Highly available HyperV cluster. Our environment includes 2 Hyper-V hosts with onboard storage running about 20 virtual machines. StarWind allowed for a redundant cluster to be configured without any extra storage and easily create an HA cluster. StarWind Virtual San functions as the primary drivers for all of our storage needs in the highly available cluster. It is used almost daily to allow for live migration of machines and failover in the event of maintenance or physical host hardware problems.
IT Supervisor at Area Agency on Aging Region 9, Inc.
Greatly improved virtual machine reliability and accessibility
Pros and Cons
- "Highly available storage is the most valuable feature. The entire rollout is hyper-converged and requires no extra storage further than the hosts in which Hyper-V is running. Another feature that has been great is the support from StarWind in general. We have their proactive support package on the main cluster that employs Starwind Virtual SAN."
- "StarWind Virtual SAN improved my Hyper-V deployment by making it highly available, was easy to roll out and manage, and has greatly improved virtual machine reliability and accessibility while reducing the stress of hardware problems."
- "Management of VSAN itself could be improved. A Web UI for management would be great rather than an application installation. StarWind is testing a command center virtual appliance that I have installed in my environment."
- "Management of VSAN itself could be improved."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
StarWind Virtual SAN improved my hyper-v deployment by making it highly available. It was easy to roll out and it is easy to manage. It has greatly improved virtual machine reliability and accessibility. Deployment of StarWind Virtual SAN has helped reduce the stress of not having a cluster that would allow for virtual machine failover if a host has a hardware problem. It is reassuring to know that all virtual machines are in a safer environment versus running on standalone hosts with no shared storage.
What is most valuable?
Highly available storage is the most valuable feature. The entire rollout is hyper-converged and requires no extra storage further than the hosts in which Hyper-V is running. Another feature that has been great is the support from StarWind in general. We have their proactive support package on the main cluster that employs Starwind Virtual SAN. The StarWind support team is right on top of all monitoring activities. If I am maintaining a physical host and it has been down for too long, I will get a notice from StarWind to confirm a problem or inform them that maintenance is being performed. They are top-notch.
What needs improvement?
Management of VSAN itself could be improved. A Web UI for management would be great rather than an application installation. StarWind is testing a command center virtual appliance that I have installed in my environment. It is very much a step in the right direction to make StarWind Virtual SAN management easier and even Hyper-V as a whole. Something Hyper-V has lacked for years is a good Web UI to manage a host or cluster. StarWind has taken upon themselves to help with this as well as manage the Virtual SAN in a single pane of glass.
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
July 2026
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
Five Years
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Very stable. I've had little to no problem since rolling it out.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It should be easy to add a host to a cluster once VSAN is installed.
How are customer service and support?
Excellent! 10/10
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No. We used standalone hosts.
How was the initial setup?
Setup is a bit complex but StarWind has great documentation to get setup and a great support team to assist in setup.
What about the implementation team?
Implementation has been done using StarWind support and with an in-house team as we have 2 separate clusters both using StarWind Virtual SAN
What was our ROI?
12-24 months.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Evaluate your solutions. This is a great solution for those user Hyper-V and ready to hyper-converge.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Technical Architect at HSData LTD
Flexible and easy to use with great support
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is also quite flexible. As an example, other vSAN solutions that we looked at had more stringent requirements regarding mixed HDD/SSD storage which wouldn't have worked in our environment."
- "The solution validation session with StarWind engineers was one of the best we have experienced and the vendor has also demonstrated a willingness to create a long-term relationship."
- "The main thing I would like to see improved is the level of documentation."
What is our primary use case?
We needed a reliable shared storage solution for our VMware vSphere Essentials solution so we could implement vMotion and High Availability features. We decided to utilise a vSAN solution to reduce costs after looking at the price of external storage solutions.
In our environment, we have a 3-server VMware vSphere Essentials Plus solution that consists of 16 x HDD and 8 x SDD on-server storage. The solution is attached to 1GB network for production but we also have 10GB network connections available for direct-connectivity between servers.
The StarWind vSAN solution was implemented as a hyper-converged solution meaning that everything runs on the VMware vSphere solution.
How has it helped my organization?
