Data and Analytics Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2025-04-19T00:08:00Z
Apr 19, 2025
The pricing for Informatica Cloud Data Quality is super expensive. The issue with Informatica Cloud Data Quality comes when you have to purchase the full suite, as having only bits and pieces can cause problems with integration.
Data & Analytics Practice at Tech Mahindra Limited
Real User
Top 20
2024-07-05T03:08:00Z
Jul 5, 2024
There are different tiers based on consumption, but there is no flexible option. The catalog grows slowly over time. It would have been nice to use a flexible feature at the beginning and then transition to a model where you have a fixed set of units that you consume and pay for. If you exceed those units, you move to the next tier. We were expecting a flexible pricing structure, which we did not get. We would have preferred a pay-as-you-go model. Although pay-as-you-go is slightly more expensive, we know our consumption will not be high initially.
The licensing costs attached to the solution are pretty high, but then, with the cloud model, the prices depend on what it provides for the value of money, which I feel was very high.
Learn what your peers think about Informatica Cloud Data Quality. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.
Informatica Cloud Data Quality Radar is a cloud application that quickly identifies, fixes, and monitors data quality problems in your business applications—wherever they are, in the cloud or on-premise.
This easy-to-use, browser-based tool empowers line-of-business managers to take ownership of the data quality process so business can maximize the return on trusted data. Informatica Cloud Data Quality Radar enables you to quickly assess the strengths and weaknesses in your data, to track...
The pricing for Informatica Cloud Data Quality is super expensive. The issue with Informatica Cloud Data Quality comes when you have to purchase the full suite, as having only bits and pieces can cause problems with integration.
I am not involved in the pricing details. It appears to use a model based on usage, such as how many rows are processed.
Informatica is one of the most expensive solutions available in the market.
There are different tiers based on consumption, but there is no flexible option. The catalog grows slowly over time. It would have been nice to use a flexible feature at the beginning and then transition to a model where you have a fixed set of units that you consume and pay for. If you exceed those units, you move to the next tier. We were expecting a flexible pricing structure, which we did not get. We would have preferred a pay-as-you-go model. Although pay-as-you-go is slightly more expensive, we know our consumption will not be high initially.
The licensing costs attached to the solution are pretty high, but then, with the cloud model, the prices depend on what it provides for the value of money, which I feel was very high.
We pay for a yearly subscription.