Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan comparison

Checkmarx and HCLSoftware are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while HCLSoftware is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.9. Checkmarx holds a 10.7% mindshare in AS, compared to HCLSoftware ’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of HCLSoftware users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

21,297 Views
14,284 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Read 43 HCL AppScan reviews

3,792 Views
2,867 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

HCL AppScan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HCL AppScan and Checkmarx One compete in the application security category. Checkmarx One seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced capabilities and integration flexibility, making it a favored choice for comprehensive security.

Features: HCL AppScan is known for thorough scanning capabilities, comprehensive vulnerability management, and effective pricing. Checkmarx One is valued for precise results, seamless integration with development tools, and insight-rich security analysis.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan users call for enhancements in scan speed, customization options, and interface design. Checkmarx One users highlight the need for improved setup documentation, more intuitive configuration processes, and additional training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan benefits from straightforward deployments but would gain from more robust customer service. Checkmarx One offers flexible deployment options and supportive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan provides affordable options with a promising return on investment. Checkmarx One, despite being more expensive, is seen as justified by users due to its extensive features and long-term security benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

14th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.7%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.6%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Rishi Anupam

Senior Manager at Airtel

A stable and scalable scanning solution with good reporting feature

The solution is used for the vulnerabilities scan on the network side The reporting part is the most valuable feature. The penetration testing feature should be included. I have been using the solution for four years. It is a stable solution. I rate it seven out of ten. It is a scalable…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."

"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."

"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."

"It is very useful because it fits our requirements. It is also easy to use. It is not complex, and we are satisfied with the results."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is that its number of false positives is less than the other security application platforms. Its ease of use is another good feature. It also supports most of the languages."

"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."

"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The security and the dashboard are the most valuable features."

"It comes with all of the templates that we need. For example, we are a company that is regulated by PCI. In order to be PCI compliant, we have a lot of checks and procedures to which we have to comply."

"You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI."

"Usually when we deploy the application, there is a process for ethical hacking. The main benefit is that, the ethical hacking is almost clean, every time. So it's less cost, less effort, less time to production."

"The static scans are good, and the SaaS as well."

"It's generally a very user-friendly tool. Anyone can easily learn how to scan"

"The HCL AppScan turnaround time for Burp Suite or any new feature request is pretty good, and that is why we are sticking with the HCL."

"The solution offers services in a few specific development languages."

More HCL AppScan pros

Cons

"The product's reporting feature could be better. The feature works well for developers, but reports generated to be shared with external parties are poor, it lacks the details one gets when viewing the results directly from the Checkmarx One platform."

"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."

"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."

"Integration into the SDLC (i.e. support for last version of SonarQube) could be added."

"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."

"In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now."

"The Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) feature should be better."

"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The tool should improve its output. Scanning is not a challenge anymore since there are many such tools available in the market. The product needs to focus on how its output is being used by end users. It should be also more user-friendly. One of the major challenges is in the tool's integration with applications that need to be scanned. Sometimes, the scanning is not proper."

"I would love to see more containers. Many of the tools are great, they require an amount of configuration, setup and infrastructure. If most the applications were in a container, I think everything would be a little bit faster, because all our clients are now using containers."

"Improvement can be done as per customer requirements."

"Scans become slow on large websites."

"They should have a better UI for dashboards."

"AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives."

"The pricing has room for improvement."

"The product has some technical limitations."

More HCL AppScan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."

"The tool was expensive."

"The solution is cheap."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. HCL AppScan is an expensive tool."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives. It also requires enhancements in customer support, similar to what Veracode provides. Regularly scheduling calls with clients to discuss fe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

The primary use case for AppScan is for security purposes. I compare AppScan with other tools such as Veracode. We use AppScan for vulnerability detection and auto-remediation of vulnerabilities wi...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 43% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

Acunetix vs Checkmarx One

Compared 1% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan

Compared 12% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 10% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs HCL AppScan

Compared 6% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

March 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

March 2025

Download HCL AppScan product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

HCLSoftware

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan

March 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.