The StarWind vSAN solution was implemented according to our project plan with minimal outages to existing workloads. We have had no issues with the solution and it works very well with minimal administrative effort.
Recently, we had a memory failure that caused one of our VMware servers to crash. Due to the shared storage provided by the StarWind vSAN, all virtual machines on the failed server were able to failover to another server. Our helpdesk didn't receive any user complaints during the time that this happened. Once we resolved the issue, the shared storage resynched itself automatically.
We now have the ability to run critical workloads on the VMware infrastructure and have already proceeded to migrate active directory and SAP Business One workloads onto this platform.
What is most valuable?
We have found the solution surprisingly simple to use. The management console allows us to monitor the solution and we have configured email alerts to alert us about critical issues. These alerts have been proven to work in an actual failure scenario, for example, when we had a memory issue with one of our servers that caused the entire server to crash. The management console also allows us to monitor the solution performance and provides us with access to system logs.
The level of support provided by StarWind both during pre-sales and post-implementation has been excellent. The solution validation session with StarWind engineers was one of the best we have experienced and the vendor has also demonstrated a willingness to create a long-term relationship.
The solution is also quite flexible. As an example, other vSAN solutions that we looked at had more stringent requirements regarding mixed HDD/SSD storage which wouldn't have worked in our environment.
What needs improvement?
The main thing I would like to see improved is the level of documentation. I had some initial difficulties understanding the solution which could have been solved via additional documentation aimed at newcomers to their solution. Although the solution does admittedly have many moving parts, I found that internal knowledge transfer to my peers was not that difficult. Hence I'm convinced that better documentation would have helped.
I would also like to see a better system implemented for obtaining updates for solution components. The system at the moment works on a request/response model.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using this solution since the start of this year (2021).
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution has proven to be reliable with the need for minimal administrative effort. During an actual failure with memory on one of our servers, everything worked exactly as planned. We didn't even receive any issues/complaints from users via our helpdesk.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
During the solution validation session with the vendor, we spoke about benchmarking the product. After performing the recommended tests, we were satisfied that the solution would meet our performance needs (both in terms of storage and networking).
How are customer service and technical support?
We haven't had any issues with the solution so have had no need to request service/technical support. However, our experience during our project makes us believe we are in good hands if we ever need anything in the future.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use a different solution. We initially implemented our VMware vSphere Essentials solution using direct storage and didn't have access to features such as vMotion and high availability. The StarWind vSAN solution allowed us to implement shared storage and pave the way to migrate critical workloads onto the VMware infrastructure.
How was the initial setup?
We complicated the initial setup process a bit because we wanted to perform the design, implementation, and migration ourselves. This led to some difficulties in terms of initially understanding the solution. StarWind helped to fill in the gaps and our implementation and migration went completely to plan with little need for downtime. We were able to implement the solution on two servers while keeping our workloads running on the third server. We then migrated the workloads and built the remaining server.
What about the implementation team?
We wanted to perform the design, implementation, and migration of the solution ourselves. We asked for help where needed during the design stage and found the vendor was very knowledgeable and could quickly answer all of our questions. We performed the implementation ourselves and then conducted a solution validation session with the vendor. During this session, the vendor validated that everything was configured according to their best practices and also performed some advanced tuning. We also had an open-ended discussion about how to operate the system. This solution validation session was one of the best I have ever experienced.
The level of support from the vendor throughout the entire project has been excellent and they have been more than willing to develop a long-term relationship.
What was our ROI?
We were price-sensitive and wanted to minimize expenditure on additional hardware. The ability to utilize vMotion and High Availability features in our VMware infrastructure has already repaid the cost of the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We found the StarWind vSAN solution was cost-effective compared to alternatives. You should talk to the vendor (or a good partner) about your needs because there are some differences in price based on your environment. We also recommend purchasing support.
In our case, we purchased StarWind vSAN for vSphere Essentials Edition which included 1 year of standard annual support and maintenance.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We initially looked at several external shared storage solutions and found them to be cost-prohibitive. We then evaluated vSAN solutions from HPE (this was discontinued) and the native solution from VMware. The native solution from VMware had fewer moving parts than the StarWind vSAN solution, but was more expensive and didn't provide the required level of flexibility that we needed regarding mixed HDD/SDD storage.
What other advice do I have?
We strongly recommend that you develop a good relationship with the vendor (or a good partner). In our experience, they played a key role in the success of the solution.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
July 2026
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Tech Support Manager at National Health Fund
Simple to set up, easy to configure and manage and allows us to achieve storage redundancy
Pros and Cons
- "vSAN we found was simple to set up, easy to configure and manage and allows us to achieve storage redundancy."
- "Using this solution has allowed us to use virtual services to achieve our business objectives."
- "I see no need for major improvements but there could be some improvements in the form of notifications and the simplifying of maintenance mode."
My organization has been using StarWind for about two years.
We use it as a storage solution for our virtual environment.
It is used to provide a High Availability cluster. We found this to be the best option for us as we have a myriad of servers, some applications, some SQL, some web, etc. Using this solution has allowed us to use virtual services to achieve our business objectives
The solutions use span our entire organization. It gives us the ability to use existing hardware in a cost-effective manner.
PROS
vSAN we found was simple to set up, easy to configure and manage and allows us to achieve storage redundancy.
CONS
I see no need for major improvements but there could be some improvements in the form of notifications and the simplifying of maintenance mode.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
CEO at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Extremely flexible, easy to scale, and stable
Pros and Cons
- "The most useful aspect is the hyper-converged SD SAN and the ease to expand it by just adding cheap SSD or NVME disks."
- "The product allows extreme flexibility for SAN and hyperconverged infrastructure."
- "A great feature would be a wizard and to include a new disk in the SAN. At the moment, including a new disk requires several steps - some that must be done at the OS level and others in each node."
What is our primary use case?
There are 2 server clusters with a software-defined SAN. They are Hyper-V Windows 2016 clusters and have been working fine for several years. We are using both NVME and SSD disks with both are working fine with good levels of performance. We provide a SaaS solution hosted in external datacenters in one cluster and the other hosts our internal servers. Starwind replaced a Dell SAN that had failed. The SaaS solution runs on an Oracle database which has had excellent price-performance using Linux in Hyper-V VM.
How has it helped my organization?
The product allows extreme flexibility for SAN and hyperconverged infrastructure. Using Hyper-V combined with Linux VMs has allowed us to scale our solutions with additional clients and client volumes. We have customers using our platform with over 1.3 million accounts. The databases have scaled seamlessly. We now have over 16 TB of disks in our hyperconverged SD-WAN and Starwind has managed them flawlessly. The ability to grow SAN size by just buying more cheap SSDs or NVME disks has been very useful.
What is most valuable?
The most useful aspect is the hyper-converged SD SAN and the ease to expand it by just adding cheap SSD or NVME disks.
What needs improvement?
A great feature would be a wizard and to include a new disk in the SAN. At the moment, including a new disk requires several steps - some that must be done at the OS level and others in each node. We have no more recommendations for the product beyond that.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using the product for over 3 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have had no stability problems whatsoever.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is very scalable. Right now, we have over 16TB of disks.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is always available and helpful
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we used a Dell EMC SAN which was failing.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was supported by Starwind.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did look at DataCore.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Works
Easy to set up, saves us on hardware costs, and gives us improved fault tolerance
Pros and Cons
- "StarWind vSAN has allowed us to leverage our server infrastructure more completely without the need to add more hardware."
- "From what we have implemented, we are not finding any lacking features or issues with our configuration that we would like to see improved."
- "I would like to see options for automated notifications of any changes, including, for example, synchronization issues."
What is our primary use case?
We are running Dell PowerEdge Series as Hyper-V hosts with StarWind providing a virtual SAN infrastructure to allow for CSVs and data replication between the hosts without having to add dedicated storage hardware.
This serves to allow us to have a fault tolerance of suffering not just a drive loss (RAID Configurations on each server allow for that) but it also allows for the loss of an entire server since we are running N+1.
The servers are directly connected to one another using 10GB NICs, allowing for fast connectivity and support for direct wiring. This meant that we did not have to invest in a dedicated 10GB SAN switch, either.
