Bitbucket Server vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,221 Views
1,221 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Git are prominent tools in version control. Git seems to have a slight edge due to its advanced functionalities and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Bitbucket Server offers strong integration with Atlassian products, support for large files, and enterprise-oriented features. Git is known for its speed, flexibility in branching and merging, and open-source nature.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server could improve its user experience, performance under heavy loads, and user interface. Git users often point out the need for better documentation, improved third-party integrations, and a more intuitive interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server's deployment is straightforward but resource-intensive, requiring significant IT support. Git's decentralized model eases deployment but may confuse users new to distributed version control. Bitbucket Server offers structured enterprise support, whereas Git relies on community support, which can vary in responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server has higher setup costs justified by its robust feature set but is costlier. Git, being open-source, has minimal setup costs and is more cost-effective for smaller teams or individual developers. Bitbucket Server may offer better ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features, whereas Git provides better ROI for a diverse user base.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. Git Report (Updated: February 2026).

Download the complete report

Bitbucket Server vs. Git

February 2026

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 13.2%, down from 28.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 10.5%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitbucket Server	13.2%
Git	10.5%
Other	76.3%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Syed Fahad Anwar

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

Integrated code tracking has streamlined our development workflows and supports project visibility

The biggest benefit I see from Bitbucket Server is that it is providing all the features which Git is providing. Bitbucket Server is using Git as a source code main tool, and it has all the features that any source code repository can provide. A plus point is that we can install it on-premises and manage it easily. Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort. Without Bitbucket Server, it is very difficult to track the code and changes. The integration with Jira helps me personally with project tracking because Bitbucket Server is a source code repository. We have our SDLC lifecycle in Jira. Every change or every feature request is created as a ticket in Jira, and this ticket is linked with Bitbucket Server repository. Any changes to the code linked to that feature will go to the repository, and we can track that this is the code changed by this feature.

Read full review

Vijaya Das

Director - Technical Product Management at Visa

A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments

Scalability is something I haven't experienced. So, a bigger team in my company looks after the scalability aspect of the solution. Therefore, I will not be the right person to rate it from a scalability perspective. Around 200 users are using Git in my company. I am not the right person to comment on whether the solution's usage rate will increase in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."

"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."

"The product is easy to maintain."

"It is an amazingly stable solution."

"Its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility."

"Bitbucket Server supports code collaboration by providing commands developers can use to check in code. Through comments, developers can specify the purpose of the code check-in. Additionally, Bitbucket allows tagging of code for releases."

"Its standout features are the seamless integration with various intelligent tools and its user-friendly nature."

"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."

"I use the solution for website management."

"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."

"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."

"The setup process is pretty simple."

"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."

"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."

More Git pros

Cons

"Bitbucket Server installation is a little bit complicated, and it requires vendor support most of the time."

"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."

"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."

"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."

"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."

"There might be further integration ideas for continuous deployment."

"The platform's integration with other cloud services should be improved."

"The UI could be enhanced."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"I would like to see less updates with the product."

"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"The platform is less expensive."

"Git is an open-source software."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"Git is completely free."

"We use the open-source version."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

18%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

There are certain features in Bitbucket Server that could be better or enhanced, which would make our life easier. One limitation is that we can control granular permissions, but there are some lim...

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

My major use case for Bitbucket Server is that it is a source code repository. We are using it to store our application source code, and we are tracking the check-in, check-out, and all the activit...

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 58% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 9% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 4% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 19% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Git

Compared 4% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Bitbucket Server

February 2026

Download Git product report

January 2026

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Overview

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse