CyberArk Certificate Manager automates and streamlines certificate processes, reducing errors and enhancing efficiency. It centralizes management, supports compliance, and improves certificate lifecycle management with customizable features.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
CyberArk Certificate Manager | 1.3% |
Microsoft Entra ID | 12.9% |
Cisco Duo | 8.1% |
Other | 77.7% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Authentication Systems | Oct 4, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Oct 4, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | CyberArk Certificate Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID | Oct 4, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | CyberArk Certificate Manager vs Cisco Duo | Oct 4, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | CyberArk Certificate Manager vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator | Oct 4, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Entra ID | 4.3 | 12.9% | 95% | 236 interviewsAdd to research |
Thales Authenticators | 3.9 | 2.3% | 100% | 6 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 9 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 58 |
Midsize Enterprise | 39 |
Large Enterprise | 183 |
CyberArk Certificate Manager offers a streamlined approach to managing certificates, focusing on automation that minimizes manual intervention and errors. Its discovery and centralized management enhance operational efficiency, while integration capabilities facilitate seamless handling of certificates across systems like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from its user-friendly, intuitive interface, robust reporting, and customizable notifications, which improve compliance, reduce bottlenecks, and allow for custom field creation. Though the on-premises version is mature, there is room for improvement in cloud service integration and out-of-the-box features. Additional enhancements are needed in documentation clarity, hardware security module support, and diverse scripting language support.
What are the most important features of CyberArk Certificate Manager?CyberArk Certificate Manager finds applications across multiple industries like finance and healthcare where stringent security protocols are critical. Organizations use it for server authentication and managing application IDs, ensuring compliance and preventing outages. Its integration with major cloud platforms and automation of installations across endpoints makes it an ideal choice for companies focusing on enhancing security and operational efficiency.
CyberArk Certificate Manager was previously known as Venafi.
Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | As a Venafi administrator at a payments processor, I automated certificate management to meet compliance requirements, integrated with Fortanix, and streamlined operations. Despite automation strengths, improving support for hardware security modules and DNS verification could enhance the platform. |
Global Security Systems Consultant at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | We use Venafi for certificate management to automate installations and monitor expiration dates, significantly reducing manual tasks and errors. While it's effective, expanding its automation and built-in integrations would enhance user experience. We're deploying a cloud-based SaaS version. |
Solution Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I work in telecom and rely on Venafi for certificate management and automation. Its ease of use and integration capabilities are valuable; however, post-CyberArk acquisition, innovation has stalled, and on-premises support is lacking, complicating integration with CyberArk's Conjur. |
Lead Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | We've used Venafi for over three years to eliminate certificate expiration issues, and its automation, customization, and reporting features significantly improved efficiency, though some UI, cloud maturity, and workflow scripting challenges still need improvement. |
Senior Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees | 4.5 | I use Venafi for certificate lifecycle management as middleware. Its top feature is excellent support, making it easy to resolve my queries. While it’s a mature product, more attention to requested improvements and technical aspects is needed. |
Software Development Engineer 2 at Expedia Group | 3.5 | I've used Venafi for three years to manage internal certificates; it improved tracking and reduced errors but has complex access, weak AWS integration, and caused a major outage due to misconfigured notifications despite overall time and cost savings. |
Cyber Security Engineer at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've used Venafi since 2010 and find it reliable, scalable, and easy to automate. Its reporting and compliance features are strong, setup was smooth, and support is excellent. Documentation could improve, but overall it's a solid solution. |
Certified Ethical Hacker at Skillogic | 4.0 | I've used CyberArk Certificate Manager for four years and appreciate its automation and renewal features, though it needs better notifications, inventory options, and SAN visibility; stability is decent, and setup was straightforward with minimal pricing. |