GitLab vs OpenText Core Application Security comparison

GitLab and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6, while OpenText is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. GitLab holds a 2.8% mindshare in AS, compared to OpenText’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 84 GitLab reviews

3,342 Views
2,379 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Application S...

Read 60 OpenText Core Application Security reviews

5,912 Views
4,419 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

GitLab

OpenText Core Application S...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Core Application Security and GitLab provide valuable tools in the application security and development category. OpenText has an advantage in compliance-driven setups due to its strong application security focus, whereas GitLab has the edge in robust DevOps features and integration capabilities.

Features: OpenText Core Application Security offers effective testing with real-time vulnerability insights, compliance ease, and integration into the development lifecycle. GitLab provides strong CI/CD pipeline management, repository integration, and continuous deployment, making it ideal for diverse development environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs better package reporting, fewer false positives, and enhanced language support, alongside improved integration with incident management and faster scanning. GitLab should focus on better third-party tool integration, particularly with Jira and Kubernetes, as well as providing clearer documentation and setup guides to enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is versatile for both on-premises and cloud deployments with mixed customer support reviews, ranging from excellent to less effective service. GitLab is primarily cloud-focused with a strong support community, though could benefit from faster direct support responses.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is perceived as expensive with concerns over subscription costs, but provides substantial benefits in reducing security risks. GitLab offers a free version suitable for smaller teams, making it competitive, particularly in scalable environments, though premium features may require justification for higher costs.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. OpenText Core Application Security Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText Core Application Security

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,945 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (3rd), DevSecOps (1st)

OpenText Core Application S...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

14th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Application Security is 4.3%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Jonathan Steyn

Principal Technical Consultant at EOH

Source code analyzer, FPR file generation, reduction of false positives and generates compliance reports, for in-depth analysis

Not challenges with the product itself. The product is very reliable. It does have a steep learning curve. But, again, one thing that Fortify or OpenText does very well is training. There are a lot of free resources and training in the community forums, free training as well as commercial training where users can train on how to use the back-end systems and the scanning engines and how to use command-line arguments because some of the procedures or some of the tools do require a bit of a learning curve. That's the only challenge I've really seen for customers because you have to learn how to use the tool effectively. But Fortify has, in fact, improved its user interface and the way users engage the dashboards and the interfaces. It is intuitive. It's easy to understand. But in some regards, the cybersecurity specialist or AppSec would need a bit of training to engage the user interface and to understand how it functions. But from the point of the reliability index and how powerful the tool is, there's no challenge there. But it's just from a learning perspective; users might need a bit more skill to use the tool. The user interface isn't that tedious. It's not that difficult to understand. When I initially learned how to use the interfaces, I was able to master it within a week and was able to use it quite effectively. So training is required. All skills are needed to learn how to use the tool. I would like to see more enhancements in the dashboards. Dashboards are available. They do need some configuration and settings. But I would like to see more business intelligence capabilities within the tool. It's not particularly a cybersecurity function, but, for instance, business impact analysis or other features where you can actually use business intelligence capabilities within your security tool. That would be remarkable because not only do you have a cybersecurity tool, but you also have a tool that can give you business impact analysis and some other measurements. A bit more intelligence in terms of that from a cybersecurity perspective would be remarkable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitLab integrates well with other platforms."

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its convenience. I am able to trace back most of my changes up to a far distance in time and it helps me to analyze and see the older version of the code."

"The SaaS setup is impressive, and it has DAST solutioning."

"The most valuable features of GitLab are the review, patch repo, and plans are in YAML."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it is compatible with GitHub. The product's integration capabilities are sufficient for our small company of 35 people."

"They incorporate new features every September, and they have introduced their own code editor and AI features."

"We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions."

"The stability of GitLab is impressive."

More GitLab pros

"What stands out to me is the user-friendliness of each feature."

