Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.8, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0. Git holds a 10.4% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 9.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,064 Views
1,064 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,549 Views
1,207 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Git both offer valuable tools for version control and project management. GitHub has a slight edge in features and enterprise support, while Git is preferred for its simplicity and open-source capabilities.

Features: GitHub enhances collaboration with integration options and security measures. GitHub Actions automate workflows, while scalability ensures it handles diverse projects effectively. Git favors version control with a CLI and GUI, offering straightforward management, reliability, and flexibility for user preferences.

Room for Improvement: GitHub's UI could be more intuitive, and its branch management needs ease. DevOps tools require more streamlining, and merge conflicts demand better handling. Git should focus on boosting automated features, improving conflict resolution, and facilitating a smoother onboarding process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub supports deployment across Public, Private, and Hybrid Clouds, with strong community and responsive technical support, though direct support could improve. Git emphasizes Public Cloud and On-premises deployments, offering simple yet sufficient user support.

Pricing and ROI: Git is free, appealing to those with budget constraints, providing significant long-term value. GitHub features free and paid tiers with detailed plans, offering substantial ROI by enhancing collaboration and deployment capabilities. Its value is evident for larger teams despite more complex pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 10.4%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 9.3%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	9.3%
Git	10.4%
Other	80.3%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijaya Das

Director - Technical Product Management at Visa

A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments

Scalability is something I haven't experienced. So, a bigger team in my company looks after the scalability aspect of the solution. Therefore, I will not be the right person to rate it from a scalability perspective. Around 200 users are using Git in my company. I am not the right person to comment on whether the solution's usage rate will increase in the future.

Read full review

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."

"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."

"The product protects our data."

"Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use."

"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."

"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten."

"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."

"The implementation is easy."

More Git pros

"Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials."

"GitHub is good for collaboration because everyone can access it or we can restrict access to a few users. If I upload a file and share the URL, it's not restricted to a set number of users. Everyone with the link can download the files."

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations."

"GitHub is pure or open-source; you can access it anywhere. You can have a lot of collateral information. You can make the changes and do the reviews from one place."

"The version control functionality for this solution has been most valuable, especially when managing projects with multiple versions."

"I'm able to access any repository that I like, whether it's public or private."

"I find the most valuable collaboration between our peers to be a seamless collaboration between our peers. We can connect and change our code, allowing us to be agile in our projects. Since we're talking about DevOps, we're using Jenkins in our pipeline. It helps speed up the process by automating the DevOps workflow."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The price could be improved."

"The solution works perfectly fine so far."

"I would like to see less updates with the product."

"More security is always welcome in my opinion."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."

"Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface."

"I would rate the initial setup process a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most difficult and 10 being the easiest. The reason for this rating is that once there are conflicts, it takes a lot of effort to resolve them."

More Git cons

"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."

"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"One thing GitHub could do is probably the same thing as what Sourcetree does. When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."

"Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"Git is completely free."

"We use the open-source version."

"The tool is free."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 23% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Git

Compared 4% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

January 2026

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

January 2026

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

December 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.