

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and GitHub compete in the field of security and software development tools. Based on the data comparisons, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional seems to have an upper hand due to its strong feature set for security and vulnerability assessments.
Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers a wide variety of extensions, automated scanning, and deep analysis capabilities which are essential for vulnerability assessments. The tool also integrates well with other penetration testing tools. GitHub provides exceptional source code management, collaboration capabilities, and flexible deployment options, making it a robust choice for developers.
Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could enhance its reporting and documentation and increase integration possibilities. It also needs to address false positives and optimize resource consumption. GitHub can improve by enhancing its integration capabilities, bolstering security features, and refining the user interface to be more accessible to non-technical users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is typically deployed on-premises and is praised for its technical support, though accessibility and speed of support could improve. GitHub's cloud-based nature simplifies setup and integration, though the support and documentation experience is variable.
Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is competitively priced with options for different business needs, offering a favorable ROI according to users. GitHub offers a robust free tier and various pricing options, making it cost-effective for startups, although managing licenses can become challenging with team changes.
The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.
Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.
I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.
The technical support from PortSwigger is excellent.
The technical support for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is pretty good, and I would give it a nine.
We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.
GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.
If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.
It provides a reliable environment for code management.
GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is very stable.
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a very stable tool, and I would rate its stability as eight out of ten.
When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.
I am providing this feedback for Copilot because it seems more widespread and more companies allow it rather than Amp, and it would be beneficial if they catch up with Amp on this capability.
Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice.
Some AI features might be added.
The dashboard of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could be made more user-friendly.
Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.
The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.
The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.
The pricing for PortSwigger is very cheap, and there are benefits in terms of time and cost savings.
I find the price of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional to be very cost-efficient.
The pull request facility for code review.
GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.
For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment.
The most valuable feature of Burp Suite Professional is its ability to schedule tasks for scanning websites.
I especially value the features for penetration testing.
The most valuable features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional are its ease of use and its cost efficiency.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| GitHub | 1.1% |
| PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional | 2.4% |
| Other | 96.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.
Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.
PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.