Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.7, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 10.5% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 10.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,221 Views
1,221 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

4,134 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Git both offer valuable tools for version control and project management. GitHub has a slight edge in features and enterprise support, while Git is preferred for its simplicity and open-source capabilities.

Features: GitHub enhances collaboration with integration options and security measures. GitHub Actions automate workflows, while scalability ensures it handles diverse projects effectively. Git favors version control with a CLI and GUI, offering straightforward management, reliability, and flexibility for user preferences.

Room for Improvement: GitHub's UI could be more intuitive, and its branch management needs ease. DevOps tools require more streamlining, and merge conflicts demand better handling. Git should focus on boosting automated features, improving conflict resolution, and facilitating a smoother onboarding process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub supports deployment across Public, Private, and Hybrid Clouds, with strong community and responsive technical support, though direct support could improve. Git emphasizes Public Cloud and On-premises deployments, offering simple yet sufficient user support.

Pricing and ROI: Git is free, appealing to those with budget constraints, providing significant long-term value. GitHub features free and paid tiers with detailed plans, offering substantial ROI by enhancing collaboration and deployment capabilities. Its value is evident for larger teams despite more complex pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 10.5%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 10.1%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	10.1%
Git	10.5%
Other	79.4%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijaya Das

Director - Technical Product Management at Visa

A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments

Scalability is something I haven't experienced. So, a bigger team in my company looks after the scalability aspect of the solution. Therefore, I will not be the right person to rate it from a scalability perspective. Around 200 users are using Git in my company. I am not the right person to comment on whether the solution's usage rate will increase in the future.

Read full review

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily."

"The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."

"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."

"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."

"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."

"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."

More Git pros

"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

"GitHub is good for small companies and for personal use."

"A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away."

"GitHub is good for collaboration because everyone can access it or we can restrict access to a few users. If I upload a file and share the URL, it's not restricted to a set number of users. Everyone with the link can download the files."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"We are finding GitHub is very stable."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."

"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."

"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"More security is always welcome in my opinion."

"The solution could improve by having more customization."

"I would like more documentation."

More Git cons

"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"Github needs more storage."

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

"The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved."

"If something has to be moved into approvals, and if they don't approve it in a few hours, then they should move the approval request to some other user, or they should have a way to escalate it."

"The stability can be improved."

"I would like to see integration with Slack such that all of the changes made in GitHub are reflected there."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"Git is an open-source software."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"Git is completely free."

"The tool is free."

"The platform is less expensive."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 19% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Git

Compared 5% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

January 2026

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

January 2026

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

February 2026

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.