


Veracode and Checkmarx One are two prominent tools competing in the secure software development category. Checkmarx One seems to have the upper hand thanks to its efficient handling of false positives and its dynamic developer training platform, Codebashing.
Features: Veracode provides robust static analysis for multiple languages, scalable APIs, and IDE integrations, also featuring Greenlight for early code assessments and superior third-party library support. Checkmarx One offers its Codebashing platform for developer training, broad language support including newer languages, and excels in real-time scanning for fast-moving development environments.
Room for Improvement: Veracode experiences longer report processing times and higher false positive counts, with concerns about its outdated user interface and limited language support for newer integrations. Checkmarx One lacks strong mobile application support and a fully matured DAST, alongside user interface complexity issues and cumbersome CI/CD integration setup. Reducing false positives and enhancing API integration are also noted areas for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode is predominantly used in public cloud settings with easy scalability and tool integration, yet limited private cloud options. Checkmarx One provides flexible on-premises and cloud deployments, suitable for enterprises needing rigorous security measures. Both products have strong customer support, with Veracode facing occasional slow resolution times while Checkmarx One users value the hands-on support despite needing more real-time developer help.
Pricing and ROI: Veracode is priced higher, often seen as costly for smaller enterprises but justified by its extensive features and security benefits, with a flexible licensing model. Checkmarx One, though still expensive, offers good value for enterprises with consumption-based licensing options. Both tools contribute to ROI through reducing vulnerabilities and speeding up security compliance, although Veracode is slightly better in long-term operational savings.
The solution provides a good ROI, especially for regular customers, offering discounts for three-year licenses.
I don't think the tool in itself is very capable of doing that, but we have XSOAR and other tool integrations done on the platform, so this can be accomplished.
Overall, between the fast scanning, automation, automatic reporting, and easy detection, it has reduced manual effort enough that we did not need an extra reviewer, even as our codebase or team size grew.
Based on my interactions with the clients, I can tell that there is a return on investment because if something is not profitable and it's not helping to save costs or vulnerabilities, clients wouldn't come back to renew their license year after year.
The scanners of Veracode bring status of the weaknesses in the current infrastructure. It scans and provides reports regarding the servers, the network, and the applications running on those servers.
Regarding price, the evaluation should focus on how efficiently they will recover their investment, considering the time saved through the use of Veracode Fix, for example, and the ability to fix code at dev time compared to the problems faced when fixing after the product is already deployed.
We did see a return on investment with Veracode, as we segregated our remediation efforts, which reduced our time to delivery as well as the number of engineers needed to help us in delivering a secure solution.
If I make it a high priority, they have resolved one query within 20 minutes.
If local Indian support cannot resolve an issue, global tech support aligns promptly within the agreed SLA.
Fast response times and knowledgeable staff who understand the intricacies of the system.
If you raise a support case with Checkmarx, it is handled smoothly.
The customer support team is amazing and they provide on-phone call, email support, and on-website support.
I have relied on Checkmarx One customer support hundreds of times for several things, and Checkmarx One support is very proactive and very responsive.
Access to the engineering team is crucial for faster feedback on the product fix process.
I have communicated with the technical support of Veracode a couple of times, and this was a really great experience because these professionals know their material.
They share detailed information via email, including screenshots or further clarification about the issue.
For stability, scalability, mean time to response, and potential incident investigation improvements, I would give it a nine or probably even a ten.
Onboarding endpoints and assets on Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is very easy.
The platform is able to auto-shut certain resources that are not in use through the agentless scan feature.
Approximately four billion lines of code are being scanned monthly.
Since it is cloud-based, the infrastructure and PaaS, IaaS, and SaaS are taken care of by the cloud marketplace.
Checkmarx One's scalability has changed my organization because the strong collaboration between the development and security team helps us to do things much faster.
Cloud solutions are easier to scale than on-premise solutions.
It has a good capacity to scale effectively.
Implementing these features into our normal CI/CD was good, so I can say that scalability is really good.
My impression of Cloud Runtime Security in stopping attacks in real-time is that I have never had an issue where it has let something through, causing an outage or concerns to the customer.
However, now in Cortex Cloud, I have not seen any lag or buffer.
My evaluation of how stable and reliable Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is very positive.
I would rate the stability of this solution a nine on a scale of 1 to 10 where one is low stability and 10 is high.
Checkmarx One is often down when the cloud provider experiences issues.
If the Veracode server is down, we experience many issues during the scan.
I have observed that it is not that reliable in terms of security because Veracode was not able to find some security threats in our application that existed since the product was developed.
It's not that easy to onboard, but once they have been onboarded on the platform, and the pipeline configured alongside the product configured, it works effectively.
Regarding the generative AI security tool, I know for sure it's Agentic.
The solution is quite premium in cost compared to alternatives such as Wiz.
There is not a clear MSP model compared to other vendors such as CrowdStrike.
Integration into the IDE being used would be beneficial so that code does not need to be uploaded to the website and an IDE-friendly report could be generated.
It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from.
If you can improve the speed optimization, it takes around 30 to 40 minutes for checking a build. If you can make it within five minutes or 10 minutes, that would be great.
If it could be integrated directly with code repositories such as Bitbucket or GitHub, without the need to create a pipeline to upload and decode code, it would simplify the code scan process significantly.
We had issues with scanning large applications. Scanning took a lot of time, so we kept it outside the DevOps pipeline to avoid delaying deployments.
A nice addition would be if it could be extended for scenarios with custom cleansers.
The solution is costly, with high-end capabilities suitable for enterprises.
Today, it is smart and easy to calculate the licenses.
For a small team under 50 developers, normal expenses come under 30 to 60K.
Due to the number of years I've implemented Checkmarx One, there are rebates and discounts from the OEM which makes it a lot more profitable.
The pricing should be reasonable, matching what we are paying for.
It's not the most expensive solution.
Overall, Veracode's pricing is lower and more scalable than many alternatives in the market.
If there's a security gap, you'll never know the cost or effect.
AI/ML aids in anticipating remediation for misconfigurations and vulnerabilities, and automatic remediation can be easily configured.
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has reduced the time spent on incident investigations, and if I had to estimate, I would say it has cut our investigation time in half.
This simplifies the management of shared responsibility among different people and entities, allowing you to use one single tool instead of having dozens of different tools to orchestrate and integrate.
Since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days.
The best features Checkmarx One offers, over the past years, include broad language and technical support that Checkmarx provides, covering most languages.
Checkmarx One has positively impacted our organization as we tend to find vulnerabilities very early in the development cycle.
It offers confidence by preventing exposure to vulnerabilities and helps ensure that we are not deploying vulnerable code into production.
The best features in Veracode include static analysis and the early detection of vulnerable libraries; it integrates with tools such as Jenkins.
It fixes issues directly in the IDE while you're doing it.

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 69 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 45 |
| Large Enterprise | 114 |
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive cybersecurity management, focusing on enhancing security operations with advanced automation and threat intelligence, addressing complex security challenges efficiently.
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks integrates cloud-scale data analytics and automation to streamline security operations, enabling faster threat detection and response. It leverages AI and machine learning to provide real-time threat intelligence and automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on security teams. Users benefit from improved visibility across networks and greater operational efficiency, making it crucial for enterprises aiming to secure their digital assets against evolving cyber threats.
What are the key features of Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks?
What benefits or ROI should you expect from Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks reviews?
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is favored in sectors like finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, where data security is paramount. Its ability to integrate with existing infrastructure and provide real-time insights makes it a preferred choice for securing sensitive information and ensuring compliance within industry regulations.
Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.
Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:
Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.
Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.
Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.
What are the key features of Veracode?
What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?
Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.
Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.