In a Hyper-V environment running Windows Server, we needed high availability in a virtualized environment for our file-share cluster without having to use expensive, external iSCSI storage. Using the built-in VDHX disks, StarWind provides the high availability that we need at a low cost and is relatively easy to manage. We now have a 2-node, fault-tolerant file-share cluster that behaves exactly as we want and it utilizes StarWind to provide the high availability directly on the VMs themselves, rather than connecting an external storage.
Systemadministratör at Hantverksdata Sverige AB
Cost-effective, easy to use, and fault-tolerant
Pros and Cons
- "You can turn your local disk storage into high-availability iSCSI storage."
- "There is a general lack of documentation, especially up-to-date documentation to get started."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
With StarWind Virtual SAN we have a cost-effective, reliable, and easy-to-manage solution without having to spend a lot of money on external SAN or NAS solutions that would have cost a lot more, and would have required more infrastructure to manage. Instead, for a little sum and a setup that took less than a day, the virtual SAN runs directly on the VMs and is easy enough to manage that a single technician can do it.
Most of the time, you don't even need to check on it as it just works once you have it set up. This saves money and time and you can cut down on your infrastructure needs.
What is most valuable?
Simply put, the best features of StarWind Virtual SAN are its core offerings:
- The fault-tolerant, high availability features using virtualized software. You can turn your local disk storage into high-availability iSCSI storage! It's so good, I can't believe Microsoft doesn't include this natively. Thankfully StarWind does the job.
- Ease of use; once set up, it just works and you don't have to spend a lot of time managing it.
- It's very cost-effective. There's even a free version license to use with a two- or three-node cluster. You don't have to purchase or manage a costly, external storage infrastructure that would essentially provide a similar service.
What needs improvement?
There is a general lack of documentation, especially up-to-date documentation to get started. This is especially true if you want to trial the software first using the free version, as some of the documentation that exists is sometimes old and certain steps provided might not be very easy to understand.
The free license only allows you to manage the setup via the CLI (the GUI works, but only provides information), which makes good documentation all the more important.
The GUI itself as well could use an overhaul; the user experience is a bit lacking until you get the feel for it.
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
April 2026
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I implemented StarWind Virtual SAN in our environment in early 2023.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Once we had it set up, it just works. I can't remember the last time I had to check on the software to see that all was in order. StarWind seems very stable and reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We only use a two-node cluster. I have not tested the software outside of this configuration, however, if you're building a much bigger cluster, you'd probably be better off investing in an external, dedicated storage solution such as a SAN.
How are customer service and support?
The one time I had to contact support, they were very good and I got the impression they understand storage and their product.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not have any other solutions before this, this was a whole new use case.
How was the initial setup?
We first tried the free edition, and due to some documentation being a little outdated, there were some issues as all we had the CLI to use. Once we went through it again though, it was fairly easy to set up.
Even for someone who has never used the software before, within a single day it was up and running. If you pay for the license, using the GUI is a breeze, even if the GUI as well takes some time to get used to and understand where to find things.
What about the implementation team?
We (I) did it in-house, and once I got comfortable with it, it was easy to set up.
What was our ROI?
We save money and time on having this solution, as there's less infrastructure to manage, we have high availability where we need it, and it's much more cost-effective than any other option.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Try the free version first, as it's perfectly capable to be used and provides the same functionality (without the GUI) as the paid version. You can then simply upgrade. It does take a little bit of time to get used to managing it with the CLI, but once it's set up, it's a breeze.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did check for options, but as we are running Hyper-V natively, there were not a lot of options as we didn't have the budget to go for an expensive hardware solution, and Microsoft does not provide a solution to this problem in the same way that VMWare for example does.
What other advice do I have?
StarWind is the best, and most cost-effective option that we have found on the market.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Area Sales Manager at ABPL
Responsive support with a built-in multifactor authentication and a good management console
Pros and Cons
- "The performance of the solution is accurate and concise."
- "One main thing this product needs to work on is reporting."
What is our primary use case?
Our organization was facing issues with storage. The main challenge was the secure backup and its restoration.
StarWind Virtual SAN helps us get rid of storage issues within the organization. The best part is StarWind Virtual SAN supports a hypervisor environment and our organization was also using the same platform for infrastructure which makes it easier for us to deploy and implement.
It also has built-in multifactor authentication which makes it compliant with our local regulations for the banking sector.
How has it helped my organization?
Our organization now can easily back up and have the data also available. Our main issue was to have a solution that has high availability of data and this solution solves that problem. In the internal audit, we also observed how helpful it was to have a proper backup solution with high availability which is now achieved by StarWind Virtual SAN. The solution has high performance which means the backups do not suffer from restoration and availability. It also has different storage RAIDs which helps to manage data in a proper way. We can use it without any latency.
What is most valuable?
The management console of the StarWind Virtual SAN is user-friendly.
You can also manage the storage in different segregated RAIDS.
It has built-in multifactor authentication available.
The performance of the solution is accurate and concise.
It gives great high availability.
The cost of the solution is overall effective.
Reporting is a great tool available in the product to demonstrate it to senior management.
StarWind Virtual SAN has very appropriate features available with the solution and it is all in one solution.
What needs improvement?
Overall the experience with StarWind Virtual SAN is good. One main thing this product needs to work on is reporting. It has all predefined reporting. They should introduce reporting which can be customized according to the organization's needs.
They need to have local support available for the product which will make response to the support cases easier and more effective.
Overall, the experience with StarWind is good and the product is precise and readily available.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for less than one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is overall stable and effective.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is highly scalable.
How are customer service and support?
They have very responsive customer support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use a different solution previously. Only the backup was done on local systems.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment is pretty straightforward and we implemented it with the help of the vendor.
What about the implementation team?
The overall vendor team is professional and skillful. They helped us a lot.
What was our ROI?
It gives good ROI to the organization since it is cost-effective.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
They also offer a free trial version of the product with basic features. An organization should test the product before implementing it.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have evaluated VMware and found the cost was a bit high compared to StarWind Virtual SAN.
What other advice do I have?
We have a hypervisor environment and it works best with that. If your organization is running any other environment for infrastructure, you need to ensure all features are up and running before implementing them in production.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
April 2026
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Network Administrator at Armitage Technology Group Inc.
Easy to set up with exceptional support and reasonable pricing
Pros and Cons
- "The product gave us a cost-effective way to deploy a highly available server environment."
- "It is not very clear within the StarWind Management Console or the StarWind support documentation how to perform maintenance on a single node in a two-node HA cluster."
What is our primary use case?
Our client had very little IT infrastructure in play relating to servers. They had a single Windows 10 low-end workstation that was acting as the controller for their food production assembly line. They were tackling a huge expansion and needed a more robust controller as their current one would go down often.
StarWind vSAN gave us a cost-effective option to leverage three Dell servers, with two in HA and a third acting as a replica in a separate building on their site. This way, it can tolerate two full server failures and still allow the assembly line controller to run.
How has it helped my organization?
The product gave us a cost-effective way to deploy a highly available server environment. This allowed our client to have their food assembly line controller always available, as it costs them a lot of money if it goes down for any more than a few minutes.
With Hyper-V and StarWind, they can have a quick turnaround in case a server goes down. It also gave us an insight into StarWinds as an alternative for future clients of ours if their server capability requirements ever increase. It's a great tool to have knowledge of and to offer as an option if needed.
What is most valuable?
The core feature of the entire product is the most valuable aspect. There aren't any features that stand out that provide a lot of value. We just like the ability to have HA storage replicated in real time between two nodes - which is enough for us to be more than satisfied. We do not interface with this product very often, so I can't speak to any feature in particular that stands out as being exceptional and valuable. The value of the product is the services given at a great price which is what drew us to the StarWind Virtual SAN to begin with.
What needs improvement?
It is not very clear within the StarWind Management Console or the StarWind support documentation how to perform maintenance on a single node in a two-node HA cluster. We had to reach out to support to confirm the process to power cycle a single node, and even then, we had to go back and forth a few times with support to get a clear and concise answer to the question we had. It would be nice to have the option to put a single node in maintenance mode so we know we can safely perform updates and power down the server if required.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've had the solution for six months in production.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I get the impression that this is better geared towards a smaller scale, for example, ad two or four-node cluster. Anything bigger, and it would make more sense to go with the big-name competitor.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is Exceptional. They have very helpful and prompt responses.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not previously use a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
The setup is straightforward with the help of the support engineers to fine-tune our deployment.
What about the implementation team?
We had setup help from the vendor team. They were quite knowledgeable. That said, I do recall them doing a few things in a different way than described by their setup guide.
What was our ROI?
I have not researched ROI.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost and licensing are very competitive.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate other options.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Security Operation Center Analyst at ASAL Innovation PVT LTD
High availability at a fair cost with good replication
Pros and Cons
- "In our case, the cost and high availability are the two most important factors which we were looking for in a solution."
- "There should be publicly available tutorials on YouTube or other platforms that help the users to integrate this solution with other platforms, for example."
What is our primary use case?
We were previously using old conventional backup methods. Last year, our organization decided to move to some cloud base storage solution, and we moved to StarWind as our primary storage solution.