How has it helped my organization?
Prior to the implementation of this solution, our servers were all standalone Hyper-V Hosts. VMs resided on a host and were unable to live migrate or sustain connectivity when a host had a reboot or maintenance item.
StarWind vSAN has allowed us to leverage our server infrastructure more completely without the need to add more hardware.
The failover ability has proven useful already in maintaining connectivity to VMs during a power event that impacted one host. VMs failed over immediately and the data replication brought the downed host back to fully synced status quickly after reboot.
What is most valuable?
The ability to utilize my onboard disk from the Hypervisor hosts, not requiring the purchase of dedicated SAN hardware, SAN switching, etc., is a real cost value.
The replication of data between the hosts that StarWind does also allows us to create redundancy since we are able to operate at an N+1 configuration. This feature allows for much greater fault tolerance than we have had before.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see options for automated notifications of any changes, including, for example, synchronization issues.
For how long have I used the solution?
It has been a few months since we implemented StarWind Virtual SAN.
How are customer service and technical support?
The support team, from implementation to general operating questions, has been an incredible value add and well worth our support contract already.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Not at this employer, but my experience previously does include HP, Dell, EMC, and Nimble hardware-based SAN units.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. StarWind provided good documentation and access to engineers to help guide the process at each step.
What about the implementation team?
StarWind provided guided installation with an engineer. He was quite well prepared and great to work with on the project.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The support contract is well worth it. The price for it was very reasonable and their team has been very engaged whenever we reach out.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did preliminary pricing on HP, Dell & Nimble, but the costs associated with hardware were going to present a challenge to our school at this point.
What other advice do I have?
As of this time, I really do not have a wishlist of features beyond perhaps some automated notifications of any changes, sync issues, etc. That being said, we have not had any operating issues come up that I would have really needed automated alerts for, so this would just be a wish list item.
From what we have implemented, we are not finding any lacking features or issues with our configuration that we would like to see improved. If this changes over time, I would certainly update my opinion, but for what was advertised, we feel like this is a pretty stable product that is meeting its goals.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Technical Department Manager at ACS SA
Cost-effective, high-performance, and good technical support
Pros and Cons
- "High Availability is the best feature of product."
- "This solution has allowed the company to create an HA virtual server environment satisfying budget restrictions and reliability requirements."
- "Maybe in the future, the replication will be supported in more cloud providers."
What is our primary use case?
StarWind VSAN software was easily deployed on the commodity hardware and integrated into the existing IT infrastructure.
We have used in HyperConvergence and Citrix XenServer installations without any problem.
With our customized hardware, we have very good IOPS and throughput.
How has it helped my organization?
This solution has allowed the company to create an HA virtual server environment satisfying budget restrictions and reliability requirements. VM live migration was ensured by StarWind VSAN as well, thanks to building a failover cluster.
The price of StarWind VSAN was another tidbit.
On top of all of this, the StarWind Support Team did everything to ensure that the IT infrastructure was up and running as quickly as possible.
What is most valuable?
High Availability is the best feature of product. You have redundancy of storage systems at a competitive price. All other storage solutions are very expensive and without redundancy and if you have it the price is very high.
Additionally, the feature of asynchronous replication, both for on-site and off-site systems is very competitive. Also the support of LSFS file system is very good.
What needs improvement?
Maybe in the future, the replication will be supported in more cloud providers.
I don't think there are features that this product doesn't have it. It has all of the things that a system engineer will want.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This solution has excellent stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is excellent.
How are customer service and technical support?
In one problem that I with the performance, they gave me a solution very quickly using a remote session.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before our StarWind Virtual SAN (VSAN) deployment, we had NetApp, IBM DS Series, and HP StorageWorks MSA1000 storage systems.
They have low performance and no replication (is very expensive).
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of this solution is straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented this solution in-house.
What was our ROI?
The ROI for this solution is very good.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
This solution has competitive prices and the implementation is very easy.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate other options. We have only classic storage and filers.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend this solution because it gives me flexibility and expandability.
It works like a charm without any problem or concern.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
CEO, Founder at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Cost-effective, fast and helpful support, and offers real-time replication between servers
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features are high availability and real-time replication between two servers."
