Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

Checkmarx and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while GitHub is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. Checkmarx holds a 10.2% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

17,957 Views
13,468 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,210 Views
7,210 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

GitHub Advanced Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the security management category. While Checkmarx One is noted for its comprehensive security coverage, GitHub Advanced Security has an advantage due to its seamless integration within the development workflow.

Features: Checkmarx One offers extensive security capabilities, robust risk analysis, and management tools. On the other hand, GitHub Advanced Security is known for seamless workflow integration, superior code scanning features, and functionalities that better fit existing processes.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One needs better integration with development environments and improvements to user interface and initial configuration processes. GitHub Advanced Security could enhance its reporting options and extend functionality support but continues to enhance based on feedback.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers flexible deployment but can be challenging during initial setup. GitHub Advanced Security is easily activated within existing GitHub environments. Customer service is reliable for both, with GitHub's being more consistent and accessible.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One provides good value with high security but has higher setup costs. GitHub Advanced Security is worth the price for its integration, offering promising ROI through improved efficiency, despite higher initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (16th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (2nd)

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.2%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 4.9%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Checkmarx One	10.2%
GitHub Advanced Security	4.9%
Other	84.9%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Sabna Sainudeen

Director, Application Security at Carlsberg

Seamlessly integrates into developer environment for streamlined code scanning

GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner. There are features in GitHub Advanced Security that cannot be used within Microsoft, which is strange since they are the same company. It should also focus on developing a software bill of materials (SBOM) to see all open software used in one place.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."

"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."

"It has all the features we need."

"The only thing I like is that Checkmarx does not need to compile."

"It allows for SAST scanning of uncompiled code. Further, it natively integrates with all key repos formats (Git, TFS, SVN, Perforce, etc)."

"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."

"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."

"The user interface is excellent. It's very user friendly."

More Checkmarx One pros

"GitHub Advanced Security is a very developer-friendly solution that is integrated within my development environment."

"The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness."

"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."

"I have not experienced any performance or stability issues with GitHub Advanced Security."

"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."

"GitHub Advanced Security's secret scanning is good."

"GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

Cons

"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."

"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."

"I think the CxAudit tool has room for improvement. At the beginning you can choose a scan of a project, but in any event the project must be scanned again (wasting time)."

"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."

"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."

"Meta data is always needed."

"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."

"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The reporting feature might need improvement. While it integrates seamlessly with my workflow, it doesn't provide management with oversight, such as statistics and the number of vulnerabilities."

"Maybe make it compatible with more programming languages. Have a customized ruleset where the end-user can create their own rules for scanning."

"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."

"An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization."

"GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform."

"The customizations are a little bit difficult."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Advanced Security?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inli...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 48% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 41% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 14% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 5% of the time

Mend.io vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

January 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

January 2026

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security

December 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.