GitHub Advanced Security vs HCL AppScan comparison

GitHub and HCLSoftware are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while HCLSoftware is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.3. GitHub holds a 2.9% mindshare in AS, compared to HCLSoftware ’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of HCLSoftware users who would recommend it.

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,097 Views
7,026 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Read 44 HCL AppScan reviews

6,267 Views
4,324 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

HCL AppScan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HCL AppScan and GitHub Advanced Security are competing in the software security category. Based on user feedback, HCL AppScan is more favorable in pricing and support, whereas GitHub Advanced Security is preferred for its advanced features and integration.

Features: HCL AppScan is recognized for its thorough scanning capability and accuracy in detecting vulnerabilities. It effectively identifies issues, offering robust security solutions. GitHub Advanced Security is known for its integration capabilities and seamless use within GitHub workflows, featuring real-time code scanning and advanced code analysis.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan users suggest the need for faster scan times and better reporting formats. Enhancements in speed and result presentation are desired. GitHub Advanced Security could improve on alert accuracy and reduce false positives, aiming for more precise threat detection and identification.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan is generally straightforward to deploy but might require technical expertise. Its customer service is well-regarded for support availability. GitHub Advanced Security allows easier deployment within GitHub environments, though its customer support is less personal compared to AppScan.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is effective in terms of cost, with users finding it a competitive option for the ROI it provides. GitHub Advanced Security is seen as more expensive, but users justify the cost due to its comprehensive feature set, offering strong ROI for those prioritizing advanced security.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Advanced Security vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security vs. HCL AppScan

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (16th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 2.9%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.4%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitHub Advanced Security	2.9%
HCL AppScan	2.4%
Other	94.7%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Devendiran Kandan

DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Security scanning has protected our pipelines but currently needs clearer dashboards and controls

We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inline product, I'm not seeing user-friendly things in GitHub Advanced Security. Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, before building and deploying the code, we want to block or do an advanced model, but it is not supporting. During deployment, code scanning is not good. It is a little complicated. It is not a straightforward method we can complete. We need expertise to get the full benefit, and troubleshooting sometimes requires going through that. The security overview dashboard is not really clear. It's not showing centralized information; each repo is showing, but if you compare it with competitors, it is not that great. Mainly in the centralized dashboard, enterprise level needs to improve. A centralized way where we can get that overall view is needed, and we want that code scanning and blocking deployments based on security. There are AI improvements, but however, it is not so easy to configure. It is multiple windows we need to go through and make changes or configure that. A few things we need to enable going into settings, and a few things we can find out in security. One product where security means the security dashboard should cover everything, but it is going here and there in many places.

Read full review

Ravi Khanchandani

Founder Director at Techsa Services

Has improved identification of encryption and authentication issues across cloud and on-prem applications

During the learning curve of onboarding HCL AppScan, we learned that HCL has altered the portfolio and now offers HCL AppScan 360, which has a much better look and feel with an improved user interface. However, there is one feature called SCA, which stands for Software Composition Analysis, that could be improved. When I'm doing an application scan, HCL AppScan has the ability to generate information about what components are in use. For example, if I'm scanning a web application, it shows me the various components being used. It tells me whether I have Java libraries, .NET frameworks, or other log management libraries such as Log4j, and what versions of those specific components are present. I would like to see more detailed reports from the tool. Currently, you can find out the components belonging to a specific software, but if detailed reporting became available, you would be in a better position to identify vulnerabilities. For instance, I could identify that I had the Log4j vulnerability and know that I need to fix my application accordingly. If they add the features I'm describing, I would consider giving them a higher rating. However, I've only been experienced with the product for three months.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have not experienced any performance or stability issues with GitHub Advanced Security."

"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."

"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."

"GitHub Advanced Security's secret scanning is good."

"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."

"It ensures user passwords or sensitive information are not accidentally exposed in code or reports."

"The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness."

"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

"It provides a better integration for our ecosystem."

"The solution offers services in a few specific development languages."

"AppScan is within the top three or four static analyzers."

"It highlights, with several grades of severity, the types of vulnerabilities, so we can focus on the most severe security vulnerabilities in the code."

"It identifies all the URLs and domains on its own and then performs tests and provides the results."

"It is an application for security assessment or scanning for static environments, and with all customers, it is performing well."

"We leverage it as a quality check against code."

"It has certainly improved our organization in terms of quality of solutions that are developed."

More HCL AppScan pros

Cons

"There could be DST features included in the product."

"We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security."

"The customizations are a little bit difficult."

"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."

"An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization."

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."

"GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

"I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources."

"IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use."

"The solution could improve by having a mobile version."

"The penetration testing feature should be included."

"The depth was low, but the part that the user could miss was also diagnosed."

"Many silly false positives are produced."

"Currently, we are satisfied with AppScan but I am sure there are better alternatives available because this is a very old product."

"The pricing has room for improvement."

More HCL AppScan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

"The solution is expensive."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"The solution is cheap."

"The price is very expensive."

"The tool was expensive."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	31

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GitHub Advanced Security?

Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, ...

See all answers

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

I'm currently working with BigFix and HCL AppScan. At least three people in my company are using HCL AppScan. Since we are a reseller, we run it in both lab environments and live production applica...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 27% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 12% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 2% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 6% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

April 2026

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

April 2026

Download HCL AppScan product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

Overview

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

HCL AppScan offers quick vulnerability detection with effective SDLC integration and is known for its user-friendly interface and seamless security integration.

HCL AppScan provides dynamic and static scanning to identify vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection. It integrates well into CI/CD pipelines, supports multiple languages, and offers web and dynamic scanning, helping businesses ensure security across development lifecycles. Users benefit from API coverage, Postman integration, and its ability to function in cloud and on-premise environments, facilitating a shift from DevOps to DevSecOps practices.

What features define HCL AppScan?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and usage.
Vulnerability detection: Quickly identifies issues like XSS and SQL injection.
Integration with SDLC: Seamlessly blends with development processes.
Dynamic scanning: Offers comprehensive security evaluations.
Multiple language support: Supports diverse programming environments.

What benefits should users consider?

Scalability: Adapts to growing needs and projects.
Low false-positive rates: Delivers accurate and reliable results.
Detailed reporting: Provides comprehensive vulnerability insights.
Effective integration: Enhances CI/CD pipeline security.

HCL AppScan is leveraged in sectors requiring rigorous security checks, such as finance and healthcare, where it conducts comprehensive scans and offers insights into potential vulnerabilities. Its robust scanning capabilities aid companies in maintaining compliance and security standards.

HCLSoftware

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security vs. HCL AppScan

April 2026

Free Report: GitHub Advanced Security vs. HCL AppScan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Advanced Security vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Advanced Security vs. HCL AppScan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.