ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform Reviews

My main use case for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is Application Whitelisting.

The features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform that I like the most is the Application Whitelist, which is mostly what I use, but their customer service is the best of the best. I deal with over 100 vendors. I'm over vendor management for the bank, and I never dread a call with ThreatLocker, with Andrew and Jordan. They're pros. They're so helpful and understanding and they're the best, out of any company. Their customer service is number one, without a doubt.

I'm just overall impressed with the solution's allow-listing feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. Being relatively new to IT, but not technology, it was a feature that I didn't know existed. Obviously it makes sense that it's needed, but the capabilities and how much it can protect you on the end, it's not surprising how useful it is.

The customer service features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform just make everything so easy. I can pick up the phone and call them or set up a Zoom call. There's no question too dumb or that I feel stupid for asking. They're responsive and on top of it. Most of the time, I can email Andrew about an issue and he'll schedule a call and have it fixed before we even have a call. He goes through and tells me what he did, and then he actively monitors the situation or policy, even after the call, just to ensure we don't have any problems, and we just don't get that anywhere else. It's amazing.

Nothing comes to mind regarding how ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform can be improved. I would suggest keeping customer service up and the Application Whitelist feature, which is what I primarily use, just keep advancing in that. Perhaps make some of it a little more user-friendly as far as the interface because it can get confusing at times, but the customer service makes up for any confusion or doubts within myself because I know that it's going to get done right and it's going to protect the bank as much as possible.

I have been using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for one year since April 1st. The organization onboarded ThreatLocker about six months prior to me, before I joined. We're still kind of starting to get everything, our Ringfencing and all our policies, starting to get them all ironed out now, but we really enjoy it.

The stability and reliability of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform have been great. We haven't had any issues. I can't think of one time where it's been down or caused any internal conflicts.

From my understanding, regarding the scalability of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, we pretty much set it company-wide and it's been a smooth process with Andrew helping us along the way, working with my supervisor, the ISO. We jumped in, and he was still in the learning phase when I joined on April 1st, but he pretty much figured it out. Through the help of the Cyber Heroes and the customer support, we've been rocking and rolling with it and are confident. It's been great.

If you have any issues or questions, the support team is right there at a drop of a hat, with no questions asked. The team will help you and walk you through it. As for the customer service and technical support of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, I would rate them from one to 10 as a 20. They're great, fantastic.

As far as operational expenses, ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has not helped my company save money; however, it helps us sleep at night knowing that our company and our customers' financials are protected, just by making sure that we don't have any vulnerabilities through bad actors and applications.

I'm in charge of information security when using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. Whenever any employee tries to download or install any application on any work device, it sends a notification directly to me, and then I have to approve or reject the request and set up policies and Ringfences to make sure that if we approve the product, it doesn't come up flagged or get kicked or ask for permission under certain circumstances. We can also change the groups with different departments if they need access to certain applications. I approve installations of software and programs.

I have used the Ringfencing feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. I assess the impact of the Ringfencing feature on controlling the behavior of approved applications as really helpful, as far as elevating certain things, setting up policies, and fine-tuning. It may not be so much about the application; it's about who's accessing it and where it's going and who installs it. It's been really helpful as far as the elevation of said application.

We're working on implementing the Network Control features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. We haven't really deep-dived into it, but we have a call set up with Andrew and Jordan next week to deep-dive into that and try to start implementing it because it's very well needed.

I do not use the Elevation Control feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform a whole lot, but I've worked with Andrew and he's walked me through some things where we've had issues.

I'm not familiar with the Storage Control feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform when it comes to enforcing policy-driven access over various systems.

It's pretty self-explanatory to identify which security and configuration settings need fixing using the DAC dashboard of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. It has a lot of nice graphs and charts and explanations for everything. It's very helpful. I like the new dashboard.

We don't use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for blocking site control and other content filtering that I'm aware of.

I would rate ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform as fantastic, 10 out of 10. I'd highly recommend them. It's a great platform. It's fairly simple to use, and if you have any questions, customer service is just top-notch. Make the jump. It'll be worth it.

We're a managed service provider, mostly dealing with small business office environments, so ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is used in the context of many different tools. It's a unification of several different tools. Their front and center is their Application Control, where I believe the older, less correct name for it would be application whitelisting. Basically, it ensures that nothing can run within a given environment. As long as the machine is protected by ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, nothing can run within an environment that is not considered kosher by the admin.

