Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.7, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 10.5% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 10.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,221 Views
1,221 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

4,134 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Git both offer valuable tools for version control and project management. GitHub has a slight edge in features and enterprise support, while Git is preferred for its simplicity and open-source capabilities.

Features: GitHub enhances collaboration with integration options and security measures. GitHub Actions automate workflows, while scalability ensures it handles diverse projects effectively. Git favors version control with a CLI and GUI, offering straightforward management, reliability, and flexibility for user preferences.

Room for Improvement: GitHub's UI could be more intuitive, and its branch management needs ease. DevOps tools require more streamlining, and merge conflicts demand better handling. Git should focus on boosting automated features, improving conflict resolution, and facilitating a smoother onboarding process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub supports deployment across Public, Private, and Hybrid Clouds, with strong community and responsive technical support, though direct support could improve. Git emphasizes Public Cloud and On-premises deployments, offering simple yet sufficient user support.

Pricing and ROI: Git is free, appealing to those with budget constraints, providing significant long-term value. GitHub features free and paid tiers with detailed plans, offering substantial ROI by enhancing collaboration and deployment capabilities. Its value is evident for larger teams despite more complex pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 10.5%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 10.1%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	10.1%
Git	10.5%
Other	79.4%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijaya Das

Director - Technical Product Management at Visa

A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments

Scalability is something I haven't experienced. So, a bigger team in my company looks after the scalability aspect of the solution. Therefore, I will not be the right person to rate it from a scalability perspective. Around 200 users are using Git in my company. I am not the right person to comment on whether the solution's usage rate will increase in the future.

Read full review

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."

"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."

"The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."

"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."

"The product is easy to use."

"Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use."

"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."

"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."

More Git pros

"The solution is scalable."

"All the features are valuable, but the most important feature is that GitHub has advanced security. The second important feature is the capability to create custom GitHub actions and the capability to deploy in different types of architectural infrastructures, such as hybrid, private, or public."

"GitHub is easy, secure, and widely documented."

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"The ease of use is valuable."

"I'm able to access any repository that I like, whether it's public or private."

"The most important feature of GitHub is the maintainability of the versions of the code."

"I find the most valuable collaboration between our peers to be a seamless collaboration between our peers. We can connect and change our code, allowing us to be agile in our projects. Since we're talking about DevOps, we're using Jenkins in our pipeline. It helps speed up the process by automating the DevOps workflow."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."

"The solution could improve by having more customization."

"I would like to see less updates with the product."

"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."

"I would like more documentation."

"Git removed the credential feature."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

More Git cons

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"There could be more integration into Azure."

"Regarding improvements, I preferred the tool's earlier pricing model, which limited storage and the number of repositories instead of the number of users, which was more convenient from a customer perspective. I've also experienced issues with GitHub servers being unable to support moving repositories, which caused problems. For basic plans, no support was available to help resolve these issues. I think GitHub should provide more support for smaller businesses to help with these problems."

"There could be some improvements related to the automation of certain processes, especially with the integration of artificial intelligence."

"The support team needs to have a well-defined SLA model since it is an area where the tool currently has some shortcomings."

"As of now, if I would like to learn about GitHub or its features, I would have to look on YouTube. It would be nice if they were able to send out a newsletter with explanations of new features that they are offering and what features are available."

"The onboarding process could be simplified."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the open-source version."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"The tool is free."

"The platform is less expensive."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"Git is completely free."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Git?

I use Git to store our code and maintain different versions, and for some projects, we use CI/CD as part of GitHub.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 19% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Liquibase vs Git

Compared 7% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

January 2026

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

January 2026

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

February 2026

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.