Amazon QuickSight Reviews

We run as a part of our agriculture platform, a lot of web apps and mobile apps. Amazon QuickSight is used in the backend for analytics and data analysis.

We are using Amazon QuickSight as we see at least 30% time savings.

Amazon QuickSight is a SaaS platform where we can run queries and get analytics without installing any software. It works well with the AWS ecosystem.

The cost of queries is very high. Improvements in drill-down ability and evolving it as an OLAP tool would help more.

We have been using it for about one year.

Amazon QuickSight has been stable in the past year.

Our dataset is not very large, so we haven't had scalability issues yet.

Support is satisfactory. Amazon support deserves ten points out of ten.

Positive

For log management, we use an in-house solution and not any third-party product right now.

No installation is required for Amazon QuickSight. Amazon maintains the service.

We see at least 30% time savings.

Competition pricing is high for query processing, however, the Data Lake cost is nominal as it is on top of S3.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

I am a consultant and an Amazon partner and reseller advising clients about which solution they should seriously focus on. For the current project, I did a comparison on PeerSpot to show them substantial information about which of the platforms is the one which they should prefer because each of them has different strengths and weaknesses, pros and cons.

The solution is very quick to turn around and integrate. You can do everything well on the QuickSight platform.

The platform’s pricing is a bit hard because even though you get a 30-day trial, you have a standard edition that's only in-house. The product is quite expensive because the price is too close to QlikView's prices but it does not ring as well as QlikView.

I am no professional analytics person, but as a developer and consultant, I think the quality of the product can be improved and be made more feature rich as well. They could do some predictive analytics, and have their graphics be a bit better to make it look nicer.

I also think they should focus on QuickSight as a separate line of business so they can generate better revenue. I have seen many companies bought over that just rest on their laurels and do not show substantial improvement in terms of features or performance like a company that has to fight tooth and nail for their sales.

I have been using Amazon QuickSight for around three months now.

The performance of the solution is quite alright and straightforward. Although QuickSight is at the testing level for us, the solution is responsive enough.

The solution is moderately stable. However, I am not very convinced about the stability since I have yet to see a huge implementation of the solution, for over 5,000 viewers for instance.

I have not contacted the support team yet, and neither have I faced any problems with the solution so far. However, I have some local Amazon staff contacts whom I can reach out to if there's any issue.

I worked with QlikView as a part of their evaluation committee about a decade ago.

From what I see so far, it's very easy to start up. Amazon QuickSight is relatively easy to configure, but I think they could optimize it a bit more. The product is in a transition as they're integrating with AWS, so the authentication part gets a bit messy.

There are no additional license fees apart from the standard licensing fees. However, the standard license is meant only for internal users and not for free readers. That's a problem, because to have free viewers, you need to escalate up to the enterprise license which ideally should not be the case.

In addition to QuickSight, I am also evaluating other options like Tableau and QlikView as these solutions are very well evaluated.

My advice is to look at your use case, look at your complexities, the sophistication of reporting that you need, and the end results of what you want. Do you have a simple reporting need? Do you get straightforward reporting requests? Or do you need something more professional and higher-end? Based on these parameters, make the decision. I would rate the solution a six and a half out of ten.

Amazon QuickSight is a business intelligence tool that gives the user all kinds of reports, like real-time and historical reporting. It allows you to showcase various reports and analytics and even trigger some limited actions. It's primarily designed for advisors or analysts.

I've used it extensively for Amazon Connect reporting.  There are many tools that can integrate with Amazon Connect for reporting, but since Amazon Connect lacks native customization features, one way to customize reporting is to use QuickSight. 

Compared to other reporting tools, it is very effective but does require an understanding of certain concepts in QuickSight. This understanding is crucial for creating dimensions, changing metrics, and visualizing reports. If someone has a thorough knowledge of QuickSight, it is a very good tool that allows for significant customization. 

Recently, with AI integrations coming into play, QuickSight has gained a lot of new features, particularly in its integration with Amazon services and the ability to write queries using simple English. This is a fantastic feature that has helped me create and deploy reports more quickly.

One area is that integrating data from different sources into QuickSight can be a bit tricky, especially with Amazon Connect. To get data flowing, you need to use two additional services and configure them correctly. 

The setup isn't straightforward and can be time-consuming.

Secondly, while QuickSight is a BI tool, it lacks features to suggest actions or integrate with other systems to turn it into more than just a data display tool.

Additionally, from a user perspective, QuickSight is easy to use if you have analytics experience. For beginners, it takes more time to understand the mechanics, visualizations, and overall functionality. 

Lastly, integration with Amazon Connect can be unstable. Changes on the Amazon Connect side can impact datasets in QuickSight, causing reporting failures. These are some of the drawbacks that needs improvement. 

I have been using it for three years. 