- "This solution improves many areas in our company including performance, data availability, and data security."
- "The StarWind Management Console is available only for Microsoft Windows/Windows Server, and should also be available for Linux and macOS, as it would reduce implementation costs."
What is our primary use case?
Our hardware is located in one of the largest data centers in the country, where we have high availability services for our company. Our internal systems include VPN, hosting services like website, email, database, DNS, FTP/SFTP, and SMB/CIFS.
Replication is between two servers with SAS and SSD storage, based on Dell servers. Network connectivity is 40GE for data synchronization and1GE for the heartbeat, directly connected.
We are using WMware vSphere as a hypervisor. This solution is highly scalable and cost effective.
How has it helped my organization?
This solution improves many areas in our company including performance, data availability, and data security.
StarWind VSAN allows us to build high availability and real-time replication, even between two servers. It offers multiple scaling and replication capabilities and includes health and performance monitoring tools. For this reason, we can build highly available services for our company, which are currently essential for the organization's activities.
Our current implementation allows us to maintain the company's production continuity and to maintain constant access to data processed by the company.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features are high availability and real-time replication between two servers. StarWind VSAN immediately copies all data to the second server over the 10GE/40GE network to ensure instant failover. Multiple connections can be made for the heartbeat.
What needs improvement?
The StarWind Management Console is available only for Microsoft Windows/Windows Server, and should also be available for Linux and macOS, as it would reduce implementation costs.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This product is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of StarWind Virtual SAN is very good.
How are customer service and technical support?
StarWind support is amazing. They are helpful and respond very quickly.
Support is available via teleconference, as well as online. They not only assist with the selection of the appropriate solution but also, help with testing and production implementation.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use another solution prior to this one.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. It was done via teleconference, which made it very simple.
What about the implementation team?
The vendor team assisted us with deployment using teleconference technology. They have a high level of knowledge and skill.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The StarWind VSAN business model is very cost-effective.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated VMware vSAN and StorMagic.
What other advice do I have?
The StarWind VSAN product is very well developed in many areas.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
IT Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Eliminates the need for other physical shared storage
Pros and Cons
- "It's quite easy to install."
- "If you compare StarWind to EqualLogic EMC or NetApp, it's a cheaper option."
- "Updating the software can be a bit tricky."
- "If you're in a high-performance-driven environment, I don't think this is the right solution."
What is our primary use case?
As traditional storage is too expensive, our clients are looking for a more affordable solution. If you compare StarWind to EqualLogic EMC or NetApp, it's a cheaper option.
What needs improvement?
Updating the software can be a bit tricky. You have to go down scripts to put it in maintenance mode, etc. It takes a while to update. From my experience, I think that's a thing that they need to improve on.
Every time I put it in maintenance mode, all of the replications stop. If they could fix this, it would be a great product.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using StarWind Virtual SAN since June 2020.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability-wise, it's hard to say because I haven't really added anything.
How are customer service and technical support?
Most of the information was quite clear on their website. The knowledge base is quite sufficient with all the info required. For this reason, I haven't had to contact technical support.
How was the initial setup?
It's quite easy to install. Also, the configuration and documentation guide from their site was quite good.
What about the implementation team?
We don't need maintenance. We do it ourselves. As I said, it's pretty straightforward — standard, to install. It's not complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I think the cost of this solution is quite fair.
What other advice do I have?
Make sure to consider the requirements of your environment. If you're in a high-performance-driven environment, I don't think this is the right solution. In this case, I would go with a traditional storage solution because you'll get better performance out of a physical one. For me, it's just a cheaper solution that doesn't require indigenous apps, etc.
I would not go for enterprise deployment. I'll go with the traditional one. Make sure your requirements fit with what you want to buy.
Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of eight.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Integrator
IT Department Manager/Senior IT Administrator at Synergium Sweden AB
Performs well, quick to set up, stable, and good technical support
Pros and Cons
- "Quick setup, great support, stability is great"
- "The overall experience is really good, and Starwind VSAN has been working rock-solid from the launch."
- "Having more support plan options would be nice."
High performance while eliminating the single point of failure.
Our previous physical SAN was outdated and wasn't able to keep up with our needs. It was a single point of failure as well, so we started looking for another solution to replace it. Once we started searching, we found really good reviews and recommendations on StarWind VSAN.
After some consulting, we chose them and weren't disappointed. The overall experience is really good, and Starwind VSAN has been working rock-solid from the launch.
We are especially happy with the pre-sales help, where all of our questions were answered quickly and accurately. The installation and initial configuration were quick. The deployment was completed by StarWind support and everything worked as promised.
Pros: Quick setup, great support, stability is great.
Cons: Having more support plan options would be nice.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Engineer at Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Helpful support, easy to set up, and it works on top of hardware or software RAID
Pros and Cons
- "The iSCSI protocol is quite simple to configure."
- "StarWind vSAN for Hyper-V solves the problem without any kind of hardware lock-in and with its low impact, easy to configure vSAN solution."
- "It would be nice to add the ability to use raw partitions instead of file containers."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case is hyper-convergence and storage virtualization.
Our configuration has eleven servers installed. Three of these are SQL servers, five are installed as application servers, and on the remaining servers, various small services are hosted. These include web servers, RDP servers, and so on.
StarWind vSAN for Hyper-V consolidated the last three servers into a failover cluster for load balancing and increased availability. This made it possible to transfer the specified services to virtual machines.
How has it helped my organization?
Initially, it was not planned to use virtualization, but at some point, I realized that it was necessary. I had no opportunity to install any shared storage and in this case, the StarWind Virtual SAN solution was perfect.
I did not have any type of failover cluster. StarWind vSAN for Hyper-V solves the problem without any kind of hardware lock-in and with its low impact, easy to configure vSAN solution. This made it possible to create a failover cluster with high performance without significant costs.
What is most valuable?
The most important features for us are:
- StarWind vSAN requires two nodes, which can be completely switchless, and it doesn’t require any additional equipment to get started.
- StarWind works on the iSCSI layer.
- StarWind requires at least two 1 GbE networks.
- StarWind works either on top of a hardware RAID or a software RAID.
- There are only three servers in our installation and it was great that I didn't need to buy any additional network hardware.
- The iSCSI protocol is quite simple to configure.
- The requirement for two-gigabit adapters also avoided additional costs.
- In particular, it was important to me that the implementation of the StarWind vSAN solution did not require reinstalling the operating system or reconfiguring the RAID.
What needs improvement?
It would be nice to add the ability to use raw partitions instead of file containers.
I think that using equal partitions would improve performance by eliminating the additional file system necessary to host the container
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for approximately six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I did not face any critical issue for our main purposes.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Very positive. As far as I understand, it will be very easy to scale.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is very competent in matters not only of the product but also of the features of the hypervisor and the operating system on which the installation was performed.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not used other solutions before.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was not difficult. I received help with the first installation from technical support.
What about the implementation team?
The vendor team helped with the initial setup and I rate their level as very high.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I think that purchasing StarWind Virtual SAN Professional Edition would be optimal for most.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
As an alternative to StarWind vSAN for Hyper-V, I considered Microsoft S2D, but I had to abandon it due to the fact that it does not support hardware RAID.
What other advice do I have?
I have not been using the product for long enough to objectively name the features that should be added in the next release or would not suit me in the current release. The functions that I needed to work on do not cause any complaints from me.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: July 2026
Popular Comparisons
Red Hat Ceph Storage
Everpure FlashBlade
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
VMware vSAN
Dell PowerFlex
HPE SimpliVity
QoreStor
DataCore SANsymphony
Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure
Scality RING
Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct
StorMagic SvSAN
HPE Alletra dHCI
Scale Computing Platform
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- I am looking to compare Nutanix and VMware vSAN. Which one is better in terms of functionality and management?
- Storpool vs. ScaleIO
- When evaluating Software Defined Storage, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What are some design considerations to keep in mind for Software Defined Storage Solutions?
- What are the advantages and limitations of Software Defined Storage?
- What are the main storage requirements to support Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning applications?
- What SDS solution do you recommend?
- Why is Software Defined Storage (SDS) important for companies?














