Datadog monitors cloud applications, infrastructure, and performance, including AWS and Azure. It offers dashboards, log aggregation, alerting, and error detection. Users value application performance monitoring, log management, and root cause analysis. Desired improvements include better tool integration, intuitive interfaces, expanded metrics, and enhanced alerts, with concerns about pricing and UI slowness.
It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing.
It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost.
It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing.
It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost.
The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security.
I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools.
The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security.
I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools.
The pricing is much more manageable versus other products.
The price of Tenable Nessus is much more competitive versus other solutions on the market.
The pricing is much more manageable versus other products.
The price of Tenable Nessus is much more competitive versus other solutions on the market.
We use a pay-as-you-use license, which is competitively priced in the market.
I don't have all the details in terms of licensing for Amazon GuardDuty, but my organization does have a license set up for it.
We use a pay-as-you-use license, which is competitively priced in the market.
I don't have all the details in terms of licensing for Amazon GuardDuty, but my organization does have a license set up for it.
So much can be done with the Open Source side, and especially for smaller shops. I personally think the pricing for Enterprise is hard to justify.
The solution has helped to increase infrastructure, agility, speed, and provisioning in the time to market.
So much can be done with the Open Source side, and especially for smaller shops. I personally think the pricing for Enterprise is hard to justify.
The solution has helped to increase infrastructure, agility, speed, and provisioning in the time to market.
The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable.
The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions.
The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable.
The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions.
It is slightly more expensive than other solutions in the same sphere.
The licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100,000 US, and I think that covers everything.
It is slightly more expensive than other solutions in the same sphere.
The licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100,000 US, and I think that covers everything.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR.
It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR.
It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management identifies vulnerabilities, manages patching, and enhances security profiles. It integrates with Microsoft Security Scorecard, helping reduce attacks. Users benefit from its accuracy and threat prioritization. Although setup is complex and needs enhancements, it covers both on-prem and cloud services efficiently.
The product’s pricing is medium.
The licensing model follows a per-user per-month structure.
The product’s pricing is medium.
The licensing model follows a per-user per-month structure.
We have to pay standard licensing fees.
We have to pay standard licensing fees.
SUSE NeuVector, used for container security, excels in vulnerability and policy management with Kubernetes. Users appreciate features like image scanning, anti-malware, and run-time security. It's valued for network monitoring and machine learning, though image scanning, security rules, and hybrid integration need enhancement. The setup can be challenging, and VM support is limited.
Licensing fees are paid yearly.
The solution's pricing could be better. The cost of a subscription is calculated on the basis of work.
Licensing fees are paid yearly.
The solution's pricing could be better. The cost of a subscription is calculated on the basis of work.
Ox Security is used for digital security management, focusing on threat detection, vulnerability management, and compliance monitoring. Users appreciate its real-time insights, automation features, and ease of integration. While its intuitive dashboard and customer support are strengths, some users desire more customization and system performance improvements.
