Bitbucket vs GitHub comparison

Read 97 GitHub reviews

4,134 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitbucket

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Bitbucket and GitHub are leading platforms in the version control and code-sharing category. GitHub appears to be in a stronger position due to its vast community support and feature robustness.

Features: Bitbucket is highly valued for its Jira integration, Mercurial support, and a secure environment for developers. GitHub stands out with its user-friendly project management tools, extensive developer network, and support for open-source projects.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket could improve its feature set beyond Atlassian tools and expand its community engagement efforts. GitHub could refine its pricing model for smaller teams and streamline integrations with non-Microsoft tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket offers smooth deployments for users within the Atlassian ecosystem with detailed documentation and personalized support. GitHub excels with its global infrastructure, smooth updates, and an active community forum offering robust support.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket provides cost-effective solutions, especially for teams utilizing Atlassian tools, ensuring a solid ROI. GitHub's higher pricing is offset by its comprehensive feature set and community resources, making it appealing for broader use cases and large-scale projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket vs. GitHub Report (Updated: February 2026).

Download the complete report

Bitbucket vs. GitHub

February 2026

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket

Ranking in Version Control

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 17.0%, down from 36.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 10.1%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitbucket	17.0%
GitHub	10.1%
Other	72.9%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

VinodKumar9

Lead Developer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Integrated task tracking has improved code collaboration and now supports secure, controlled delivery

The integration with Jira is a feature I really appreciate in Bitbucket because it allows for easy task management integration, which is very beneficial. Bitbucket provides strong Jira integration, which is essential for our client who uses Jira for task management. This integration helps streamline processes and has built-in CI/CD pipelines, private repositories, and provides solid support for managing tasks effectively. The CI/CD pipeline in Bitbucket streamlines our development process as we need built-in pipelines, which are available and easy to use. Bitbucket maintains code quality through branch permissions that alert you if you are pushing directly and there are branch protections or conflicts. It enforces naming conventions for branches, making it secure and easy to manage. Security-wise, Bitbucket has good features such as private repositories, access controls, authentication requirements, and secure pull requests, ensuring safety at various levels. The initial setup for Bitbucket is easy as I log in with the company email to access a workspace. Creating repositories follows a straightforward process involving setting permissions and branch creation.

Read full review

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have approximately 300 to 400 users using this solution. Our whole organization uses it. I rate the scalability of Bitbucket an eight out of ten."

"I find Bitbucket's branching, pull requests, and branch mergers very valuable."

"Bitbucket is a standard git implementation with perfectly coordinated screens, it's secure, and we have had no problems with it."

"We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically."

"Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting."

"The tool helps us manage different versions of code and branches. I like that Bitbucket is similar to Git but may have some vendor support. It has many of the same features as Git."

"The product's initial setup phase experience was good."

"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."

More Bitbucket pros

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"I did not have any issues with the stability of Github. It worked seamlessly."

"I find GitHub very user friendly."

"The ease of use is valuable."

"GitHub is a very good tool, and people should use it more than any other, even Bitbucket."

"We are finding GitHub is very stable."

"The ease of the planning board feature in GitHub is very valuable."

"The version control functionality for this solution has been most valuable, especially when managing projects with multiple versions."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"There could be more AI features included in the product."

"In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any."

"Bitbucket could improve pipeline building and deployment. Our deployments are not using the Bitbucket. Deployments we are going through Azure DevOps, but the integration is happening in Bitbucket."

"The scalability for the cloud version can be improved."

"Bitbucket could improve its security. For example, the user access security could improve."

"Although Bitbucket is scalable, there's always room for improvement in terms of scalability."

"The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved."

"We need an improved automation feature for the cloud."

More Bitbucket cons

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"The integration with Visual Studio Code could be more streamlined."

"The query function in GitHub is a bit stiff."

"GitHub's issue management could be improved a little from an organization standpoint. It would be helpful to have the ability to organize a work board or a backlog more comprehensively. For organizations migrating to GitHub from arbitrary systems, it's a little bit of a headache to move on to that system."