If you don't allow it, it doesn't run with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. It's as simple as that. I've had it block PowerShell scripts that my RMM has sent through. It's one of those things that in the moment, it's really annoying. However, the implication is that if that were anybody else, they wouldn't have been able to allow it.

I deal with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. It provides peace of mind because it unifies a lot of different tools, including managed detection and response and Endpoint Detection and Response.

The single pane of glass management for all this functionality is really the best feature. It unifies many utilities that would have been separate costs before, and it lets us sleep at night knowing that things are being monitored 24 hours.

The ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform auditing capabilities have provided valuable insights for us and have stopped several would-be malware infections.

Going with the theme of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform being a one-stop shop where they have just about everything, and they have a really good product stack as is. However, the one last thing I would want to see is mail security implemented similar to how Mail Protector does theirs, except obviously managed and included in a subscription tier with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform.

It's pretty easy to deploy as far as this functionality goes. However, it's very annoying to uninstall. You have to go into the online control panel and disable tampering for a device before it'll let you uninstall it without complaining really loudly. This is actually one of those things that is annoying in day-to-day operation because it assumes you don't know what you're doing. However, I would rather it let me know when it doesn't need to than have a situation where our protection is just being disabled and nothing's being done about it.

On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform a nine. There's a little bit of smoothing they could do, but most of my annoyances with it are with the concept as a whole and there's not really anything anyone can do to fix them. It comes with the territory. It's not really something that they in particular could improve upon.

I have dealt with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for a couple of years at this point.

The support with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is phenomenal. Utterly phenomenal. I literally don't think I have ever waited more than a minute to hear back.

Positive

We've been Blackpoint customers for MDR, EDR before ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. They did not offer the Application Control or the network control, the storage control. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform added the MDR, EDR functionality as a logical extension of what they do with the application whitelisting, with the network control, with the storage control. It was just a logical extension. But Blackpoint only ever offered the MDR, EDR functionality. And as far as I know, they were only just starting to branch out into Application Control before we moved over to ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform.

The zero-trust approach of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has helped us pass certain certifications for cybersecurity. The zero-trust portion means that it's a little more annoying than traditional security software. However, you know for a fact that it's working because you can watch it stop stuff in real-time.

I do use the Application Control feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. It is about as straightforward as you could hope for a tool. They offer many deployment options. They have an agent installer you can download. They have a deployment script that you can push through your RMM, or through a Group Policy type implementation.

I'm not very familiar with the pricing of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. I don't look at the numbers typically as I focus on technological aspects and implementation. From what I understand, our licensing costs are actually fairly reasonable. For the tier we're at now, it's approximately $10 an endpoint, and we're easily able to upsell that. We're covering our costs and then a little bit on top. It's such a useful tool that if I were making the decision, I would probably even sell it at a loss and take a little bit of a chunk out of other managed service profit margins if necessary. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is just that useful.

The way Ringfencing helps limit application actions is by allowing an application to run. However, that application is not allowed to talk to certain common threat vectors such as scripting hosts, PowerShell, macros, etc. That's how it's configured by default. You can configure it however you want. For example, I could stop Chrome from talking to Word if needed.

I rate ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform a nine out of ten.

As a sheriff's department, our main use cases for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform involve managing many different endpoints that are our deputies on the road who constantly receive evidence, encompassing various file types, including video files in executable form from banks and ATMs, necessitating careful monitoring of executions.

Additionally, we have a finance department that faces constant phishing attacks, and the platform helps us gain better control over what is executed in our environment. When something is executed, we can pause to assess its necessity.

By using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, we have been able to consolidate several security tools, including considering removing SentinelOne to streamline everything under ThreatLocker and ThreatLocker Detect to minimize device overhead. Previously, we encountered conflicts between tools, but transitioning entirely to ThreatLocker has been satisfying as it effectively prevents threats.

For us, the features we appreciate most about ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform are the learning mode, maintenance modes, and installation modes which we utilize heavily. We do not allow new applications to be executed in our environment, so we maintain an approved list of applications. The learning mode enables us to learn these applications initially, thus preventing the launch of anything else. If an unapproved application attempts to launch, it prompts a conversation about its necessity, often revealing that we might already have a similar tool we can use. The maintenance mode is indispensable for us.

My impression of the allow-listing feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is positive; it is convenient that for widely used applications such as Adobe, we do not have to learn each individual application as we can simply allow the entire suite, ensuring all updates and applications are included. This feature helps us establish a static baseline of safe items to ensure familiarity within our finance department and other teams.

I have used the ringfencing feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform.

I assess the impact of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform on controlling the behavior of approved applications as beneficial; for example, with our CAD program, there is no need for outside applications to interface with it. This ringfencing capability allows us to monitor any unauthorized interaction attempts with our applications, providing intensive oversight of their behavior.

Regarding the network control feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, I do not use it extensively; we mainly rely on our network firewall since all our clients are connected through a VPN. However, I am actively learning about the features and plan to advocate for increased usage as I recognize we are under-utilizing this aspect.

I do use the elevation control feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform.

My assessment of how ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform facilitates just-in-time administrative access for approved applications is quite favorable; for instance, one of our applications requires admin access for initial launches or periodically to download new map files. This application can be set to launch as an admin automatically, alleviating recurring issues.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform helps us save on operational costs and expenses, particularly concerning application management since it enables us to verify applications efficiently. Before, we often had to backtrack and resolve issues created by unverified installations, which has transitioned to a more proactive stance against vulnerabilities.

Identifying which security and configuration settings need fixing using the DAC dashboard is somewhat difficult at times. Initially, we encountered challenges when launching applications for the first time due to denials, requiring a detailed investigation. However, I have found that there is a more effective approach available in the panel for this purpose; nonetheless, I still struggle to pinpoint the exact reasons for certain denials and the policies causing them.

To improve ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, it would be beneficial to integrate a notification feature with the learning mode that clearly indicates items learned during a session. This feedback would help us understand what is learned in real-time, especially during a one-hour learning mode setup, ensuring we remain aware of potentially unnecessary learned items.

We have been using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for a little over a year now.

I assess the stability and reliability of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform as excellent; in the entire time we have had it, there was only one occasion where it crashed, necessitating a reinstall. Given the scale of our operations managing a thousand installations, this performance is impressive.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales well with our company's growing needs; as we continuously hire new deputies and add servers, the installation process is smooth and easy when the right server or workstation applications are designated for installation.

My experience with the customer service and technical support for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is positive; they are responsive and readily available. We manage through our MSP, which facilitates direct communication during troubleshooting, making it easy to connect when issues arise. I would rate the support at a ten as I have never faced any problems.

Positive

Prior to using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, we were utilizing SentinelOne.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is that the setup process is straightforward. While I do not know the specifics of our financial arrangement because our finance department manages that, we focus on securing multiple vendor quotes as part of our internal procedures. The initial learning phase took about a month or two, establishing a baseline across our machines, and after that, it became an effortless operation.

We manage through our MSP, which facilitates direct communication during troubleshooting, making it easy to connect when issues arise.

Quantifying the exact savings ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides is challenging, but I estimate it saves us at least a couple of hours a week through streamlined auditing processes rather than the manual effort previously required.

There are no other solutions I am aware of that address similar needs outside of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. I believe we considered a couple of other solutions during our decision-making process, but I cannot recall their names now.

Overall, I would give ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform a rating of ten out of ten. It is an ideal solution for any company lacking comparable protection, offering complete visibility into the environment, making it a recommended choice for every organization with computer systems in place. I have not used the storage control feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform until recently; I finally got it turned on today. We plan to implement it, especially since we frequently receive various USBs as evidence in law enforcement, allowing us to issue specific USBs that individuals can use safely without risking unknown data from random devices.

We're using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform primarily as our antivirus to restrict access. We provide our employees with the programs they need to use, and then we ensure that anything not running is not allowed to run.

Many dental places use scanners that are two or three generations too old with software that only runs on Windows 7, so Ringfencing from ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is perfect for that. It allows us to have a computer on the network that has many potential vulnerabilities, but we are able to prevent any unauthorized activity.

By using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, we're using it as our primary antivirus, so we're not using things such as Bitdefender or anything else that we might suggest. We are just using ThreatLocker as our primary for that.

Personally, I really think the Ringfencing feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is really cool. I think allowing yourself to run more antiquated, obsolete things through Ringfencing is really powerful, especially with companies who want to be cost-effective.

Ringfencing allows us to do exactly what we need and nothing more. That is exactly what we want with these more obsolete devices that we are Ringfencing.

The Elevation Control feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is one that we use quite often, and I think it's also something that really speeds up a lot of our day-to-day work by being able to quickly say we will elevate this and then we will go on about our day.

I would say the Elevation Control feature really improved our process because it prevents our users from needing to call us or write us and wait on hold for ten or so minutes to request elevation. They will send in the request, we will get an email or it will pop up on the elevation dashboard, and it is as easy as clicking and going.

I actually have a gripe with the allowlisting feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. When updating software, it is a little inconvenient. Many users actually tend to have an issue, and I have spoken with other people here at the ThreatLocker event as well, where that is the main issue coming from the user end in that they want to install something and install it immediately without having to ask anybody. However, I feel that might be a necessary evil in order to have everything secure, as we do not want them accidentally running ransomware or something similar.

Primarily, we have different VPN services, but we are trying to slowly integrate some of the VPN features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. We are having a little trouble with that integration, specifically with the Network Control.

We had ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform in place at our company as soon as I started working here, approximately a year ago.

I use the help center on ThreatLocker portal quite often, and they are usually very responsive, which I think is really impressive.

Positive

We do not need those tools anymore as we use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform as a replacement.

Personally, I think ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is fine the way it is. I have no big complaints with it. I would say maybe the education on it could be a little clearer. I know they have a bootcamp and an exam for that, and you can also take that online. They also have the help center available. ThreatLocker is pretty squared away in my opinion.

We are running a pretty lean setup, so ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform allows us to have an overview of all the computers that we are managing at one time, which is very helpful in that way.

We are a small company of less than fifteen people managing around seventy different clients, all with a varying amount of computers from five computers to almost twenty. I would say that ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has not impeded any of that. It is definitely usually the smoothest part of the process to get ThreatLocker enabled.

There is a lot of overhead when you are running a bunch of antiviruses with personal users having their own things they want to run, but if we have ThreatLocker, we can tell them that we know everything that is going on. We do not really need to have any of this that is causing additional overhead on your computer.

Zero-Touch is the future, and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is the easiest way to accomplish that. If you already have Zero-Touch in place, then that is fine, but if you want it to be easy and scalable, ThreatLocker is the way to do it. I would give ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform a rating of ten out of ten, as this is probably the easiest way to implement IT for any company and any IT security is through ThreatLocker.

We use Application Control with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, and we have started to use Network Control a little bit. Elevation Control is the main feature we have gotten use out of.

One of the things we have discussed with our solutions engineer at ThreatLocker is that we are trying to do nested groups. At the time, ThreatLocker does not have a great way to do that; you have to make separate groups. They said that is already in the works, so I do not know if that is helpful, but that is the main thing.

We have gotten a lot of use out of the feature of removing local admins from a lot of computers with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. Our company is spread out, so we cannot usually get hands-on those computers. It is a lot easier to hit the button on ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform and remove it and also just get an audit of whether there are any other local admins floating out there. That has been really helpful. The testing environment has been very helpful as well.

We did not have any testing environment previously to using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, so it was us as IT admins doing our best to test software before deploying it out to the users. That helps a lot.

I assess its role in facilitating just-in-time administrative access for approved applications with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform as very helpful in allowing a user to install software, so we do not have to actually remote in and put our credentials. We can give them an hour to install the software, monitor their machine, make sure it is all safe, and they are good to go after that. It helps us save a lot of time.

I find the Storage Control feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform to be very helpful when it comes to enforcing policy-driven access over various storage devices. We are trying to get into CMMC, which is a compliance certification; one of the requirements is to inventory any USB devices that we have floating around the company. With ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, we are able to name those devices, record their serial number and everything, and who they are assigned to. We have visibility into that, and it is very helpful.

The allow-listing feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is very helpful for managing which software, scripts, and libraries run on my device. It is obviously a lot better than trying to blocklist specific things. We can only allow the things that we want in the environment.

I have used the Ringfencing feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform.

I assess its impact on controlling the behavior of approved applications with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform as working well to me. I am not super deep into it as far as how we are designing the Ringfencing, what we are blocking, and what we are allowing, but from what I can tell, it is helpful.

