built two white box type servers using NAS-specific SATA drives. Both solutions have been outstanding.

How has it helped my organization?

The StarWind SAN solution has provided numerous benefits to our organization. First of all, the fault-tolerant volume has saved us twice from hardware failures maintaining the volume without any loss of service or data. In addition, having a centralized SAN has provided outstanding flexibility to our virtual infrastructure. Setup and management of the system are very easy and customer support has always been very responsive and thorough. Management of the StarWind system is mostly non-existent because once it is set up, it just runs.

What is most valuable?

The fault-tolerant volume has been wonderful and provides peace of mind. We have experienced multiple hardware failures at one site and the fault-tolerant volume worked exactly as expected with zero downtime. I really appreciate how easy it is to use the software and set up a fault-tolerant volume.

What needs improvement?

If there was one feature I would like to see it would be a built-in subsystem for managing UPS backups shutdown procedures providing a way to initiate VM shutdown on all host servers, shut down the host servers, then put the fault-tolerant mirroring in standby, and finally shut down the StarWind SANs. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for more than six years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability has been rock solid. The only failures we have experienced have been in hardware, and the fault-tolerant volume worked exactly as expected.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is great.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer service has always been excellent. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used Openfiler then moved to Open-E, and finally Starwind. I would highly recommend StarWind and have in many cases, including for our corporate HQ when we were acquired.

How was the initial setup?

Setup was easy and support is always helpful with any questions or even to walk you through the setup if you are a novice. 

What about the implementation team?

We implemented using our in-house IT.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before we purchased StarWind, we evaluated several software solutions and a couple of hardware solutions. In the case of the software solutions, StarWind was the clear winner in performance and ease of use. In comparison to the hardware solutions, it was a lot more economical.

We fully evaluated Open-E and StarWind. StarWind was both easier to set up and manage, and it also outperformed Open-E.

What other advice do I have?

StarWind has been an excellent solution for our virtual storage needs. There are features like remote replication that we don't currently use but could provide excellent disaster recovery for a remote site.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Director of Technical Sales at SSTL Group
Real User
Easy to install and maintain, has good dashboards and good performance
Pros and Cons
  • "A typical system administrator with minimal experience in Hyper-V, VMware, or Windows can do VSAN configuration and maintain VSAN operations."
  • "This solution should be more self-sufficient, running without creating domains or failover clusters."

What is our primary use case?

I started using this product when I had challenges with failover as one of the requirements for my client. I had to deploy the failover environment but the challenge was mirroring of the servers.

Now that I have implemented StarWind, everything is running perfectly.

How has it helped my organization?

The product I had bought for the client mirrors from one server to another. This means that an application installed on server A can still be accessed on server B. In my case, I had an access control system installed in one server but mirrored on the other server.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are easy installation, the appearance of the dashboard, the software runs as a native hypervisor component or in VM, and it does not require any deep storage and network administration or UNIX management skills.

A typical system administrator with minimal experience in Hyper-V, VMware, or Windows can do VSAN configuration and maintain VSAN operations.

What needs improvement?

This solution should be more self-sufficient, running without creating domains or failover clusters.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for three months

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The system is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Performance is uncompromised by the minimalistic hardware footprint, as well as the reduced deployment and management costs. StarWind VSAN brings to the table server-side flash and memory caches, log-structuring, and an absolutely minimalistic I/O path. The resulting performance is unmatched by either typical virtual appliances or physical shared storage.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not use another solution prior to this one.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was easy and step-by-step, following the manuals.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licensing is easy and the whole package is cost-effective.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I was directly recommended by the manufacturer.

What other advice do I have?

For now, StarWind has satisfied my needs, as my requirement was to create a failover environment for the servers, also allowing the system to run with less administration. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1244424 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Systems and Security at a wellness & fitness company with 11-50 employees
Real User
High availability that is cost-effective, easy to implement, and has good support
Pros and Cons
  • "It allows me to configure High Availability and failover clustering with some fault tolerance, at a cost point that doesn’t break the bank for a small business budget."
  • "I would like to see some additional, and possibly clearer, implementation videos with some slower and possibly more detailed descriptions of what the various steps of implementation are for someone who is unfamiliar with high availability and failover clustering in Windows."

What is our primary use case?

This solution provides us with high availability and failover with fault tolerance across two nodes. Implementing a highly available environment made way more sense to our company using StarWind’s Virtual SAN than other SAN or virtual SAN solutions we looked into over the past few months.

How has it helped my organization?

