Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Acunetix vs GitHub Code Scanning comparison

Invicti and GitHub are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3, while GitHub is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.6. Invicti holds a 3.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to GitHub’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.
Acunetix
Read 33 Acunetix reviews
  • 4,155 Views
  • 1,096 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
GitHub Code Scanning
Read 5 GitHub Code Scanning reviews
  • 885 Views
  • 429 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and GitHub Code Scanning are key players in security and code testing. GitHub Code Scanning generally holds an advantage for its ease of use and seamless integration into development workflows.

Features: Acunetix provides comprehensive vulnerability detection, robust scanning, and extensive reporting for deep security analysis. GitHub Code Scanning offers seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, a streamlined interface, and effective collaboration tools within the GitHub ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could benefit from enhanced integration, improved performance speed, and simplified user navigation. GitHub Code Scanning needs more comprehensive vulnerability detection, expanded language support, and enhanced reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix requires a complex setup but has satisfactory customer service. GitHub Code Scanning offers simple deployment with integrated support from the GitHub ecosystem, leading to higher user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix comes with a higher upfront cost but offers significant long-term value through its exhaustive security features. GitHub Code Scanning provides cost-effective solutions via GitHub plans, achieving ROI through efficient workflow integration.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. GitHub Code Scanning Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Acunetix vs. GitHub Code Scanning
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (16th), Vulnerability Management (22nd), DevSecOps (6th)
GitHub Code Scanning
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
17th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 3.5%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil - PeerSpot reviewer
Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy
Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.
Read full review
VishalSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open
You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"Acunetix is the best service in the world. It is easy to manage. It gives a lot of information to the users to see and identify problems in their site or applications. It works very well."
"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours."
"The product is really easy to use."
"We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why."
"The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities."
"The solution is highly stable."
More Acunetix pros
"It's very scalable, very easy to handle, and very intuitive."
"GitHub Code Spaces brings significant value with its simplicity and ease of use."
"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."
"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."
"The static code analysis capability in GitHub Code Scanning is a very powerful feature, providing the ability to identify vulnerabilities and ensure code quality."
 

Cons

"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched."
"The pricing is a bit on the higher side."
"You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing."
"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."
"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."
"Acunetix needs to include agent analysis."
"Acunetix needs to be dynamic with JavaScript code, unlike Netsparker which can scan complex agents."
"While we do have it integrated with other solutions, it could still offer more integrations."
More Acunetix cons
"When running code scans, GitHub Code Scanning provides recommendations for probable fixes. However, integrating a feature where developers receive real-time highlights of vulnerabilities when checking in or merging a PR would be beneficial."
"At times it becomes very annoying as it highlights certain things which are intuitive. They require code coverage for those aspects as an extra overhead."
"One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may overlook details, such as outdated libraries, which could be highlighted for attention."
"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."
"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."
"The price is exceptionally high."
"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."
"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."
"The solution is expensive."
"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."
"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."
More Acunetix pricing and cost advice
"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."
"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetration testing. The main use cases include vulnerability scanning, security testing,...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...
See all answers
What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?
We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?
The organization pays for the license of GitHub Code Scanning, but specific price details are unknown.
See all answers
What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?
When running code scans, GitHub Code Scanning provides recommendations for probable fixes. However, integrating a feature where developers receive real-time highlights of vulnerabilities when check...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix Logo
OWASP Zap vs Acunetix
Compared 17% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix
Compared 11% of the time
HCL AppScan vs Acunetix Logo
HCL AppScan vs Acunetix
Compared 9% of the time
Invicti vs Acunetix Logo
Invicti vs Acunetix
Compared 7% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix
Compared 6% of the time
More Acunetix Competitors
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning
Compared 35% of the time
Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning Logo
Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning
Compared 28% of the time
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning Logo
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning
Compared 12% of the time
Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning Logo
Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning
Compared 10% of the time
Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning Logo
Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning
Compared 5% of the time
More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Acunetix
June 2025
Acunetix reportDownload Acunetix product report
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
June 2025
GitHub Code Scanning reportDownload GitHub Code Scanning product report
 

Also Known As

AcuSensor
No data available
 

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

GitHub
 

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Acunetix vs. GitHub Code Scanning
June 2025
Free Report: Acunetix vs. GitHub Code Scanning
Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. GitHub Code Scanning and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Acunetix vs. GitHub Code Scanning report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.