From my point of view, Dragos cannot be improved at the moment, but having more user-friendly platforms would be good. Enhancing the user interface experience to be better or more smoothly would be beneficial.
Dragos should be improved in deployment complexity as it requires OT engineering coordination. One needs to have proper engineering coordination to understand the system, deploy it, integrate it, and make all the complex things into one system. This is very challenging, and one should be really skillful and have experience to accomplish this. Cost is another area for improvement. The cost is higher due to site-based licensing and expert services. The licensing is very heavy, and expert services are required for deployment. Cost-wise is also challenging and needs to be improved. Integration needs alignment with IT security systems and compliance frameworks. Controlling cybersecurity where any fraudulent person or third party should not access the system is controlled, and managing that level of complexity is quite challenging. Since there is continuous monitoring, it can reduce operational risk losses by 20% to 30% annually. Controlling that huge amount of data and transactions, especially regarding storage, requires a lot of database space. The space-wise storage should be reduced.
I think Dragos could be improved, as I have worked in Nozomi and compared it to Nozomi. Nozomi offers a lot of flexibility in what I am able to learn and unlearn, and I have more visibility towards the nodes, links, and process variables, which I think is missing in Dragos. I think Dragos can offer more flexibility similar to Nozomi and more visibility into the assets, nodes, and links, which would make it more competitive in the future.
Director of IT at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Apr 25, 2025
Dragos could improve its asset visibility and discovery tools, as the competitor Claroty has better options in this area. Additionally, integrating out-of-the-box with major ERPs like SAP would be beneficial. Claroty performs slightly better in native cloud environments.
Operational Technology Security protects industrial systems from cybersecurity risks, ensuring safe and efficient operations in manufacturing, energy, and critical infrastructure sectors.OT Security focuses on safeguarding control systems such as SCADA, DCS, and PLCs from threats. Challenges include complex networks, legacy systems, and the convergence of IT and OT environments. Users highlight the importance of solutions that provide real-time visibility and automated threat detection.What...
From my point of view, Dragos cannot be improved at the moment, but having more user-friendly platforms would be good. Enhancing the user interface experience to be better or more smoothly would be beneficial.
Dragos should be improved in deployment complexity as it requires OT engineering coordination. One needs to have proper engineering coordination to understand the system, deploy it, integrate it, and make all the complex things into one system. This is very challenging, and one should be really skillful and have experience to accomplish this. Cost is another area for improvement. The cost is higher due to site-based licensing and expert services. The licensing is very heavy, and expert services are required for deployment. Cost-wise is also challenging and needs to be improved. Integration needs alignment with IT security systems and compliance frameworks. Controlling cybersecurity where any fraudulent person or third party should not access the system is controlled, and managing that level of complexity is quite challenging. Since there is continuous monitoring, it can reduce operational risk losses by 20% to 30% annually. Controlling that huge amount of data and transactions, especially regarding storage, requires a lot of database space. The space-wise storage should be reduced.
I think Dragos could be improved, as I have worked in Nozomi and compared it to Nozomi. Nozomi offers a lot of flexibility in what I am able to learn and unlearn, and I have more visibility towards the nodes, links, and process variables, which I think is missing in Dragos. I think Dragos can offer more flexibility similar to Nozomi and more visibility into the assets, nodes, and links, which would make it more competitive in the future.
Dragos could improve its asset visibility and discovery tools, as the competitor Claroty has better options in this area. Additionally, integrating out-of-the-box with major ERPs like SAP would be beneficial. Claroty performs slightly better in native cloud environments.