OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

The compared OpenText and PortSwigger solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #3 in DAST , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 11.6% mindshare in the category. PortSwigger is ranked #11 in AS , with an average rating of 8.8, and holds a 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

4,556 Views
1,822 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 65 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

8,872 Views
5,678 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: May 2022).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

May 2022

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd), DevSecOps (8th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (11th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is designed for Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and holds a mindshare of 11.6%, up 9.9% compared to last year.
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 3.1% mindshare, up 2.1% since last year.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing	11.6%
Veracode	15.7%
Checkmarx One	15.0%
Other	57.7%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional	3.1%
SonarQube	13.6%
Checkmarx One	8.8%
Other	74.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

ArnabPaul

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Enhancements in manual testing align with reporting and integration features

WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produces minimal findings, necessitating manual verification. The solution offers customization features for crawling and vulnerability detection. It includes various security frameworks and allows selection of specific vulnerability types to audit, such as OWASP Top 10 or JavaScript-based vulnerabilities. When working with APIs, we can select OWASP API Top 10. The tool also supports custom audit features by combining different security frameworks. For on-premises deployment, the setup is complex, particularly regarding SQL server configuration. Unlike Burp Suite or OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, which have simpler setup processes, WebInspect requires SQL server setup to function.

Read full review

Moti Huberman

Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks

I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that has been most influential in identifying vulnerabilities is its ability to crawl the website, understand the structure, and analyze the network packets sent and received."

"Reporting, centralized dashboard, and bird's eye view of all vulnerabilities are the most valuable features."

"There are lots of small settings and tools, like an HTTP editor, that are very useful."

"It is easy to use, and its reporting is fairly simple."

"Guided Scan option allows us to easily scan and share reports."

"I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level."

"My experience with technical support has been good."

"It's a well-known platform for doing dynamic application scanning."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

"The feature that we have found most valuable is that it comes with pre-set configurations, with a set of predefined options where you can pick one and start scanning, and we also have the option of creating our own configurations, such as how often the applications need to be scanned, along with good reporting and dashboards that integrate well with other task management applications we are using."

"We are mostly using it for scanning the entire website. So, we basically create a script with the entire website and then run it for different injections."

"The free version is one of the best proxy tools for manual testing."

"Burp has several good features; it's cheaper than other solutions and you can scan any number of applications and it updates its database."

"I found the best value, features and documentation in Burp."

"I find the attack model quite amazing, where I can write my scripts and load my scripts as well, which helps quite a bit."

"The suite testing models are very good. It's very secure."

"The solution is stable."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."

"The first time we ran the module, it was okay, however, the next time we ran it, it almost crashed."

"One thing I would like to see them introduce is a cloud-based platform."

"The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective."

"I want to enhance automation. Currently, Fortify WebInspect can scan and find vulnerabilities, but users with specific skills need to interpret the results and understand how to address them."

"The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps."

"I would like WebInspect's scanning capability to be quicker."

"This solution is very expensive."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

"Request handling capacity, it do not handle huge chuck of requests as it freezes."

"The vendor must provide documentation on how to use the new API feature."

"The price could be better. The rest is fine."

"There is a certain amount of lead time for the tickets to get resolved."

"It should provide a better way to integrate with Jenkins so that DAST (dynamic application security testing) can be automated."

"The interface for the automatic scan can be improved because it is easy for technical users, but the business users have trouble with it."

"The use of system memory is an area that can be improved because it uses a lot."

"If we're running a huge number of scans regularly, it slows down the tool."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is very expensive."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"The price is okay."

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"It is a cheap solution, but it may not be cheaper than other solutions."

"The platform's pricing is reasonable."

"It is expensive for us in Brazil because the currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."

"PortSwigger is reasonably-priced. It's fair."

"It has a yearly license. I am satisfied with its price."

"PortSwigger is a bit expensive."

"For a country such as Sri Lanka, the pricing is not reasonable."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?

I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 6% of the time

Invicti vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 5% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

Software Risk Manager ASPM vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 5% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 4% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

April 2026

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

Burp

Overview

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a vital tool for cybersecurity experts, valued for features like Intruder and Repeater, and offering strong automation for effective vulnerability detection and web security.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional aids organizations in conducting comprehensive application security testing. With functions like scanning, proxy setup, and numerous plugins, it provides essential support for vulnerability assessments and penetration testing. Despite needing improvements in reporting, false positive reduction, and scanning speed, it remains adaptable for different security operations through its automation, extensive community support, and regular updates. Licensing and pricing flexibility are considerations, alongside API security enhancements and documentation improvements. Widely used for intercepting and scanning web applications pre-launch, it supports compliance testing while offering tools for request replaying, traffic manipulation, and brute forcing.

What are the key features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

Intruder: Automates attacks to test web application vulnerabilities.
Repeater: Lets users send modified requests to observe responses.
Extender: Supports additional functionalities through plugins.
API Support: Offers capabilities for automated workflows and integrations.
Vulnerability Scanner: Efficiently detects application security flaws.

What benefits should users consider?

Affordable Pricing: Offers value through cost-effective plans.
Community Support: Access a robust network for troubleshooting and advice.
Automation Capabilities: Streamlines security testing processes.
Regular Updates: Continuous improvements and feature developments.

In industries like finance and healthcare, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is implemented to enhance application security frameworks. It provides critical insights for regulatory compliance and risk management. The tool's adaptability supports organizations in routinely identifying and addressing vulnerabilities, ensuring robust protection against potential threats and facilitating secure application launches.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Aaron's

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

May 2022

Free Report: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.