"The solution scans our code and provides us with a dashboard of all the vulnerabilities and the criticality of the vulnerabilities. It is very useful that they provide right then and there all the information about the vulnerability, including possible fixes, as well as some additional documentation and links to the authoritative sources of why this is an issue and what's the correct way to deal with it."

"We identified a lot of security vulnerability much earlier in the development and could fix this well before the product was rolled out to a huge number of clients."

"Its ability to perform different types of scans, keep everything in one place, and track the triage process in Fortify SSC stands out."

"The solution saves us a lot of money. We're trying to reduce exposure and costs related to remediation."

"The licensing was good."

"The feature that I find the most useful is being able to just see the vulnerabilities online while checking the code and then checking suggestions for fixing them."

"The most valuable feature is that it connects with your development platforms, such as Microsoft Information Server and Jira."

More OpenText Core Application Security pros

Cons

"I would like more Agile features in the Premium version. The Premium version should have all Agile features that exist in the Ultimate version. IBM AOM has a complete Agile implementation, but in GitLab, you only have these features if you buy the Ultimate version. It would be good if we can use these in the Premium version."

"It would be really good if they integrated more features in application security."

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

"The only thing our company is really waiting on in terms of features is the development of metrics."

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."

"This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications."

"We do face issues in our company when we run out of disk space."

More GitLab cons

"They have very good support, but there is always room for improvement."

"During development, when our developer makes changes to their code, they typically use GitHub or GitLab to track those changes. However, proper integration between Fortify on Demand and GitHub and GitLab is not there yet. Improved integration would be very valuable to us."

"There are many false positives identified by the solution."

"They have a release coming out, which is full of new features. Based on their roadmap, there's nothing that I would suggest for them to put in it that they haven't already suggested. However, I am a customer, so I always think the pricing is something that could be improved. I am working with them on that, and they're very flexible. They work with their customers and kind of tailor the product to the customer's needs. So far, I am very happy with what they're able to provide. Their subscriptions could use a little bit of a reworking, but that would be about it."

"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand could improve the reports. They could benefit from being more user-friendly and intuitive."

"There is room for improvement in the integration process."

"Takes up a lot of resources which can slow things down."

"I would like the solution to add AI support."

More OpenText Core Application Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"This is an open-source solution."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

"There are different licensing options available, including a free limited-user license."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"GitLab is a free solution to use."

"GitLab is cheap."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"Their subscriptions could use a little bit of a reworking, but I am very happy with what they're able to provide."

"Fortify on Demand is moderately priced, but its pricing could be more flexible."

"The licensing was good because the licenses have the heavy centralized server."

"Fortify on Demand is more expensive than Burpsuite. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount."

"The price is fair compared to that of other solutions."

"The solution is a little expensive."

"It is cost-effective."

More OpenText Core Application Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,945 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

In comparison with other tools, they're competitive. It is not more expensive than other solutions, but their pricing is competitive. The licenses for Fortify On Demand are generally bought in unit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

There are frequent complaints about false positives from Fortify. One day it may pass a scan with no issues, and the next day, without any code changes, it will report vulnerabilities such as passw...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 17% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Core Application Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Application Security

June 2025

OpenText Core Application Security report

Download OpenText Core Application Security product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.

OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.

What features define OpenText Core Application Security?

Static and Dynamic Scanning: Offers thorough analysis to identify vulnerabilities during development.
Real-time Vulnerability Tracking: Continuously updates and monitors potential security threats.
Seamless Development Platform Integration: Enhances security processes without disrupting workflows.
Cloud-Based Service: Provides flexible, on-demand security capabilities with accurate results.
API Support: Allows smooth integration and automation within existing systems.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Optimizes resources by lowering costs associated with security management.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the process of identifying and resolving vulnerabilities.
Enhanced Code Security: Strengthens overall application security during the development lifecycle.
Accelerated Time-to-Market: Streamlines development stages by integrating essential security tools.

Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.

OpenText

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText Core Application Security

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. OpenText Core Application Security

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. OpenText Core Application Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,945 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. OpenText Core Application Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.