Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at iLAB LLC.
Reseller
2023-02-21T20:25:51Z
Feb 21, 2023
Both are quality products. ALM QC was originally designed to support a Waterfall approach. ALM Octane was designed to support more of an Agile approach, but can also be used for Waterfall projects. ALM Octane provides the benefits of more options to connect and work with Automation tools outside of the UFT family. Micro Focus looks to be shifting towards ALM Octane and Value Edge as their focus for the future so I would normally recommend those products but for a specific use case or requirement, it could be better to use ALM QC.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Application Quality Management vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
OpenText Application Quality Management and OpenText Software Delivery Management are both competitive solutions in application lifecycle management. Based on the features, pricing, and scalability, OpenText Software Delivery Management holds an advantage due to its broad integration capabilities and agile support.Features: OpenText Application Quality Management offers bug traceability, web accessibility, and extensive API integration. It is highly customizable and supports requirements...
Both are quality products. ALM QC was originally designed to support a Waterfall approach. ALM Octane was designed to support more of an Agile approach, but can also be used for Waterfall projects. ALM Octane provides the benefits of more options to connect and work with Automation tools outside of the UFT family. Micro Focus looks to be shifting towards ALM Octane and Value Edge as their focus for the future so I would normally recommend those products but for a specific use case or requirement, it could be better to use ALM QC.