Security Researcher at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
May 5, 2020
There were times when we had to run the login sequence several times in order to capture it properly. It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved.
Senior Information Technology Architect at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Mar 30, 2020
Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved. In the future, I would like to see better integration between static analysis and dynamic analysis.
Assoc. Director at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Feb 9, 2020
Right now, it's kind of bulky. There are a lot of newer generation tools coming out that are easier. Also, when it comes to the installation and deployment, they inspect the enterprise. It was ok with the scale, but still I think they can make it a little lighter in nature.
Senior Software Developer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Nov 14, 2019
The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective.
Information Security Architect at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jun 24, 2019
The solution needs improvements from the scanning and the technical perspective. In the next release, we would love to see smooth scale mobile testing - if it has similar to testing with wider applications for different technologies as well because people are moving towards mobile. If the solution can integrate AI and also understand the application by itself, this will be great.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in...
There were times when we had to run the login sequence several times in order to capture it properly. It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved.
Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved. In the future, I would like to see better integration between static analysis and dynamic analysis.
Right now, it's kind of bulky. There are a lot of newer generation tools coming out that are easier. Also, when it comes to the installation and deployment, they inspect the enterprise. It was ok with the scale, but still I think they can make it a little lighter in nature.
The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective.
The solution needs improvements from the scanning and the technical perspective. In the next release, we would love to see smooth scale mobile testing - if it has similar to testing with wider applications for different technologies as well because people are moving towards mobile. If the solution can integrate AI and also understand the application by itself, this will be great.
The service can be improved by creating a reduction of false positives.