Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 7.7% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,290 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,060 Views
908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Github and Git are competing tools in the open-source and version control systems category. GitHub appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced security features and seamless integration with various DevOps tools.

Features: GitHub's notable features include advanced security, GitHub Actions for automation, and cloud-based repositories facilitating team collaboration and integration with tools like Jenkins and Jira. Git, a robust version control system, supports effective branching, merging, and history tracking. Its compatibility with both CLI and GUI ensures flexibility for different user preferences.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance its security features, improve integration with project management and DevOps tools, and develop a more user-friendly interface for non-technical users. Git could focus on improving its GUI, offering better support for non-text files and large repositories, and enhancing merge conflict resolution capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is well-suited for public and hybrid cloud environments, fostering remote collaboration. Git offers deployment flexibility in both cloud and on-premises settings. GitHub's community support is strong, though improvements in direct customer service for complex issues would be beneficial, while Git could benefit from more responsive official support.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides both free and paid options, delivering cost-effective solutions with extensive features, though managing licenses can be cumbersome. Git, being open source, incurs no licensing costs, appealing to budget-conscious users. Both platforms deliver strong ROI, with GitHub's functionalities enhancing collaboration savings and Git offering economical version control.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 7.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.9%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."

"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."

"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."

"I use the solution for website management."

"The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."

"We use the tool to store codes."

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

"The setup process is pretty simple."

More Git pros

"The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes."

"The solution is scalable."

"The product has a good UI. It's simple and easy to access, and technical help is easily available. The two-factor authentication security is another valuable feature."

"We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security."

"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."

"GitHub is the best tool for source repositories."

"The most valuable features are the speed, low latency, and the clear, concise set of commands."

"The solution can scale."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."

"It's not very user-friendly."

"In our company, we sometimes feel the need to have certain kinds of reports, but we never get those customized reports in Git's dashboard."

"The tool's user interface is terrible. It needs to be more user-friendly."

"The solution works perfectly fine so far."

"I would like more documentation."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

More Git cons

"It would be good if there were training materials for junior developers."

"There could be more integration into Azure."

"GitHub storage is one of the main requirements and it could improve."

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

"We face issues with synchronization while working with teams."

"I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature."

"GitHub needs to improve its UI."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is free."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"The platform is less expensive."

"We use the open-source version."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"Git is completely free."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 35% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 18% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

March 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

March 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

March 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.