Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 1.0% mindshare in DLP, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 81 Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) reviews

12,844 Views
2,440 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Read 7 Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention reviews

3,609 Views
3,609 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and Check Point WAF are competing in the cybersecurity arena, with Palo Alto excelling in data protection and Check Point leading in web application security.

Features: Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention offers advanced data classification, seamless integration with cloud services, and real-time monitoring enhancing data security strategies. Check Point WAF stands out with its AI-driven threat prevention, DDoS protection, and zero-day attack safeguards.

Room for Improvement: Palo Alto could enhance its web application security features, offer more flexible pricing models, and expand its threat intelligence capabilities. Check Point WAF can improve its data protection measures, streamline deployment processes, and refine user interface for greater usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Palo Alto Networks provides a seamless integration experience with strong infrastructure support and detailed customer service to simplify deployment hurdles. Check Point WAF offers efficient deployment backed by extensive documentation and responsiveness, prioritizing swift issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto Networks tends to involve a higher initial cost justified by its specialized data security approach, targeting organizations focused on data integrity, while Check Point WAF presents a competitive pricing strategy with quicker ROI, especially appealing for environments prioritizing immediate web application security.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,197 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is 1.9%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	1.0%
Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention	1.9%
Other	97.1%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Jamie A Larkin

Senior Solutions Specials at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Comprehensive security solution enhances data classification and protection

The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox. Compared to competitors, these are often additional add-ons, whereas Palo Alto Networks provides a complete solution. The artificial intelligence integration in the product also helps immensely by classifying data, identifying data, and monitoring user access and behavior, thus improving data security strategies.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudGuard WAF has been great."

"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."

"You can maintain a legal framework structure at all times."

"The features I have found most valuable are the comprehensive threat prevention capabilities, automated policy management, and seamless integration with cloud environments."

"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."

"Machine learning is a valuable tool for this assessment because it allows for a two-phase approach: secure and non-secure."

"With the introduction of AI in general, Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides very high accuracy on the data, allowing me to avoid a lot of false positives and saving me time in determining if what I'm seeing is a possible attack."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security is the one-stop solution for the security of applications and providing API protection to servers and facilities 24/7."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."

"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."

"Having this technology, which makes it easy to manage with administration done centrally, is super helpful."

"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox."

"It is a stable solution with good support."

"The primary feature is managing firewalls through Panorama, especially when handling multiple firewalls across different sites like headquarters and remote sites."

"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."

"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."

Cons

"There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the scope of what necessarily their product is."

"The trial version should be extended further so that QA test engineers can actually test the utilities in a real sense and can provide the maximum amount of feedback for enhancements."

"While Check Point CloudGuard WAF is a strong solution, it could be improved in a few areas such as simplifying and customizing the user interface and reporting database."

"If the price could come down, I would be very happy with the product."

"In my opinion, there is some room for improvement regarding pricing, which we require, and much of it relates to the license base and support."

"A feature we'd like to see in the future is something that could protect against other attack vectors, with a focus on application protection."

"At present, we require a lot of customization and additional features to make it usable in our system."

"Deeper and more transparent integration between Cloud Application Security and analysis monitoring tools could be very valuable - although the solution currently offers integrations with third-party security tools."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."

"Pricing is expensive."

"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."

"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."

"There are mostly performance issues."

"The configuration for Palo Alto Networks firewalls requires specifying many details, such as protocols and services."

"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."

"The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of the solution depends on the buyers. But, from my point of view, it is in line with the rest of the products and the price list of Palo Alto."

"The licensing model is very fair-minded and it's a good value. It scales well... Its licensing model is more streamlined when compared to other DLP solutions."

"Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly."

"It's expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,197 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	40

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks' pricing can be complex. Their catalog is extensive. They have a licensing model based on credits for virtual machine firewalls or containers, which simplifies the process, while...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved. Simplifying the initial setup procedure could also be beneficial as it currently requ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The primary use case is a part of a complete package for Government of Canada. It helps in comparing data loss prevention against Fortinet, making it a cost-effective solution. It is used in the co...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 13% of the time

Versa Secure Internet Access vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Blue Coat Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 10% of the time

Cyera vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

October 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

September 2026

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report

Download Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention provides integrated security to manage firewalls, protect data, and enhance endpoint defenses, streamlining installation and configuration for comprehensive data safety measures.

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention centralizes security management through Panorama, integrating modules for data protection and antivirus to shield endpoints. It identifies and safeguards sensitive data without additional infrastructure, delivering real-time updates via cloud-delivered security signatures. Key features include role-based access, sophisticated data classification, and AI-driven monitoring to bolster security strategies. Despite strengths, it faces challenges like improved stability needs, manual firewall updates, and lacking documentation in maintenance and deployment. Customers note reliance on third-party backups and system complexity, deeming it a candidate for setup simplification compared to Check Point.

What are the key features of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Panorama Management: Unified control for multi-site firewall management
AI Integration: Enhanced data classification and behavior monitoring
Role-Based Access: Tailored access control to sensitive information
Cloud-Delivered Updates: Real-time security updates for threat protection

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Seamless Integration: Easy setup and configuration across endpoints
Comprehensive Protection: Robust defense against data loss and threats
Cost Efficiency: Enables cost-effective data protection strategies
Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous oversight of data flow and access

Enterprises apply Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention in industries like call centers to regulate data flow, ensure PCI compliance, and monitor sensitive information such as credit card data. Its integration into governmental cybersecurity strategies supports data exfiltration prevention and cost-effective alternatives compared to other providers.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,197 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.