Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.7% mindshare in DLP, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and Check Point WAF are competing in the cybersecurity arena, with Palo Alto excelling in data protection and Check Point leading in web application security.

Features: Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention offers advanced data classification, seamless integration with cloud services, and real-time monitoring enhancing data security strategies. Check Point WAF stands out with its AI-driven threat prevention, DDoS protection, and zero-day attack safeguards.

Room for Improvement: Palo Alto could enhance its web application security features, offer more flexible pricing models, and expand its threat intelligence capabilities. Check Point WAF can improve its data protection measures, streamline deployment processes, and refine user interface for greater usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Palo Alto Networks provides a seamless integration experience with strong infrastructure support and detailed customer service to simplify deployment hurdles. Check Point WAF offers efficient deployment backed by extensive documentation and responsiveness, prioritizing swift issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto Networks tends to involve a higher initial cost justified by its specialized data security approach, targeting organizations focused on data integrity, while Check Point WAF presents a competitive pricing strategy with quicker ROI, especially appealing for environments prioritizing immediate web application security.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,647 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 2.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is 1.9%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	0.7%
Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention	1.9%
Cloudflare One	2.0%
Other	95.4%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Jamie A Larkin

Senior Solutions Specials at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Comprehensive security solution enhances data classification and protection

The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox. Compared to competitors, these are often additional add-ons, whereas Palo Alto Networks provides a complete solution. The artificial intelligence integration in the product also helps immensely by classifying data, identifying data, and monitoring user access and behavior, thus improving data security strategies.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature is rate limiting. If I'm expecting 500 visits per hour, Cloudflare will limit the requests if I suddenly get 50,000."

"We mostly use Cloudflare WAF, and gets basic Cloudflaire DDoS, caching as extra bonus . We like the factor these features are all integrated into 1 console, simple to manage."

"Cloudflare is by far the most effective solution that I have come across."

"The tool also offers good scalability, and the dashboard, along with real-time analytics, is very good."

"For Cloudflare Access, I am using the free plan...The most valuable feature is their protection."

"Cloudflare DDoS mitigates DDoS attacks."

"It is a stable solution."

"The solution has different options that can be used to differentiate DDoS attacks."

More Cloudflare One pros

"It provides advanced analytics that gives each team time to prepare for any threat that might occur in the future."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF has positively impacted our organization in security and operational efficiency, with a 30-40% drop in malicious traffic and a 15-20% reduction in manual intervention for our SOC team due to reduced false positives and automated protection."

"I rate it ten out of ten."

"The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively."

"The most valuable features are its ease of use and multiple functionalities."

"We have prevented many potential threats that could be a major setback to our set goals."

"Overall, the product is excellent."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF works well for preemptively blocking Zero Day attacks and detecting hidden anomalies."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."

"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox."

"It is a stable solution with good support."

"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."

"Having this technology, which makes it easy to manage with administration done centrally, is super helpful."

"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."

"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."

"The primary feature is managing firewalls through Panorama, especially when handling multiple firewalls across different sites like headquarters and remote sites."

Cons

"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."

"The free plan has limitations. For example, I can only set up three rules, and the application firewall is unavailable."

"Automation could be improved where you can easily add a TLS and SSL certificate to an application or web app if the developer did not include it."

"I would like them to include a VPN feature to provide a secure connection to the data center."

"Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar."

"The onboarding process can be improved a little bit."

"Cloudflare DDoS has poor technical support."

"From a logging perspective, it is still a bit difficult to see exactly what users are being blocked with the current views."

More Cloudflare One cons

"If the price could come down, I would be very happy with the product."

"For Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), the negative aspects include the very high price, complex licensing, and the need for specialized trained people to configure it, which is comparatively more complicated than other firewalls like Palo Alto and FortiGate."

"The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations. It took approximately a month and a half to understand how the solution works because of inadequate documentation."

"The User interface can be improved, especially for 1st time user."

"I would like it to be able to analyze more complex functions, although I did not examine the case study of more complex implementations. Things like forum fields, etc seem to need a little more focused protection of the fields scheme validation."

"I face issues with the UI part of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), as it malfunctions sometimes."

"I have faced issues with the tool's blocking aspects. It is hard to open or block web services due to the multitude of cloud centers. I have to do the process manually at times. We have a bug which is hard to solve."

"They might be able to add more integrations."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."

"Pricing is expensive."

"The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved."

"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."

"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."

"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."

"There are mostly performance issues."

"The configuration for Palo Alto Networks firewalls requires specifying many details, such as protocols and services."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"It is extremely affordable and high value for cost."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of the solution depends on the buyers. But, from my point of view, it is in line with the rest of the products and the price list of Palo Alto."

"It's expensive."

"The licensing model is very fair-minded and it's a good value. It scales well... Its licensing model is more streamlined when compared to other DLP solutions."

"Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Performing Arts

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	53
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Pricing is competitive. Akamai is more expensive, in my view.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

In my opinion, Cloudflare One can be improved mainly through compatibility, as the integration should be much simpler...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Cloudflare One's primary use case for my organization is to protect servers and to provide remote access with the VPN...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized b...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intellige...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks' pricing can be complex. Their catalog is extensive. They have a licensing model based on credits ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved. Simpl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The primary use case is a part of a complete package for Government of Canada. It helps in comparing data loss preven...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 14% of the time

Cyera vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Versa Secure Internet Access vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Blue Coat Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 10% of the time

WatchGuard Firebox vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 2% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

August 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

August 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

July 2026

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report

Download Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention provides integrated security to manage firewalls, protect data, and enhance endpoint defenses, streamlining installation and configuration for comprehensive data safety measures.

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention centralizes security management through Panorama, integrating modules for data protection and antivirus to shield endpoints. It identifies and safeguards sensitive data without additional infrastructure, delivering real-time updates via cloud-delivered security signatures. Key features include role-based access, sophisticated data classification, and AI-driven monitoring to bolster security strategies. Despite strengths, it faces challenges like improved stability needs, manual firewall updates, and lacking documentation in maintenance and deployment. Customers note reliance on third-party backups and system complexity, deeming it a candidate for setup simplification compared to Check Point.

What are the key features of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Panorama Management: Unified control for multi-site firewall management
AI Integration: Enhanced data classification and behavior monitoring
Role-Based Access: Tailored access control to sensitive information
Cloud-Delivered Updates: Real-time security updates for threat protection

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Seamless Integration: Easy setup and configuration across endpoints
Comprehensive Protection: Robust defense against data loss and threats
Cost Efficiency: Enables cost-effective data protection strategies
Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous oversight of data flow and access

Enterprises apply Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention in industries like call centers to regulate data flow, ensure PCI compliance, and monitor sensitive information such as credit card data. Its integration into governmental cybersecurity strategies supports data exfiltration prevention and cost-effective alternatives compared to other providers.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

23andMe

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.