We have gotten a lot of use out of Elevation Control feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform.

I do not believe we have started eliminating anything with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform; it is just an add-on for us right now.

We have not gotten too deep into blocking things on the network with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. We do have RDP blocked on user endpoints now, so that is helpful for sure.

I have not yet used the DAC dashboard.

I do not know if we are actually using the real-time threat intelligence category controls employed by web control in blocking malicious and non-compliant sites.

We got ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform about a year ago.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has been pretty solid in terms of stability and reliability. There is one slight issue we have run into where the testing environment sometimes is not available, but they do provide updates and emails. Nothing is going to have perfect 99.999% uptime, so that is understandable. But that is really the only hiccup we have had.

As far as I know, ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has scaled pretty smoothly with the growing needs of my company; we have not had any issues with that as far as I am aware.

I evaluate the customer service and technical support of ThreatLocker as awesome. The Cyber Hero team is great. They are very helpful and very responsive. They actually will help us get to a solution and not just repeat a script. A lot of companies repeat a script, but the people I have talked to at ThreatLocker seem genuinely interested to help, so they are great.

Positive

We were building up from the ground up and were not using another solution before choosing ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform.

I would probably say ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is a 10 overall. I do not have a great experience with a ton of different security vendor companies, but they have been pretty great so far. I would recommend them to any company that has to keep track of who is installing what, what is being run in the environment, controlling local admin, storage control, and all that. If you need that, then ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform would be helpful for sure.

My main use cases for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform are to manage shadow IT and to prevent the issue of not being able to restrict downloads.

The feature I prefer most about ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is the Ring Fencing.

Ring Fencing is important because most of the clients I deal with don't have any control over what their employees are doing, and they're downloading and exposing themselves. Shadow IT exists extensively, and this feature helps prevent that.

I have found the allow listing feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform to be quite good. I appreciate that it takes the time to learn the client prior to putting it into secure mode, which helps eliminate the back and forth at the beginning of the relationship with the client.

I have used the Ring Fencing feature, and thankfully, I haven't had any issues with it. It has been straightforward and works well.

I find the health score to be one of the new features I was examining, and I appreciate that it can show people the different scores that they have as a company once everything is installed. This allows them to see many things they didn't even know they had on their computers.

Using the DAC dashboard to identify which security and configuration settings need fixing has been excellent and very insightful.

I believe ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could be improved with a mobile version, as many clients work off their phones, downloading all kinds of things on their mobile devices. We currently can only protect the workstation versus the actual mobile device.

I have been using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for about a year and a half.

I haven't experienced any downtime, crashes, or performance issues with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. Everything has been excellent.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales very smoothly with our growing needs, and my account representative has been very helpful with no complaints at all.

I evaluate the customer service and technical support as great. We have cadence calls, and anytime I have any questions, they help me out very quickly. I would rate the customer service a ten out of ten.

Positive

I was not using or working with another product before using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. Nothing did what ThreatLocker does.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has helped my company and my clients' companies save on operational costs and expenses. I would estimate we have saved at least thirty to forty percent.

The pricing, setup costs, and licensing of the solution seem quite good. The pricing is not prohibitive, and for the value we're getting, I think it's good.

By using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, I haven't consolidated any other tools.

The efficiency of the real-time threat intelligence and category controls employed by Web Control in blocking malicious and non-compliant sites is excellent and fast. The cyber heroes are very quick to answer when I need any help.

My experience with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has been very positive overall. I would give this solution a rating of ten out of ten.

Currently, we are utilizing application control with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform to control what our employees are able to access, but we do plan on moving further into the storage control piece.

We are already seeing some curtailing of shadow IT applications and optimizing the approval process for new applications with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform.

The biggest thing that we have seen with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is the ability to identify applications that employees have not brought before IT or information security to ensure it is an approved application.

We have not really utilized the network control aspect of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform at this time.

We do not really utilize the real-time threat intelligence and category controls employed by web control in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform at this time.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform allows a lot more control to prevent malware attacks that are trying to identify themselves as different things utilizing the ring fencing capabilities, as well as catching any non-IT approved applications that come through.

The greatest feature that I appreciate about ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is the unified audit; there is just one screen that I go to where I am able to see everything I need, apply the filters that I require, and see it all.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform allows me to go in and see what has been blocked recently, make sure that there is not anything malicious in the field, or that nothing is impacting the day-to-day needs of our employees.

