Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Azure Data Lake Storage Logo

Azure Data Lake Storage Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.3 out of 5

What is Azure Data Lake Storage?

Featured Azure Data Lake Storage reviews

Azure Data Lake Storage mindshare

As of January 2026, the mindshare of Azure Data Lake Storage in the Cloud Storage category stands at 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Storage Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Azure Data Lake Storage1.4%
Dropbox Business - Enterprise7.7%
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP7.0%
Other83.9%
Cloud Storage

PeerResearch reports based on Azure Data Lake Storage reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryCloud StorageJan 27, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJan 27, 2026Download
ComparisonAzure Data Lake Storage vs Google Cloud StorageJan 27, 2026Download
ComparisonAzure Data Lake Storage vs Dropbox Business - EnterpriseJan 27, 2026Download
ComparisonAzure Data Lake Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAPJan 27, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Dropbox Business - Enterprise4.17.7%90%91 interviewsAdd to research
Google Cloud Storage4.34.3%97%80 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Compare Azure Data Lake Storage with alternative products

Learn more about Azure Data Lake Storage

Related questions

 
Azure Data Lake Storage Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Vice President, Technology at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees4.5I’ve used Azure Data Lake Storage extensively for analytics with Databricks, and it's easy to integrate and set up, though pricing can be tricky and lacks flexibility; overall, it’s reliable, scalable enough, and fits well within the Microsoft ecosystem.
DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees4.5I use Azure Data Lake Storage for various data types and appreciate its seamless integration with Azure resources. Its valuable features like lifecycle management aid in data backup, but migration improvements and retention period extension are necessary. Competitors include AWS and Google Cloud Storage.
EPM Practice Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0We implement solutions using Azure Data Lake Storage due to its integration with Azure tools such as SQL servers and Azure DevOps. While it's a robust platform, support speed for critical issues needs improvement for better efficiency.
Data Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5In my use case, Azure Data Lake Storage is effective for storing PDF files for AI applications. It's cost-effective, integrates with Azure services, and offers hot and cold storage options. However, a vector database feature would enhance its AI capabilities.
Senior Solutions Architect at EQ2 Technology5.0I find Azure Data Lake Storage to be secure for data analytics and processing, supporting safe transfers via Azure Storage Explorer. Although its rapid improvements are impressive, enabling certain features in weaker IT environments can be challenging.
Senior Solutions Architect at Think Power Solutions3.5We use Azure Data Lake Storage for call monitoring and connecting data lakes, handling both structured and unstructured data for analytics. The scalability due to the blob is valuable, though adding AI features would enhance the solution.
Data Engineer at Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas4.5In my experience with Azure Data Lake Storage, it optimizes storage and data processing with tools like Global Storage while reducing costs. However, data integrity needs improvement, and better security features could enhance its suitability for big data solutions.
BI & Data Engineering Manager at a sports company with 10,001+ employees4.5Azure Data Lake Storage ensures secure, seamless data integration with features like Azure BitLocker encryption. Its cost is decent, and its reliability, performance, and scalability are strong. Improvement could be made in integrating serverless query features with Data Lake Analytics.