I like this product because it is easy to use and it allows us to have a realistic vision of what is going on at the heart of our network. Flow matrices, the ability to analyze response times for our web apps (http), and what is related to SQL requests are among the key features we need.
Network Engineer with 501-1,000 employees
Easy to use and allows us to have a realistic vision of what is going on at the heart of our network.
Pros and Cons
- "I like this product because it is easy to use and it allows us to have a realistic vision of what is going on at the heart of our network."
- "Increase the drive’s capacity to store more data, and maybe switch to a database system similar to 3Big-Data."
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
This product enabled us to identify the cause of some apps known to be running slow. Analyzing connection times from the sequence of elements involved in a request (PC, application server, database server) enables us to immediately identify the element that is failing.
What needs improvement?
Increase the drive’s capacity to store more data, and maybe switch to a database system similar to 3Big-Data. The goal is to avoid truncating information after a certain amount of time, and to improve the performance.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for several years, but the latest 3.0 version, which was installed at Campus France in 2014, brings in new features that we find very interesting.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No, no problem at all.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No, no problem at all.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No, no problem at all.
How are customer service and support?
Customer Service:
Good level, I can describe it with three words, responsiveness, availability and efficiency.
Technical Support:Good level as well. Efficiency and professionalism.
How was the initial setup?
It was simple but a bit long, because one has to create all networks, objects, flows and so on… But once it’s done, it’s very smooth.
What about the implementation team?
With a vendor team, very qualified and kind.
What was our ROI?
I didn’t really know about that, but I think it is an essential tool, it enables us to know what is going on our network at anytime, and it saves us several men/days spent on analyzing what is happening when faced with some apps slowing down for instance…For that reason alone, I really think it’s cost-effective.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Yes, I had tested HP Openview, but despite its extensive offer, this product is too complex.
What other advice do I have?
Carefully identify the important elements within the technical infrastructure (apps, servers, database, etc…) during the set-up phase, as it affects the relevance of the data.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
ICT Manager with 51-200 employees
Beyond the savings of the IT team’s productivity, the reduction of the performance degradations has helped save money.
Despite their ability to monitor availability and resource consumption (CPU, RAM, Disk…), our SNMP monitoring tools (Microsoft SCOM) did not provide any useful information to deal with user complaints. “Wireshark”, which we used to use for firefighting operations, could not provide us with an easy way to understand the origin of an issue.
First, we felt the need to monitor proactively our IT usage, as well as the performance of both our network and applications. In case of complaint, we wanted to be able to quickly qualify:
- Which application was impacted? Which users were impacted? When?
- Was our WAN network overloaded? By which applications?
- Was there any abnormal behavior on our network (virus or worm)?
Second, due to the limited WAN capacities with a maximum of 10Mbps per connection, we needed to fully understand our network usage: which application was using which capacity and when? The objectives were to be able to anticipate congestions and their nasty consequences on our users and to get the right information to optimize our network and its usage.
Our IT infrastructure partner, AB Network, presented Performance Vision from SecurActive, which seemed to respond to our requirements. To validate its capabilities in a real life environment, we organized a proof of concept with AB Network. The conclusion was fully positive!
Each collaborator of the IT team has a full access to the solution. Each of us looks at the information he needs to execute his tasks: two developers, two people in charge of the infrastructure administration, one person in charge of the relationship between industrial engineering and IT, and myself:
- Our developers use Performance Vision to troubleshoot performance issues on our http applications which are critical for our users located across all our sites to access to our databases. A good example is our planning software: this application is accessed from several sites by users from different companies within the group. It connects to several ERPs to consolidate planning information for several countries. Performance Vision helped optimize its performance by providing a clear understanding of how the application chain works.
- The administrators in charge of the infrastructure monitor specifically the WAN usage and the bandwidth consumption. A recent example was the identification of a malfunction inside our antivirus architecture: in principle our antivirus system is composed of servers located on each of our four main sites. A configuration issue made that some clients communicated with the antivirus server of a different site and overloaded the WAN network.
- My team access to the data from the three probes distributed on our main sites through a single graphical interface, which is particularly intuitive.
- There are many examples of diagnostics run thanks to Performance Vision: without this tools, these incidents would have had strong consequences on our business. With Performance Vision, our administrators have been able to quickly pinpoint the origin of the issue and to solve it:
- Citrix Performance degradation: some time ago, we received a growing number of complaints from users based on Poland trying to connect to our central applications. We could quickly identify that the performance was degraded for the Citrix flow only and not for the applications themselves. We identified that the slowdown of the Citrix flows was due to the configuration of our PDM/PLM application, which was using too much bandwidth during office hours.
- We have a file synchronization software which runs over multiple sites. Our sites have different bandwidth available depending on the number of users present on each site. Thanks to Performance Vision’s reporting, we tuned the configuration of this software to manage this synchronization on all our sites, without any harm to our daily business operations.
Our team is currently working on a degradation that appeared on a customized application which relies on VB6 to query our SQL databases. I have no doubt that we will find the necessary elements to solve this problem in a very short timeframe.
On my end, I read a daily report to validate that our response times (application, network, and bandwidth) are fine. Automated, these reports represent no additionally workload for my team and allow us to share an objective history of our network & application performances and usage.
After 15 months of use, our feeling is strongly positive. I recommend Performance Vision to other IT directors on a regularly basis, to have a good visibility on the network and to diagnose or optimize the performance of their IT. It is a key element to help our teams to efficiently collaborate both at the development and infrastructure levels.
Beyond the savings gained on the IT team’s productivity, the reduction of the performance degradations for the business users, the monitoring of our bandwidths and the optimization of our applications, Performance Vision also helped saving the money we would otherwise have spent in the upgrade of our WAN network.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Network Manager at a local government with 51-200 employees
No more than half a day, and we were getting relevant information that was fully intuitive.
Our team is in charge of the network routing and quality of access of the different applications. As part of our mission, we need to visualize the flows towards our datacenter and to monitor the response times of all applications for each of the 300 remote sites.
In 2011, we started to look for a tool capable of addressing our needs. We selected a few products and tested them intensively on our datacenter: some proved to be good at protocol analysis but way too complex to manage for our needs; they would have required more dedicated resources than we could afford. All reports had to be created from zero and were not available “out of the box” (reporting was indeed an important feature for the Police Headquarters). Other solutions only covered a portion of our needs, because they were based on active QoS /compression devices and were not rendering the necessary diagnostic and analysis capabilities.
In the end we selected Performance Vision based on its strengths which fit well with our needs: In no more than a half day, we were getting relevant information and could use the product; The drill down access to information was fully intuitive; The tool was adapted to all our team (including punctual / light users); The network context (geographical and IP addressing plans) was perfectly translated into the interface and reports.
Moreover, Performance Vision offered an easy way to automate the distribution of graphical response time reports to all our IT staff located on each remote site; the information provided was easily understood by them and required little additional information from our team.
For diagnostics, Performance Vision outperforms our previous sniffer solutions and Netflow collectors! We started by making an assessment of all applications to understand their respective behavior: we pointed out a certain number of conception defects, which had a negative impact on users despite good server and network performance. We also built a baseline and determined the normal behavior of each application. We also implemented a daily reporting on our most critical applications to check that their performance andbehavior remained in line with the baseline.
Secondly, we proceeded to a large "house cleaning" operation: we got rid of large volumes of DNS errors, corrected the configuration of many workstations (which were using bad URLs or IP addresses for updates), as well as the one of certain servers relying on IP addresses instead of domain names, etc…
Performance Vision is an easy-to-use product; its administration requires very little time. Of course, Performance Vision provides data which has to be interpreted (e.g. one of our critical applications has very good response time per transaction but it involves a large number of transactions per user). The training is a key element in the project: as far as we are concerned, it got delivered in our context, on our own data. It has been very efficient and has quickly put us in a position where we can efficiently understand the information we are getting.
Overall, our experience has been brilliant: we consider Performance Vision as a very good product which fits our initial wishes. It is simple to use, provides a lot of relevant information. Upfront, it is very easy to use for network administrators and provides well designed reports for other IT staff members. We keep on enriching its configuration and using it on a daily basis. We have the project to extend its coverage through an additional virtual probe to analyze network traffic on remote sites (to analyze the application flows which cannot be viewed from our datacenter and diagnose local issues on remote sites)”.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Tachnical Lead at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Preforms well, detailed documentation, and helpful support
Pros and Cons
- "The performance of Accedian Skylight is better than other vendors."
- "The UI interface of Accedian Skylight could improve."
What is our primary use case?
The solution can be deployed on the cloud or on-premise.
What is most valuable?
The performance of Accedian Skylight is better than other vendors.
What needs improvement?
The UI interface of Accedian Skylight could improve.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used Accedian Skylight for approximately 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Accedian Skylight is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
I have used the support from Accedian Skylight and they are helpful.
I rate the support from Accedian Skylight a ten out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Accedian Skylight is simple. Anyone can complete the implementation because the documentation is detailed.
When upgrading a customer's production network, typically it takes approx eight hours, though it may be as little as two or three hours depending on the customer's requirements.
What was our ROI?
The solution is worst the money. We have received a good ROI. If did not receive a good ROI we would not have been using it for 10 years.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others. The solution provides good support and we have not experienced any problems. The support typically resolves issues within 24 hours.
I rate Accedian Skylight a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2026
Product Categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Network Monitoring SoftwarePopular Comparisons
Splunk AppDynamics
SolarWinds NPM
PRTG Network Monitor
Splunk Observability Cloud
Elastic Observability
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Application Performance Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
- What solution would you recommend for monitoring traffic utilization of leased lines?
- How Much Should I Budget for an APM Solution?
- Which is the best AANPM product? Should we be considering anything besides for Riverbed?
- Who Uses APM?
- What is your favorite tool for Application Performance Monitoring?
- How does synthetic monitoring differ from real user monitoring?
- Differences between SiteScope and dynaTrace?
- Splunk as an Enterprise Class monitoring solution -- thoughts?