We have used the ring fencing feature with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform; it has been very handy in basically locking down the access range that our authorized applications have and keeping things where they need to be.

It is very easy to manage the allow-listing feature of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform; it makes it much easier to look at everything and confirm that I know what that program is and what that application is so I can let it run, versus having to go through a giant list and try to remember what something is called based on file names. This is definitely very user-friendly.

At this point, I have not found anything about ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform that really needs improvement.

Maybe the documentation for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could be enhanced, but it would be a minor improvement.

We have been using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for about three months.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is stable; we have had zero issues in terms of getting into it, operating it, or making or saving any changes that we have ever needed to make. It is also very quick.

So far, we have had no issues with the scalability of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform; it has been able to expand and the group and customization we get out of it is quite impressive.

We have not really needed to utilize customer support at this time for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform; the implementation team and support from that avenue has been more than sufficient for us to keep things up and running and functional.

We did not previously use a different solution with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. We did not really evaluate any other options before choosing ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform; we were able to witness a demo and see it in action at a conference at one point and it really intrigued us. We arranged for more of a live demo on our side along with some implementation and review, and it just fit all the needs that we had.

Keep the cadence of the implementation meetings when looking into using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform; they are your greatest resource in getting things onboarded and everything set up. That is really the key piece. Without our implementation team, it would not be going nearly as smoothly as it does. Give yourself time as well. It is not something that can happen quickly, especially if you have a complex array of systems that touch a lot of different things. Make sure that you do not go too secure too quickly.

With the capabilities and the power that were behind ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, it came in at a much lower number than what we expected, and the team that helped us get it all lined out was quick, efficient, and very informative.

We are not expecting immediate returns at this time, but we are expecting to see some good returns in terms of risk being brought down due to the fact that malicious software will not be able to be run and shadow IT applications will not be done as well.

At this time, we have not consolidated anything with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, but the plan is to consolidate our USB tool management to prevent unauthorized USB devices on the network.

We have not run into too many situations that required workarounds; we have mostly been reviewing the blocked items and selecting the ones that we need to get enabled. This is because we are still in the early implementation phase.

I would rate ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform a 10 overall.

Essentially, ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is super easy to use, very informative, and it does everything quickly and easily.

My main use cases for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform include Elevation Control, application whitelisting, and Storage Control.

The feature I like the most in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is the application control, as we have many users that have their own opinions on what they should run, and it is good to be able to deny by default.

By using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, our company has been able to eliminate or consolidate security tools, such as BeyondTrust PAM, and we removed USB-Lock software by adopting ThreatLocker.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales well with the growing needs of our company, and when we expand it to all 500-odd practices, the learning mode will make it scale and work really well. It has been smooth so far, and our solutions engineer is always on hand and is really good.

I would like them to focus on integrating with our SIEM tools.

I have been using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for about nine months.

I have not experienced any issues, crashes, or downtimes with the stability and reliability of the platform. The speed of deploying policies and the user receiving the notification that the application request has been approved is really quick.

My experience with customer service and technical support is positive as they are always responsive. We have taken products in the past where it has been an extra thing that you pay for, whereas our solutions engineer or whoever it is, is always there, ready to speak to us and will jump on a call in an instant, which has been really good. I would rate the customer service and technical support a 10.

Positive

Prior to adopting ThreatLocker, I was using BeyondTrust PAM and USB-Lock software.

I believe ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform will save our company on operational costs and expenses in the long run with time and manpower, and it will be invaluable if it does stop that one breach that could happen.

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is that it replaced some tools, making it seem more competitive value-wise, but it is the flagship tool doing what it does, which means it is quite expensive.

We looked at a couple of other solutions in the evaluation process, but I cannot think of anything that did everything that ThreatLocker does, so there was not really a comparison.

I assess the Elevation feature's role in facilitating just-in-time administrative access for approved applications as really good because a lot of dental software is legacy and written before people cared about security in IT, so it requires being run as admin or it will not work unless the user is admin on the machine. Therefore, it is really good to elevate just the application rather than having everybody at the practice be an admin.

