Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PeerSpot user
Digital Security Specialist at Derivco
Real User
Oct 21, 2020
Improves firewall performance, saves engineers time in optimization, and the technical support is responsive
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the Firewall Analyser, which has a number of fantastic features."
  • "The most valuable feature is the Firewall Analyser, which has a number of fantastic features."
  • "I would like to see enhanced dashboards or build meaningful reports for executive consumption."
  • "There are areas where auditing rule changes are not accurate."

What is our primary use case?

The purpose of using the product was to attack and Analyse rule bases from a holistic perspective. The Firewall Analyzer has a rule base consolidator as well as a feature to make the rule base more permissive. It also helps to reduce rule base clutter, as well as legacy rules.

Traffic query helps us to quickly find rules that allow outbound access.

FireFlow is a useful ticketing system that integrates with many products.

We would like to use FireFlow's API to automate certain tickets that come through to leverage automation in our environment. 

How has it helped my organization?

An example is that we have a policy with 900 rules, which we were able to reduce to 500 rules. That's close to a 50 percent savings on the rule base.

We used the Unused rules function in Firewall Analyser to examine our rule base. This has drastic performance increases in our production firewalls.

Objects not used within rules can save even more when it comes to cleaning up rule bases. Where this is a very manual process without AlgoSec, engineers can have a level of automation by building useful reports to assist with clean up.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the Firewall Analyser, which has a number of fantastic features.

From a risk perspective, you can apply compliance Frameworks like ISO 27001 and PCI DSS against firewall rule bases to see if your rule base is compliant. If you are not then AlgoSec provides descriptive ways on how to adjust rules to make your rule base more compliant. 

Definitely, the policy-cleanup features are the main draw. Shadowed rules, rule duplication, rule consolidation, rules permitting too much access, and rule usage are very useful and help to clean up rule bases.

What needs improvement?

There are areas where auditing rule changes are not accurate. It is important to be accurate when using rule changes, as users need to be accountable for their changes; however, I cannot trust AlgoSec when rule changes come through on reports as they reflect incorrectly. I have taken this up with support and have never really had a resolution for this. 

I would like to see enhanced dashboards or build meaningful reports for executive consumption. 

AlgoSec is a fantastic product, and I would like to see more "granular" breakdowns of traffic on IPT traffic analysis for source and destination, as the way it does it currently does not allow me to self problems for rules with ANY in the destination.

Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using AlgoSec for one and a half years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability-wise, this product is good.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is always responsive and always willing to understand the issues. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Our previous solution was not useful and did not have an intuitive interface. Support was also terrible.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. If you understand your infrastructure, it will be easy to deploy in a central location.

What about the implementation team?

Our deployment was done through a vendor team and it took one week.

What was our ROI?

We haven't saved any money yet but we have improved the performance of certain devices.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I would suggest that you start with a VM, get a PoC with a temp license, and try it out. You will love it.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I would not like to disclose which other products, but I have used two other products that didn't even come close to AlgoSec's power.

What other advice do I have?

Its a good production and good support, definitely worth it.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Sahanawaz khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Platform Owner at Emirates NBD
Real User
Jul 27, 2020
Has made our life easier by optimizing and cleaning up tasks within a short span of time
Pros and Cons
  • "Traffic Analyzer provided the centralized view for our IT SOC operations to focus mainly on high-risk firewall rules exposing with explicit any rules."
  • "Both the modules of AlgoSec solution which has been on-boarded in our environment are amazing to use as it provides a central end to end visibility of the firewall rules spanning across the multiple layers of the firewall."
  • "Algosec should also be exploring the integration with the open source firewalls as well."
  • "Customer service is good but needs more improvement to be on listening side of the customers."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case of this solution was to optimize and cleanup all the unused legacy firewall rules from multiple firewalls which was massive in terms of time and effort.

The other user case in our environment was to automate all the manual day to day firewall changes to reduce the turnaround time for application owners.

We wanted to have central visibility for our entire firewall portfolio to see the firewall flow of traffic traversing through multiple layers of firewalls.

How has it helped my organization?

Definitely with the help of this solution it made our life easier to optimize and clean up the task within a short span of time which provided the quick visibility of all the rules to be actioned.

Traffic Analyzer provided the centralized view for our IT SOC operations to focus mainly on high-risk firewall rules exposing with explicit any rules.

The other best feature is the Fire flow module which is in the process of implementation to automate the firewall rules changes along with the workflow model right from the requester to the implementer.

What is most valuable?

Both the modules of AlgoSec solution which has been on-boarded in our environment are amazing to use it as it provides a central end to end visibility of the firewall rules spanning across the multiple layers of the firewall.

It's helping our Risk and Compliance team to assess all our firewall rules periodically and help us to remain compliant. 

It saves a lot of manual time especially in daily operations and increases the turnaround time for business.

It has helped us internally to provide the documentation for our auditing and reporting purposes.

What needs improvement?

AlgoSec should explore integrating more multi-vendor platforms and should be looking towards ready infrastructure for providing Infrastructure as service (IAAS) on any cloud platforms as the trend and technology is gradually moving from In House platforms to Cloud platforms.

Algosec should also be exploring the integration with the open source firewalls as well.

The GUI features of Algosec solution should be more flexible to use and adopt.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution for one year.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In terms of scalability, it's a license-based model to add license at any point of time when you have any new firewalls added in the portfolio.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer service is good but needs more improvement to be on listening side of the customers.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No, this is the first time we have introduced this solution.

How was the initial setup?

Our Initial setup was not so straight forward as we were exploring all the features to its depth so lots of engagement was done with OEM level to explore and implement in our environment.

What about the implementation team?

We went through local vendor support however the involvement from OEM was also huge and phenomenal.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Definitely the simplicity to use this solution is the key factor to be a leader in this competition and the other factor is the response and support model.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We went through the RFP process evaluation for all the magic quadrant leaders of the  market.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Consultant at HCL Technologies
Real User
Apr 30, 2020
During extreme load in business hours, it works well without any issues
Pros and Cons
  • "It helps us to streamline our firewall rules, identify risks, and provide better visibility. This product has significantly saved the time and human efforts in creating and deploying firewall rules. It is now easier for our cybersecurity team to analyze firewalls rules and ACLs, using them in a more efficient manner."
  • "This product has significantly saved the time and human efforts in creating and deploying firewall rules."
  • "We are running multiple hybrid cloud solutions, working with cloud providers, and looking for API integrations with cloud and related interoperability. Sometimes, when we are trying to delete or disable any rule, it takes more time than expected."
  • "Sometimes, when we are trying to delete or disable any rule, it takes more time than expected."

What is our primary use case?

We are using Firewall Analyzer (AFA) to compare configurations from multiple firewalls, such as Cisco ASA, Palo Alto, Check Point, and so on. It helps us to streamline our firewall rules, identify risks, and provide better visibility. This product has significantly saved the time and human efforts in creating and deploying firewall rules. It is now easier for our cybersecurity team to analyze firewalls rules and ACLs, using them in a more efficient manner. Other features are also very important for us.

How has it helped my organization?

With the help of this product, we can manage all the network security equipment in a centralized way. We are also able to make requests to our security team about quick and valid changes requests, helping to minimize the workload in documentation, troubleshooting and so on. This helps to identify any wrong or unnecessary changes in the network security perimeter, making sure that all security policies and best practices are followed in our network domain. During change implementation, and especially after completion, we can validate, make sure that everything is working fine, and is up-to-date per our expectations.

What is most valuable?

It’s capability to build and present entire network topology via map makes team members to easily investigate the entire domain. Whenever new applications and services get on boarded and traffic rules and policies being created it automatically discovered those Apps and services and makes life easy. Each and every performance report can be fully automated using this and saves time in audit and compliance requirement.It also helps us to clean old and obsolete rules or those rules which are not in use otherwise it could be very difficult without this product as team have to log into each firewall and remove rules and policies

What needs improvement?

We are running multiple hybrid cloud solutions, working with cloud providers, and looking for API integrations with cloud and related interoperability. Sometimes, when we are trying to delete or disable any rule, it takes more time than expected. 

Sometimes, the web browser has issues with slowness. It can be worked out with a click or two. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We are using Algosec Firewall Analyzer referred to as (AFA) since 2018.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is very stable, robust product. During extreme load in business hours, it works well without any issues. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It provides interoperability with all vendor firewalls and the scalability is much easier.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is always good whenever we contact the support team. We always get an immediate response and a solution within defined timelines.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Earlier we are not using any solution but always planning to procure solution that have ability to integrate multi vendor firewalls into single platform and after assessments and evaluations with OEM products we finally select Algosec as approved solution.  

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup was very simple. Using Quickstart help, any member can take part in deployment and administration from basic to advanced level. 

Only the firewall integration could take time due to some complex interactions. 

What about the implementation team?

We implemented using our own internal team and with the help of AlgoSec technical support team. AlgoSec technical support was excellent and prompt.

What was our ROI?

It provides an improvement in the firewall process load. It also helps with increasing CPU and memory utilization.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

When it comes to the cost of support and licensing, it is much cheaper than other competing products.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We have tried FireMon and Tufin under a non-production environment, but the overall features of AlgoSec were best. Therefore, we choose this product for our production environment.

What other advice do I have?

Excellent product to use and has tremendous support from OEM.

We have not faced many problems or issues using this product.

We also have not tested AI or ML capabilities and are very keen to start working with it now. 

Overall, it is well-maintained, robust platform tool for firewall management.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Resp. Area de Segurança at REN
Real User
Apr 22, 2020
AlgoBot checks if rules already exist or finds out easily where they need to be configured
Pros and Cons
  • "AlgoBot is a brilliantly, simple idea that lets us give our IT internal customers a way to check if rules are already in place before asking for more."
  • "AlgoSec has saved us a lot of time in managing our rule base which has become increasingly large."
  • "The license rekeying needed for when you need to change a firewall usually takes a bit of time."
  • "The only complaint is about the license rekeying needed for when you need to change a firewall. That usually takes a bit of time."

What is our primary use case?

Our main use cases for this solution are:

  • Firewall Rule optimization
  • Topology mapping of various firewalls
  • Automating the implementation of rules.
  • Reports warning before time based rules expire. 

We also implemented the AlgoBot, which is extremely useful when checking if rules already exist or finding out easily where they need to be configured.

We have 20-plus firewalls from multi-vendors in several sites, both IT and OT. Therefore, an automated way to manage firewalls is a must, especially since staff is always on the short side.

How has it helped my organization?

AlgoSec has saved us a lot of time in managing our rule base which has become increasingly large. With 20-plus multi-vendor firewalls, it gets really hard to manage without a solution like AlgoSec. This has helped us to fulfill our internal SLAs for change implementation.  

The fine tuning of the policies is a lot faster and repeatable. 

The compliance factor has also helped us a lot where we can show auditing that we have a repository for all the changes made in the firewalls, who made them, and at what time.

Gone are the days where time-based rules expire without anyone noticing. We have now automated reports sent to the team. This allows us to ask the involved asset owners if rules can be disabled or need to be extended.

What is most valuable?

Most valuable features are the firewall rule optimization, topology mapping, and automating the deployment of new rules in several multi-vendor devices. 

AlgoBot is a brilliantly, simple idea that lets us give our IT internal customers a way to check if rules are already in place before asking for more.

With firewall rule optimization, you cannot only tune most used rules higher in the rule base, but also check for unused objects or rules to clean up.

The automatic implementation of rules in several firewalls simultaneously is also a great feature, especially in large environments or on short staffed teams. 

What needs improvement?

AlgoBot should be more developed by adding more features to the chat.

We will be integrating with Cisco ACI soon. Hopefully, new features with this integration will be developed as well in terms of automation.

I came across a difficulty recently with a BGP enabled firewall that had a large number of routes. This wasn't directly supported due to a 3000 rule per firewall limit.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using AlgoSec for over six years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It has been running flawlessly since installation. Even upgrades are pretty straightforward and have never given us problems.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have added 10 more firewalls to our 14 existing and have had no performance or scalability issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

We have had several tickets opened and the responses were fast. This enabled us to solve our problems quickly. The only complaint is about the license rekeying needed for when you need to change a firewall. That usually takes a bit of time.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did use a different solution for several years. The features and usability made us switch.

How was the initial setup?

If you are knowledgeable about the firewalls that you intend to manage, the initial setup is really easy. The most difficult steps are configuring checkpoints for LEA integration where you need to create the object in each firewall, establish connectivity, install the database, install the policy, etc.

What about the implementation team?

It was initially implemented through a vendor. Their level of expertise was good enough to implement the solution effortlessly.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Cost is based on firewall. There are bundles, e.g., virtual firewalls might make the solution cheaper.

The licensing scheme should be done in a simpler way. For example, if we delete a firewall and want to add a new one, then the license doesn't get freed up automatically. You have to request a new license to customer support and install it. If you are testing new implementations, this can be cumbersome.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated the main competitor, Tufin, because we were using it!

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
MITP-2 at State of Nevada Department of Administration Message
Real User
Apr 22, 2020
Traffic queries help when troubleshooting a problem, especially if the traffic goes through two or more firewalls
Pros and Cons
  • "Traffic queries are a great help when troubleshooting a problem, especially if the traffic is going through two or more firewalls."
  • "Technical support is the best that I have ever dealt with."
  • "The initial cost was high for us, but we have always been behind the tech curve and cost has always been the limiting factor."
  • "The initial cost was high for us, but we have always been behind the tech curve and cost has always been the limiting factor."

What is our primary use case?

I am the senior network security engineer in an environment of more than 80 firewalls ranging from ASA 5506-X to ASA 5585-X and now to FortiGate 3960E. As part of this position, I need to be able to audit firewalls and ensure that they are compliant to a number of policies.  Before AlgoSec, this was done in a very long, slow manual process, and it took days to audit even the smallest firewall. With AlgoSec, I can run a compliance report and see exactly where that firewall falls short.

How has it helped my organization?

AlgoSec has freed up my time to look into new solutions and complete other jobs that I have to get done. I have been able to shepherd the migration from Cisco ASA to FortiGate and using AlgoSec made that process much easier. Now, when I get a request for audit information, that information is available at a click. A PCI audit is no sweat. I know which firewalls fall under PCI, and I can provide the needed answers in minutes instead of days.  This has improved my use of time.

What is most valuable?

Policy optimization, compliance, and change reports are the most valuable. I can clean up firewall rules quickly, optimizing the rule set and moving on in hours. Before, I was looking at days. Compliance is a breeze. The change reports are helpful to see changes over time and also be a "second set of eyes" when looking into issues. 

The mapping tool is helpful. 

Traffic queries are a great help when troubleshooting a problem, especially if the traffic is going through two or more firewalls.

What needs improvement?

I can't think of specific improvements. If anything, the product has been improving in usefulness constantly. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer for approximately two and a half years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Product hotfixes are released regularly and are a breeze to install. I have dealt with other products that always promising to fix bugs, but it takes months or longer for the next patch to appear. AlgoSec is on top of this and in my opinion is a real leader with bug fixes.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is the best that I have ever dealt with. I have yet to have a support engineer tell me that they couldn't fix a problem or that it was sunspots (Cisco TAC). They have gone above and beyond multiple times. I never hesitated to call as they have never made me feel that the problem is the user, even though I am sure that there were times it has been.

I have never had a problem that the technical support wasn't willing to dig into and get resolved.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Not really. We used a homegrown VBScript that would parse the configurations on our firewalls for auditing. This didn't help at all with compliance.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is not difficult. The professional services were outstanding in installation and knowledge transfer.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented through a vendor team. Their expertise was outstanding. They made sure to spend a lot time doing knowledge transfer.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The initial cost was high for us, but we have always been behind the tech curve and cost has always been the limiting factor. That attitude has changed. Now, we look for the best, not simply the cheapest.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did look at a couple of other solutions. FireMon and Qualsys are the only two I remember.

What other advice do I have?

It has saved my bacon a number of times and is a great arrow to have in your quiver of tools.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1335075 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Engineer at Chubb
Real User
Apr 22, 2020
Risky rules reports help to reduce manual work
Pros and Cons
  • "We need less time to identify any risks in our firewalls, as we can detect changes in real-time."
  • "It is a great tool that makes work easier each day."
  • "A vulnerability management module might be interesting, though not integrated with a third-party vendor. It should be an AlgoSec VM module."
  • "Some PDF reports are not so good. E.g., the graphics and reports are not so good."

How has it helped my organization?

We need less time to identify any risks in our firewalls, as we can detect changes in real-time.

We have obtained in easy way to do compliance reports for audit purposes. With this optimization reports, we can clean up unused rules, consolidate covered or redundant rules. We can also define trusted rules that apply.

Risky rules reports help to reduce manual work and identify the main risky configurations to remove. This give us some recommendations on how remediate and their importance.

What is most valuable?

  • Identifying and removing risky rules
  • Firewall rules cleanup (unused rules)
  • Security compliance reports
  • Security baseline settings

What needs improvement?

A vulnerability management module might be interesting, though not integrated with a third-party vendor. It should be an AlgoSec VM module.

I would like some server integration for vulnerability management.  

Some PDF reports are not so good. E.g., the graphics and reports are not so good. Sometimes, we need to create graphics and reports to compare security ratings across months and groups. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AlgoSec for two years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Awesome.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Great.

How are customer service and technical support?

Excellent and very kind technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licensing is very easy to set up. The pricing is relative to how you want to expand and harden your network security. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not evaluate another solution.

What other advice do I have?

It is a great tool that makes work easier each day. I can't imagine working without AlgoSec and using it for my daily activities. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Network Security Engineer/Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
Nov 23, 2023
Excellent for firewall policy auditing and firewall policy automation
Pros and Cons
  • "It now takes less than half of the time it took before we had this tool to deploy the flows requested by the business."
  • "We would like to see more features in the GUI so that we don't have to work with the API as extensively."

What is our primary use case?

We've been using Algosec as our reference tool to clean our policies from old unused rules and objects and to assess rules that are categorized as risky so that we can fix those risks.

Firewall Analyzer from Algosec is our main tool for Firewall auditing and it makes our external auditors very confident on the way our policies are managed.

Fireflow from Algosec also helps us identifying which firewalls are on the way from source to destination when we need to open flows and it saves us a lot of time. We are still on our path to implement full automation of firewall policy creation with Algosec's Fireflow but the goal is to achieve it soon.

How has it helped my organization?

Since we deployed Algosec our Firewall policies which didn't have much maintenance over more than 15 years had their policies reduced to less than half the rules by using Algosec's Firewall Analyzer to remove unused rules, unused objects withing rules, compacting several firewall rules in one rule, etc.

We were also able with Firewall Analyzer to get risk reports of our firewall policies and start tackling them to close them or at least to be aware of its existance.

Firewall Analyzer is amazon in Policy Optimization and we feel we are much more secure since we have this product. If we add a rule that poses a risk we get an alert from Firewall Analyzer which is very important to us.

We are also starting to use Fireflow and our goal is to have the policy creation automated soon. For now we are already able to identify which firewalls are on the path between point A and point B and we are on the path to full automation which will reduce a lot the workload of our team.

What is most valuable?

The feature we find the most valuable is the Firewall Analyzer for the firewall policy audits and to show external auditors we have a process to identify risks and to tackle them. It's also very important for policy clean maintenance. 

This helps us know which devices are between the source and destination on the flows that we need to open for the business. The audit tools are also very important to us because we can easily have everything that needs to be presented to the security auditors.

We are in the process of implementing FireFlow for full automation which will save us time for more important things we need to to on daily basis that are not creating firewall rules. We aim to achieve the full automation soon.

What needs improvement?

In our case it would be very important to improve support to Dell switches and also some Juniper switches, which we have a lot of in our company network. This has been our difficulty for the full automation on the Fireflow. If all our network devices were Cisco I'm sure we would have the network map complete very easily and the full automation working with much less effort.

We already asked Algosec for the support of the switches we have that are not natively supported for the future versions and we expect that we are lucky enough for them to be supported on the next releases, although there are some ways of working around non-natively supported switches to complete the network map.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Algosec solution for more than 5 years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We never had issues so far in terms of stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is very scalable and allows you to add all the firewalls and devices you need.

It is also scalable on the licensing as you can start by buying only the Firewall Analyzer license with which you can start onboarding all the devices and completing the network diagram so that Algosec's has the whole picture and know all the paths from network A to B.

After that you are ready to start using FireFlow and you can buy the license only when you are ready to start deploying it.

How are customer service and support?

Sometimes it takes more time than expected to have answers for support tickets, but in general the customer service is good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Not in our case.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup has been easy. The only difficult thing was the part in which we needed to onboard non natively supported switches. That part is a bit more complex.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented with a mix of external company and in-house. The external team was helpful and had a good expertise level.

What was our ROI?

The time we save on our daily operations is very important. We could reduce the team size with this tool as we had a trainee almost fully working on opening flows.

It also allows us to detect risks on firewall rules and fix them, keeping the company network safe.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price for the solution is not cheap but if you use it fully it will compensate in terms of securitization and in terms of time gained on the daily operations. It is also very helpful if your company is audited on the security part.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We heard about Tufin and Algosec, and after going through the specs we decided to go on a POC with Algosec and ended up buying it as it fitted our needs. We followed our Firewall integrator advice, who also recommended Algosec for our Firewall's park which is basically Fortinet and Check Point.

What other advice do I have?

We recommend trying fully automation in a controlled environment before widely deploying it to the production firewalls. It's important to gain confidence on the product.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Zufayri Zaidi - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Analyst at AceTeam Networks
Real User
Jun 5, 2023
A solution with a good interface that can be used for firewall policy management
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of AlgoSec is its firewall analyzer."
  • "AlgoSec's audit management is not good enough and can be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We use AlgoSec for firewall policy management.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of AlgoSec is its firewall analyzer. AlgoSec also has a better interface.

What needs improvement?

AlgoSec's audit management is not good enough and can be improved. Also, AlgoSec should be made more scalable.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AlgoSec for around one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AlgoSec is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

AlgoSec is not a scalable solution. Only I use AlgoSec in our company to do firewall management.

How was the initial setup?

It is moderately easy to set up AlgoSec.

What about the implementation team?

Two staff were involved in AlgoSec's deployment, which took around three hours.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing AlgoSec, we evaluated Tufin as an option. We chose AlgoSec because it has a better interface.

What other advice do I have?

AlgoSec is a good firewall management tool for organizations with multiple firewall levels. If you only have two or three firewall levels, then AlgoSec is not worth investing in.

Overall, I rate AlgoSec an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.