Git vs Helix Core comparison

Git and Perforce are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.6, while Perforce is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.0. Git holds a 9.5% mindshare in VC, compared to Perforce’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,057 Views
1,057 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Helix Core

Read 6 Helix Core reviews

391 Views
344 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

Helix Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Helix Core and Git are key players in the version control system category. Helix Core tends to have the upper hand in large-scale project management, whereas Git shows strength in its distributed nature and user accessibility.

Features: Helix Core performs well in managing large binary files, supports complex branching, and is suitable for enterprise-level projects. Git provides a distributed version control system, has strong community support, and is versatile for open-source development.

Room for Improvement: Helix Core users seek a more intuitive setup process, better integration with other tools, and improved user accessibility. Git users desire better handling of large binaries, enhanced security features, and more robust support for scaling issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Helix Core has robust customer service and tailored deployment options, favored in enterprise settings. Git benefits from extensive self-service resources due to a large community, although formal customer service is lacking, and its decentralized model simplifies deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Helix Core’s setup costs can be significant, delivering high ROI for large projects due to its efficiency. Git, being open-source, has minimal setup costs and offers substantial ROI, especially advantageous for smaller teams or projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. Helix Core Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. Helix Core

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Helix Core

Ranking in Version Control

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 9.5%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Helix Core is 2.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Grazvydas Govaras

Senior Solution Architect at Danske

Helps to store and version the code

We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches. I would like to see less updates with the product. I…

Read full review

Daniel Kirschner

Technical Lead, Methods & Tools at Volkswagen

Configuration management features improve workflow but require a steep learning curve

I need to work more with Helix Core to identify specific areas for improvement. However, it has an extensive feature set that leads to a steep learning curve, where users need to learn quite a bit of features to work with it effectively. While its customization is not an issue, the GUI might not appeal to everyone.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product protects our data."

"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."

"The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."

"We use the tool to store codes."

"Git is easy to use."

"The implementation is easy."

"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."

"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."

More Git pros

"I find the configuration management features of Helix Core particularly valuable."

"The customer service and support are excellent."

Cons

"I would rate the initial setup process a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most difficult and 10 being the easiest. The reason for this rating is that once there are conflicts, it takes a lot of effort to resolve them."

"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."

"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."

"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."

"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."

"Git removed the credential feature."

"There is nothing that could be improved at this time."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

More Git cons

"It has an extensive feature set that leads to a steep learning curve, where users need to learn quite a bit of features to work with it effectively."

"However, it has an extensive feature set that leads to a steep learning curve, where users need to learn quite a bit of features to work with it effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"The tool is free."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"Git is completely free."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"The platform is less expensive."

More Git pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Helix Core?

Pricing is relatively moderate at three to four out of ten. I find this cost justified for the capabilities provided by the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Helix Core?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Helix Core?

We use Helix Core in our software development processes as a configuration management solution. Our typical use cases include system-level configuration management, versioning software, and managin...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 38% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 9% of the time

More Git Competitors

Visual Studio Team System vs Helix Core

Compared 31% of the time

Bitbucket vs Helix Core

Compared 24% of the time

More Helix Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

August 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Configuration Management

August 2025

Download Helix Core product report

Also Known As

No data available

Perforce

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

Perforce, the Fast Software Configuration Management System, is a tool that versions and manages source code and digital assets for enterprises. Perforce is easy to install, learn and administer; seamlessly handles distributed development; and supports developers across a large number of platforms. Perforce ensures development integrity by grouping multi-file updates into atomic changes, enables concurrent development, and intelligently manages multiple software releases using its Inter-File Branching system.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Intuit, Disney, Nvidia, Ubisoft, Samsung, Vmware, Adidas, Pixar, salesforce.com, EA

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. Helix Core

July 2025

Free Report: Git vs. Helix Core

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. Helix Core and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. Helix Core report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.