AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

1,802 Views
834 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit are competing in the version control platform category. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive community support and seamless integration with various CI/CD services, making it preferable for collaborative projects.

Features: GitHub offers extensive integrations with CI/CD services, a strong community focus, and a vast repository of tools. AWS CodeCommit's features include seamless integration with AWS services, secure environments, and support for Git tools and workflows.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance security measures for private repositories, improve integration with non-Microsoft services, and offer more robust native project management tools. AWS CodeCommit might improve by expanding its community support, providing better UI navigation, and offering enhanced documentation for non-AWS integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub provides straightforward deployment with extensive documentation and community resources. Its customer service is responsive. AWS CodeCommit benefits from AWS's overall deployment efficiency and strong enterprise-oriented support, particularly beneficial for AWS-centric businesses.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers various pricing tiers suitable for individuals and enterprises, providing significant ROI through collaboration capabilities. AWS CodeCommit is cost-effective, especially for those leveraging existing AWS resources, with a competitive pay-as-you-go model.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 6.3%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.0%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"The customer service is pretty good."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"GitHub is easy, secure, and widely documented."

"Our code is secure."

"The most valuable feature is the fact that it's cloud-based, and we don't have to manage an on-premises server to use it."

"The code sharing and updated history are valuable features."

"GitHub has improved the productivity of my team by simplifying code merging and enabling effective branching strategies."

"I'm able to access any repository that I like, whether it's public or private."

"GitHub is good for collaboration because everyone can access it or we can restrict access to a few users. If I upload a file and share the URL, it's not restricted to a set number of users. Everyone with the link can download the files."

"With GitHub, we can manage our development progress, CID, and continuous integration. It helps streamline our development processes effectively."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"GitHub should provide more integration in their next release, including integrating with Jenkins, CI/CD and Jira."

"The ticketing system is not working."

"I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature."

"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."

"Github needs more storage."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"The user interface on GitLab is better."

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price. Compared to Azure, AWS is more expensive, and that's the trend.

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics. A built-in dashboard with advanced analytics, like commit frequencies and pull request trends, could be added. These features would help gain dee...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 76% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

AWS CodeCommit

May 2025

Download GitHub product report

May 2025

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent