Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Logo

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Reviews

Vendor: Red Hat
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)?

Featured Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) reviews

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) in the Application Server category stands at 16.2%, down from 18.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)16.2%
Oracle WebLogic Server21.2%
Tomcat18.8%
Other43.8%
Application Server

PeerResearch reports based on Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication ServerAug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs TomcatAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs Oracle WebLogic ServerAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs IBM WebSphere Application ServerAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Oracle WebLogic Server4.021.2%86%35 interviewsAdd to research
IBM WebSphere Application Server3.812.6%88%31 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business85
Midsize Enterprise61
Large Enterprise316
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
31%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Insurance Company
5%
Educational Organization
4%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Legal Firm
3%
University
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Media Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Non Profit
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%

Compare Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) with alternative products

Learn more about Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) customers

Related questions

 
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
VP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees3.5I find JBoss to be lightweight, easy to manage, and offering better clustering compared to WebSphere. The setup is straightforward, ideal for enterprise needs, though I wish for improved booting and centralized data management similar to an AWS console.
Director of Product at a computer software company with 201-500 employees4.5I've used JBoss as our default app server for over ten years due to its flexibility and ability to stay current with modern technologies, though it could be lighter. Automation with JBoss improves deployment efficiency, lowering total ownership costs.
DevOps Cloud Engineer at Atos IT Solutions and Services4.0I use JBoss mainly for application administration, finding it stable, scalable, and rich in features like modular architecture and clustering. It improved deployment efficiency and reduced downtime, though it needs better CLI automation and cloud-native configuration support.
Network Security Engineer at Samsung3.5I’ve used Red Hat JBoss EAP extensively for Java application development and deployment. It’s cost-effective, scalable, and integrates well, though it could improve on scaling and cloud features. I’d rate it 7 out of 10.
Senior Consultant at Inacta AG4.0I utilize JBoss for Java server applications due to its speed, reliability, and solid reputation, though its cost can be a barrier. Wildfly is a viable alternative for those seeking a free version, especially if support isn't required.
Product owner at Digitt Plus (AFT)4.5In my previous company, we used JBoss to bring APIs in-house, valuing its scalability and ease of use for integrating systems like Visa. However, the documentation needs improvement for clearer guidance. Overall, JBoss is cost-effective.
Senior Architect at Systems Limited3.5Our company utilizes JBoss for enterprise clients in the banking and finance industries, appreciating its flexibility and stability. However, the solution lacks capabilities for modern needs like microservices. We adapt the open source version according to client requirements.
Founding Partner at 2Five14.5We used JBoss as our application server due to its Java EE compatibility and support for clustering. Its ease of installation and user-friendly features were valuable, though the older version lacked a user-friendly web console and flexible monitoring options.