StarWind Virtual SAN is the solution exactly we are looking for. It replicates the data between the hosts, giving us 30 TB of usable redundant storage.
StarWind Virtual SAN is a flexible solution in terms of storage expansion. The big advantage we got from StarWind is the ability to meet compliance requirements to ensure we are fail-safe.
How has it helped my organization?
StarWind Virtual SAN is cost-effective, with high availability and good flexibility, and is a high-performance software-defined storage solution.
StarWind features like high availability and cost-effectiveness improve the ability of our organization by reducing the cost of old storage methods. Additionally, StarWind Virtual SAN provides excellent performance. It delivers fast data access and efficient data transfers, which actually improves the application performance and user experience.
What is most valuable?
In our case, the cost and high availability are the two most important factors which we were looking for in a solution. StarWind Virtual SAN is a cloud-native solution, and cost and other factors are favorable to us. I would recommend this solution if a company has a tight budget and hardware limitations in its environment. Of course, users do need to consider other factors as well as every organization has its own preference for solutions.
What needs improvement?
There is always room for improvement, and user expectations never end.
The first and most important thing the solution needs is video tutorials. There should be more focus areas. To use the solution, users should not need to always create tickets to get support from the vendor. There should be publicly available tutorials on YouTube or other platforms that help the users to integrate this solution with other platforms, for example.
Documentation improvement is the second area that needs focus. We require more detailed documentation. That will definitely help users to effectively utilize this solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for more than one year.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were a using conventional backup solution previously.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have evaluated a few options previously. However, I can't recall the names. That process was handled a year ago.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Information Systems Manager at HALL'S CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Excellent support, lowers energy costs, and never fails
Pros and Cons
- "We are running Hyper-V on twin servers in failover, and being able to manage servers from anywhere I need to, virtually, has been a game changer."
- "I'd love to see more clarification for us folks who are smart enough to do some damage yet not smart enough to use CLI."
What is our primary use case?
We had several aging servers that needed to be replaced, including a server from 2008 and one that was an old Microsoft Small Business Server from 2011.
When we ended up needing to replace everything when they had all reached end of life, we had some hard choices to make. We could have replaced all of those old bulky servers with a new pile of power-hungry and massive machines, or replace them all and virtualize everything and put them on two single-unit rack-mounted servers. We ended up going with StarWind Virtual SAN, and have never looked back.
How has it helped my organization?
Want to talk about speed, performance, and reliability? We literally went from having four or five very large and powerful boxes to the two sister servers that were provided by StarWind, and we set them up to have much better performance. Even more importantly, we found support that is world-class. I have never worked with such an impressive and well-balanced crew as the techs that I have had the pleasure of working with over these years. They are absolutely mind-blowing in every aspect that I've had them help me out with, from preinstallation to rollout to maintenance.
What is most valuable?
We are running Hyper-V on twin servers in failover, and being able to manage servers from anywhere I need to, virtually, has been a game changer.
The most valuable feature has been their support and willingness to help me with issues that, frankly, were not their responsibility. Every time I've called or emailed them, they have jumped in anyway and helped me find success in figuring out the issues I was having. They even kept the ticket open until I asked them to close it, which is nice.
What needs improvement?
Every solution has plusses and minuses, and for someone like me, who has very little experience spending my time in CLI, I appreciate a good GUI. This is the one place I would love to see the experience of StarWind improved. I wish there were more of an explanation or set of instructions that could point me in the right direction when I wanted to increase the size of one of our VMs. I did end up being able to shut the machine down and increase the size of its virtual HDD, however, in the end, I missed the mark and allocated too much space - and in a production environment, that space comes at a premium. I'd love to see more clarification for us folks who are smart enough to do some damage yet not smart enough to use CLI.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have had our StarWind Virtual SAN for almost five years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Our StarWind Servers have only ever "gone down" when I have been applying an update to the server's software. They have been rock solid and have better than six nines on their stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
So far, we've been able to add storage and new servers year after year and have never run into an issue.
How are customer service and support?
Their customer service and support have been world-class. There is no other company I've ever worked with that had the level of support and dedication that I've been able to experience with StarWind.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not have a "solution" like this before. We previously had a hodgepodge of parts, servers, and service providers, which is nothing compared to what we have now.
How was the initial setup?
The setup was amazing. The hardware arrived, we plugged it in, and StarWind connected to them and was off to the races getting our servers converted and up and running within a week. I've never seen anything similar since then.
What about the implementation team?
We used a combination of in-house IT/IS and StarWind support to get these set up and running. In the end, we were all happy with the speed and technical expertise that went into our setup and the dedicated technicians who stuck with us throughout the entire setup and implementation.
What was our ROI?
