Bitbucket Server vs Liquibase comparison

Atlassian and Liquibase are both solutions in the Version Control category. Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0, while Liquibase is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. Atlassian holds a 13.2% mindshare in VC, compared to Liquibase’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Liquibase users who would recommend it.

Bitbucket Server

Read 27 Bitbucket Server reviews

2,007 Views
2,007 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Liquibase

Read 5 Liquibase reviews

681 Views
681 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Liquibase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Liquibase are competing tools in their respective fields. Bitbucket Server holds an edge due to its integration with Atlassian products, while Liquibase is strong in database schema change management.

Features: Bitbucket Server integrates smoothly with Atlassian tools, promotes collaboration, and enhances version control. Liquibase offers robust database schema change management, supports seamless database migrations, and enables effective database versioning.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server needs performance improvements, better permission controls, and enhanced speed. Liquibase requires richer documentation, simplified rollback processes, and improved usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server is easy to deploy for teams already using Atlassian tools and benefits from comprehensive customer support. Liquibase deployment can be complex, and users indicate a need for better support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server offers competitive pricing with a good ROI, especially for Atlassian-integrated teams. Liquibase has higher setup costs but provides solid ROI by enhancing database performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Liquibase

Ranking in Version Control

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 13.2%, down from 28.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Liquibase is 4.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitbucket Server	13.2%
Liquibase	4.5%
Other	82.3%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Syed Fahad Anwar

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

Integrated code tracking has streamlined our development workflows and supports project visibility

The biggest benefit I see from Bitbucket Server is that it is providing all the features which Git is providing. Bitbucket Server is using Git as a source code main tool, and it has all the features that any source code repository can provide. A plus point is that we can install it on-premises and manage it easily. Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort. Without Bitbucket Server, it is very difficult to track the code and changes. The integration with Jira helps me personally with project tracking because Bitbucket Server is a source code repository. We have our SDLC lifecycle in Jira. Every change or every feature request is created as a ticket in Jira, and this ticket is linked with Bitbucket Server repository. Any changes to the code linked to that feature will go to the repository, and we can track that this is the code changed by this feature.

Read full review

reviewer2797194

Software Engineer

Database-as-code has transformed how we track schema changes and manage controlled migrations

The best features Liquibase offers include CI/CD integration, which we really appreciate because we didn't have a lot of issues integrating it into our existing CI pipelines, and the changeset and changelog, which are the source of truth that effectively tell us how the database changes are taking effect. The CI/CD integration helped my workflow by improving visibility with the changelog and changeset. For the CI part, Maven and Gradle builds are already available, so we just use the Maven plugin and it was pretty straightforward. There is something called Liquibase Validate as well, which helps with pre-deployment checks. We use the update SQL command for dry-run approvals. Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by providing a way to manage database migrations instead of maintaining raw SQL, which comes with the issue of not being able to track certain schema updates or new table creations. With Liquibase, you have that history through the changelog and changeset tables, which maintain that history of changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is an easily scalable solution."

"Its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility."

"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions."

"Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes half an hour to deploy."

"It has consistently performed well without major issues, providing a reliable code management and collaboration environment."

"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."

"It is an amazingly stable solution."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."

"Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by providing a way to manage database migrations instead of maintaining raw SQL, which comes with the issue of not being able to track certain schema updates or new table creations."

"Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by reducing the time spent syncing databases."

"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."

"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."

Cons

"The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects."

"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."

"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."

"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."

"Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive."

"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The user experience is tedious and long-winded. It could also be smoother from an admin's perspective."

"The solution's user interface could be improved because it's not very user-friendly or intuitive."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"The pricing is quite high."

"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."

"Liquibase could be improved in several ways. Some facilities could be enhanced, and for first-time users, it could be more intuitive rather than overwhelming."

"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."

"Liquibase can be improved by addressing the issue that changelog files could conflict with Git if they're not modularized properly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"Liquibase is an open-source solution."

"The pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

There are certain features in Bitbucket Server that could be better or enhanced, which would make our life easier. One limitation is that we can control granular permissions, but there are some lim...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

My major use case for Bitbucket Server is that it is a source code repository. We are using it to store our application source code, and we are tracking the check-in, check-out, and all the activit...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Liquibase?

Liquibase is an open-source solution. If you are using Liquibase, you need to update its license. I think Liquibase is affordable for our organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Liquibase?

Liquibase can be improved by addressing the issue that changelog files could conflict with Git if they're not modularized properly. While we create one file per feature, rollbacks are not magical a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Liquibase?

My main use case for Liquibase is database-as-code, which we use for creating table schemas, maintaining migrations, and ensuring that in production, if rollbacks happen, then it's more controlled ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 58% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 9% of the time

Surround SCM vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 5% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 4% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Git vs Liquibase

Compared 23% of the time

DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Liquibase

Compared 19% of the time

Bitbucket vs Liquibase

Compared 19% of the time

GitHub vs Liquibase

Compared 17% of the time

More Liquibase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server

February 2026

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

February 2026

Download Liquibase product report

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Overview

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

Liquibase is a migration-based open source database version control solution that relies on a changelog to track what changesets have been deployed to a database, and what additional changesets needs to be applied to a database in order to migrate a database schema to a specific version. Liquibase supports an XML model for defining changesets so that database schema changes can easily be translated to another DBMS platforms. As an open source solution, Liquibase is ideal for smaller teams and projects or for teams that have ample time to invest in extending and adapting the open source capability to meet their needs.

Liquibase

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Nike, JP Morgan Chase, Bancolombia, UPS, Anthem

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase

February 2026

Free Report: Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.