Bitbucket Server vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,185 Views
1,007 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Git are prominent tools in version control. Git seems to have a slight edge due to its advanced functionalities and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Bitbucket Server offers strong integration with Atlassian products, support for large files, and enterprise-oriented features. Git is known for its speed, flexibility in branching and merging, and open-source nature.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server could improve its user experience, performance under heavy loads, and user interface. Git users often point out the need for better documentation, improved third-party integrations, and a more intuitive interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server's deployment is straightforward but resource-intensive, requiring significant IT support. Git's decentralized model eases deployment but may confuse users new to distributed version control. Bitbucket Server offers structured enterprise support, whereas Git relies on community support, which can vary in responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server has higher setup costs justified by its robust feature set but is costlier. Git, being open-source, has minimal setup costs and is more cost-effective for smaller teams or individual developers. Bitbucket Server may offer better ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features, whereas Git provides better ROI for a diverse user base.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. Git Report (Updated: April 2025).

Download the complete report

Bitbucket Server vs. Git

April 2025

Helped 851,823 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 25.9%, up from 24.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 7.9%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Read full review

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is an easily scalable solution."

"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."

"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."

"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions."

"Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration."

"The tool makes pushing codes and setting up CI/CD pipelines easy."

"Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products."

"It can efficiently promote code to different environments."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

"Git's learning curve is shallow, making the solution easy to use after a few tutorials."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."

"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."

"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."

"Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use."

"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."

More Git pros

Cons

"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."

"There might be further integration ideas for continuous deployment."

"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing."

"The UI could be enhanced."

"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."

"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."

"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."

"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."

"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."

"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."

"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"The scalability could be better. I think it requires some discipline to have large teams working on the same project without facing problems merging code. I'm using Git for personal projects, but I know companies face merge conflicts when more than one person is working on code simultaneously."

"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"We pay around $6 per user."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

More Bitbucket Server pricing and cost advice

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"The tool is free."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"Git is completely free."

"We use the open-source version."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 94% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 5% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 2% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 36% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 17% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Bitbucket Server

May 2025

Download Git product report

May 2025

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Overview

Bitbucket Server is a preferred choice for managing source code and version control, facilitating development workflows like CI/CD, task tracking, and collaboration among teams.

Organizations use Bitbucket Server to handle multiple repositories, manage code pipelines, and support various development workflows including CI/CD deployment. Integration with Jenkins and Jira enhances the software development lifecycle, meeting specific project requirements. Key features include user-friendly management, ease of use, and private repositories, fostering efficient code promotion and collaboration. However, improvements are needed in command-line functionality, UI, log handling, and integration with third-party tools.

What are Bitbucket Server's key features?

User-friendly management: Simplifies source code and repository management.
Version control: Effective tool for tracking and managing code changes.
Code collaboration: Facilitates teamwork and peer reviews.
CI/CD pipeline support: Enables automated deployment processes.
Seamless integration: Works well with tools like Jenkins and Jira.
Private repositories: Secure storage for project code bases.

What benefits should users expect?

Performance: Reliable and stable performance for development tasks.
Task tracking: Efficient management of development workflows.
Code promotion: Smooth transition of code across environments.
Enhanced collaboration: Improved teamwork and communication.

In industries like software development and IT services, Bitbucket Server implementation varies. Companies may integrate it into DevOps workflows for continuous integration and deployment. It's also used in sectors requiring stringent version control and collaboration, ensuring efficient project management and delivery.

Atlassian

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse