GitHub and Mend.io are competitive tools in the software development industry, offering different advantages. GitHub holds the upper hand in terms of flexibility and integration capabilities, while Mend.io excels in vulnerability detection accuracy.
Features: GitHub provides flexible code repository management, version control, and integration capabilities. Users also appreciate its community support for open-source projects and security. Mend.io offers robust management of open-source components, extensive database coverage, and effective vulnerability detection across multiple languages, providing insights into security vulnerabilities and aiding compliance.
Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance usability and expand security features. Users suggest improvements in its ticketing system, integration with tools like Slack, and handling large files. Mend.io can improve its user interface, report generation, and provide better integration with package managers, along with offering more comprehensive support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub offers flexibility with deployments in public, private, and hybrid clouds, with adequate technical support and a strong community for problem-solving, though some users report delays. Mend.io, deployed primarily in cloud environments, offers responsive technical support, straightforward deployment, and knowledgeable customer service.
Pricing and ROI: GitHub is cost-effective for many users due to its free and open-source nature, providing strong ROI by minimizing code management and collaboration costs. Mend.io’s pricing is competitive for its features, offering cost-effective solutions for managing open-source dependencies, though it may incur higher initial costs.
Mend.io has provided a good return on investment by significantly reducing vulnerabilities.
Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.
The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.
I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.
They prioritize providing the best experience to large organizations like ours, belonging to the Fortune 100.
We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.
GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.
It provides a reliable environment for code management.
If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.
GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.
AI integration in code security tools like Mend.io is still in its early stages and relatively immature.
I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.
Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area.
There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished.
The actual challenge is how easy it is to integrate it in the early phase of the software development life cycle.
The organization decided to consolidate tools and chose Snyk since it provides multiple functionalities in one solution.
The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.
The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.
Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.
The cost of Mend.io is competitive, being quite low compared to others.
I like how I can create different builds from different branches, which helps me as a QA to test certain features separately from the main application.
GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.
The pull request facility for code review.
We find it 100% accurate in detecting vulnerabilities.
It handles Application Security, performing SCA SAST and container scanning.
Mend.io is a software composition analysis tool that secures what developers create. The solution provides an automated reduction of the software attack surface, reduces developer burdens, and accelerates app delivery. Mend.io provides open-source analysis with its in-house and other multiple sources of software vulnerabilities. In addition, the solution offers license and policy violation alerts, has great pipeline integration, and, since it is a SaaS (software as a service), it doesn’t require you to physically maintain servers or data centers for any implementation. Not only does Mend.io reduce enterprise application security risk, it also helps developers meet deadlines faster.
Mend.io Features
Mend.io has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Mend.io Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Mend.io. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Mend.io solution.
Jeffrey H., System Manager of Cloud Engineering at Common Spirit, says, “Finding vulnerabilities is pretty easy. Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) does a great job of that and we had quite a few when we first put this in place. Mend.io does a very good job of finding the open-source, checking the versions, and making sure they're secure. They notify us of critical high, medium, and low impacts, and if anything is wrong. We find the product very easy to use and we use it as a core part of our strategy for scanning product code moving toward release.”
PeerSpot reviewer Ben D., Head of Software Engineering at a legal firm, mentions, “The way WhiteSource scans the code is great. It’s easy to identify and remediate open source vulnerabilities using this solution. WhiteSource helped reduce our mean time to resolution since we adopted the product. In terms of integration, it's pretty easy.”
An IT Service Manager at a wholesaler/distributor comments, “Mend.io provides threat detection and an excellent UI in a highly stable solution, with outstanding technical support.”
Another reviewer, Kevin D., Intramural OfficialIntramural at Northeastern University, states, "The vulnerability analysis is the best aspect of the solution."
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
