Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.6, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0. Git holds a 9.5% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,057 Views
1,057 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,586 Views
1,434 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and Git compete in the version control and collaboration tools category. GitHub has the upper hand due to its extensive community support, collaboration tools, and integration capabilities.

Features: GitHub is renowned for its community support, collaboration tools like pull requests and branching, and integration with tools such as Jira, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps. Git offers straightforward version control, effective branch and merge conflict management, and supports both CLI and GUI operations.

Room for Improvement: GitHub needs to enhance its security features, improve integration with automation tools, and simplify interface complexities for non-technical users. Git requires a more user-friendly interface and improved branch management standardization. Both platforms struggle with large file handling and AI tool integration for automation and security analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is mainly cloud-based with hybrid and on-premises options and has a robust community although official support can be hit or miss. Git is commonly used in private infrastructures and relies on open-source support. Both could benefit from more direct and professional support.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers free public usage and tiered plans for private projects, though licensing complexities exist. Git is open-source and cost-effective with straightforward ROI. GitHub's pricing is reasonable, offering enhanced features at a premium compared to Git's free model.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 9.5%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 7.6%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Grazvydas Govaras

Senior Solution Architect at Danske

Helps to store and version the code

We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches. I would like to see less updates with the product. I…

Read full review

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."

"The implementation is easy."

"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."

"Version control is beneficial as it allows me to keep track of all the modifications I have made to the applications."

"I use the solution for website management."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."

"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."

More Git pros

"GitHub is pure or open-source; you can access it anywhere. You can have a lot of collateral information. You can make the changes and do the reviews from one place."

"We use GitHub as a repository."

"We are finding GitHub is very stable."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"There are no issues. It's simple, easy, and fully compatible from my perspective with Git."

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

"It has a lot of features from the code development perspective. You get a lot of features such as repo, commit, merge, and branch. You can play around and do things on the fly. It is easy and simple to deploy. It is also easier to use when working from home."

"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."

"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."

"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"The main problem for me is the frequent upgrades in the solution because every other upgrade is a minefield. When you do the upgrade, there is always something that doesn't work."

"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."

More Git cons

"It would be better if the amount of storage were increased."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"GitHub could improve in resolving conflicts when multiple developers modify the same line of code."

"There could be some improvements related to the automation of certain processes, especially with the integration of artificial intelligence."

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

"The onboarding process could be simplified."

"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."

"If you are uploading or cloning a large file, with more than 25 megs, it's pretty slow."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"Git is an open-source software."

"Git is completely free."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"The tool is free."

"The platform is less expensive."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 38% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

August 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

August 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

July 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.