VMware ESXi Reviews

We are using VMware ESXi for running various kinds of applications in our environment that use virtual machines.

VMware ESXi provides a reliable and stable environment, which makes us confident in our IT operations. We rely on it particularly in production environments where reliability is crucial.

VMware ESXi is very reliable, especially for our production environment. The ability to collapse its vulnerabilities swiftly adds to its reliability. Hyper-threading is a feature we use extensively.

For horizontal scalability, VMware ESXi is not the right product, and we have been evaluating alternative options. There are also some complaints about the web interface and licensing issues after Broadcom's acquisition.

I have been working with VMware ESXi for more than ten years.

VMware ESXi provides a very stable environment, making it a reliable choice for our operations.

Vertical scalability with VMware ESXi is very achievable, allowing easy upgrades to physical components like CPU and RAM. However, its horizontal scalability is not as flexible.

We have received good service from VMware technical support, though the need for assistance has been infrequent.

Positive

I have not had a chance to explore many other solutions in comparison to VMware ESXi.

The initial setup process is not complex and can typically be done in a little more than one hour with the help of one resource.

We are considering moving to another product for better cost-effectiveness, which might improve our ROI.

From a cost perspective, we are not entirely satisfied with VMware ESXi.

We are considering Kubernetes or OpenShift as potential alternatives.

Technically, VMware ESXi is a mature product, and I would recommend it for reliable, stable environments.

The product is very reliable. People prefer VMware because it does not work on networks. It works on FC. It checks the availability of all the hosts using the logical unit number. That is why we recommend the solution to the customers. If the network or module restarts or the cable is disconnected from the host, it does not impact VMware.

VMware is very costly.

I have been using the solution for more than 15 years.

The tool is very stable.

We are a bank. We have approximately 2000 branches in Pakistan and all over the world. Our bank’s production area is working on VMware in Pakistan.

We contact support. We have a corporate portal. The support is very good.

The initial setup is very easy.

The tool is costlier than any hypervisor.

Hyper-V is a free product. Once we install a data center version, Hyper-V is free. I have used many hypervisors like VMware, Hyper-V, Nutanix, and Oracle VM. All are good products.

Most people do not know why VMware is more stable than Hyper-V. Our clients use Webex after version 6.5. Before, we installed VMware Client and connected to the vCenter server. The vCenter server was connected to the vCenter host. There were a lot of version and service issues with vCenter. Things have been better after we installed Webex.

The cost is very important. We have to buy the latest hardware and licenses. The license is very costly. The vendor might discontinue the perpetual license. The tool will become more costly. Customers will leave VMware and choose Hyper-V. The vendor must rethink the price. We can learn to use the solution through YouTube videos. Beginners can use the tool, but we must learn and better know the product. It is a very good product.

Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

I use the solution in my company for hosting machines and storage.

In our data center operations, the tool is used just as a server for computing, storage, and networking.

The most valuable features of the solution are that it is efficient, fast, and affordable.

I think the tool can do better in terms of pricing.

The tool offers an open-source version, which is not really well supported.

I have been using VMware ESXi for five years.

It is a very stable solution.

The solution's scalability part is a bit tough, but I think it is due to our own implementation. It is a bit difficult currently. In terms of scalability, there are other ways of scaling it, like setting multiple nodes, and all that, but we are not that advanced. In our company, we don't set it up. I think in terms of scalability, it is limitless.

There are 100 users with two appliances in my company.

I have not contacted technical support for the solution.

I have tried a few other tools.

The product's initial setup phase is quite simple, and I think anybody can do it.

You just purchase the server, and then you do the installation. To purchase the server, you have to look through the hardware compatibility list and make sure the equipment is all supported. There are enough available drivers for it. Once it is approved, you can download the installation package and then put it in. After that, you do the patching. Whatever patches that need to be updated and just put it in.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

The solution can be deployed in around four hours.

Two people were needed for deployment.

The tool was deployed with the help of an in-house team.

The tool is cost-effective.

Broadcom recently purchased VMware, and the pricing scheme has changed. If I need any more features in the tool, I can actually purchase them. If the product includes it in the current base package, it will be good. If not, then I will have to purchase it.

Compared to other tools, VMware ESXi is more stable than the other offerings. I think the support from the parent company is good, and it releases patches quite often, so it is better supported.

The feature or the functionality of the tool is good for virtualizing everything.

The tool is able to offer protection requirements and helps the organization's compliance and data as there are frequent patches being released, which are well supported.

My company does not use any AI initiatives for the product at the moment.

The tool's maintenance is easy.

I recommend the tool to others. Everyone should follow the tool's documentation.

I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

The solution is the hypervisor in our clients' IT infrastructures, serving as the foundational platform for their virtual environments.

This solution has significantly enhanced efficiency by enabling the consolidation of multiple servers onto a single host, optimizing resource usage and overall performance.

The platform's most valuable features include its role within the vSphere suite, requiring a vCenter Server for management. ESXi alone is just a hypervisor; effective management and optimization are achieved through clusters and vCenter Server.

The main challenge for the product concerns hardware choices, such as customers opting for cheaper CPUs and memory.

There is always potential for further refinement, such as improving the web interface or fine-tuning advanced settings.

I have worked with VMware ESX since its initial release, around 2001 to 2003.

I rate the solution's stability a ten. 

The solution's scalability is ten out of ten.

The technical support was excellent when VMware was part of Dell. Since the transition to Broadcom, I have yet to have the opportunity to assess the current support quality.

The initial setup is straightforward and typically takes about 10 to 20 minutes. However, additional customizations can be extended at this time.

The full deployment of the solution generally takes a few hours, depending on the customer's specific requirements.

The product pricing was reasonable before, but recent changes, including bundling, have complicated the cost structure. While prices were reduced, additional features have led to higher overall costs.

I rate VMware ESXi a ten out of ten. 

I have used the solution at home and in my company's departments.

When my company decided to go virtual, we chose VMware for the main reason, which was to comply with the other tools on our campus, like ZenSource and Citrix. My department was the lone runner of ZenSource and Citrix, so it was not the right thing to continue with them. The technology was great, but we didn't want to be the only department using such solutions, and so we moved to VMware. VMware and Nutanix have complex setup phases, especially in the beginning.

VMware ESXi has a complex setup phase, making it an area where improvements are required.

I have been using VMware ESXi for ten years.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

My company had worked with the limited capabilities of the tool's scalability features. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

A few hundred people use the tool in my department, but around 5,000 people use it throughout the organization.

The tool is used regularly as part of our virtual infrastructure.

I have had no issues with the technical support for the solution. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

Positive

I have used ZenSource and Citrix.

VMware ESXi has a complex setup phase.

The installation of VMware and Nutanix was done together, and it took a couple of days. After the setup phase, you can fine-tune it, and it takes time for everything to run as you expected or as you want it, but it took a few days to get it up and running and back in production.

My company did not set up the tool by ourselves. After the initial setup, we ran it and managed it, but the initial setup was done by the company that we bought it from. It was a sort of a two-key solution until we got everything running. A third party was involved in the setup phase.

I am not sure about cost savings, but efficiency-wise, it has improved our company.

If one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as an eight.

I have not faced any challenges while integrating VMware ESXi with existing infrastructure.

My company doesn't handle any AI-driven projects with the tool.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

We use it for virtualization. We have about 500 virtual machines that run on eight hosts running ESXi. It's pretty good and robust. It does what we want it to do. That's why we never change. We just stay with VMware and ESXi because it always works. I normally never have a problem with it. It's very stable.

I like VMotion. We can update hosts without affecting the VMs. VMotion would be number one.

It's a good product. For what we use it for, probably just the pricing. To make it cheaper. Pricing is always the first thing to look at for improvement.

Probably just integration of firmware updates could make life easier. But I think that comes with VxRail, not if you buy separate servers. It would be good to do the VMware and ESXi updates at the same time.

I have been working with this product for 15 years. A long time. Since the first version, maybe even more than 20 years.

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.

It's quite high. I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We use it at an enterprise level.

The customer service and support are pretty good. If you've got a major problem, they come and fix it pretty quickly.

Positive

I also use VMware vSphere 7. It runs on the servers, and we have Fibre switches and Unity for storage.

We do ESXi, Cisco firmware, and Dell firmware.  

The initial setup is very easy. 

It's maybe 30 minutes to set up, and then it's working. It's really quick.

It is a hybrid model. 

It is suitable for medium to enterprise levels. 

Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten. The recommendation is very high. It's probably the best hypervisor we've used.

An insurance company uses the solution to optimize its hardware. It can virtualize and run multiple applications on three servers that use VMware ESXi virtualization. More than 50 virtual servers are run on the three Cisco hosts. They use VMware Horizon for desktop visualization.

VMware ESXi provides high availability and a good web interface. The VMware vCenter, included in VMware ESXi, helps us manage our infrastructure. With VMware vCenter, you can manage and administer every other virtual machine and Cisco host.

VMware should make recovering the password easier if customers forget it. Since everything is being containerized and moved to the cloud, VMware ESXi should keep on improving to meet up with the current technology trend.

I have been using VMware ESXi for more than ten years.

VMware ESXi is a very stable solution.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

VMware ESXi is a scalable solution. Our clients for VMware ESXi are mostly medium-sized businesses.

I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.

The solution’s technical support is very good and helps resolve any issues.

Positive

Once you have gone through the training, the solution's initial setup is very easy. The deployment takes approximately three to four days.

The solution's deployment time depends on the number of virtual machines created and the physical infrastructure. It's a straightforward process. Before you deploy the solution, you need to analyze the risks involved and how to mitigate them if you encounter any during the course of deployment. You need to do a proper assessment of the environment and customer requirements to ensure that whatever you are deploying will address such requirements.

You should also create room for upgrades. Suppose a customer needs additional capacity because they have acquired a new application that needs more resources. If you don't increase room, you will have to acquire new hardware to add on or do an upgrade immediately. Everything should be planned for the next three years' utilization. If you do it properly, everything will work out perfectly.

The solution saved our customers money and time. Initially, they had to purchase new hardware to launch a new application. With VMware ESXi, they have been able to launch applications without buying new infrastructure. The solution helps them to launch a new application without going through the procurement process of six months to one year.

VMware ESXi is a costly solution in Africa and other developing countries. The initial acquisition cost may be between $ 20,000 to $ 30,000, depending on the number of servers clustered together.

Providing security is a continuous process because no client or vendor is 100% secure. VMware ESXi hasn't created any security loopholes so far. Once we follow the best practice and do the normal patching from time to time, you can upgrade the patches and eliminate any lapses. VMware always comes with regular patchups on the infrastructure.

I would recommend VMware ESXi to other users because it is a good solution, and its support is fantastic and far better than most other OEMs.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We used it to run production and development workloads. It is quite a stable product in comparison to alternatives like Hyper-V.

The best advantage is that it reduces the footprint in your data center. By utilizing virtualization and a highly optimized hypervisor, you can run more workloads and reduce the physical space needed in your data center.

We haven't encountered any limitations because we already have a vSphere license. When running VMs, people don't request excessive configurations. We haven't reached any limits regarding storage or memory, as customers don't demand such high-end services.

In ESXi, they use different technologies like memory compression, TPS, and ballooning for resource optimization. These features allow you to run more workloads on the servers.

So, these features have been effective in optimizing server resource management.

The 6.5 and 6.7 versions already have features like graphics card passthrough and virtual compatibility.

I'm happy with the product. But what I feel is that FT (Fault Tolerance) is not used much. So maybe more focus on that feature is needed.

Sometimes, it takes some time for the level-one support to troubleshoot and respond. So, that could be improved. 

I started working with VMware ESXi in 2009, so it has been around 15 years.

It's my favorite product due to its stability. I haven't seen many problems with it.

In terms of ESXi, scalability is good. Nowadays, we utilize the full capacity of physical servers, and ESXi allows for good scalability. You can create a cluster and run numerous VMs across multiple hosts.

I'm satisfied with the support. Sometimes, when you open a case, and it lands on the first level, it takes much time to get it sorted out. But whenever level two or level three guys are involved, it’s good.

With VMware, I have worked for around 15 years, and sometimes the initial support takes longer to resolve issues. It seems like they have level-one support that takes more time. However, once the case gets escalated to level two, they provide solutions. So, VMware has a very good resource in their support team, but there are occasional delays.

Positive

I worked on Hyper-V when I was part of an SOC around 2015 or 2016. I deployed it with a four-node cluster. We used antivirus software on top of it, and I feel that caused many problems, like cluster downtime. The resource optimization was also not that great. Later, I migrated that workload to VMware.

ESXi and vCenter. My current organization only uses those two products, but my previous organizations used mostly VMware products, like vSAN, vROps and vRealize. They were a cloud provider and mainly used VMware products.

The installation and deployment are very easy for both vCenter and ESXi.

The ESXi installation and upgrade process is very easy. Even backup is easy now. The recent appliances come with configuration backup, which is a good option.

It is easy to maintain, especially when compared to Hyper-V or AWS.

In my previous organization, we used all VMware products, which were all integrated without any complexity. It was integrated with the Zerto replication tool, vROps, vCloud Director, and NSX. All of these VMware products were integrated together seamlessly. 

We also integrated some monitoring tools, and that was easy as well.

Time-saving is there. Suppose your workload is running on physical data, it’s more time-consuming and costly. But in VMware, it's cost-saving. 

In the case of Hyper-V, you would require more effort because most of the time you need to manage the VM manually due to issues. So, that was time-consuming in Hyper-V. But here, it’s easy to manage in less time.  

One of my colleagues from my previous organization mentioned that Broadcom had increased the pricing on all the products after the acquisition. 

In my current company, we have vCenter and ESXi. The company was doing a POC for the lab environment with vSAN.

Overall, it is good. I would rate it a nine out of ten because there have been issues with the support.