Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise vs Claude for Enterprise comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
2nd
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
5th
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
2nd
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Claude for Enterprise
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
5th
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
7th
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
6th
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
4th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (5th), AI Software Development (14th), AI Content Creation (6th), AI Research (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the AI Proofreading Tools category, the mindshare of ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is 8.8%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Claude for Enterprise is 9.0%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Proofreading Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise8.8%
Claude for Enterprise9.0%
Other82.2%
AI Proofreading Tools
 

Featured Reviews

SV
Automation tester at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Centralized knowledge has transformed collaboration and now streamlines documentation work
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is already a very strong AI tool, but some improvements could enhance it further. Currently, context depends on what is provided, the prompts, and what is in memory. An improvement could be the automatic suggestion of relevant files or context based on queries. Cross-document semantic linking could be beneficial. Better handling of evolving knowledge would be useful, such as showing what changes have been made since last month. Additionally, teams want finer permissions such as read-only memory groups and scoped templates by role, departments, and temporary access tokens for contractors. I feel that more granular access controls are needed. Beyond APIs, teams now want no-code automations, including the ability to trigger summary generation after meetings, classification of support tickets, and scheduling of reports. Another improvement that comes to mind is the implementation of an in-app learning and training program. Built-in tutorials could help the team discover more advanced features and learn how to provide better prompts. The platform should provide best practices that show users what they need to do to get the best results. An in-app learning or training program would be valuable.
Nishant Thakkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at WTW
Data visualization and workflow efficiency improve with automated features
I do not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer, and I was not offered a gift card or incentive for this review. We use other tech products such as Microsoft Excel and Slack. We can use my real name when publishing my review, along with my real company name. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Claude an 8.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It provides details that previously took days or weeks to gather, and I can improve and get more insight on subjects with more accuracy."
"I save significant time because I can quickly get information about sources for subjects and main industry specialists regarding specific themes."
"The context-aware responses provide significant value in my company communication strategies."
"ChatGPT might write a 40-line script in 15 seconds, where it might have taken me 15 minutes before, allowing me to do my job quicker, which lets me help customers quicker, which lets nobody have to stay late at work, either me or them."
"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise has positively impacted my organization by simplifying work, allowing tasks that could have required five or six people to be completed with fewer individuals while helping us create well-constructed content with great grammar and easily accessible stored information."
"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise makes my life very easy because every time I have to look up something on Google, I have to search through multiple results, but ChatGPT Team - Enterprise provides information in a simpler view with the easiest format and in quite literally the simplest sentences."
"I would rate ChatGPT a nine on a scale of one to ten."
"It is pretty valuable that we can set up prompts to define the context for conversations with ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, which enables it to stay the course during responses."
"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."
"Claude has positively impacted my organization, as evident from the metrics which show productivity doubling and turnaround time being cut in half."
"Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick Python scripts."
 

Cons

"These evaluations aren't always accurate because if you're not a specialist on the subject, you may create something that's not real."
"Rockset is now bought by OpenAI. It’s uncertain if Rockset will continue to exist as it is."
"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is already a very strong AI tool, but some improvements could enhance it further."
"There is scope for improvement in ChatGPT Team - Enterprise regarding more customization of team behavior."
"Filtering the database based on indexes is difficult in Rockset and should be simplified."
"In terms of improvements needed for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, accuracy still requires enhancement in complex or high-domain specific scenarios, particularly architecture and security topics."
"One area where ChatGPT Team - Enterprise can be improved is hallucinations."
"There are issues of cost and viability, with various concerns around these aspects, but that would be a great enhancement for us."
"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."
"The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Proofreading Tools solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ChatGPT?
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is currently working well, and I do not see any need for improvements because it handles every project I run without complexity or delay. Everything on ChatGPT Team - Ente...
What is your primary use case for ChatGPT?
My main use case for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is developing and coding, and for team collaboration, we have been using it for content marketing as well as coding. A specific example of how I use C...
What advice do you have for others considering ChatGPT?
I rate ChatGPT Team - Enterprise a ten out of ten because it is stable, flexible, and fully customizable. It also demonstrates the best functionality and performance so far. I advise others looking...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?
For an individual user, it is very easy and straightforward. I cannot speak to larger teams.
What needs improvement with Claude?
The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases. The system should be better at understanding when to reply directly with the foundational model ...
What is your primary use case for Claude?
I primarily use Claude for developing quick Python scripts, conducting research, and getting answers to complex questions. Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick...
 

Also Known As

Rockset
Anthropic Claude 3 Haiku
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Cisco 3. Comcast 4. DoorDash 5. Expedia 6. Facebook 7. GitHub 8. IBM 9. Lyft 10. Microsoft 11. Netflix 12. Oracle 13. Pinterest 14. Reddit 15. Salesforce 16. Slack 17. Spotify 18. Square 19. Target 20. Twitter 21. Uber 22. Verizon 23. Visa 24. Walmart 25. Yelp 26. Zoom 27. Airbnb 28. Dropbox 29. eBay 30. Google 31. LinkedIn 32. Amazon
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ChatGPT Team - Enterprise vs. Claude for Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.