Top 10 GitHub Advanced Security Alternatives

4.4 out of 5

11 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to GitHub Advanced Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), GitLab, and Snyk. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. GitHub Advanced Security surpasses its competitors by offering seamless code scanning, secret scanning, and dependency reviews integrated directly into the developer workflow, enhancing security measures without disrupting productivity.

GitHub Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with GitHub, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

4.0 out of 5

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

4.0 out of 5

SonarQube offers extensive multi-language support and customization, ideal for organizations prioritizing static code analysis. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security provides seamless security integration within GitHub, making it suitable for teams focusing on streamlined security within existing GitHub workflows.

Download GitHub Advanced Security vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report

Pricing

SonarQube Server has a lower setup cost, focusing on code quality, while GitHub Advanced Security, offering robust security features, incurs a higher setup expense. The key distinction lies in their initial investment differences and primary functionalities.

View comparison

Pricing

GitLab

4.2 out of 5

GitLab

4.2 out of 5

GitLab shines with seamless integration and pipeline automation to enhance developer productivity, making it attractive for streamlined processes. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security is favored for its advanced threat detection and security alerts, appealing to those prioritizing top-tier security capabilities.

Download GitHub Advanced Security vs. GitLab Report

Pricing

GitLab's setup cost is competitive, while GitHub Advanced Security involves higher upfront expenses, highlighting a clear cost distinction between the two.

View comparison

Pricing

GitLab's setup cost is competitive, while GitHub Advanced Security involves higher upfront expenses, highlighting a clear cost distinction between the two.

Snyk

4.0 out of 5

Snyk

4.0 out of 5

Snyk provides seamless integration and developer-centric features, enhancing ROI with flexible pricing and broad deployment options. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security offers strong integration within GitHub and Azure DevOps, appealing to tech buyers seeking comprehensive security coverage and enhanced workflow integration.

Download GitHub Advanced Security vs. Snyk Report

Pricing

Snyk offers a more straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while GitHub Advanced Security may require higher setup expenses but provides comprehensive integration with GitHub's platform.

View comparison

Pricing

Snyk offers a more straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while GitHub Advanced Security may require higher setup expenses but provides comprehensive integration with GitHub's platform.

Checkmarx One

3.8 out of 5

Checkmarx One

3.8 out of 5

Checkmarx One excels in competitive pricing and reliable support with effective code analysis. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security integrates seamlessly with repositories, offering versatile risk detection despite higher costs. Checkmarx’s economical setup contrasts with GitHub’s extensive features, appealing to diverse tech buyer preferences.

Download Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report

Pricing

Checkmarx One involves a comprehensive setup cost, contrasting with GitHub Advanced Security's straightforward implementation process.

View comparison

Pricing

Checkmarx One involves a comprehensive setup cost, contrasting with GitHub Advanced Security's straightforward implementation process.

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode excels in comprehensive security testing types and features adaptable deployment across environments. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security integrates seamlessly with repositories, providing automated code scanning and security measures. Tech buyers may choose Veracode for diversified support or GitHub for workflow integration.

Download GitHub Advanced Security vs. Veracode Report

Pricing

Veracode setup costs are upfront and well-defined, while GitHub Advanced Security offers a more flexible pricing approach with potential scalability for growing teams.

View comparison

Pricing

Veracode setup costs are upfront and well-defined, while GitHub Advanced Security offers a more flexible pricing approach with potential scalability for growing teams.

Mend.io

4.2 out of 5

Mend.io

4.2 out of 5

Mend.io attracts tech buyers with competitive pricing, versatile integration, and real-time detection. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security offers extensive features like robust code scanning. Tech buyers may choose Mend.io for cost-effectiveness, while others favor GitHub for long-term value and advanced functionalities.

Download GitHub Advanced Security vs. Mend.io Report

Pricing

Mend.io has minimal setup costs, while GitHub Advanced Security requires a more significant initial investment, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Mend.io has minimal setup costs, while GitHub Advanced Security requires a more significant initial investment, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two solutions.

OpenText Core Application Security

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Core Application Security

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Core Application Security offers extensive feature integration, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive security control. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security's seamless workflow integration and customization make it attractive for development teams prioritizing efficient tool integration within established practices.

Download GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security Report

Pricing

OpenText Core Application Security requires a considerable setup cost, whereas GitHub Advanced Security offers a more budget-friendly setup. This pricing distinction highlights a significant cost difference between the two security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Sonatype Lifecycle

4.2 out of 5

Sonatype Lifecycle

4.2 out of 5

Sonatype Lifecycle is recognized for its robust security insights and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security impresses with superior workflow integration and immense ROI potential, making it a compelling option despite requiring detailed documentation improvements.

Download GitHub Advanced Security vs. Sonatype Lifecycle Report

Pricing

Sonatype Lifecycle has a lower setup cost compared to the more feature-rich GitHub Advanced Security, which offers extensive integrations and robust security tools.

View comparison

Pricing

Sonatype Lifecycle has a lower setup cost compared to the more feature-rich GitHub Advanced Security, which offers extensive integrations and robust security tools.

HCL AppScan

3.9 out of 5

HCL AppScan

3.9 out of 5

HCL AppScan attracts tech buyers with its competitive pricing, comprehensive security testing, and robust support. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security appeals with its extensive feature set, seamless GitHub ecosystem integration, and offers strong long-term ROI despite higher initial costs, catering to larger enterprises.

Download GitHub Advanced Security vs. HCL AppScan Report

Pricing

HCL AppScan requires a moderate setup cost, while GitHub Advanced Security is known for having a higher initial investment. The significant difference in setup costs may influence decision-making depending on budget constraints.

View comparison

Pricing

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

4.3 out of 5

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

4.3 out of 5

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional focuses on customizable penetration testing tools and cost-effective pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, GitHub Advanced Security emphasizes seamless GitHub integration with comprehensive code scanning features, attracting those prioritizing DevOps alignment and advanced security capabilities.

Download GitHub Advanced Security vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report

Pricing

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional incurs a one-time setup cost, while GitHub Advanced Security involves no setup fees, highlighting a key financial consideration between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional incurs a one-time setup cost, while GitHub Advanced Security involves no setup fees, highlighting a key financial consideration between the two solutions.

Show 5 more products

Related categories

Application Security Tools

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Software Development Analytics