It allows me to configure high availability and failover clustering with some fault tolerance, at a cost point that doesn’t break the bank for a small business budget.

Doing failover testing, things have worked pretty flawlessly.

What is most valuable?

The support for two-node implementation was great.

What needs improvement?

I would like to see some additional, and possibly clearer, implementation videos with some slower and possibly more detailed descriptions of what the various steps of implementation are for someone who is unfamiliar with high availability and failover clustering in Windows.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for two months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a very stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is excellent.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support team is very knowledgeable.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not use another solution prior to this one.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

I was able to implement this configuration following a couple of online guides from StarWind and a couple of third-party articles. I also had the StarWind support team available to me if/when I had any issues.

What about the implementation team?

We implement this solution in-house.

What was our ROI?

Within days, maybe weeks. How much is uptime worth?

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There are two tiers of support and in my opinion, support is worth the cost.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not evaluate other products before choosing this one.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for anybody who is considering this solution is to give it a try.

Implementing a UPS along with it is a good idea.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Computer Engineer at Savronik Electronic
Real User
Fast integration, cost-effective, and excellent support
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of this solution is the support. They are excellent and you can learn a lot from the support team."
  • "I wish there was online support because email return takes a long time and a faster solution should be found."

What is our primary use case?

We tried StarWind because the other solutions we tried were not doing enough, and the performance of this solution was very good. The price is cheaper than other solutions. The physical server was very useful to set up a designer virtual server. 

How has it helped my organization?

This solution has given us real-time synchronization to make sure we don't have a single point of failure. Our company works seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day, and doesn't have the time to cut the production infrastructure.

The StarWind solution, in conjunction with our backup and disaster recovery strategy, provides improved performance and resilience. 

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of this solution is the support. They are excellent and you can learn a lot from the support team.

We have benefited a lot from its fast integration.

What needs improvement?

I wish there was online support because email return takes a long time and a faster solution should be found.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for less than six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have been using the product for a short time but have not seen any glitches.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The drives have been resized. This caused the loss of data and we noticed that you need a third-party vehicle. StarWind Training could do this. Scalability was very good in this respect.

How was the initial setup?

Installation is not too complicated, but there should be more auxiliary resources. We used virtual and physical servers in the application. We have created a large number of virtual servers.

It took about three months from placing the order to fully up and running.

What about the implementation team?

The StarWind team can do the installation together and help. You learn a lot from the support team. The installation takes a long time but the result is excellent.

What was our ROI?

Even though we got rid of our SAN, we are still getting higher performance for significantly less outlay, dollar-wise. It is more efficient on the management side. The technical advice and support is quite good.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price is more affordable than other solutions. The product is excellent in value and benefit.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, the Starwind software, support, and implementation was great. I would highly recommend it.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Google
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Works at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Consolidated storage with automatic host synchronization
Pros and Cons
  • "It has allowed me to effectively and confidently manage the maintenance of hosts where I can power off a host and have its VMs migrate to another one."
  • "The product can include a more simple way of synchronization after a forced shutdown as the current process has a few more steps to check that hosts have synchronized and this can be automated."

What is our primary use case?

The solution provided me the ability to share storage between three physical VMware hosts in my environment. Hence, I have HA for my VMs to move across hosts once they are stored on the vSAN using VMotion. Moreover, I am able to utilize the storage I already have on servers and save the expense of purchasing a new storage appliance.

How has it helped my organization?

It has allowed me to effectively and confidently manage the maintenance of hosts where I can power off a host and have its VMs migrate to another one.

Also, in having the same storage shared between hosts I can have at least one host storing all of the VMs for my cluster.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of this solution are as follows:

  • Consolidated storage among all three hosts
  • Synchronization of data between hosts
  • Using VMware VMotion
  • Incorporating HA in VMware
  • Management tools available to manage box
  • Email alerts if there are any problems with managed storage
  • Excellent support

What needs improvement?

The product can include a more simple way of synchronization after a forced shutdown as the current process has a few more steps to check that hosts have synchronized and this can be automated.

The service support should have in its basic plan a chat support 24x7 in addition to email.

How are customer service and technical support?

Support for this solution is excellent.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Andre C A Griffith MSc MBCS MCTS MCP ITIL - PeerSpot reviewer
Andre C A Griffith MSc MBCS MCTS MCP ITILWorks at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User

Very simple VSAN solution for small IT workshops needing a simple enterprise solution like Starwind VSAN providing shared storage without the overheads of purchasing assets and enterprise licensing costs.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: September 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.