ChatGPT Team - Enterprise Reviews

I don't have one use case. I have many. I use ChatGPT for creativity and brainstorming. I often use it to generate ten or twenty ideas for a topic, and that often helps me to then pick which direction I actually want to go into. I use it to fine-tune my writing skills. When I write an important document, I ask it to analyze it. When I create presentations, I often ask ChatGPT to create images for me. I often ask ChatGPT to summarize long texts for me. I also use it for complex knowledge research where I would have to use multiple searches on Google.

The chat and talk functionality and the search functionality are the best features ChatGPT offers. I also switched a lot of my searches from Google to ChatGPT, and it scales well. More people have easier access to knowledge.

I think it's pretty good. No recommendations.

Around two years.

Well, it scales well.

I've never interacted with customer support. I never needed it.

Positive

I switched a lot of my searches from Google to ChatGPT. I also evaluated Perplexity, but ChatGPT was better. I also looked at DeepSeek, Claude, Grok, and a lot of other LLMs, but in the end ChatGPT is the best for my average use case.

Very straightforward, very easy.

A lot of time saved on certain tasks.

Perplexity, DeepSeek, Claude, Grok, and a lot of other LLMs.

Just use it. Just don't be afraid to use it. Just go with it. I would rate ChatGPT a nine on a scale of one to ten. It's really, really good.

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is visible in my LinkedIn profile, and I have been working with it for a certain period. I have integrated it with n8n and have also integrated it with other existing business systems related to ChatGPT Team - Enterprise. I am working with the SaaS version of ChatGPT Team - Enterprise.

The best features in ChatGPT Team - Enterprise from my perspective are notable. The context-aware responses provide significant value in my company communication strategies. ChatGPT Team - Enterprise's context-aware responses are valuable in how I assess their contribution to my company communication strategies.

Beyond adding more African languages, there are other aspects of ChatGPT Team - Enterprise that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future.

I have some knowledge about OpenAI technical support regarding ChatGPT Team - Enterprise.

Positive

The pricing is on the heavier side for the Nigerian market. Overall, ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is cost effective and brings a return on investment for my use.

DeepSeek, ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, and Grok are not quite the same, but there are key differences among those products.

I can share advice and recommendations with others who are considering ChatGPT Team - Enterprise for their environment. I am working as a business automation expert with Instutech Limited. I rate this review 9 out of 10.

We used Rockset as an SQL interface on some of DynamoDB. Our use case is primarily for customer-facing data reporting.

The ease of integrating Rockset once with DynamoDB and minimal maintenance has improved our organizational efficiency. The performance on the SQL queries was pretty fast, which was a significant benefit for us.

The most valuable feature is the ease of service. It just works once integrated with DynamoDB. The performance on SQL queries is fast.

For our use, there is no room for improvement. It depends on how you use it, however, from our perspective, it has met our needs.

We started using Rockset around the end of 2020 and continued until earlier this year.

From how we have used it, Rockset has always been stable. We never saw any issues. It always performed faster than our overall customer portal.

Our use case wasn't anything crazy, so for what we have done, it was totally fine. We run pretty small instances, so I can't judge its scalability for larger use cases.

Customer service and support have been very good. I know the founding team well and have always felt that we received good service. We had more interactions compared to other software and services.

Positive

The initial setup was very simple. As long as you give it access to your database, that’s it. It took about an hour.

For what they do, I think Rockset is priced just right. I wouldn't say it's cheap or expensive. It's definitely worth the money for the problem it solves.

Rockset is now bought by OpenAI. It’s uncertain if Rockset will continue to exist as it is. OpenAI may have its own agenda for it. They have started canceling some contracts with customers, so this might change how Rockset operates.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We use Rockset to get data from the database faster, just like MySQL. Our actual database was not in the query language. We were getting a replica of that database, and there was a breach. Anything that is changed on the database will also be stored in Rockset. We used the solution for analytics purposes.

Rockset is very fast, and you can query just like in MySQL.

Filtering the database based on indexes is difficult in Rockset and should be simplified.

I have been using Rockset for the last two years.

Rockset is a stable solution.

The solution has good scalability.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

Rockset is an easy tool, and anyone can use it. The solution provides some type of data grouping. This grouping of data based on some parameters is not simple, but it is very useful. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.