Check Point Application Control Reviews

In our company, when acquiring CKPOINT products to be able to have perimeter protection for our teams, both cloud and on-premise.

we are able to carry out greater protection with Check Point's gateway, integrated with access control. It is a great help.

Check Point Application Control has been of great help in being able to provide access and granular security improvements for different departments with different profiles within the company. It is important to be able to do this in environments that deserve greater control in different areas.

We gained a lot in control, however, also through the reports it was possible to determine what was happening, and subsequently, make security improvements in the application control blade. Its use is really simple and intuitive, and when we have had doubts we have relied on the public documentation.

One of the advantages of Check Point Application Control is the large number of profiles included within the tool to be able to generate granular policies, in addition to permissions between servers or even web access.

Its implementation is simple. It is another great advantage. In our case, we use it with our R81 Check Point Gateway. It was implemented in Microsoft Azure, being a virtual device.

On the other hand, the log reports are very good for making validations and decisions.

Something important to mention is the improvement at the support level. It could be more advanced. Sometimes the responses are somewhat slow or based on a schedule that is not always the same as the companies. It's difficult to generate a session with them to better explain your needs.

We would also like the costs to be more comfortable. Although they are not different from other security tools, they could have improvements to provide greater interest to customers who are interested or loyal to Check Point's products.

In the company, we have made security improvements in recent years to be able to solve technological gaps in which vulnerabilities could greatly damage work continuity. Application control is a great help for our gateways.

Previously we had used Fortinet Gateways, however we liked what Check Point offered better at the level of modern security tools.

It is very important before implementing security improvements to have a test environment to evaluate correctly. I recommend taking previous implementations into account.

Before opting for Check Point, we validated and verified several demos with other manufacturers, however, we liked it better and it was better adapted to our internal needs.

Check Point Application Control enables my team to customize websites to fit our daily needs. It provides security measures that can be set in place to safeguard our content and internal information. 

It provides reliable tools for setting up HTTPS security policies that prevent security risks related to SSL protocol. The product provides real-time insights into the data traffic from the applications and their performance. 

The security protocols have enabled my team to set restrictions for accessing confidential information.

There is efficient protection of data and workflows from external interferences. This platform provides basic tools for protecting applications from cyber attacks and building strong websites. 

The SmartView tracker enables my members to monitor data traffic across the applications. It has provided a great opportunity for us to set up basic rules for interacting with applications. 

This product provides reliable data controls that monitor the performance and operational capability of all the applications within the company's networking infrastructure.

The central management system provides a reliable platform for application control and URL filtering. 

The security gateways have set comprehensive security tools for protecting data from malware attacks. 

The application library can run many apps and websites at the same time without functional complications. 

The application control system blocks internet sites and cyber attacks that can affect daily operations. 

SmartEvent Analysis provides capabilities for understanding application performance with charts and reporting analytics.

The most set features have enhanced the effective management of workflows. 

Malware threats can advance attacks when there are no timely measures to curb online phishing attacks. 

The solution needs an efficient monitoring platform that provides individual employee data, and performance will boost productivity in the organization. 

Most features perform well since there are few complaints. The security tools should be empowered more to fit daily demands and prevent our systems from advanced threats. 

I recommend the use of this platform to other organizations for reliable application performance.

I've used the solution for two years. 

The application security controls and monitoring tools are powerful.

I am impressed by its great performance.

The customer support staff has been reliable and committed to great service delivery.

Positive

I have not worked with a similar solution.

The initial setup was straightforward.

The implementation was done by the vendor team, and their level of expertise is excellent.

The recorded ROI has improved from 40% to 65% currently.

The setup cost and licensing terms are efficient.

I evaluated other application control products, however, Check Point Application Control was the best.

This is great system for monitoring application performance and I recommend to others.

The company-based applications have benefited from this software in the enhancement of security and performance acceleration. 

Check Point Application Control monitors all tools' performance and operations in all enterprise activities. 

The reported performance metrics help us allocate resources and unlock hidden business potentials. Over the past year, this product has boosted the end output of all applications and promoted efficient teamwork. Each tool can easily link and integrate with others with set task objectives.

Check Point Application Control has highly improved business operations with modern data control systems. 

It ensures that the health of each application can handle the set tasks and projects without any challenges. 

We have increased workflow performance and improved the service delivery to our clients. 

Data transfer with preferable security measures has enhanced better collaboration among teams. The connection of applications has enabled members to understand the data flow and set goals with real-time reports.

The set security measures integrated with applications help us to identify and set policies that can support our programs. 

It mitigates the security risks that can affect business tools and their implications on the overall production capacity. 

The workflow tracking capacity provides data on all employees working with certain tools and their contributions. 

Check Point Application Control can monitor the operations of many applications at the same time without low-performance experiences. There is increased revenue from the reduced cost of consolidating required security tools.

The set security features have increased the production efficiency of all applications. The new IT team monitoring this system requires proper training in order to execute the targeted goals effectively without failure. 

