Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 33.8%, up from 33.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 25.9%, up from 24.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Prathamesh DMarathe - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless collaboration and merge conflict resolution improve code management
I use the Bitbucket tool to store the code repository and maintain a CI/CD pipeline, allowing multiple developers to work on different code branches. We can integrate with the developer Marathe bridge branch, enabling it to be pushed into the production environment within the CI/CD.  I use…
Dileep DK - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Multiple users can work on the same repository using different branches, making it beneficial."
"It seems to be quite scalable."
"The product's most valuable feature is output backup."
"The code reviews and the ability to support DevSecOps are very important."
"The initial setup was straightforward, especially leveraging its cloud platform deployment options."
"The tool helps us manage different versions of code and branches. I like that Bitbucket is similar to Git but may have some vendor support. It has many of the same features as Git."
"The tool's UI is better."
"The version control feature for our code and the security aspect is valuable to us."
"It is an easily scalable solution."
"Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is server management."
"The platform's most valuable features are the code reviews and the ability to add comments to the code."
"The most valuable feature is that it has its own pipelines."
"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions."
"Our code is secure."
"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."
 

Cons

"One of the areas the solution could improve on is when there is a merging conflict it is quite confusing. When I am having a merging conflict I get stuck on the page, then I need to search how to handle the particular problem. For example, finding what the commands are which can be used."
"The module component needs improvement."
"There are many places where the product could be expanded to make it a more complete solution."
"I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."
"I would like to see the integration with some of the cloud service providers improved."
"Bitbucket doesn't currently offer AI functionalities."
"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions."
"In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement."
"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."
"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."
"Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development."
"The platform's integration with other cloud services should be improved."
"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."
"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side."
"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because it is cheaper than solutions like GitLab."
"We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket."
"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."
"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."
"I did not pay for the license as I was using a corporate license. But I think the pricing is fair."
"Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
"I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."
"We pay around $6 per user."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
"The solution comes as a part of the suite."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."
"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."
"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
42%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.