Bitbucket and AWS CodeCommit are version control services for collaborative software development. AWS CodeCommit appears to have the upper hand due to its robust integration with other AWS services and strong security features, making it more appealing for tech buyers focused on the AWS ecosystem.
Features: Bitbucket integrates well with Atlassian products, enhancing project management with features like pull requests, inline editing, and JIRA integration. AWS CodeCommit offers seamless integration with AWS products, ensures strong security through IAM policies, and is highly scalable. The primary difference lies in platform compatibility, with Bitbucket favored by Atlassian users, while CodeCommit is better suited for AWS-centric workflows.
Room for Improvement: Bitbucket could enhance its user interface for easier navigation and offer more comprehensive support for larger teams. Additional security features and detailed access controls are other areas for improvement. AWS CodeCommit could improve by offering more robust user documentation, a simpler setup process for users unfamiliar with AWS, and expanded integration options outside the AWS ecosystem.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket is deployed in a cloud-based model, simplifying setup with extensive documentation and support from Atlassian. AWS CodeCommit offers a streamlined experience for AWS users but may require familiarity with AWS IAM for initial setup. Bitbucket is easier to deploy within the Atlassian suite, while CodeCommit is advantageous for those invested in AWS services.
Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket provides competitive pricing with a favorable structure for small to medium-sized teams, resulting in an attractive ROI. AWS CodeCommit's pricing involves layered infrastructures, which can lead to higher costs, but offer significant ROI for projects leveraging AWS's services. The choice depends on platform dependency and team size, with Bitbucket offering immediate ROI but possibly greater potential with AWS CodeCommit in AWS-intensive environments.
AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
Bitbucket is a team-oriented Git-based code hosting and collaboration solution. The best-in-class Jira and Trello integrations in Bitbucket are meant to bring the entire software team together to complete a project. Bitbucket gives your team a single location to collaborate on code from concept to cloud deployment, to generate quality code through automated testing, and to deploy code with confidence.
There are three deployment options for Bitbucket:
This has some advantages over Bitbucket Server:
Bitbucket Features
Bitbucket has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Reviews from Real Users
Bitbucket stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust traceability and user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:
One PeerSpot reviewer, a Developer III at an Information Technology at a energy/utilities company, writes, “Bitbucket has improved our organization because it has simplified and streamlined our developer communication code and review process. It is also much more visual.” He adds, “Bitbucket's traceability is great. Being able to see pool requests is just a great thing for collaboration.”
Kajal P., Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company, notes, “The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.