The set performance monitoring systems are complex to interpret and scale down their operations. 

The customer service team works tirelessly to ensure our teams are satisfied. Cloud network security has kept our assets secure since we deployed with a smooth continuation of other enterprise activities.

I've used the solution for one year and four months.

This product is stable and with high-performance capabilities.

I like the persistence of improving security across the organization from this application.

I have no words for the support team; I really congratulate them on the excellent job!

Positive

I have previously worked with AppDynamics - although the security models did not meet our targets.

It is easy to setup and learn how the product works.

The vendor team did the implementation.

The set targeted ROI has been achieved.

The setup procedure is good and the cost is suitable for most enterprises.

I evaluated operations and performance of AppDynamics.

Check Point Application Control is the best solution for security and performance controls.

We had the need to control and be able to manage rules in a granular way for maintaining the security and control of the data, management by teams, identity, and applications grouping them by category and thus being able to defend ourselves from threats and malware that wants to enter our infrastructure while  reducing the operating cost.

Something that we need and want is an inspection of the data. We must see what the different users and applications of our network are sharing, and that is where the control solution brings us that administration value.

As our need is great, and we not only have a single organization yet also have several subsidiaries. It is there where we are integrating a centralization under well-managed control. It is where application control gives us the possibility of generating rules, and policies that are adjusted and flexible. We need the solution to be able to be adapted to the business and to be modified and scalable according to the need and evolution of our organization. It offers a powerful administration and a great catalog.

The best value we have is their actionable reports on user analytics, events, and activity that are extracted from their database. This technology allows us to present reports on the control and management of event policies against applications, locations, IoT, and Identity. Having all this data available generates a control layer that strengthens a security posture. Its best feature will forever be the generation of tangible reports of every actionable activity found and stopped by the solution.

I would like this layer to be faster to install in the future. The evolution of its equipment and appliances where the solution is executed has improved a lot, however, it is necessary to increase that capacity. Some competitors do it just as well and in that layer, are faster to apply their changes. These would give greater value and would be a differentiator. Among other things, I would like this integrated solution to manage from mobile devices in an optimized way and be able to administer from anywhere in the world.

I've used the solution for two years.

The solution is very stable and has regular updates.

It is fast and easy to scale and manage.

Their cost is based on their appliances, and they offer equipment with the highest licensing.

Not all of the company's web traffic goes through Check Point, however, on the significant web traffic side, we solve security needs with Check Point. 

Especially if you are going to give broad permissions, you need to block dangerous applications at the very beginning of your rule set. In this context, we use Check Point to block on an application basis. Sometimes there are general accesses. Like Azure, we can only give access by selecting the relevant applications. Check Point is a very good solution because these applications are constantly updating the IP lists on the backend.

It does not require a lot of work to be activated and used. It is quite simple to open the application layer blade and activating it means you are ready to use it. 

The concept of NGFW is actually used exactly for this feature and I can say that it does justice. Once you are ready to use it, you can optimize your rule set by selecting the desired application name in the rule. Since the objects used are updatable, the need for you to return and update is very rare. This structure really saves you time.

First of all, to use this layer, you don't need to struggle and make changes to your structure. It is enough to have a firewall with NGFW support and turn on the application layer filtering blade. Apart from that, the objects in the rules you wrote have very little margin of error. In other words, the accesses of the application you put are passed or blocked as necessary. In fact, some applications have separate objects for download and installation, so you can write the rule set you have in mind more easily.

The objects found now have large applications or general category definitions that are completely determined and organized by Check Point. It would be nice if there was a platform and small application owners could come and send their own applications' name and IP information from there. If we could use application objects directly in our rule sets in Check Point in those small companies, that would be ideal. A few more layered objects could be created for Azure in large applications. It would be nice if firewall administrators could see parser information such as IP behind these objects.

I've been using it for the past six years in different companies.

On our infrastructure, we installed the Check Point 6200 appliance as our primary firewall. It is deployed in a distributed mode, with the security gateway and management running on separate machines.

Our major purpose is to limit web access from internal networks.

Using application control, we blocked the use of peer-to-peer applications such as torrent from our networks and allowed only youtube.com from the media streaming category, resulting in a significant improvement in bandwidth.

Aside from these numerous categories, we blocked a large number of high-risk applications from access our network.

We can control bandwidth and high-risk application access from our network using application control.

We want our users to only be able to access certain websites during working hours. We accomplished this through application control by blocking social media, phonography, drugs, media sharing, and other sites.

We also restricted file sharing sites through application control and blocked file uploading, which helped us avoid data loss.

We set a usage limit for YouTube.com, giving us more bandwidth control.

The control options for an application are very specialized. We may thus ultimately decide what to access and what to prevent.

It is relatively easy to implement an application control policy, and it is made to integrate with the access policy.

The ability to see each application clearly in the logs is quite helpful.

Application control utilizes signatures similarly to how IPS does. It is an excellent feature.

It's pretty easy to schedule updates to the application control database. We can design a check for fresh updates every two hours.

Users can clearly understand the reasons for site blocking from the blocked message.

1 – Custom applications for internal applications must be defined frequently. This should be improved. It would be much better if Check Point could detect internal applications and automatically bypass them.

2- Without HTTPS decryption, the majority of App Control recognition features will be rendered ineffective, as everything has been encrypted thus far.

3-An application may have multiple category tags, which is confusing.

These areas should be improved. 

It satisfies all of our needs except for this. 

Check Point Application Control assists us in controlling bandwidth and restricting internet access for our infrastructure.

I've used the solution for almost two years.

Yes, we used a different solution. However, it did not satisfy us in terms of security. As a result, we decided to deploy Check Point NGFW for enhanced security.

Before migrating to Check Point firewall, we conducted market research and solicited feedback from my contacts who are already Checkpoint NGFW customers. We decided to use Check Point NGFW as a result of this.

Our ROI is that it increases the security precautions that prevent users from accessing websites that can harm our business. Additionally, it also reduces the use of the internet, which is often unrelated to business tasks.

It is one of the main solutions that we have applied in our offices for the administrative control of access to specific services social networks within the corporation, viewing of videos or services that in some way distract the worker from their activities. It's also facilitated us with the ability to separate the databases by a gateway which makes the administration and the permissions granted to the end-users much easier.

One of the ways it's helped us improve was in the administration and the permissions for specific services. This was very useful to us when making a database per gateway and configuring them through layers to have better visualization, control, and administration of the rules, which allows new administrators to have a better scope and understanding of the organization. This has undoubtedly been the newest thing for us as gateways administrators.

One of the aspects of the solution that has given us more value is the integration of a domain controller with the firewall through the dashboard which allows that through inline layers, LDAP.

The visualization of users, the administration, and the permissions that we can grant to users makes our configuration a more dynamic environment since, as organizational units of an active directory, we can grant permissions to users to specific applications allowed through the URL filtering or application control within the dashboard.

With Check Point we are more protected, however, one of the issues is the cost. They are expensive products due to the fact that we have to buy blades for each solution that we want to integrate into our corporate. Without a doubt, it is worth it, however, it is an important point that could be considered. 

Likewise, nowadays a 2MFA solution could be integrated to Check Point since nowadays remote connections made with remote workers are required to protect the extension from the office to your home through a VPN connection.

I've used the solution for about three years.

The Check Point solution is very stable, however, the installation of JHF at least once a month is somewhat annoying since that could be interpreted as not being a stable solution.

In terms of scalability, my impressions have always been good since there is a lot of scalability in this service. For example, you can integrate several solutions to a centralized administration.

They have an excellent support team. They are fast and it is easy to escalate any situation.

Positive

We did not previously use a different solution.

The setup was straightforward.

We handle the implementation in-house.

We've seen a 40% ROI.

Despite the somewhat high cost, based on the blades, it is a reliable solution.

We didn't evaluate other solutions.

Before using this solution, I needed to have other network components that would allow me to block or restrict access to unauthorized sites, which generated a very high cost in terms of licensing and maintenance. Now, I can control authorized and unauthorized access to my end-users, and I can control bandwidth and assign a defined bandwidth to guarantee the operation of my company. 

With this solution, I was able to establish and guarantee the security of my end-users using the categories and definitions within the solution. I'm able to easily identify high-risk sites, as well as sites not allowed for explicit content.

In the beginning, I did not have control of the content that my users had access to, which put the integrity of my company at risk. With this solution, I was able to create explicit policies that would adhere to the rules that we established for access to applications. 

Previously, I had 2 appliances from another brand to control the traffic of applications and to control bandwidth. It is a very simple product to administer with amazing potential endowed within a large database of applications and is constantly updated.

The automatic updates of new applications and signatures guarantee protection at all times without the need to apply a change manually. This has been largely beneficial to my organization and only on a couple of occasions have I had a problem with legacy applications being applied to a filter incorrectly. We've solved this by documenting them in the Check Point portal to ensure they are not listed as a malicious application or IP. There is a large database of applications that have been incorporated together with the traffic control tool assigning a defined bandwidth for certain applications.

It's important that there is the option to validate the policies before applying them since it is very annoying and causes a waste of time to apply a new policy or rule and afterward receive an error that the policy has failed. 

It is important that, if you are being notified of the modifications in the automatic policies that were updated, it's clear in terms of the content that is included as well as the applications that have been modified for being malicious or not. 

Without a doubt, these would be contributions that would greatly benefit the solution's operation within my company.

I've worked with the solution for 5 years.

In some equipment, the scaling is very good, however, it depends on the equipment that is purchased and if there is correct sizing.

Yes, I made the change because I tried a demo and it seemed like a great product.

It is a very safe and stable product.

The licensing is very good. We always rely on an authorized dealer to ensure proper operation and sizing.

Yes, I evaluated Cisco, Palo Alto, and Fortinet.

Not at this time.