In previous deployments, Amazon Connect was used by all the supervisors and some of the C-suite executives who were actually using Connect. All those supervisors, C-suite people, and even team leaders in the contact centers used QuickSight for their day-to-day operations. 

They relied on it to understand their dashboards, check wallboards, and monitor how graphs showcase the different performances of the agents and even the voicebots at times. 

In a call center with around 300 total, I have seen 20  to 25+ QuickSight users, which includes C-suite people as well, like the head of the call center and the head of business operations.

It's affordable compared to other long-term contractor business tools available in the market. There are cost advantages with QuickSight, but it needs to be configured properly to realize these savings and get the most out of the platform at a lesser cost.

For first-time users, it's crucial to understand the use case first. Why do we need to use QuickSight? It's like a Lego block, capable of constructing a lot. So, determine whether QuickSight is really necessary for your use case. 

If QuickSight is chosen, take advantage of Amazon's documentation to learn about its strengths and capabilities. Understand the different dimensions, metrics, visualizations it supports, and the various fields and objects. Learn how it integrates with data sources. Knowing these aspects well will help you launch your projects faster and more easily.

Based on my personal experience with the usage and UI, I would rate it around a five out of ten. There are many developments that could still be made in QuickSight, especially in the way it integrates.

We generate reports from QuickSight, and the data is stored in an S3 bucket.

The graph charts, pie charts, and box plots are valuable.

In one of the use cases, we had to embed the dashboard into the client application. The embedding function doesn’t work well. The solution must be more user-friendly. I have also written some questions on the community page.

I have been using the solution for the last three years.

I rate the tool’s stability a six out of ten. Some functionalities are not available in the product. It is not as mature as Tableau and Power BI.

I rate the tool’s scalability a six out of ten. The product is serverless. It can be scaled, but it takes time based on the workload and the data that needs to be fed from the dashboard. Around 500 people use the product in our organization.

I have raised around three tickets. I get responses from the support team.

Neutral

I rate the ease of setup a seven out of ten. The deployment took hardly two to three hours. We needed three people to deploy the product.

The solution’s price is fine. I rate the pricing a six out of ten. The pricing depends on the number of authors and readers we need.

I evaluated Tableau and Power BI, but our clients’ setup was established on AWS, so they preferred Amazon QuickSight.

People are using the tool without any problems. Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.

We have used it as rapid prototyping for exploring visualizations and analytics with the data. It seems to work quite nicely.

Our clients are looking for advice. To the extent that they were on AWS, we pointed them to this rather than using Power BI, which frankly we had an awful experience with. We were comfortable with the AWS stack, everything on AWS, and we pointed them to that for some of their analytics and with us holding their hand. Rather than investing in another product, we found a good cost model there. If you're running on AWS and paying for those services, the whole QuickSight thing was a nominal add-on cost for its services. It's actually pretty efficient.

From an analytics perspective, it's really good for self-service analytics.

It's not a Tableau. It's not a TIBCO Spotfire. They could do further integration with some data governance and data cataloging. You can't tell a data story as well in QuickSight as you can on others, especially in TIBCO Spotfire. If they integrated it more with some data cataloging and had some guided analytics where it will walk you through everything, that would be ideal. Most clients don't expect it to do that. That said, once again, it isn't a Tableau. The results are as good as Tableau, and yet, it doesn't, from an engineering perspective, tell the data story or allow a user to be able to access a data catalog that lets you drive how your analytics need to go. I don't if they're working on that, however, that would be a lovely enhancement.

I've used the solution within two years. 

The stability has been quite good. I don't believe we've had any major issues with the stability. I can't recall dealing with bugs or glitches and it doesn't seem to crash or freeze.

I haven't really tested the scalability. There's no reason to think it wouldn't, given AWS's general capability. 

I'm aware of other solutions. however, rather than licensing Tableau or Power BI, or TIBCO, we found that we needed an introductory analyst tool for our clients that we could help them use. The more sophisticated users are using things like TIBCO on AWS, or Tableau, or Looker. However, with QuickSight, we find it to be really good as an introductory tool for our clients that want to do simple analytics.

The cost of the solution has a minimal cost if users are already on the AWS stack.

There are additional service fees based on the services it consumes. However, the cost is pretty mild. 

It's not like it's a few pennies a day. However, it's a per service or CPU and disc storage, and it's mostly CPU. It's a minimal surcharge as you're consuming more services on AWS.

I'm very excited about their product. We were using others, other things for visualization analytics, however, within the AWS stack, it's actually proving to be pretty capable.

It was a whole AWS stack that we're shaping out. Given our partnership with Amazon, they've been pushing a lot of different services and products at us. But the QuickSight was something that was remarkably quick to stand out and recreate some use cases within, for example, Power BI. So we have found that to allow for a really rapid, quickly produced prototype. 

I would recommend QuickSight as, if you were a citizen developer, it's very approachable. Learning something like TIBCO or Power BI is a bigger learning curve. What I do like about QuickSight, is that it gives a relative beginner the ability to really start seeing results quickly. I don't think it's a competitor yet for some of the more sophisticated tools. However, if a developer or developer's client was relatively unsophisticated, it's a very smooth and quick place to start.

I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten simply due to the fact that, in its class, it does well, however, in comparison to some other tools, it's not as robust.

Our primary use case bank in the financial sector, we review the information and make some validation with the legacy system and a book of indicators of KPIs with directors and CEOs.

The data is very powerful and the splice is fast.

The most valuable feature I have found is the low-level securities are very easy to use. The power of calculation with variables or building formulas and you can use datasets that are incremental updates. It is powerful and fast. You do not need to update all the data, you can use a partial update. It is something you use a lot in the industry.

I would like to see a feature that allows us to save a draft version before making it public and publishing it. This draft option would allow for comments to be made and those comments to be reviewed. Changes could be made and then published to the public.

I have been using Amazon QuickSight for the past two years.

The stability is excellent. Only one time in two years was the service not working and that was for an hour.

There is very good scalability and large capacity.

Technical support is very good. You have support and a forum where you can search for help and new ways to use it.

The initial setup was straightforward and easy.

The implementation was done in-house. The deployment usually takes one week to ten days.

The pricing is cost-effective with a good plan.

You can use it with confidence and you can trust in a product that is evolving very fast. It is better than Tableau, which is another leader in the market. Amazon QuickSight is easy to use and cost-effective. On a scale of one to ten, I would give Amazon QuickSight an eight.

I'm a student, and I'm using Amazon QuickSight for my research paper. I'm using it for visualization.

I like that with Amazon QuickSight, you don't need to install an app to use its services. With other BI tools, you need to install the app, so Amazon QuickSight is better for me in this area.

I have no idea how other powerful tools such as Tableau and Power BI work, but an area for improvement in Amazon QuickSight is the storage. That needs to be increased, but that also means you have to pay for that increase in storage.

It would be great if Amazon QuickSight had a free trial for students.

I also noticed that the product no longer allows the creation of stories. It used to have that feature, so Amazon QuickSight should bring that back.

Another area for improvement in the tool is data cleanup because I'm experiencing errors when cleaning the data. Some data automatically gets deleted, so that should be improved, and there should be more options for data cleanup.

What I'd like Amazon QuickSight to have in the future is documentation. It needs video tutorials to help users write code and show the different functions and purposes of Amazon QuickSight.

I've used Amazon QuickSight for six to seven months now.

Amazon QuickSight is a stable product.

I didn't try other BI tools apart from Amazon QuickSight.

I'm using a paid version of Amazon QuickSight, paying about $22 monthly. As I have yet to learn about the pricing for other tools, such as Power BI, I won't be able to compare. Still, if Amazon QuickSight has lower pricing than Power BI, then it's the better product, but if its pricing is higher, then the pricing for Amazon QuickSight needs to be lowered.

The only BI tool I have experience with is Amazon QuickSight.

I'm using the student version of the tool.

I didn't work with a significant amount of data, so at the moment, I won't be able to advise new users of Amazon QuickSight.

My rating for Amazon QuickSight is six out of ten.

I'm a user of Amazon QuickSight.

We use QuickSight for the BI and for reporting purposes. We want to integrate two different applications. For example, we would want to merge NetSuite and an accounting solution and get the data from a fancy dashboard. Users can get any information they want at any point. We don’t need to query it every time we need something.

It has a lot of valuable features, but the most important aspect is the affordable cost. This solution costs much less in comparison to the competitors like Qlik Sense, Power BI, and Tableau. 

Otherwise, the rest of the features are similar to the competitors.

It can be made more user-friendly as some users might find this solution hard to implement. Qlik Sense, for example, is very user-friendly. 

The design and visual appearance of the dashboard can be upgraded for improved user efficiency. 

The product is stable. Around 10-14% of people in my organization are using Amazon QuickSight. This is because most of the market has already been dominated by Tableau. Qlik Sense has also captured a large part of the market. 

It should be scalable.

We were using Qlik Sense, but presently we are migrating to Amazon QuickSight.  

It's not complex, but it's a bit tricky compared to the other tools. The setup of reporting on Amazon QuickSight is more difficult than other tools like Qlik Sense, Power BI and Tableau. 

There are different cost structures for using Amazon QuickSight. A fixed membership can be obtained and a timeframe basis membership is available for users too. I believe the pricing is quite low and the solution is worth the money. 

If a client is already using a competitor solution like Qlik Sense, then on most occasions, they wouldn't want to migrate to Amazon QuickSight. I personally believe that this solution is going to blow up the market very soon. I would rate it an eight out of ten.