GitHub vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

GitHub and GitHub Advanced Security are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0, while GitHub Advanced Security is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. GitHub holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub Advanced Security’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of GitHub Advanced Security users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,549 Views
2,094 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,210 Views
7,210 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

GitHub

GitHub Advanced Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the software development and security domain. GitHub Advanced Security has the upper hand due to its specialized security features and integration capabilities, although it's often perceived as expensive.

Features: GitHub is well-regarded for its community support, code management, and integration capabilities, offering seamless collaboration and secure version control. GitHub Advanced Security distinguishes itself with robust security features such as code scanning, dependency checks, and customizable security queries integrated within the development workflow.

Room for Improvement: GitHub can enhance integration with CI/CD tools and its user interface, as well as improve project management and security measures. GitHub Advanced Security could advance its customization options, enhance reporting, and provide better API support while addressing setup complexity and pricing concerns.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is known for easy public cloud deployment and offers various cloud and on-premises options. Community support is strong, though official support is average. GitHub Advanced Security often involves a complex setup preferable for hybrid or on-premises environments, and users report mixed experiences with customer service efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub is considered cost-effective, providing many features for free, favoring small teams or open-source projects. GitHub Advanced Security's high cost is a concern, but its enhanced security and efficiencies provide a good ROI for larger organizations prioritizing code security.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 4.9%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.1%
GitHub Advanced Security	4.9%
Other	94.0%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Sabna Sainudeen

Director, Application Security at Carlsberg

Seamlessly integrates into developer environment for streamlined code scanning

GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner. There are features in GitHub Advanced Security that cannot be used within Microsoft, which is strange since they are the same company. It should also focus on developing a software bill of materials (SBOM) to see all open software used in one place.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"GitHub is the best tool for source repositories."

"I find GitHub very user friendly."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"Applying GitHub Actions saves so much time for the team because it automates the developer's work to the server."

More GitHub pros

"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."

"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."

"GitHub Advanced Security is a very developer-friendly solution that is integrated within my development environment."

"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."

"I have not experienced any performance or stability issues with GitHub Advanced Security."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."

"GitHub Advanced Security's secret scanning is good."

"GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

Cons

"The security point should be addressed in the next release and scaling is also an issue."

"If something has to be moved into approvals, and if they don't approve it in a few hours, then they should move the approval request to some other user, or they should have a way to escalate it."

"If you are uploading or cloning a large file, with more than 25 megs, it's pretty slow."

"GitHub could automate the setup process more, such as creating YAML files for GitHub Actions."

"GitHub could add some more security features."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"If we have complex branch strategies, it becomes very complicated to manage all those branches."

"GitHub needs to improve its UI."

More GitHub cons

"There could be DST features included in the product."

"An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization."

"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."

"GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"The customizations are a little bit difficult."

"Maybe make it compatible with more programming languages. Have a customized ruleset where the end-user can create their own rules for scanning."

"The report limitations are the main issue."

"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Advanced Security?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inli...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 41% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 14% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

Fortify Application Defender vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 1% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

January 2026

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

January 2026

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.