Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Invicti and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3, while PortSwigger is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8. Invicti holds a 2.7% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 32 Acunetix reviews

3,283 Views
2,632 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 63 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

3,221 Views
2,172 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Acunetix

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional compete in the web vulnerability scanner category. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is favored for its advanced functionalities, despite its higher cost.

Features: Acunetix provides automation in vulnerability scanning, aiding efficiency in continuous integration environments. It is known for its detailed reporting and user-friendly interface. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is preferred for its comprehensive manual testing tools, facilitating detailed and granular analysis, which is ideal for security professionals seeking thorough investigations.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could benefit from enhanced reporting flexibility and a more intuitive issue management interface. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional users suggest improving scalability for large environments and the support for automated workflows. Each product targets specific user needs in these areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is commended for its simple deployment process and effective customer support, providing a quick start and reliable troubleshooting. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, despite having a more complex setup, offers comprehensive documentation and a responsive support team capable of assisting with sophisticated deployment needs.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix has a competitive pricing model offering solid ROI, particularly attractive for smaller organizations. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, although more expensive, is considered valuable due to its extensive capabilities, providing substantial returns in advanced security testing.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,589 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

17th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (23rd), DevSecOps (6th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.7%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor

Head - Quality Control at Net Solutions

Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms

We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is really easy to use."

"Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"Acunetix is the best service in the world. It is easy to manage. It gives a lot of information to the users to see and identify problems in their site or applications. It works very well."

"It generates automated reports."

"Acunetix has an awesome crawler. It gives a referral site map of near targets and also goes really deep to find all the inputs without issues. This was valuable because it helped me find some files or directories, like web admin panels without authentication, which were hidden."

"It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have."

"It's very user-friendly for the testing teams. It's very easy for them to understand things and to fix vulnerabilities."

More Acunetix pros

"This tool is more accurate than the other solutions that we use, and reports fewer false positives."

"The intercepting feature is the most valuable."

"We are mostly using it for scanning the entire website. So, we basically create a script with the entire website and then run it for different injections."

"The way they do the research and they keep their profile up to date is great. They identify vulnerabilities and update them immediately."

"The technical support from PortSwigger is excellent, managing response time and quality efficiently without any issues."

"The most valuable feature of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is the dashboard. It is very informative and you can receive all the information you need in one place. It's clear, well-defined, and organized. Anybody without any cybersecurity can use it."

"The solution scans web applications and supports APIs, which are the main features I really like."

"The product has a good learning hub."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

"The pricing is a bit on the higher side."

"I rate its stability six out of ten."

"It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."

"Acunetix needs to improve its cost."

"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."

More Acunetix cons

"The solution is not easy to set it up. You need a lot of knowledge."

"The biggest drawback is reporting. It's not so good. I can download them, but they're not so informative."

"There is not much automation in the tool."

"Scanning needs to be improved in enterprise and professional versions."

"One area for improvement is the integrated browser, Chromium. Single Sign-On (SSO) methods like Microsoft authentication login sometimes fail and show errors. As a workaround, I have to use a different browser, such as Firefox, to log in and make Burp work."

"It would be beneficial to have privileged access management as a part of Burp Suite Professional."

"You can have many false positives in Burp Suite. It depends on the scale of the penetration testing."

"The one feature that I would like to see in Burp is active scanning of REST based web services. A lot of organizations are providing APIs to access their services to support different business models like SaaS. Scanning these APIs is still a challenge for many security product companies."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The solution is expensive."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"The yearly cost is about $300."

"The pricing of the solution is reasonable. We only need to pay for the annual subscription. I rate the pricing five out of ten."

"The platform's pricing is reasonable."

"For a country such as Sri Lanka, the pricing is not reasonable."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten."

"Burp Suite is affordable."

"The pricing of the solution is cost-effective and is best suited for small and medium-sized businesses."

"We have one license. The price is very nominal."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,589 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I typically use Acunetix ( /products/acunetix-reviews ) to identify vulnerabilities for clients.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I would recommend Acunetix to others. Overall, I rate this solution seven out of ten.

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

I find the price of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional to be very cost-efficient.

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 10% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 15% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

April 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

Burp

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,589 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.