Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Reviews

I use Cambium Networks Wireless WAN mostly for wireless service.

The most valuable features of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN are cloud management and links.

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range.

I have been using Cambium Networks Wireless WAN for approximately a year and a half.

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is highly stable.

The scalability of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is good.

We have approximately 30 to 40 clients using this solution.

I rate the scalability of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN a nine out of ten.

I have not used the technical support from Cambium Networks Wireless WAN.

We did not previously use another solution.

The initial setup of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is straightforward. The deployment takes 20 to 25 minutes. However, it depends on the environment.

Our in-house technical team does the implementation of the solution. We have an engineer and technician that support the solution. If the size of the implementation is larger we will need more support staff.

We have seen a return on investment by using Cambium Networks Wireless WAN.

I rate the level of ROI from using Cambium Networks Wireless WAN a five out of five.

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is a free solution, we only pay for the hardware. The warranty of the hardware is for five years

I rate Cambium Networks Wireless WAN a ten out of ten.

What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch.

I think this product could be improved if It were SMS based. If I have a visitor in my office, I'd like to be able to send them the wireless password as a message via SMS, so I don't have to give it out. 

I would like to see some type of blocker device. I need to block certain devices that should not be present in my organization or in my network.

We have been using Cambium for three years.

This is a stable solution.

The scalability is good. 

I think support could be better and more efficient. 

The initial setup was very easy and only took about five minutes. 

There is no licensing cost, just the initial fee for the solution.

I also evaluated Meraki.

I give this product a seven out of ten. 

This is a cost-effective solution and you can get many benefits from it, but you don't get 100% of what you need. You're getting 70 to 80 percent benefit with the Cambium, as opposed to other solutions that cost more. 

The version I am using involves the model I am utilizing for testing. 

We use the solution for data sharing and file sending. We test any environment when it comes to sharing among people who are roaming. 

I did not like this solution from the get go and have no interest in it, as it is entirely not good for the end-user. 

There are no features that I have found to be most valuable. The solution offers no features that cannot be found in other products. 

In the three to four months since I started testing the product I have found its performance to be lacking and it to be very difficult and complicated. The interface is difficult. 

The Cambium user interface and configuration should be improved. The configuration is very complicated and not user friendly.

The solution should be BLE enabled. In a recent review I conducted of Cisco 9115 and Cisco 9100 it came to my attention that both of these products are BLE enabled.

We have been testing Cambium for three to four months. 

One could say that the solution is stable. 

One could say that Cambium is a scalable solution. 

It is not being extensively used, although we do have plans to increase the usage.  

Technical support is not very good. It's very hard to initiate the technical support. One would have to make a huge effort in this areas since we are talking about a new product that nobody is familiar with. This will take time. If a person were to open a car manufacturing plant, he would expect the product to provide support of after sales service, Yet, if the technical support were not good the question would arise as to whether he would wish to buy the product again. 

The initial setup was complex.

The user interface is very complicated and not well defined. Configuring is very difficult. In contrast, Cisco is very straightforward and user-friendly when it comes to installation and configuration. 

The duration of the deployment depends on the person's knowledge. 

We made use of a consultant for the deployment. Our experience with him was what one would typically expect. 

When it comes to licensing costs we have been using the Cambium devices on a trial basis. 

I am not comfortable with Cambium because it will take time for it to attain the viability in the user market that Cisco has, which is a market leader geared for large enterprises. This will only change once Cambium provides a big boost and makes the necessary changes needed to have a very good user product. But, Cisco is Cisco.

We have ten users making use of the solution. While five departments will deploy a single Cambium device, the same users are using it.

My advice to others is that the configuration should be user-friendly and uncomplicated. 

I rate Cambium as a five out of ten. 

It is good for small hospitals and small shops because they are places where there are more people in a small area.

It is reasonably priced and has good technical support.

I think the installation and configuration could be easier. A bit more user friendly software for configuration would be good.

The stability could be improved as well.

We've been using it for a couple of months.

I think it could be more stable.

Technical support has been good.

The installation was a bit complex. It took about an hour or two for one access point.

We used a vendor team during implementation.

I think the pricing is fine for Cambium.

I would rate Cambium at six, on a scale from one to ten. The price and technical support are good, but the installation is a bit complex.

We use the solution as an internet service provider to the end-user, individual user, for direct collaboration, and in the government offices. 

Cambium is really nice. I used to use Ubiquiti and that solution was fine for a while. However, Cambium is better because as they have eEPMP 400. In Africa, you need a low price. You also need to get a lot of customers.

In terms of performance, even in small items, everything is very good.

The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple.

The solution isn't as well known in the country. Most people are more familiar with Ubiquiti, and that solution has a lot of other options. 

Pricing isn't ideal and could be improved.

The solution can sometimes be very slow and clunky.

The solution needs to add an LTE solution and/or something in 3.5GHz.

I originally started working with the solution in 2014. It's been a number of years now since I was first introduced to the solution.

The solution is quite stable. It's very reliable for our clients. It doesn't crash or freeze. It doesn't seem to have bugs or glitches.

That said, sometimes, for streaming in the country, we have issues. They're just minor. It's not a big problem.

The solution is quite scalable. If a company needs to expand the solution, they should be able to.

I've never personally dealt with technical support, therefore I can't speak to their level of service.

We've used Ubiquiti in the past and prefer Cambium over Ubiquiti. There were a lot of problems previously and customers were complaining it wasn't working right, so we had to abandon Ubiquiti. Now the customers seem to be content.

In some cases, we still use Ubiquiti, although it's rare now. We also occasionally use an AT&T PS 300.

The initial setup is not complex. It's very easy to implement.

The deployment is almost instantaneous. It only takes a minute.

You only need one person to handle deployment and maintenance.

We implement this solution for our clients as a service provider.

The solution is a bit pricey. There are extra costs, for example, for equipment or hardware that isn't included, such as cables, etc. It's not too expensive, however.

We're a service provider and a customer. We're working with an older version of the product. We have ePMP 2000 and we want to upgrade to 3000, which we will be doing soon. We plan to use the solution into the future.

I'd recommend the solution, and recommend everyone uses PMP.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. It's worked very well for us.

Our primary use case for the solution is to evaluate our warehouse management to determine where materials are, so our users are not facing any trouble while dispatching or putting away that material.

The performance is very good.

I rate the solution a ten out of ten. The solution is good but it can be improved by making it perfectly stable.

We have been using the solution for approximately six years.

The coverage is very good, and it is a stable product.

The solution is scalable, and approximately 130 users are utilizing the solution. We have to deploy over 80 access points because we have two or three per AP.

We rate our experience with customer service and support as ten out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward and takes between 15 to 30 minutes. However, if it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy, and we have to wait for some vehicles that can bring a person or the height.

We implemented the solution in-house.

A license is required for its warranty and extension, and its price is good.

We use the solution for enterprise Wi-Fi access points service.

The solution is easy to use.

The solution's price could be better.

We have been using the solution for a few years.

It is a stable solution, and I rate its stability as an eight.

The solution is scalable. We have customers working with more than 50 units of the solution.

The solution's customer service is good.

The complexity of the solution's initial setup depends on specific outdoor infrastructure. Its deployment involves multiple factors, including equipment, electricity, bandwidth, wall mounts, technical design, radio design, IP engineering, etc. It requires approximately a day to complete and varies from project to project.

It is an expensive solution.

Cambium is easy to install, maintain and work with. I advise others to make the purchase decision based on their requirements. 

I rate the solution as an eight.

We use Cambium for backhauling.

The Wifi coverage and throughput performance of Cambium could improve.

I have been using Cambium for approximately 12 years.

The scalability of Cambium is good outdoors but indoors it is not very good.

I have not used technical support.

The initial setup of Cambium is straightforward.

There are not any licenses needed to use Cambium.

I rate Cambium an eight out of ten.