The ROI is impossible to know. That said, in terms of reliability and performance, it has paid for itself within the first two years of ownership in electrical costs. They have, in the five years we've had them, paid for themselves in that aspect of cost alone. There is not even a comparison in terms of cost per watt and performance that we have observed.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution has given us the best results that I have ever seen in any environment.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did eliminate several other solutions. That said, it has been too long to remember which ones. I remember worrying that StarWind's performance was going to be one of those too-good-to-be-true situations. It wasn't. The hype lived up to the performance and reliability.
What other advice do I have?
If you are on the fence about them, jump off and land on their side where you never have to look back.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Freelance Technology Writer at TechnologyAdvice
Affordable, reliable, and fast
Pros and Cons
- "StarWind Virtual SAN offers high availability and data resilience features to prevent data loss if hardware fails."
- "I want to suggest that the complexity of the startup and shutdown procedure needs to be reduced."
What is our primary use case?
We use StarWind Virtual SAN to create a reliable, scalable, and cost-effective solution for storage requirements. We used it to store data in a VMware environment.
We have a small setup of servers where we use Starwind Virtual SAN as our primary storage solution to store critical data and applications. We have a 30 TB usable storage where StarWind Virtual SAN provides us with reliable, fast, scalable, and cost-effective features to store and manage critical data and apps.
It's a scalable storage solution, and in the future, if our requirements expand, we can scale out our storage requirements pretty easily.
How has it helped my organization?
It helped us in providing a reliable, fast, scalable, redundant, and affordable storage solution for our VMware-based infrastructure. It's continuously running for the last year or so, which shows its reliability.
It also helps us reduce maintenance costs as it's working pretty fine for the last year or so. So, we didn't face any issues yet. It's a solution where we can truly say that set up and forget.
I'd like to say that it's one of the best storage solutions for your virtual environment, especially for SMBs.
What is most valuable?
StarWind Virtual SAN offers high availability and data resilience features to prevent data loss if hardware fails. This feature helps us to save data or any critical application on it.
You can scale it from a 2-node to a larger, multi-node deployment which makes it a pretty flexible solution for businesses that are growing from time to time. It has very good performance with an improved cache
It has a pretty user-friendly interface that makes it easy to install, configure, and manage storage in any virtualized environment.
What needs improvement?
While our experience with StarWind Virtual SAN has been positive, we don't have any issues yet.
The price makes it a pretty perfect and affordable solution as compared to other solutions available in the market for the same deployment scenarios.
I want to suggest that the complexity of the startup and shutdown procedure needs to be reduced. Another thing that I want to highlight about the documentation that needs some improvement and better organization. Right now, I don't have any other issues in my mind that can be written here.
For how long have I used the solution?
For the last year or so, I've been using this solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We don't have any stability issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Currently, we have a small setup, and in the near future, if we need to scale our setup, StarWind Virtual SAN will help us accordingly.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support experience so far has been positive.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Yes, I use VMware vSAN and FreeNAS.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is simple, and a lot of information is already available.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented it in-house.
What was our ROI?
We have been using it for the last year or so, and it's working very fine in our environment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
StarWind Virtual SAN is a reliable, scalable, and cost-effective solution. I highly recommend using this storage solution, especially for SMBs.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated other options and found StarWind Virtual SAN is a reliable and cost-effective solution.
What other advice do I have?
It's a pretty reliable, cost-effective storage solution for virtual environments.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
IT Admin at Protect Fundus d.o.o.
Free to use with great features and good reliability
Pros and Cons
- "StarWind vSAN has a lot of great features and is a perfect solution for mirroring internal disks and flash between servers."
- "vSAN's free version does not have a graphical user interface."
What is our primary use case?
We purchased StarWind Virtual SAN to replace the no longer supported SAN App. Since the hard drive is outdated, the warranty was expired, and the user interface is poor, we decided to upgrade to a newer system.
We have four server rooms on site, which we equipped with storage servers, each with 45 TB of SSD storage, on which we installed StarWind Virtual SAN software.
With the help of the fantastic support from the StarWind team, we connected five compute servers from our previous SAN setup running Hyper-V. Everything worked smoothly. All of our data is stored on the storage nodes and replicated almost instantly.
How has it helped my organization?
We tried several solutions, such as iSCSI storage and Hyper-V Replication. The results were good yet did not produce the expected results. We had many problems with scheduled and unscheduled failovers. There were also limitations in the application itself.
After some research, I decided to go with the free version of vSAN from StarWind. I followed the instructions and technical support to deploy the SQL cluster using the StarWind vSAN free version. I tested the application with many scenarios. All failover options worked without any interruption.
What is most valuable?
StarWind vSAN has a lot of great features and is a perfect solution for mirroring internal disks and flash between servers. It provides a high-performance mirrored central disk to perform any implantation with high profitability.
In my case, I had a requirement to implement a SQL cluster solution with servers and internal disks.
Without StarWind vSAN there would be a bigger cost for the company, as we would need to buy a lot of disks and, of course, hardware and software, to run everything. That's why we choose StarWind.
What needs improvement?
vSAN's free version does not have a graphical user interface - all options are available from the command line. The graphical user interface is very important when we need to check the status and fix errors quickly, even if it is not a technical expert team.
There are a few other limitations in vSAN's free version. They could release a few premium features to its free-use version, as we believe then there would not be so much of support tickets, and not everyone knows how to use Powershell.
They add auto-update features, so you don't need to do it manually.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution offers great stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability has been great.
How are customer service and support?
We have found that we can get a quick response to questions on the forums.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used an HP solution, however, it was unstable.
How was the initial setup?
In order to do a seamless setup, users need to read the manuals.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the setup with our in-house team.
What was our ROI?
The solution was free to use.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'd advise new users to try the free version first.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We only evaluated StarWind.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Systems Administrator at White Oak Management
Easy to expand storage, great support, and offers great high availability
Pros and Cons
- "Having the ability to migrate machines live in our environment was made possible by this software."
- "StarWind Virtual SAN improved our organization by allowing us to sleep at night."
- "StarWind really needs to market its product more."
- "The only "improvement" for the software would be having a web-based GUI interface for monitoring their storage nodes."
What is our primary use case?
In our environment, we are using a full-scale Hyper-V cluster and individual VMware hypervisors. StarWind provides highly scalable, highly accessible storage to all servers within the environment.
Virtual machines requiring high availability are stored using the StarWind software virtual storage area network. The StarWind software itself is stored on a virtual machine on two nodes within our Hyper-V cluster.
At present, we only have the two-node solution and would like to upgrade in the near future to provide even more redundancy/data durability.
How has it helped my organization?
StarWind Virtual SAN improved our organization by allowing us to sleep at night. The software allowed us to implement a highly scalable software-based storage area network using our existing commodity hardware.
We didn't have to purchase anything extra to make this project "work"; we just installed the software on two virtual machines, set up the ISCSI networking, and attach the hosts to the ISCSI targets.
Having the ability to migrate machines live in our environment was made possible by this software.
What is most valuable?
The best part of the StarWind vSAN software is having the ability to add as many nodes as you need.
You can instantly expand storage across a rack, data center, or geographical location. Support by StarWind is awesome. They are able to get on multiple remote sessions to help us go through our proof of concept with both Hyper-V and VMware environments.
Support also contacted us multiple times after implementation to see how things were going, and if we had any questions or wanted to learn more about the product. If there was a question they couldn't answer, they were sure to get back to us - often within the same day. The support for the product has been most valuable.
What needs improvement?
StarWind really needs to market its product more. It's a game changer not only for our medium-sized business. However, I could see how organizations of all sizes could benefit from their solutions (not just their Virtual SAN product).
I wish I could tell more people about how great the software is and how phenomenal their support team is.
The only "improvement" for the software would be having a web-based GUI interface for monitoring their storage nodes. While the software has e-mail notifications and a desktop client for management, having a mobile, web-based solution could make management even easier. Hopefully, this is something that can be included in the next version.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using StarWind for over two years.
How are customer service and support?
Any interaction with customer service and support has been awesome. They are quick to respond and very thorough.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not previously use a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. The vendor has several Youtube videos showing how easy it is to set up.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented the solution in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing can't be beaten. If StarWind is above a company's budget, they should contact them directly, and they may be able to assist with special pricing. Licensing is based on TBs of data and the number of storage nodes.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked into a few other shared storage solutions, such as Dell and Nutanix.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2026
Popular Comparisons
Red Hat Ceph Storage
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
VMware vSAN
Dell PowerFlex
HPE SimpliVity
Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure
DataCore SANsymphony
Scality RING
Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct
HPE Alletra dHCI
StorMagic SvSAN
Scale Computing Platform
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- I am looking to compare Nutanix and VMware vSAN. Which one is better in terms of functionality and management?
- Storpool vs. ScaleIO
- When evaluating Software Defined Storage, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What are some design considerations to keep in mind for Software Defined Storage Solutions?
- What are the advantages and limitations of Software Defined Storage?
- What are the main storage requirements to support Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning applications?
- What SDS solution do you recommend?
- Why is Software Defined Storage (SDS) important for companies?


















