Check Point Application Control Reviews

Check Point Application Control serves as my main solution to control application access within my organization. Recently, we blocked entertainment applications, which enabled us to control application access for users more effectively through Check Point Application Control.

Check Point Application Control offers excellent features, particularly its auto-update capability and deep application visibility and control. The auto-update feature and deep application visibility help me in my daily work because application updates are automated, eliminating the need for manual updates, and I can control applications at a granular level.

Check Point Application Control has positively impacted my organization by providing strong control over application usage and visibility. It has improved compliance and saved time for our organization.

Check Point Application Control is functioning well for our needs, and I do not see anything requiring improvement at this time.

I have been using Check Point Application Control for more than three years.

Check Point Application Control demonstrates excellent stability.

Check Point Application Control has excellent scalability with no issues.

Although I have not personally interacted with the customer support team, my team has had multiple sessions with them, and they provided good support.

We have been using the same solution since the beginning and have not switched from a different solution.

Check Point Application Control has delivered excellent return on investment, as it has saved both money and time for our organization.

I had a great experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing from the Check Point sales team because they made it straightforward to understand the setup cost and licensing.

Before choosing Check Point Application Control, I did not evaluate other options.

I recommend that any organization wanting to control application usage in their environment consider Check Point Application Control as one of the best solutions available. I provided this review a rating of 10.

Our main use case for Check Point Application Control is to detect and prevent cyber attacks with the help of different application traffic that is restricted, so it identifies.

In our organization, we use Check Point Application Control to control user traffic accessing allowed application categories by the security policy configured in the solution.

The best feature about Check Point Application Control is that its database is very strong, and the categorization of the application is outstanding, so we are able to block applications based on the categories.

The categorization in Check Point Application Control helps our team because entertainment and weapons applications are not allowed in our organization, so we block those applications.

After implementing Check Point Application Control, we are getting proper security and user application access control.

We are seeing improvements in security with the controls from Check Point Application Control, and we are also saving our productivity.

I don't see any feature lacking in Check Point Application Control.

Every solution has space to improve, which is why I've chosen nine out of 10 for Check Point Application Control.

We have been using Check Point Application Control for more than three years.

Check Point Application Control is stable.

Scalability-wise, Check Point Application Control is excellent and can grow with our organization's needs.

I have a great experience with the support team for Check Point Application Control.

Neutral

We are using Check Point Application Control as the same solution without switching.

We have evaluated FortiGate application control before choosing Check Point Application Control.

I can say we have seen time saved as a return on investment.

Anyone looking for the best solution in the security domain for application control can consider Check Point Application Control. I rate Check Point Application Control nine out of ten.

Check Point Application Control is configured on our firewall and controls access to applications. I have an admin login for the firewall application, and I create policies for users that grant different application access levels. This allows me to control employee access through Check Point Application Control.

Since we use Check Point Application Control, we can control user accessibility to applications, and employees are only allowed to use particular compliant applications that we permit in our security policy.

The best features Check Point Application Control offers in my experience are its usability and straightforward, easy configuration.

The interface and user interface make Check Point Application Control easy to use, and the policy creation and security profiles that I configure for departments are regularly updated.

Time has been saved because previously some employees were wasting time accessing useless or entertainment applications. Now we effectively block them, and they are not wasting time on unproductive work that our organization does not use. I can say productivity has increased since using Check Point Application Control.

Check Point Application Control is working fine currently, so I do not see any challenges with it.

I have been using Check Point Application Control for less than one year in terms of hands-on technical experience, but in terms of usability, I have been using this solution for more than two to three years.

Check Point Application Control is pretty stable, and I am not facing any kind of challenge.

Check Point Application Control is handling the traffic growth of my organization, so I do not see any challenge.

I have interacted with the customer support team for Check Point Application Control a couple of times, and it was a pretty good experience.

Positive

Since I have joined my organization recently, it has only been one year, so I do not know what the previous solution was before Check Point Application Control.

I was not part of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Application Control, so I cannot comment on that.

I do not know what options my team evaluated before choosing Check Point Application Control, but Check Point is an outstanding product, and that was a great decision by the organization's IT team.

I would advise anyone looking for a good security solution regarding applications to consider Check Point Application Control as one of the best solutions currently present in the market. I have rated this product a nine out of ten.

My main use case for Check Point Application Control is visibility.

I use Check Point Application Control to monitor what users in my company are using and to control the specific use case.

I don't have anything else to add about how I use Check Point Application Control for visibility or control at this moment.

The best features Check Point Application Control offers include granular access level and good visibility, and it is also easy for deployment.

Check Point Application Control has positively impacted my organization by being easy to deploy and manage.

The ease of deployment and management has benefited my organization because we already have a Check Point firewall, and we have a team to manage Check Point, so we decided to integrate more of the features for Check Point as well, recently adding a Check Point application.

I think Check Point Application Control is good and doesn't require any improvements at this time.

I don't have more to add about any needed improvements, even minor ones, right now.

I have been using Check Point Application Control for around six to seven months.

Check Point Application Control is stable; till date, it remains stable.

We haven't tried Check Point Application Control's scalability.

I haven't really needed to contact customer support.

Neutral

I didn't previously use a different solution for application control.

Check Point Application Control is deployed on-premises in my organization.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that the cost was high, and I think the cost should be improved for competitor pricing.

We are a reseller in addition to being a customer of this vendor.

I have seen a return on investment because it was time saved, as we already have expertise, making it a time-saving solution for me.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that the cost was high, and I think the cost should be improved for competitor pricing.

Check Point Application Control was my first choice without evaluating other options.

That's it for now regarding additional features.

I advise others looking into using Check Point Application Control that it is good to try, easy to manage, but the pricing part is on the higher scale; nothing else, overall, it's a good product.

On a scale of one to ten, I rate Check Point Application Control a seven.

I've been using Check Point Application Control since the last three years, where I've been an administrator for Check Point firewall. Within that span, I have encountered multiple clients where Application Control was being used.

My main use case for Check Point Application Control is mostly for granularization of what to access and what not to access, particularly for a client with more than 3,000 users. For such a large number of users, it's always a hectic task for the administrators to give granularization on what the client has access to and what they do not. So, with the help of Check Point Application Control, we can define the granularity that reduces the risk of unauthorized access and potential breaches. Additionally, it has helped us improve efficiency and enhance real-time threat prevention capability.

I have unique scenarios where Check Point Application Control made a difference in a client environment that wasn't categorized, resulting in bandwidth issues. When we implemented Check Point there, we granularized the teams by categorizing what all access each team needed, which helped us improve bandwidth efficiency overall.

The best features of Check Point Application Control are advanced threat detection, SSL inspection policies, application categorization, and custom application detection, all of which stand out due to the zero trust security model Check Point follows along with several other enhancements.

The custom application detection feature in Check Point Application Control has been helpful in my environment where we define access for different teams. For instance, the HR team needs access to Facebook and other social media platforms, while the marketing team requires access to promote new features and products we are implementing. By regulating application-centric access, we increase the overall productivity for users while restricting them from browsing non-essential sites.

Application categorization and SSL inspection are crucial because to achieve full effectiveness of application control, it is necessary to have HTTPS inspection enabled.

Check Point Application Control has positively impacted my organization by increasing productivity and optimizing bandwidth. By filtering out the level of access that users have, we limit potential threats from malicious links, ultimately increasing both security and user productivity.

I can share metrics reflecting the impact of Check Point Application Control, where we have seen a reduction in the number of tickets created, indicating fewer incidents. Also, bandwidth has been optimized, especially after categorization where we previously faced overutilization issues.

Check Point Application Control could be improved, particularly regarding the application categorization accuracy as we often face miscategorization issues. The database should be updated properly to avoid misclassification and ensure 100% accuracy.

I see a needed improvement in the categorization where a gaming site might be categorized under sports or gambling. For instance, I blocked it under gambling but also allowed it in games, causing issues where the site sometimes gets opened incorrectly. This is an area where Check Point can enhance their service.

I've been using Check Point Application Control since the last three years.

In my experience, Check Point Application Control is stable.

The scalability of Check Point Application Control is commendable as it can handle organizational growth effectively.

I've reached out to customer support for Check Point Application Control, and the experience was good. The tech engineers are knowledgeable and supportive, with prompt responses, although I believe the response time could be improved.

I would rate the customer support for Check Point Application Control at nine out of ten.

Positive

I did not previously use a different solution before Check Point Application Control.

The initial setup with Check Point Application Control is straightforward and very simple.

I have seen a return on investment with Check Point Application Control, with increased productivity as users no longer spend time on unnecessary applications. By restricting access to only what is required, the productivity has increased, which results in greater value for the organization.

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Application Control is that the pricing is a bit high, but the features provided justify the cost. The features that Check Point offers are extensive and worth the investment.

Before choosing Check Point Application Control, we evaluated Palo Alto as well, but I find Check Point's level of categorization and database readiness for application control to be more user-friendly and comprehensive.

Check Point Application Control is deployed on-prem in my organization.

My advice for others looking into using Check Point Application Control is to definitely consider it if you already have security needs.

Overall, Check Point Application Control is an awesome product that can definitely be used to secure environments.

I rate Check Point Application Control nine out of ten.

My main use case for Check Point Application Control is to use it as a security gateway on our next-generation firewall base, allowing us to control the application usage within our organization.

In my organization, we have multiple departments, and based on their requirements for applications, we can allow separate application categories using Check Point Application Control.

Different departments use Check Point Application Control to manage access to certain applications for security or compliance reasons, and it helps with automation in our organization as any new application that is introduced will be automatically added into categories.

The best features Check Point Application Control offers include tracking application usage, and the suggestion feature is great, with excellent security and visibility.

The suggestion users feature works based on its own database, which detects and gives me access to applications, helping with security and visibility in my organization.

Check Point Application Control has positively impacted my organization by giving us good control over application usage, allowing us to control user access and providing proper security.

Productivity has increased because no user is able to access those applications, so they are not able to get distracted during work.

Check Point Application Control is working properly, so I do not see any improvements that can be made in this security feature.

I have been using Check Point Application Control for three years.

Check Point Application Control is pretty much stable.

It has handled growth or changes in my organization well over the past three years, so Check Point Application Control is scalable.

The customer support for Check Point Application Control includes very good integration, security, and technical support, and they will help.

Neutral

We were using the same solution before Check Point Application Control.

I can see a return on investment from using Check Point Application Control through time saved.

Check Point Application Control has helped save time for applications.

Before choosing Check Point Application Control, we evaluated one additional option with the application.

My advice for others looking into using Check Point Application Control is that it is one of the best solutions for application security.

Everything is perfect, and I do not think there is anything I should change for the future.

I would rate this review a nine out of ten.

We use Check Point Application Control to block and protect our website which are not required for user access.

Check Point provide excellent support. It is easy to operate and handle with the recent GUI.

If someone wants to review the configuration for the proxy, they would need to look elsewhere, as this tool is not designed to assess the performance of security policies.

I have been using Check Point Application Control for three years.

The product is stable.

The solution’s scalability is good.

When we open a ticket for a critical issue, we are immediately connected with a Level 3 support engineer via phone call within two minutes. There is no waiting list. The support is very swift and efficient, and they assign the best available engineer for critical issues, bypassing the L1, L2 and then L3.

Positive

We have moved the Check Point Application Control from AppSense, the epoxy solution, because of several issues. Users experienced latency while accessing the internet through the AppSense. Additionally, the AppSense client software installed on user machines frequently crashed, and it was not compatible with MacBooks.

The initial setup is straightforward and takes around three months to complete.

The product is expensive but it is worth the money.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The companies have implemented this security tool, due to several factors. The companies develop or buy applications for different functions or needs and this is where Check Point Application Control comes in. 

The tool has allowed us to be able to identify and classify all those applications that are being used within the network, which simplifies the work of managing bandwidth, and also helps us to have better control over security since it allows us to allows you to block or allow access to our network.

It has helped us a lot in being able to have more unified and managed control over the entire infrastructure of the companies since with this we have better control in the applications of how we can limit each access or exit to the Internet. Without this tool, it would be a little more complicated since we would be very limited in defining policies based on characteristics such as IP addresses and port numbers. In addition, it has helped improve productivity in the IT area since we have reduced the time dedicated to each of the applications.

The tool fulfills the function for which it was designed. It has many important features that have greatly helped the company and the IT department. For example, it presents visibility of all traffic on the network, which helps us have better management to take measures necessary to optimize performance and security.

It also presents a strong point which is the use of policies. Compliance helps the company a lot and it is something that the tool does very well.

They need to improve the graphical interface.

They should also improve the latency when entering the GUI. 

The application should not be so closed when it comes to integrations with third-party tools.

They have become a bit expensive to be able to purchase them for smaller companies. 

I have been using this application for one year in this company, however, I had previously used it for two years in a previous company.

The tool to the extent that I have used it these years has been very stable and safe.

The tool is my scalable and adapts to our security infrastructure very well.

Support should improve service times and be faster in providing solutions.

Positive

There was no type of tool that fulfilled this function previously.

The installation of the tool at first is somewhat complicated since it has a fairly high learning curve. After getting to know it and how to configure it, that curve becomes easy.

At first, the installation and configuration were done with the supplier. They provided us with training and we proceeded to make the necessary configurations.

Making an investment is always complicated. Doubts that can arise. However, it is never bad to invest in a security tool. It brings peace of mind to the company and the financial side.

You must evaluate the needs that the company requires, then request quotes according to the needs of different suppliers.

Several options were analyzed, such as Palo Alto Networks App-ID, Fortinet FortiGate Application Control, and SonicWall Application Firewall, among others.

You must have a culture of updating the tool every time you can, always choosing a tool with stability that is scalable since companies change day by day.

I am using Check Point Application Control for controlling streaming, social media, and video sites.  Additionally, we control VPNs and peer-to-peer sites. We use it to control sites that use a lot of bandwidth.

Check Point Application Control has resulted in fewer outside attacks, increased bandwidth for communication to the outside, more control for the CPA and users, and improved remote access management. We have numerous external collaborators working with our organization, and we have strict protocols for them to follow, which Check Point Application Control has helped us enforce. The VPN feature is also very helpful for remote users. Overall, Check Point has provided our organization with increased security, better performance, improved network response, and fewer issues.

The most valuable feature of Check Point Application Control is VPN access and the ability to lock out sites we do not want users to have access. The reporting monitoring software in Check Point Application Control is fantastic. For example, log filtering is beneficial.

There are many aspects we do not like about the solution and there are a lot of alternatives available on the market. Some of the settings are buried deep within the solution making it a challenge to navigate. It would be helpful if it was more intuitive. Additionally, there can be some settings that are in multiple places, this leaves the user not knowing what settings are needed to be modified for the wanted result. I have lost confidence because I do not know if I change a setting or if it is going to have the desired result I intended it to do.

I have used other solutions, such as Palo Alto and I did not experience these types of problems.

When we apply a change in Check Point Application Control there can be some time for the changes to take effect. The time is too long, and we have experienced approximately five minutes on occasion for modifying some rules or filtering.

When there are outside-of-the-network threats, such as DoS attacks, Check Point Application Control should have more integrated ways to deal with the attacks. We should not have to purchase add-ons or secondary solutions or patches.

There is some functionality that is not working anymore as it once did, such as HTTP filtering. The complexity of application usage is increasing day by day, and it seems that at some point, we will need to initiate specific projects to tackle the issue of application filtering. Check Point Application Control has been instrumental in addressing this challenge, but with the continued growth in complexity, more advanced features would be necessary to make the solution even more effective.

I have used Check Point Application Control within the last 12 months.

Perhaps due to inadequate planning during the initial installation, we encountered numerous issues that persisted over the years. For instance, we faced challenges with VPN connectivity in certain locations, and at times, multiple CPU calls occurred while SharePoint failed to utilize all available machine resources. These problems led to daily performance issues and crashes, causing considerable headaches.

It seems that the lack of careful planning during the installation phase was the root cause of these problems. With better planning and attention to detail, we could have avoided these issues altogether.

I rate the stability of Check Point Application Control a seven out of ten.

We have approximately 2,000 simultaneous VPN access. We have a total of approximately 4,000 users using the solution.

I rate the scalability of Check Point Application Control an eight out of ten.

The support we received was very good.

I rate the technical support from Check Point Application Control a nine out of ten.

Positive

I have used other solutions.

The first deployment of Check Point Application Control posed significant complexity challenges in our large-scale operation. With numerous employees and diverse needs, attempting a self-setup proved to be a daunting task. However, despite the initial ease of implementation, performance degradation gradually surfaced over time, whether after several weeks, months, or even a year or two.

The root cause of the problem lay in inadequate planning and suboptimal configuration at the outset. Our policies failed to work correctly, and we encountered multiple issues that necessitated reaching out to the vendor for assistance. While the system provided many customization options to cater to our specific requirements, uncovering the hidden settings proved to be a stumbling block. Ultimately, we struggled to identify the optimal configuration that would best serve our organization. The default settings are easy to find but the advanced settings are not easy to find and use.

I rate the initial setup Check Point Application Control an eight out of ten.

We use consultants and integrators to install Check Point Application Control. Additionally, we had an external course to improve our knowledge. The solution is complex and we were not able to do the implementation with the knowledge we had. We are discovering more options as we continue using the solution.

The price of Check Point Application Control is high. The support and ecosystem around the solution are expensive.

I rate the price of Check Point Application Control a seven out of ten.

I would advise others before choosing any solution to look at many of the solutions on the market and compare them. It would be helpful to do a proof of concept and test the solutions before purchasing. What the Gartner Magic Quadrant research site advertises sometimes does not translate into the actual performance of the solution. It is important to test the solutions.

Check Point Application Control is a sophisticated powerful solution that makes it difficult to customize. The price and the complexity of the solution might not be the best choice. Planning is a very important aspect of having the smooth operation of the solution if one chooses to use it.

I rate Check Point Application Control an eight out of ten.

The solution's primary use cases include application visibility and control, enforcement of security policies, risk mitigation, and bandwidth management. 

It has enhanced security posture, increased visibility and control, policy enforcement, and improved compliance, etc.                     

The best features of this application include visibility, granular policy enforcement, application risk assessment, and compliance reporting. 

These features collectively contribute to enhancing network security, improving operational efficiency, ensuring regulatory compliance, and mitigating risks associated with unauthorized or malicious application usage within an organization using Check Point Application Control.

The following aspects need to be improved:

• Application detection and classification
• The user interface 
• Usability
• Threat detection and prevention
• Reporting and analytics

I have been Check Point Application Control for the past two years.

The stability is good.

The scalability is good.

Technical support is good.

Positive

No, I didn't previously use any other solution. 

The initial setup is clean.

We had a vendor, and they were good.

The ROI is nice.

The pricing should be reduced, and the licensing needs to be improved.

We did evaluate Forcepoint Application Control.