Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1720029 - PeerSpot reviewer
Snr Information Security Analyst at The Toronto Star
User
Great compliance with good application control and a robust IPS blade
Pros and Cons
  • "We can easily check firewall configurations against any compliance standard."
  • "Support for customers really needs to improve."

What is our primary use case?

Check Point firewall is used as edge protection.

Traffic to the internet and from the internet does go through the firewall where IPS, URL, and app policies are applied.

Check Point was also used as an internal firewall to segment traffic between the data center and the user network. Basically, all traffic from any user will have to be inspected by an internal Check Point firewall before any server is accessed.

Check Point is also used for PCI-DSS credit card checks within any email sent or received. This is effective in detecting credit card numbers within any email sent by a user in error and blocks that from being exposed. 

How has it helped my organization?

The product has improved visibility into the traffic going through our network.

For all traffic leaving the network, Check Point provides the capability to inspect and permit traffic using not just ports but application IDs, which is more secure than simply permitting TCP/UDP.

Check Point has a robust IPS Blade which has added an additional layer of security on connections to the data center.

Check Point's compliance blade also helps in checking how Check Point's appliance configuration is in compliance with any requirement that we need to provide evidence for.

What is most valuable?

Check Point application control is very useful. This blade detects traffic and provides the ability to grant access based on the application and not the port as TCP/UDP can easily grant access for more than what's required.

The Check Point compliance model is also great. We can easily check firewall configurations against any compliance standard. It has made it easy to provide evidence and reports.

Check Point integrates with third-party user directories such as Microsoft Active Directory. The dynamic, identity-based policy provides granular visibility and control of users, groups, and machines and is easier to manage than static, IP-based policy.

What needs improvement?

Support for customers really needs to improve.

Check Point also needs to create a study license that will enable the customer to install a firewall (maybe with reduced connectivity) for a bit longer so that one can simulate scenarios without having to re-install it every 15 days.

We had a lot of problems with the VPN blade on the solution. We sometimes have trouble with the performance of the solution. Maybe some performance tuning options could be added in a future release.

Check Point needs to create a certification program that involves practical applications. 

Buyer's Guide
Check Point NGFW
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about Check Point NGFW. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the Check Point firewall for three years.

How are customer service and support?

Customer service really needs to improve.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used Cisco ASA for Internet-facing Web applications, however, Check Point was used at the EDGE ( all user traffic to the internet), internal firewall ( all user traffic to datacenter), all internet traffic to PCI-DSS applications instead.

What about the implementation team?

Implementation was done with the help of Check Point's professional services.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

If you have the budget, it's a good idea to go for the Check Point Firewall.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also evaluated Palo Alto.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1698246 - PeerSpot reviewer
System administrator at BINDER GmbH
User
Offers quality patches and hot fixes and has very clear logs
Pros and Cons
  • "The activation of additional features is very easy and well documented."
  • "The debugging of VPN tunnels is very stressful."

What is our primary use case?

We are using Check Point NGFW for controlling the traffic on our entire network. It controls the traffic and access of the networks and also the traffic outside of our network. The firewalls are used in and HA-Setup.  

The features we use are application and URL-filtering, anti-bot/virus, and sandboxing functions. It is also used for Site2Site VPNs and endpoint VPNs. For us, the Check Point NGFW is the center of network traffic and security. 

We use the new features of Check Point to reduce standalone systems. 

How has it helped my organization?

In the past few years, the attacks and risks have grown. That's why we introduced a NGFW. All the securtiy risks can be minimized with the product. Especially if you route the whole network trafiic over the firewall. You can filter malicious sites and traffic and can analyze the entirety of traffic. The URL filter works much better and is much stronger than our other previous solution. 

In the case of migrating or patching, it is very easy due to the fact that you can transfer the whole ruleset and settings from your old device. Patching is very easy and we've never had problems.

What is most valuable?

If you have an HA Setup you will have zero downtime. Teams and VoIP traffic will also not get stuck; you would notice anything while switching to the backup module. 

The quality of the patches and hotfixes is great. We never had any issues during or after patching. All patches and hotfixes are well documented and if you have any issues the KB is very helpful. 

The log is very clear and can be filtered very easily. If you need to analyze not only the connection you can use the CLI to dump TCP packets. 

The activation of additional features is very easy and well documented.

What needs improvement?

Sometimes, the firewall has its peculiarities which you have to know especially when you want to set up a Site2Site VPN with a third-party vendor - specifically if you want to set up IKEv2. 

The debugging of VPN tunnels is very stressful. Sometimes you don't know what the firewall negotiates with the other site, so you have to use the command-line for the VPN debugging. However, if you use both sites, the setup is very easy. 

The speed could be better when installing policy changes. In the beginning, we didn't have all features active. Now, it is all active and it takes some time to install. This is sometimes annoying if you forget a small change.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using this solution for several years. This is our 3rd Check Point firewall.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Check Point NGFW
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about Check Point NGFW. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1643319 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees
User
Easy to set up, stable, and offers excellent technical support
Pros and Cons
  • "The packet inspections have been a strong point."
  • "I would like there to be a way to run packets that capture more easily in the GUI environment. Right now, if we want to read packet captures, we have to do so from the command line."

What is our primary use case?

It's our main firewall and the first line of protection from outside attacks. We use it to interconnect our remote locations (that use different vendors and equipment) and let the employees work remotely. We're a small site with 300 users and this equipment is more than enough for us. We use almost all the blades and the equipment has run smoothly for years. This NGFW monitors all the traffic outside of the main network, prevents malicious activities, and lets us easily manage network policies to shape our connections.

How has it helped my organization?

We have a lot of flexibility now, and a leg up identifying zero-day threats. We have multiple ways of doing policies now that we didn't have before. The options are more robust than previous products and I would say that we're pleased with the product. The reports I'm getting are that we're satisfied, even impressed, with the options Check Point offers.

There is a scope of improvement in detecting zero-day threats using the SandBlast technology, by introducing emulation of Linux-based operating systems. We have also observed issues while using the products with SSL decryption. There is room for improvement in application-based filtering, as with other firewalls available in the market today. Check Point has improved its application filtering capabilities in the recent past and their latest version, R80, is more capable but still, creating an application-based filter policy is a little cumbersome.

What is most valuable?

It's a NGFW with all of the capabilities required to protect for next-generation attacks at the perimeter level. The module or Security features that are provided as part of the base license with Check Point include (VPN, IPS, Application Control, and Content Awareness) which itself is strong enough to protect the organization.

The packet inspections have been a strong point. Our identity collectors have also been helpful. In many ways, Check Point has been a step up from the SonicWall that we had in-house before that. There's a lot of additional flexibility that we didn't have before.

What needs improvement?

I would like there to be a way to run packets that capture more easily in the GUI environment. Right now, if we want to read packet captures, we have to do so from the command line.

The biggest improvement they could make is having one software to install on all three levels of their products, so that the SMBs, the normal models, and the chassis would all run the same software. Now, while there is central management, everything that has to be configured on the gateway itself works differently on the three kinds of devices.

For how long have I used the solution?

I started using the solution 3 months ago.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The web interface was easy for me. The configuration is logical, so it's easy to use and easy to understand how to protect, how to open a port, how to manage, and how to route a device. That's why I prefer Check Point. It's robust and I never have issues with the hardware.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is quite good. You can scale well across locations for not too much cost. If a company needs to expand, it can do so relatively easily.

Also, cost-wise, it's very affordable to scale up. It's not expensive to add hardware and licenses as needed. They make upgrading very cheap.

We have 200 people on the solution. That said, they are using it with an IPsec tunnel. They don't use all of the capabilities of the hardware. They are using it just to encrypt tunneling between the sites.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support has been excellent

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Yes, we were previously using SonicWall but security is less robust in comparison to Check Point.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very easy.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it through a vendor called S G Informatics India Pvt Ltd.

The level of expertise I would rate at 10 out of 10.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I would recommend going into Check Point solutions. Although Check Point has the option of implementing your firewall on a server, I would advise implementing it on a perimeter device because servers have latency. It's best to deploy it on a dedicated device. Carry out a survey to find out if the device can handle the kind of workload you need to put through it. Also, make it a redundant solution, apart from the Management Server, which can be just one device. Although I should note that, up until now, we have not had anything like that ourselves.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We have looked into Sophos.

What other advice do I have?

The most valuable features are the security blades and the ease of managing the policies, searching logs for events, and correlating them.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1625355 - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
User
Good centralized management and VSX with great scalability potential
Pros and Cons
  • "There is a lot of legacy traffic from other vendors that has been migrated to Check Point which has resulted in a lot of stability in our environment."
  • "The product or services can be improved from the cost and the pricing perspective."

What is our primary use case?

The next-generation firewalls are used on the perimeter within a couple of data centers. There are lots of firewalls and we are trying to consolidate everything in the final solution. The MDS and VSX are real solutions that are easing the consolidation across different domains to make management easier. It also improves the overall solution from the operations perspective where BAU teams can leverage different Check Point product lines, like Smart Log, to support customers on a daily basis.

How has it helped my organization?

There is a lot of legacy traffic from other vendors that has been migrated to Check Point which has resulted in a lot of stability in our environment. Moreover, consolidation happening across different legacy environments is being enhanced by the usage of MDS and VSX solutions offered by Check Point. This is making things easier from both a migration and implementation perspective. It offers easy management architecture, and, with Smart Log, makes life easier for the operations engineers and different teams working with Check Point products.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Check Point is the Centralized Management (MDS) and Virtualization (VSX) for the firewalls. Using these features provides enhanced security with reduced cost across different domains and tenants with complete segregation from the policies database and a user traffic perspective. Using these features is proving to be scalable as things are virtualized and the resources can be increased or decreased as per the demand or usage from a project perspective.

What needs improvement?

The product or services can be improved from the cost and the pricing perspective. There are a lot of other competitors in the market providing similar solutions with more low-cost options. There is no doubt that the great three-tier architecture of Check Point is great, however, when the cost is considered, it proves to be a bit expensive as compared to other products in the market. Also, the licensing and maintenance costs are quite high. Maintaining these solutions proves to be a bit costly to organizations from a day-to-day perspective.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is excellent.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is really good.

How are customer service and technical support?

We are satisfied with the level of support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Yes, we have used a different solution previously and have switched because of the great performance that Check Point offers.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

Yes, and we had a good experience.

What was our ROI?

The ROI meets our expectations.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost is quite high for Check Point products.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes, however, I prefer not to say which.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, the solution and product line are good but more competitive pricing can be offered.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
PeerSpot user
Sreegith Sreedharan Nair - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Engineer at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech
Real User
Centralized management, good VPN functionality, provides valuable insights into our traffic
Pros and Cons
  • "The SmartView monitor and SmartReporter help us to monitor and report on traffic."
  • "Integration with a third-party authentication mechanism is tricky and needs to be planned well."

What is our primary use case?

We have deployed Check Point firewalls for perimeter security and also for filtering East-West traffic. 

Check Point helps in improving perimeter security along with giving insights into different kinds of traffic and attacks.

Isolation between different tiers of APPs is critical for us and Check Point is utilized for handling high traffic volumes of East-West traffic.

We are leveraging the VPN module on the perimeter firewall for users to access the VPNs. VPN authentication is integrated with RSA for multi-factor authentication.

How has it helped my organization?

We have reduced the number of firewalls using the VSX cluster from Check Point. This reduced management overhead to a great extent. Also, the stability of clustered firewall helps us in meeting SLAs with clients.

Check Point firewalls can be tuned for one-off cases like allowing out-of-sync packets for a source-destination pair, which is a feature that helped us tackle application issues. 

We have deployed VPN firewalls in multiple data centers, which help with load sharing and redundancy for the VPN traffic.

Managing all of our user VPNs, customer VPNs, and Cloud VPN tunnels' endpoint encryption from a single management portal is helping us.

What is most valuable?

VSX helps to reduce the physical footprint on datacenter racks.

The SmartView monitor and SmartReporter help us to monitor and report on traffic.

Centralized management and management high availability give the ability to manage firewalls in a DR scenario. 

Features such as the ability to simultaneously edit the rule base by multiple admins and revert to a previous rule base revision are very useful.

Having a separate appliance for logging helps us in meeting the security audit requirements, without having an overhead on management.

What needs improvement?

Configurations can be complex in some situations and need experienced engineers for managing the solution.

Integration with a third-party authentication mechanism is tricky and needs to be planned well.

SmartView monitor can be enhanced to display granular details of gateways with a single click. Also, having the ability to generate alerts from the Smart Monitor would be a nice feature.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Check Point firewalls for the last eight years.

How are customer service and technical support?

Support might take a long time to resolve issues in rare scenarios.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to always keep an identical configuration, even interface statuses, in a VSX cluster before an upgrade to minimize upgrade failures.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
IT cloud network engineer - PeerSpot reviewer
Junior Network Specialist - Cloud Operations Engineer at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
VPN is easy to configure while the CLI allows us to automate things
Pros and Cons
  • "One of the most valuable features is the data center object integration with Azure. We are using Azure a lot and there is very nice synchronization between the objects in Azure, and it's very easy to implement rules using this feature."
  • "The NAT services part needs improvement. It's not sophisticated. It needs functions like range assignment for NATing. The way you assign a list of IPs for NATing is too simple. It just allows you to use pools."

What is our primary use case?

We use them to protect our edge infrastructure and for interconnecting our sites using the VPN.

What is most valuable?

One of the most valuable features is the data center object integration with Azure. We are using Azure a lot and there is very nice synchronization between the objects in Azure, and it's very easy to implement rules using this feature.

Other valuable features include: 

  • the VPN — it's quite easy to configure it and it provides us with an easy way to interconnect our sites.
  • the CLI, for automating things
  • it is very easy to manage, to make backups, and to configure
  • the support and the graphical user interface.

What needs improvement?

The NAT services part needs improvement. It's not sophisticated. It needs functions like range assignment for NATing. The way you assign a list of IPs for NATing is too simple. It just allows you to use pools.

There could also be improvement to the automation. They should provide a tool for creating and maintaining rules.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Check Point firewalls for more than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is an eight out of 10 because we have had some problems with URL filtering, with the domain filtering in particular. When the domain is under a CDN, it sometimes gives us problems because there is more than one IP for each domain.

We have also had problems with data center objects or Azure objects where we have created a rule and the rule stops working. We opened a case with Check Point and they answered us. We installed fixes and it looks like it's working now.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is quite nice at the firewall level. It gives us the possibility of implementing clusters and high-availability.

We are also working on an Azure implementation and it looks good. We have not yet deployed to the Azure Check Point implementation, but it promises a lot.

We have about 200 employees and, on the administrative side, there are 12 to 15 people working with the Check Point solution. They are mostly networking infra engineers. We are using about 40 percent of the firewall capacity. We don't currently have plans to increase capacity.

How are customer service and technical support?

We are satisfied with the support. When we have a problem, it's very easy to contact the support center and they give a fast response. I would give their support a nine out of 10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have worked with the Cisco ASA firewalls and with firewalls from manufacturers like MikroTik.

What was our ROI?

It's hard to measure ROI, but our sense of security, as a company, is good with Check Point.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

In terms of quality versus price, Check Point is very balanced.

What other advice do I have?

The biggest lesson I have learned from using Check Point firewalls is that if you know how to work with Linux, you will be able to manage almost all the features.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Network Security Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Consultant
High-capability devices help us to integrate with cloud infrastructure and internet applications
Pros and Cons
  • "It also gives us a single console for everything. Rather than having one device for URL filtering and a different device as a firewall, this gives us everything in one place."
  • "It would help if they were easier to deploy, without needing more technical people. It would be nice if we could just give basic information, how to connect, and that would be all, while the rest of the setup could be done remotely."

What is our primary use case?

We work with these firewalls for overall security, including content filtering.

How has it helped my organization?

High-capacity and high-capability devices help us to integrate with the cloud infrastructure as well as internet applications.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the URL filtering. 

It also gives us a single console for everything. Rather than having one device for URL filtering and a different device as a firewall, this gives us everything in one place.

What needs improvement?

It would help if they were easier to deploy, without needing more technical people. It would be nice if we could just give basic information, how to connect, and that would be all, while the rest of the setup could be done remotely.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Check Point NGFWs for six years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

They're pretty stable. I don't see any issues there.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability means upgrading to newer, better hardware.

From an end-user perspective, everyone in our organization is using it, as it's a perimeter device. If they have to access the internet, they use this firewall to allow that access. We have about 4,000 end-users and about 200,000 concurrent connections.

How are customer service and technical support?

Check Point's technical support is a seven out of 10. Sometimes it takes a lot of time to get the right people on TAC issues. And to buy time, they just use generic questions, which is really time-consuming and doesn't relate to the problem at all.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

For the infrastructure in question, we have always used Check Point firewalls.

I have worked with Cisco ASA. Cisco is more CLI oriented, whereas Check Point is more GUI oriented. With the GUI, it's easier to manage and administrate it. If the configuration becomes bigger and bigger, it is really easy to see things in the GUI versus a CLI.

The advantage of the CLI is that you can create scripts and execute them. But the disadvantage is that they become so lengthy that it becomes very difficult to manage.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward because it's a GUI interface. Even when it was upgraded, things didn't change in terms of the look and feel. It was still the same. There was no need to learn new things. It's easy for any administrator to learn new features.

On average, deployment takes one to two hours, including mounting and everything, from the physical work to moving the traffic there.

The issue is that we still need people to be onsite to do this because some tasks have to be done on the day. That means a technical person is required to do that work. We can't give it to any other person to do this because, until those particular steps are completed, things can't go any further.

We have six people, network admins, for deployment and maintenance because we have about 30 of firewalls.

What about the implementation team?

We do it ourselves.

What was our ROI?

When we first started using them, we were just using them for basic functionality. Then we started using more features and introducing other components. For example, we had a different proxy server which we depended on. Once we got the Check Point, we could use the same device for multiple roles, which reduced the cost a lot. I would estimate our costs have been reduced by 30 percent.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

If you use the features then it's cost-effective. Otherwise, it's expensive.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1412340 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Protects our environment with security checks against vulnerabilities
Pros and Cons
  • "We like the centralized management for configuring multiple firewalls. It also gives us the Antivirus, threat prevention, and vulnerability tests. These four features protect the environment with security checks. Vulnerability tests allow us to configure changes that can protect the environment."
  • "The Antivirus feature is something that could be improved. We don't get much from the Antivirus update in comparison to their competitor's firewalls. It needs to be more advanced because Check Point is nowadays sent all over the world. Therefore, the Antivirus feature should be of very good quality and cover all virus checks. I would also like the Antivirus updates to be more frequent."

What is our primary use case?

We use it to provide security to our environment from the outside world. We are using it to provide security against vulnerabilities using threat prevention, Antivirus, and IPS.

How has it helped my organization?

In advance, we get security vulnerabilities. So, we can configure new security policies, update our antivirus, or check the configuration to protect the environment.

What is most valuable?

We like the centralized management for configuring multiple firewalls. It also gives us the Antivirus, threat prevention, and vulnerability tests. These four features protect the environment with security checks. Vulnerability tests allow us to configure changes that can protect the environment.

What needs improvement?

The Antivirus feature is something that could be improved. We don't get much from the Antivirus update in comparison to their competitor's firewalls. It needs to be more advanced because Check Point is nowadays sent all over the world. Therefore, the Antivirus feature should be of very good quality and cover all virus checks. I would also like the Antivirus updates to be more frequent.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with it for the last seven years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a very stable firewall. The updates that we get from this Check Point Firewall are also very stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is good.

There are more than 10,000 users. The Check Point Firewall is deployed through the company.

How are customer service and technical support?

All their technical people are very solid in their knowledge.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used Cisco ASA and FTD. We switched from Cisco ASA to Check Point because there were no antivirus, vulnerabilities, or security prevention features. Check Point has more advance features, which are easier to use, than Cisco.

We also had to install IPS devices with Cisco.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. It was not too difficult to deploy the Check Point firewall. Deployment takes between 12 to 15 months.

We have done a cloud-based deployment throughout our network.

What about the implementation team?

We did the deployment ourselves. We have onsite specialists who have done many deployments.

20 people take care of the deployment and troubleshooting of this firewall.

What was our ROI?

There is a money saving because we no longer require other devices, like an IPS, a separate antivirus, or vulnerability tests. We get all the devices within a single tool. Before, we would have different teams taking care of different devices. Now, we take care of only one device, which is another source of savings. We have saved a lot of money with this solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The prices are good for its features. The benefit of its license is we get timely security prevention updates. The price is good for the technology that we get.

What other advice do I have?

This is a good solution. I would recommend to take advantage of as many features as you can. It has many features, and to protect security, you should use all the best features that you can.

As soon as the company will grow, we will definitely increase our usage of the firewall. We have already increased our usage due to employees working from home.

The biggest lesson that I learned is we can use the features of a firewall security to protect our environment. Also, rather than deploying multiple firewalls, we can configure a centralized management system, and this saves time.

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point NGFW Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point NGFW Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.