Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Core Application Security Logo

OpenText Core Application Security Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
4.0 out of 5

What is OpenText Core Application Security?

Featured OpenText Core Application Security reviews

OpenText Core Application Security mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Core Application Security in the Application Security Tools category stands at 4.3%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Core Application Security4.3%
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)22.4%
Checkmarx One10.3%
Other63.0%
Application Security Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Core Application Security reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Security ToolsAug 28, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Core Application Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)Aug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Core Application Security vs VeracodeAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx OneAug 28, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)4.022.4%81%116 interviewsAdd to research
GitLab4.22.6%97%85 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise37
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business272
Midsize Enterprise191
Large Enterprise1095
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
Insurance Company
5%
Educational Organization
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
University
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Transportation Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Media Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Construction Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%

Compare OpenText Core Application Security with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Core Application Security

OpenText Core Application Security customers

Related questions

 
OpenText Core Application Security Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Lead Developer at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I use Fortify to identify security vulnerabilities and sensitive information in source code, particularly access tokens. It's effective but prone to false positives and doesn't check CVEs in third-party libraries, which necessitates using an additional tool.
Principal Technical Consultant at EOH5.0I find Fortify on Demand to be effective in enhancing security posture through SAST and DAST scanning. It offers valuable dashboards for vulnerability analysis, though there's a learning curve. Its AI-driven engine significantly reduces bug densities and security incidents.
Cloud architect at Vodafone4.0We use Fortify on Demand to secure APIs and systems throughout development, testing, and production stages, finding its scanning capabilities crucial. Integration with pipelines like Jenkins could be smoother, but it remains essential for our security infrastructure.
Pre-Sales Manager at Ejada Company Limited4.5I use Fortify On Demand for identifying application vulnerabilities in sales and desk operations. Its seamless integration with DevOps enhances security testing. It's affordable, but I wish it had AI features like other vendors.
Architecture Manager at Alinma Bank4.0We used Fortify on Demand for cybersecurity threats, but its limited programming support and lack of dynamic testing led us to transition to SonarQube. SonarQube’s broader language support and pipeline integration improved testing for our core banking application.
Test Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees5.0I use Fortify on Demand to scan our bank's applications for security vulnerabilities. Its user-friendly features, especially the vulnerability scanner, are invaluable, though I wish it included runtime analysis and AI-driven enhancements for improved security.
Director at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees3.0I use Fortify on Demand at my company for security code scans. While the tool serves its purpose, it produces many false positives, and reducing these would greatly enhance its effectiveness. Evaluating other tools is costly.
Security Tester at Ray Business Technologies Private Limited4.5We utilize Fortify on Demand for static code analysis. Its user-friendly automatic scanning and AI features excel in detecting vulnerabilities and recommending solutions. The integration with CI/CD tools is beneficial, though pricing could be improved.