My thoughts on the Storage Control feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform when it comes to enforcing policy-driven access over various storage devices are that we get patient scans, x-rays, and dental notes from other practices or from NHS emergency appointments on USBs and CDs. I would personally love to block and ban all of them, but we cannot, so being able to whitelist by file type or by user group is good.

My impression of the allowlisting feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform in managing which software, scripts, and libraries run on our devices is that there is an initial learning curve, but once you get your head around how it works, it is fairly simple. At the beginning, the learning mode does most of the heavy lifting for you, but when you get to a monthly update that is outside of the learning mode and you have to go back in and do it yourself, I found it difficult to begin with, but now that I have done it a few times, it is really simple.

In regards to the ringfencing feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, I do not feel like we have used much of that. If it is happening in the background, it is great. I think there was something to do with a user running PowerShell to connect to Azure, which we knew was happening, but it was good to get sight of who did it.

We have not gotten to the Network Control feature stage yet. I have only been using the product for nine months, so we have not gotten around to the DAC Dashboard yet. There are some reds on there. Web Control is not something that we took.

For ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, I cannot think of any feature improvements that I would like them to add in their next release because for what we use it for at the moment, it is great. I would rate this review a 10.

A specific example of how I use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform to secure my server is that nobody can install any application without my permission, which is helpful.

I use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform by installing it on every server to monitor it from the portal, where I can grant access if an application needs to be installed or deny it if it does not. This approach is helpful for us.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has positively impacted my organization by ensuring that as soon as we implement it on the server, new employees or new colleagues cannot install anything without our permission.

It has reduced the number of unauthorized software installations.

We decided to consolidate those tools because ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides EDR, which aligns with the zero trust model.

The cloud provider I use for my deployment is Microsoft Azure.

I would say ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers good value for money because if you are pursuing security, you should consider ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform. Money is saved because it is not costly, and I would suggest it for other companies. I would definitely recommend it to new companies if I had the opportunity.

It is helpful for us to find out which application is being blocked or which user is trying to install something using the DAC dashboard, as it is clear and helpful.

We have not used the storage control feature for enforcing policy-driven access over various storage devices because we are using Wasabi storage.

I would advise someone that if they need a zero trust platform, they can switch to ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform.

My impression of the allow-listing feature in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is that we can add the application .exe file or the path so it will not block useful applications, such as the call recording application, track applications, and sometimes the Wasabi cloud platform.

I already explained why we are switching to ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform; it gives quick resolution and quick action. I would rate this review a 10.

My main use case for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is endpoint protection, a zero trust platform for applications, We use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform for application whitelisting and blacklisting for certain purposes on different machines and computers as a specific example of how we use it for one of those purposes.

Made it overall safer and more organized

The best features ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers include application control, network control, web control, and storage control. All these features are great and are used effectively by us.

I find myself relying the most on Application Control mainly because we use it for application whitelisting, making it very beneficial for us and it keeps a good stack for our applications that we should use.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform has impacted our organization positively by providing protection and it has been a great tool for us from a security perspective.

My impression of the solution's allow-listing feature in terms of managing which software, scripts, and libraries run on my devices is that it is very solid because we can easily review what scripts and things are coming in ahead of time and only approve which ones we want.

I have used the ringfencing feature with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform, and I assess its impact on controlling the behavior of approved applications as really good because certain applications should not have to interact with other applications, so it has been really beneficial.

Identifying which security and configuration settings need fixing using the DAC dashboard is pretty easy because they offer the solutions for it as well.

Improvements for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform could include some additional guidance in the beginning of setup. We were fortunate enough to work with an engineer for a lot of our setup and it was very beneficial, but we also had some questions there, and they have a great support team that helps us. However, some more guidance in the beginning would be very beneficial for those just starting out.

I have been using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform for about two years now.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is stable.

The scalability of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is fairly easy and quite good.

The customer support is fantastic.

N/A

The impact of application whitelisting or blacklisting with ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform on my day-to-day work has been that efficiency-wise, it was a bit harder in the beginning because we were new to the product and it was a lot of overhead to manage it. However, once we got through all the challenges with it, it became very easy, and we were able to develop a good workflow for ourselves and for all of our clients.

My advice to others looking into using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is that it is going to be difficult in the beginning, but it will be much easier after going through the setup for your first client and then branching out from there; it becomes much easier. I give this product a rating of 10 out of 10.