"I decided not to use GitHub but developed my tool because I found it more efficient. I'm familiar with my tools, making them easier to use. I like being able to customize them to fit my workflow and the way I think.. Software development is like a personal workshop, and I tailor my version control to match my approach."

"One thing GitHub could do is probably the same thing as what Sourcetree does. When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"If you are uploading or cloning a large file, with more than 25 megs, it's pretty slow."

"The storage for this solution could be improved."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Bitbucket is a low-priced tool."

"I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."

"You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."

"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."

"I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side."

"Bitbucket may be perceived as costly for smaller companies."

"With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."

"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."

More Bitbucket pricing and cost advice

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?

It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?

Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket?

Bitbucket has less community support compared to GitHub, which has many users. However, if you are already using Jira, Bitbucket becomes a natural choice. Bitbucket has limitations such as communit...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

Bitbucket Server vs Bitbucket

Comparisons

Compared 42% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket

Compared 9% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket

Compared 8% of the time

Git vs Bitbucket

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Bitbucket

Compared 5% of the time

More Bitbucket Competitors

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub

Compared 4% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Bitbucket product report

Bitbucket

January 2026

Download GitHub product report

January 2026

Overview

Bitbucket is a team-oriented Git-based code hosting and collaboration solution. The best-in-class Jira and Trello integrations in Bitbucket are meant to bring the entire software team together to complete a project. Bitbucket gives your team a single location to collaborate on code from concept to cloud deployment, to generate quality code through automated testing, and to deploy code with confidence.

There are three deployment options for Bitbucket:

Bitbucket Cloud is a web-based version of Bitbucket that is hosted on Atlassian's servers and accessible via a URL. Pipelines, an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool in Bitbucket Cloud, allows you to create, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.
Bitbucket Server is installed on your computer and runs in your environment. Bamboo, our robust CI/CD platform, has strong connections with Bitbucket Server, allowing you to totally automate your workflow. The license is unlimited.
Bitbucket Data Center appears to users as a single instance of Bitbucket Server, but it is actually hosted on a cluster of servers in your environment.

This has some advantages over Bitbucket Server:

Availability: If one cluster node fails, the remaining cluster node(s) can continue to service requests, resulting in little or no downtime for customers.
Performance at scale: A cluster of numerous Bitbucket Server-running machines can manage more traffic than a single system.
Mirroring: For distributed teams working with large repositories, smart mirroring can increase Git clone performance.

Bitbucket Features

Bitbucket has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Workflow control: This helps you to enforce a project or team workflow.

Cooperation: Pull requests with inline commentary for code review cooperation.

Customization: If you don't find what you're looking for in our Marketplace, you can use our full Rest API to create unique features for your workflow.

Jira and Trello integration: Bring order to the chaos and keep the entire software company informed. Access to Jira issues and Trello cards' branches, build status, commits, and status.

Code collaboration: From concept to cloud, code collaboration is a must. Create a merging checklist with designated approvers and check for passing builds before transitioning Jira issues based on pull request status.

Consistent delivery: With built-in continuous delivery, you can build and test automatically. Build, test, and deploy with Bitbucket Pipelines, our integrated CI/CD solution. Benefit from code-based configuration and quick feedback loops.

Simple deployment: Keep track of your deployments, preview them, and confidently promote them.

Code security: You can rest easy knowing your code is safe on the cloud, and you can use checks to prevent errors from occurring.

Reviews from Real Users

Bitbucket stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust traceability and user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

One PeerSpot reviewer, a Developer III at an Information Technology at a energy/utilities company, writes, “Bitbucket has improved our organization because it has simplified and streamlined our developer communication code and review process. It is also much more visual.” He adds, “Bitbucket's traceability is great. Being able to see pool requests is just a great thing for collaboration.”

Kajal P., Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company, notes, “The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it has been a good experience from my side using this solution."

Atlassian

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent