Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while GitHub is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 81 Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) reviews

12,844 Views
3,853 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,441 Views
7,367 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

GitHub Advanced Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Check Point WAF and GitHub Advanced Security are competitors in the cybersecurity and application security space. Check Point seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive integration and automated threat management capabilities.

Features: Check Point WAF is known for its robust AI-driven threat prevention, zero-day attack protection, and centralized management. It offers easy deployment and automated operations, reducing false positives. GitHub Advanced Security integrates seamlessly into the developer workflow with security scans, flexible custom rules, and secret scanning capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Check Point could improve its UI simplicity and enhance documentation for smoother deployment. High pricing is also a concern compared to competitors. GitHub Advanced Security needs to address its pricing model, improve the centralized dashboard, and enhance API security while reducing complexity in customizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point WAF has quick deployment across cloud environments and extensive customer support, though occasional delays in response times are noted. GitHub Advanced Security integrates well with GitHub, yet users face challenges during initial setup and require better comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point WAF is considered expensive but offers a satisfactory ROI through reduced cost of ownership and efficient management. GitHub Advanced Security is pricey, particularly for larger teams, due to its developer-based pricing model. Check Point's flexible subscription options make it suitable for larger operations seeking comprehensive security.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitHub Advanced Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 2.2%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	1.1%
GitHub Advanced Security	2.2%
Other	96.7%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Devendiran Kandan

DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Security scanning has protected our pipelines but currently needs clearer dashboards and controls

We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inline product, I'm not seeing user-friendly things in GitHub Advanced Security. Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, before building and deploying the code, we want to block or do an advanced model, but it is not supporting. During deployment, code scanning is not good. It is a little complicated. It is not a straightforward method we can complete. We need expertise to get the full benefit, and troubleshooting sometimes requires going through that. The security overview dashboard is not really clear. It's not showing centralized information; each repo is showing, but if you compare it with competitors, it is not that great. Mainly in the centralized dashboard, enterprise level needs to improve. A centralized way where we can get that overall view is needed, and we want that code scanning and blocking deployments based on security. There are AI improvements, but however, it is not so easy to configure. It is multiple windows we need to go through and make changes or configure that. A few things we need to enable going into settings, and a few things we can find out in security. One product where security means the security dashboard should cover everything, but it is going here and there in many places.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Having a cloud detection response helps to very quickly identify security threats in our environment."

"I find the configuration and real-time monitoring features valuable."

"The implementation of this tool for security management and control is very simple."

"The solution's strongest point is that you can connect everything to it, giving you a full view of what's connected."

"It seamlessly protects through machine learning, giving us visibility into potential attacks and where they come from."

"Compared to what we used before, it's helping us to be more efficient in managing our traffic."

"The best features Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) offers in my experience are deployment, reliability, and scalability, and it has positively impacted my organization as a money saver and time saver by providing proper responses within 10 to 20 seconds, resolving queries quickly with excellent accuracy and reliability from its AI capabilities."

"It has allowed us to use components with known vulnerabilities, which have been prevented based on their multiple databases that have correlated incidents, helping the development of applications to be fast, efficient, and safe, which is what we were looking for."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness."

"Dependency scanning is a valuable feature."

"GitHub Advanced Security is a very developer-friendly solution that is integrated within my development environment."

"The initial setup was straightforward and completed in a matter of minutes."

"GitHub Advanced Security's secret scanning is good."

"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."

"I have not experienced any performance or stability issues with GitHub Advanced Security."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

Cons

"Support could be improved, particularly in terms of availability."

"I do not know if it is already there, but I would like to have complete visibility between the posture management and firewall as a service."

"The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better."

"CloudGuard for Application Security, like the other Check Point applications, has been presenting major latency problems when entering their administrative portal."

"The interface and deployment require qualified skills and a qualified engineer who knows this product very well."

"The user interface, SmartConsole, sometimes malfunctions and requires a restart."

"The negative aspect is that Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) uses Check Point Harmony in its management console, which sometimes creates latency when connecting to or opening the platform."

"The solution should improve false-positives."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security."

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."

"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."

"An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization."

"There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform."

"Maybe make it compatible with more programming languages. Have a customized ruleset where the end-user can create their own rules for scanning."

"GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"There could be DST features included in the product."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"It is extremely affordable and high value for cost."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	40

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GitHub Advanced Security?

Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 10% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

October 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

October 2026

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitHub Advanced Security

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitHub Advanced Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.