Checkmarx One and OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing compete in the dynamic application security testing market. Checkmarx One has the upper hand due to its developer-friendly approach and robust integration capabilities.
Features:Checkmarx One offers developer-friendly static application security testing with fewer false positives. It supports multiple languages and enables incremental scanning. OpenText DAST excels in live vulnerability scanning without needing source code and provides detailed reporting capabilities.
Room for Improvement:Checkmarx One needs to reduce false positives, improve role management, and enhance language support for emerging languages. OpenText DAST users suggest improving user-friendliness for non-developers, enhancing authentication handling during scans, and simplifying the interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Checkmarx One provides flexible deployment models, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid, making it versatile for users. Customer service receives mixed feedback due to technical support responsiveness. OpenText DAST, mainly deployed on-premises with optional cloud support, is reliable but occasionally cumbersome in setup. Customer service is generally appreciated for being knowledgeable and responsive.
Pricing and ROI:Checkmarx One's pricing is on the higher side, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and effectiveness, offering good ROI by improving development speed and security practices. OpenText DAST also has high pricing, justified by its live application security capabilities. Both offer valuable testing, though Checkmarx One provides greater pricing transparency compared to OpenText DAST's varied pricing structures.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing | 17.7% |
| Checkmarx One | 13.0% |
| Other | 69.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 38 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.
Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:
Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
