Bitbucket Server vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,064 Views
1,064 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Git are prominent tools in version control. Git seems to have a slight edge due to its advanced functionalities and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Bitbucket Server offers strong integration with Atlassian products, support for large files, and enterprise-oriented features. Git is known for its speed, flexibility in branching and merging, and open-source nature.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server could improve its user experience, performance under heavy loads, and user interface. Git users often point out the need for better documentation, improved third-party integrations, and a more intuitive interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server's deployment is straightforward but resource-intensive, requiring significant IT support. Git's decentralized model eases deployment but may confuse users new to distributed version control. Bitbucket Server offers structured enterprise support, whereas Git relies on community support, which can vary in responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server has higher setup costs justified by its robust feature set but is costlier. Git, being open-source, has minimal setup costs and is more cost-effective for smaller teams or individual developers. Bitbucket Server may offer better ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features, whereas Git provides better ROI for a diverse user base.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. Git Report (Updated: December 2025).

Download the complete report

Bitbucket Server vs. Git

December 2025

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 14.3%, down from 28.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 10.4%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitbucket Server	14.3%
Git	10.4%
Other	75.3%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Syed Fahad Anwar

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

Integrated code tracking has streamlined our development workflows and supports project visibility

The biggest benefit I see from Bitbucket Server is that it is providing all the features which Git is providing. Bitbucket Server is using Git as a source code main tool, and it has all the features that any source code repository can provide. A plus point is that we can install it on-premises and manage it easily. Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort. Without Bitbucket Server, it is very difficult to track the code and changes. The integration with Jira helps me personally with project tracking because Bitbucket Server is a source code repository. We have our SDLC lifecycle in Jira. Every change or every feature request is created as a ticket in Jira, and this ticket is linked with Bitbucket Server repository. Any changes to the code linked to that feature will go to the repository, and we can track that this is the code changed by this feature.

Read full review

Vijaya Das

Director - Technical Product Management at Visa

A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments

Scalability is something I haven't experienced. So, a bigger team in my company looks after the scalability aspect of the solution. Therefore, I will not be the right person to rate it from a scalability perspective. Around 200 users are using Git in my company. I am not the right person to comment on whether the solution's usage rate will increase in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products."

"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is server management."

"Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration."

"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions."

"It can efficiently promote code to different environments."

"Its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility."

"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."

"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."

"The features I am most impressed by is the automation."

"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."

"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."

"The setup process is pretty simple."

"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."

More Git pros

Cons

"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."

"The UI could be enhanced."

"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."

"The product's initial setup phase is complex."

"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."

"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."

"There are absolutely things that could be improved in collaboration features in Bitbucket Server, with respect to people who are not using it every day, such as managers who need to be able to approve things but don't use Bitbucket Server so often."

"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."

"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."

"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"The platform is less expensive."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"Git is an open-source software."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"Git is completely free."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

There are certain features in Bitbucket Server that could be better or enhanced, which would make our life easier. One limitation is that we can control granular permissions, but there are some lim...

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

My major use case for Bitbucket Server is that it is a source code repository. We are using it to store our application source code, and we are tracking the check-in, check-out, and all the activit...

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 64% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 7% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 23% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Bitbucket Server

January 2026

Download Git product report

January 2026

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Overview

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse